Students with Learning Disabilities Assessment. Purposes of Assessment Screening Determining eligibility Planning a program Monitoring student progress.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
New Eligibility and Individualized Educational Program (IEP) Forms 2007 Illinois State Board of Education June 2007.
Advertisements

RtI Response to Intervention
Data Collection Benchmark (CBM Family) Progress Monitoring Interventions Tiers Training/Materials Problem Solving Model Allocation of Resources.
Understanding Special Education services SPECIAL EDUCATION REFERRAL PROCESS.
IDEA and NCLB Accountability and Instruction for Students with Disabilities SCDN Presentation 9/06 Candace Shyer.
I dentification of Children with S pecific L earning D isabilities July 17, 2014 Presented at MEGA Conference 2014 By Clare Ward, Billie Thompson and Christine.
Novice Webinar 2 Overview of the Four Types and Purposes of Assessment.
1 Referrals, Evaluations and Eligibility Determinations Office of Vocational and Educational Services for Individuals with Disabilities Special Education.
“Special Education 101” Dr. Kaye Tindell Special Education Director.
The Criteria for Determining SLD When Using an RTI-based Process Part I In the previous session you were presented the main components of RtI, given a.
Interpretation of Test Results Chapter 11 Terry Overton Assessing Learners with Special Needs, 5e Copyright ©2006 by Pearson Education, Inc. Upper Saddle.
Assessing Learners With Special Needs Chapter 1 Introduction Terry Overton Assessing Learners with Special Needs, 5e Copyright ©2006 by Pearson Education,
Understanding Students with Learning Disabilities Chapter 5.
Assessment of Learning Disabilities Chapter 5. Purpose of Assessment Protects the interests of children Protects the interests of children Help schools.
Identification, Assessment, and Evaluation
Determining Eligibility Within Tennessee’s RTI² Framework TASP 2013 Fall ConferenceTASP 2013 Fall Conference Theresa Nicholls, Ed.S., NCSPTheresa Nicholls,
S PECIFIC L EARNING D ISABILITIES & S PECIAL E DUCATION E LIGIBILITY Daniel Hochbaum Equal Justice Works Fellow Sponsored by McDermott Will & Emery February.
Copyright of PEN Connecting the Dots: The Evaluation Process, the Development of the IEP & Monitoring for Progress Parent Education Network 2107.
The process of assessment: the role of the teacher Chapter 1 ~~~~~
The Evaluation Report A Guide Summer First Page Date of Report: – The Date of Report is the date all of the information is compiled and the report.
Considerations in Determining Primary Disability Speech Language Impairment or Specific Learning Disability.
I nitial E valuation and R eevaluation in IDEA Produced by NICHCY, 2007.
Copyright © Allyn & Bacon 2008 Chapter 2: The Personnel and Procedures of Special Education Chapter 2 Copyright © Allyn & Bacon 2008.
WALKING THROUGH CHILD STUDY. What is the Child Study Committee? A committee that enables school personnel, and non school personnel, as appropriate, to.
University of Connecticut Center for Excellence in Developmental Disabilities Families As Partners Training Steps in the Special Education Process.
KEDC Special Education Regional Training Sheila Anderson, Psy.S
Specific Learning Disability: Accurate, Defensible, & Compliant Identification Mississippi Department of Education.
THE PERSONNEL AND PROCEDURES OF SPECIAL EDUCATION Chapter 2.
Evaluating Student Response to Instruction Using a 3-Tier RtI Progress Monitoring System John M. Hintze, Ph.D. University of Massachusetts National Center.
1 The Special Education Assessment and IEP Process EDPOWER Teacher Institute 2013.
Identification of Children with Specific Learning Disabilities
Parent Leadership Team Meeting Intro to RtI.  RtI Overview  Problem Solving Process  What papers do I fill out?  A3 documenting the story.
Educable Mental Retardation as a Disability: Accurate, Defensible, & Compliant Identification Mississippi Department of Education.
Individualized Education Plan (IEP) GOALS: Provide an understanding of your role as well as other professionals involved. Demystify the basic workings.
Chapter 7 School Performance. Purposes for Assessing School Performance Evaluate the achievement status of an entire school population Determine the need.
Edissa J. & Pheakday N. EDSPE 6642 Seattle Pacific University Edissa J. & Pheakday N. EDSPE 6642 Seattle Pacific University.
Charlevoix-Emmet ISD Eligibility Guidelines
INTODUCTION TO ASSESSMENT INTODUCTION TO ASSESSMENT Chapter One.
Assessing Learners with Special Needs: An Applied Approach, 6e © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 1: An Introduction To Assessing.
Catholic College at Mandeville Assessment and Evaluation in Inclusive Settings Sessions 3 & /14/2015 Launcelot I. Brown Lisa Philip.
Assessment Parents Due Process Title 6 and ELL Using Assessment to Identify Evaluating Formally –IQ –Achievement Evaluating Informally –tying into instruction.
Specific Learning Disabilities (SLD) Eligibility Implementing Wisconsin’s SLD Rule December
 Three Criteria: Inadequate classroom achievement (after intervention) Insufficient progress Consideration of exclusionary factors  Sources of Data.
Assessment Of Exceptional Students Part One: Chapter Two.
R esponse t o I ntervention E arly I ntervening S ervices and.
Learning Disabilities A general term describing a group of learning problems Largest single disability area 4.0% of all school-age children are classified.
Specific Learning Disability Proposed regulations.
Response to Intervention New roles for Reading Teachers in the newly authorized IDEA.
WISCONSIN’S NEW RULE FOR SPECIFIC LEARNING DISABILITIES Effective December 1, 2010.
Chapter 5 Informal Assessment.
Chapter 2 The Assessment Process. Two Types of Decisions Legal Decisions The student is determined to have a disability. The disability has an adverse.
Referral Made Like any other disability determination under IDEA, can’t be based on any single criterion – meaning a single test, assessment, observation,
 RtII is a comprehensive multi-tiered prevention model that provides services and interventions as early as possible to meet the instructional needs.
Revisiting SPL/IIT/SAT/SLD AND OTHER ALPHABETIC ANOMOLIES!
Specific Learning Disability: Accurate, Defensible, & Compliant Identification Mississippi Department of Education.
Exceptional Children Program “Serving Today’s Students” Student Assistance Team.
Teacher Roles and Responsibilities in the IEP Process Amanda Strong Hilsmier EDUC 559.
Focus Questions What is assessment?
File Review Can be used to gather information during pre- referral process Requirements for eligibility for: Autism Spectrum Disorder, Communication, Emotional.
Specific Learning Disability: Guidelines
Verification Guidelines for Children with Disabilities
Understanding Students with Learning Disabilities
Assessment of Exceptional Students
CHAPTER 12: Assessing Reading Achievement
Identification of Children with Specific Learning Disabilities
EXPLORING THE LEARNING SAFETY NET
Implications of RtI Implementation for NYS Schools
Chapter 1 Special Education Assessment.
Evaluation in IDEA 2004.
Identification of Children with Specific Learning Disabilities
Presentation transcript:

