SNB - REACT Business Perspective IPR Protection April 1, 2009 Presentation Eli Mufisovski.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 n European Commission 4th Global Congress: Combating Counterfeiting and Piracy Dubai – 3 February 2008 An Urgent Need to Better Respond to the Global.
Advertisements

Ronald Brohm SNB-REACT Cancun, 1 December 2009 European Anti – Counterfeiting Network.
Company LOGO Establish Working Mechanism of Joint Council For Comprehensive IPR Protection Lv Guoqiang Shanghai Intellectual Property Administration P.
Improving Legislative Frameworks and Enforcement Measures Against IP Crime Mr. Khoo Boon Hui Commissioner, Singapore Police Force Vice-President for Asia,
U.S. Government Coordinated Approach to IPR Protection and Enforcement 4 th Global Congress on Combating Counterfeiting & Piracy February 3-5, 2008 Wayne.
IP Rights Infringements and Enforcement Recommendation 45 of the WIPO Development Agenda 6-8 May 2013 Cairo Egypt 2013.
Preventing Infringement of Intellectual Property (IP) Rights in the Workplace Awareness raising to how to prevent infringement within [business name] September.
Ministry of Interior of Montenegro,,The Fight against corruption and organized crime in Montenegro Ministry of Interior of Montenegro,,The Fight against.
© 2011 Dean A. Pelletier Protecting Economic Drivers Because All Roads Lead To The U.S. January 14, 2011 The NAMM Show Anaheim,
Trademark Enforcement through Administrative Agencies April 30, 2013, New York IP in China.
PAN INDIA OPERATIONS India’s Exclusive Full Spectrum Business Risk Solutions Enterprise SUBSTANTIVE CHALLENGES IN INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY PROTECTION IN INDIA.
Counterfeit and Pirated Goods 6 th April Relevant Acquis Icelandic Legislation International Conventions Customs Intervention Preconditions Time.
WTO Dispute DS362 China vs. United States
World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) Dispute Settlement and Effective Enforcement of IP.
Enforcement Directive and Software Protection Joost Verbeek Partner ULYS Law Firm Brussels, 26th of April 2006.
Powerpoint Templates The fight against bid rigging- NACC experience Bridget Dundee Dar es Salaam, Tanzania, 2013.
Office of the U.S. Trade Representative Kira M. Alvarez CHIEF NEGOTIATOR AND DEPUTY ASSISTANT U.S.T.R. For intellectual property enforcement.
GENERAL DIRECTORATE OF CUSTOMS CZECH REPUBLIC BUDĚJOVICKÁ 7 PRAGUE Lucie Bednářová IPR Unit Specialist.
China on the way to a high-technology country: The legal policy perspective Stefan Luginbuehl Lawyer, International Legal Affairs.
Strengthening the Protection and Enforcement of Intellectual Property Rights in Ukraine Activity October 2014.
Government of the Republic of Macedonia Secretariat for European Affairs Subcommittee on Trade, Industry, Customs and Taxation 3 rd meeting 10 May 2007.
COORDINATIVE BODY FOR INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY. - Establishing – composed of the representatives from Ministry of Interior, Ministry of Culture,
Priorities to Combat Counterfeiting and Piracy Koji Yonetani Director Intellectual Property Affairs Division Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Japan
Complete ACTA negotiations and implement in 2010 Expand counterfeiting and piracy database Enhance transparency and monitoring Build respect for IPR’s.
GENERAL ALBANIAN PATENTS AND TRADEMARKS OFFICE Sub-regional seminar on the commercialization and enforcment of intellectual property rights.
1 China IP Enforcement in the Entertainment Industries Dr. James Luo Managing Partner Lawjay Partners Berkeley, Oct 2012.
The Sixth Annual African Consumer Protection Dialogue Conference
Enforcement of Intellectual Property Rights in the Republic of Macedonia State Office of Industrial Property of the Republic of Macedonia ______________________________.
Falenty, 27 September EU Regulation No. 1383/2003 Community Customs Code Law on Customs Service EC Regulation No. 1891/2004 What are the legal requirements.
IPR enforcement in the EU Evidence of impact of on the access to generics Johanna von Braun University of Cape Town, South Africa Kiev, 21/22 nd June 2010.
The emergence of an Enforcement Agenda Intellectual Property Rights and Access to Essential Medicines: Challenges and Opportunities in Free Trade Agreement.
Eli Mufisovski SNB-REACT Balkan Skopje 1 April 2009 European Anti – Counterfeiting Network.