Students with Learning Disabilities Assessment

Purposes of Assessment Screening Determining eligibility Planning a program Monitoring student progress Evaluating a program

Types of Assessment Formal evaluation - Standardized testing - Norm-referenced Tests of Intelligence - Used to ascertain student’s general ability level and to rule out mental retardation

Informal Evaluation and Assessment - Criterion tests - Probes - Placement tests - Checklists - Direct observation - Miscellaneous techniques - Curriculum-based assessment - Alternative assessment

Testing Guidelines Assessing Culturally Diverse Students –Over-representation of students from culturally and linguistically diverse backgrounds in programs for learning disabilities Testing Accommodations –i.e., extended time and tests read aloud –Teachers should make decisions on what accommodations to use based on data- based decisions

Assessment Process in Learning Disabilities Prereferral –Analyze individual cases and find strategies before referring to special education Referral –Involves determining if a student is a candidate for special ed services, contacting and discussing it with the parents, beginning a screening study, and meeting with parents and appropriate professionals to decide if formal evaluation is needed

Assessment Process C ontinued Assessment for Identification –Examining the parameters that define a learning disability –Looking for severe discrepancy between achievement and intellectual ability

Assessing Specific Components of a Learning Disability –Exclusion : looking at other factors such as hearing problems or emotional disturbance –Academic Achievement : discrepancy between ability and achievement –Language Achievement : listening comprehension and oral expression –Process : visual, auditory, haptic, sensory-integration, and motor –Discrepancy : failure to achieve in one of seven areas, the gap between achievement and and intellectual ability must be extensive enough to result in “severe discrepancy”

Determining Discrepancy - Standard Score Comparisons -Deviation from Grade Level -Expectancy Formulas -Regression Analysis

Assessment Model 1.Determine scope and sequence 2.Decide what behavior to assess 3.Select an evaluation activity 4.Administer the evaluation 5.Record student’s performance 6.Determine short- and long-range instructional objectives

Assessment for Instruction Assessment for How to Teach –Identify major areas of assessment: expectation factors, stimulus events, response factors, and subsequent events –Weigh the major areas in relation to each other; after they have been assessed and viewed as a whole, a profile may be written Individualized Education Program (IEP) –Once student is determined as having a learning disability, assessment focuses on instruction; process is guided by an IEP