Subregional Capacity-Building Seminar on the Commercialization and Enforcement of Intellectual Property Skopje, FYR Macedonia, 1-3 April 2009 Prepared.
ANTI-CARTEL ENFORCEMENT IN VIETNAM Presented by: Le Thanh Vinh Vietnam Competition Administration Department – Ministry of Trade Seoul, 07/04/2006.
IPR and China – Ways to deal with – Ways to deal withInfringement/counterfeiting.
NOIP: Challenges and Strategies IPRTA forum Mexico City, July 9-11, 2008 Pham Phi Anh Deputy Director General National Office of Intellectual Property.
An Introduction to IPR Enforcement Tony Bonnici UNECE Skopje, 1 April 2009.
CAPACITY BUILDING TRAINING PROGRAMME ON INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS AND RELATED WTO ISSUES April 28-May 2, 2008 Session 3 Enforcement under the TRIPS.
Strengthening the Protection and Enforcement of Intellectual Property Rights in Ukraine Activity October 2014.
U.S. Government Coordinated Approach to Intellectual Property Enforcement Third Global Congress on Counterfeiting & Piracy January 30, 2007 Office of the.
Practical Cooperation with Latvian Customs and Enforcement Officers in Intellectual Property Enforcment CIPR - REACT 25 November 2004.
“Commercialization and enforcement of intellectual property rights” - Skopje, April 2009 UNECE ‘Recommendation M’ on the Use of Market Surveillance.
EEMAN & PARTNERS BORDER MEASURES: The offensive against IP offences ? AROPI, Genève, 30/11/2010 Marius Schneider Attorney-at-law EEMAN & Partners.
EEMAN & PARTNERS Border Measures WIPO seminar for judges and enforcement institutions Sofia, 22 & 23 November 2012 Marius Schneider Attorney-at-law Eeman.
SECI Center: A Regional Tool in Combating Transborder Organized Crime and Terrorism UNECE – OSCE workshop on “The Economic Dimension of Security in Europe:
Anti-Fraud Strategies
Regional Dialogue on EPAs, IP and Sustainable Development for ECOWAS Countries Dialogue organised by ICTSD, ENDA Tiers Monde & QUNO Saly (Dakar), Senegal,
Enforcement under the TRIPS Agreement [Shortened version of presentation] Regional Conference – IP Enforcement Cairo, November 9, 2008 Ms. Louise van Greunen.
WARSAW May 2006 Seminar on Enforcement of Property Variety Rights.
COORDINATIVE BODY FOR INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY. - Establishing – composed of the representatives from Ministry of Interior, Ministry of Culture,
Trademark Enforcement through Administrative Agencies May 02, 2013, Chicago IP in China.
Regional Seminar on Enforcement of IP rights Enforcement of IPR Hungarian implementation László Vass Legal and International Department HIPO.
Slovenian Intellectual Property Office helping you protect your intellectual property Enforcement of IPR in Slovenia at present (as seen from the Slovenian.
Japan’s Perspective on Combating Counterfeiting and Piracy Third Global Congress on Combating Counterfeiting and Piracy Hisamitsu Arai January 30, 2007.
The Directive on Enforcement and The Customs Regulation Warsaw May 2006 Martin Ekvad Community Plant Variety Office Head of Legal Affairs.
IPR Enforcement in the United Kingdom Kenny Wright Danish Patent and Trademark Office.
ABA Annual Meeting All Rights Reserved Brief Overview of the Intellectual Property System in China Elizabeth Chien-Hale
TAIEX workshop for Southern Mediterranean countries on fighting against piracy and counterfeiting Tunis, 06 October- 07 October 2010.
VLADA CRNE GORE MINISTARSTVO EKONOMIJE TRŽIŠNA INSPEKCIJA MARKET INSPECTORATE IN THE AREA OF IPR PROTECTION INTER-REGIONAL SYMPOSIUM ORGANIZED BY The World.
4th Inter-Regional Symposium on Enforcement of IPRs, Belgrade, September 6 and 7, 2011 Slovak Customs Administration Marián Haršány.
MGT601 SME MANAGEMENT.
ANTI-COUNTERFEITING TRADE AGREEMENT
Observatory Work Programme 2015
IPR’s: new challenges and opportunities
Intellectual Property Rights in Global Markets
Regional Seminar on Enforcement of Plant Variety Rights
Audiovisual Sector Social Dialogue Committee
Enforcement of Intellectual Property Rights in the Community Benoît Lory European Commission, DG Internal Market and Services Enforcement of Intellectual.
Counterfeiting and Intellectual property theft in Medicines World Bank Symposium March 10, 2005 Washington DC Frederick Razzaghi Director of Technical.
Supporting IPR protection of SMEs Recent Turkish Initiatives
Presentation transcript:

SNB - REACT Business Perspective IPR Protection April 1, 2009 Presentation Eli Mufisovski

Introduction SNB React – anti counterfeiting association Non-profit Our members- 150 well known companies are partner in our Business Partnership Group

Introduction Assist authorities Try to find most efficient way to fight counterfeit Service provider vs right owners

Introduction Counterfeit = worldwide industry organized by criminal organizations Right holders cannot combat this criminal phenomenon alone Balkan countries should join forces (EU)

Challenges In the Balkan area fight against counterfeit is difficult  Lack of legislation and experience Use the legislation more creatively The fight of counterfeit has started the past few years

Challenges  Raise awareness among public Most economy’s in the Balkan are not very strong Tendency to approve the sale of counterfeit The “infringers” are justified! Raise awareness among authorities of the importance and possibility of fight against counterfeit -Loss of revenues -Protection of consumer a.o.

Legislation National legislation in line with EU regulation? Nevertheless: most Balkan countries are a part of the Trade Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Right Protection Agreement (TRIPS) (!)

Legislation Border enforcement Market Surveillance Police

Border Enforcement Border enforcement: most important tool to prevent the circulation of counterfeited goods Has to be a quick and simple procedure Right Owner submits a Customs Application  Should be less formal (POA not notarized and apostle in all countries separately); they sign indemnity letter anyhow

Border Enforcement Simple: counterfeit goods =infringement Therefore long court procedures should be avoided!! Why go to court; counterpart rarely challenges counterfeit nature Effect: more costs, legal, storage…a.o. For budgetary reasons, right owners drop cases when they are long and costly

Border Enforcement Simplified procedure applied:? Macedonia : Yes Serbia: No Albania : Yes, not applied yet Montenegro: No, practically Yes Bosnia and Herzegovina : No

Border enforcement Improvement: Art 6 (EC 2003/1383) All costs………. “All costs” should be all customs costs, not all storage and destruction costs!

Market surveillance More difficult to act when the counterfeited goods are on the market Important for the right owners to have the infringing goods immediately removed and ultimately destroyed; if not the case, no interest. Different approach in the Balkan countries

Market Surveillance National legislation; -Law of Market Inspectorate -Law on Industrial Property Right -Law on Consumer Protection -Criminal Law In common: Trips Agreement

Improvement Acting on request or ex-officio? Needed; manpower and training  React and the right owners can assist in training and can assist the officers or inspectors during a raid Have the goods seized and destroyed  React could assist in storage and destruction

ACTA New initiative ACTA (Anti Counterfeiting Trade Agreement.) more protection for the right owners  Business Perspective; Strict criminal enforcement; administrative and civil enforcement cannot substitute criminal enforcement. Harmonizing at international level criminal sanctions against counterfeiting and piracy

ACTA Encourage judicial authorities to impose higher penalties to deter future infringement Ensure the ability of law enforcement officials with the authority to act ex officio to seize (materials, evidence etc) and impose sanction/ penalty like imprisonment

ACTA Destruction, removal from channels of commerce; costs of storage and destruction on right holders should be eliminated Provide prompt and reasonable access by right holders to relevant documents and information on counterfeiters and pirates to use in conducting private investigations, filling complaints o.a.

Conclusion Avoid long procedures, Avoid storage costs (possible solution, own storage, React can assist) Destruction (uniformed way, recycling) Cross border information

Thank you SNB REACT BALKAN Ms. Eli Mufisovski Dame Gruev nr 1 Skopje - Macedonia Tel Fax