Draft HCP Review Primer.  Manages 2.6 million acres of aquatic lands for the benefit of all citizens of the state - a unique, distinct role among governments.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Fish and Wildlife Losses and Hydroelectric System Responsibility January 2004.
Advertisements

Implement Wy-Kan-Ush-Mi Wa-Kish- Wit Watershed Assessment and Restoration Plan Now A Regional Support Program Sponsored by the Columbia River Inter-Tribal.
Protect and Restore Little Salmon River Project # Nez Perce Tribe Fisheries/Watershed Program By Chad Fealko.
Strategic Hatchery Management Roadmap to Success Don Campton U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Portland, OR.
Massachusetts Ocean Management Plan SeaWeb/National Press Club MA Executive Office of Energy and Environmental Affairs Ian A. Bowles, Secretary Deerin.
Continuing Operation of the Pacific Coast Groundfish Fishery Overview of U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Biological Opinion Laura Todd Newport Field Office.
Using the Open Standards to Advance Puget Sound Recovery Kari Stiles, PhD Puget Sound Partnership Conservation Measures Partnership Oct 7-9, 2014.
WETLAND REGULATORY PROGRAM Role of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
Comprehensive Ecosystem-Based Amendment 1 Ecosystem Workgroup Presentation for H.1.a. and H.1.b. September 13, 2014 Agenda Item H.1.a & H.1.b Supplemental.
Elliott State Forest Planning Update Elliott State Forest Planning Update Oregon Department of Forestry and Department of State Lands “Stewardship in Forestry”
Columbia River Toxics Reduction Working Group 2012 Regional Roundtable: Pacific Northwest Pollution Prevention Resource Center.
Habitat Conservation Plan (HCP) Governance/Implementation September 4, 2013 Presentation Jonathan Garcia Senior Planner.
Montana’s 2007 Nonpoint Source Management Plan Robert Ray MT Dept Environmental Quality.
Use of the Endangered Species Act in Alaska Doug Vincent-Lang, Special Assistant Alaska Department of Fish & Game 1.
Presented by: Terri Gaines DWR FESSRO February 28, 2014 Regional Permitting for the CVFPP.
Clean Water Act Section 404 Basics Clean Water Act Section 404  Regulates discharges of dredged or fill material into waters of the U.S., including.
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Coordinating U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Regulatory Permits with Species Conservation Plans November 16,
NFIP ESA ComplianceImplementing a Reasonable and Prudent Alternative – FEMA Region 10 ESA and the National Flood Insurance Program Implementing a salmon.
Natasha Pearce, Jenny Bauman, Nicolas Ramos-Lara, Samantha Redmon.
Why Now? Regional, State and Federal Interests in Our and Coasts Why Now? Regional, State and Federal Interests in Our Oceans and Coasts Krista Kamer Program.
Implementation of the Biological Opinion for Russian River Water Supply, Flood Control Operations & Channel Maintenance National Marine Fisheries Service.
HABITAT CONSERVATION PLANNING Charles J. Randel, 1 III, Howard O. Clark, Jr., 2 Darren P. Newman, 2 and Thomas P. Dixon 3 1 Randel Wildlife Consulting,
Kitsap County Shoreline Master Program Update Task Force Work Group Meeting August 16, 2011.
Washington State Energy Facility Site Evaluation Council Region 10 Regional Response Team Northwest Area Committee Seattle, WA February 12, 2014 EFSEC.
Fish and Wildlife Service Mission Conserve, protect and enhance fish, wildlife, and plants and their habitats for the continuing benefit of the American.
Endangered Species Act Section 7 Consultations. The Endangered Species Act Sec. 2:Purpose Sec. 3:Definitions Sec. 4:Listing, Recovery, Monitoring Sec.
Biological Opinions & Endangered Species Act Consultation – A “How To” Guide for Working with Agencies on ESA Issues MATTHEW A. LOVE Partner- Seattle,
Summit #1 San Juan County Shoreline Master Program Update March 1 st, 2 nd, and 3 rd
Pacific Coast Groundfish Bycatch Management for Protected Species Implementing NOAA Fisheries’ Biological Opinion West Coast Region Alison Agness 1, Steve.
Building Strong! 1 US Army Corps of Engineers Regulatory Program Kimberly McLaughlin Program Manager Headquarters Operations and Regulatory Community of.
2014 Program Goal Statements for Salmon and Steelhead Overview Nancy Leonard, Laura Robinson and Patty O’Toole (NPCC)
2010 Yakima Basin Science & Management Conference Yakima River Basin Study June 16, 2010 Joel Hubble, Technical Projects Biologist Columbia-Cascades Area.
Washington Environmental Council May 10, 2013 DNR Aquatic Resources Photo from WA Department of Ecology – Washington State Coastal Atlas – 2006.
Washington State Steelhead Status Review PACIFIC COAST STEELHEAD MEETING JON ANDERSON WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF FISH & WILDLIFE MARCH 9-11, 2010.
MMS Alternative Energy Program November 28, 2007.
Salmon Recovery Status Report Joint Legislative Audit & Review Committee Linda Byers September 14, 2005.
Canada’s Ocean Strategy. The Oceans Act In 1997, Canada entrenched its commitment to our oceans by adopting the Oceans Act. In 1997, Canada entrenched.
The Balcones Canyonlands Conservation Plan, Balcones Canyonlands Preserve, & Public Service Infrastructure William A. Conrad Secretary BCCP Coordinating.
Gerry Pratt State AOC Coordinator, Division of Water New York State Department of Environmental Conservation 625 Broadway, Albany, NY P: 518.
Integrating Other Laws into BLM Planning. Objectives Integrate legal requirements into the planning process. Discuss laws with review and consultation.
Management Strategies for Columbia River Recreational and Commercial Fisheries and Beyond Oregon and Washington Staff Options for Initial Analysis.
REGIONAL COORDINATION High Level Indicators Draft “white paper” to recommend a core set indicators that can be shared among all types of monitoring Protocol.
Advisory Committee Kickoff Meeting SWRCB Program to Develop Sediment Quality Objectives for Enclosed Bays and Estuaries of California July 29, 2003 CAL/EPA.
The Upper Lochsa and Progress Toward Restoration Rebecca A. Lloyd, NPT Watershed Division.
Lower Snake River Comp Plan M & E Program SPY’s thoughts based on 3 weeks.
Fish and Wildlife : Regulatory Framework and Challenges Cherise M. Oram STOEL RIVES LLP Hydrovision 2008 Ocean/Tidal/Stream Power Track 7D “Environmental.
Terrestrial Biology & Beyond… Chris Maguire Terrestrial Biology Program Coordinator Oregon Department of Transportation Local Government Environmental.
Solano Habitat Conservation Plan 580,000 Acres 36 Covered Species; 4 Natural Communities 17,500 acres of Urban Development; 1,280 acres of other New Facilities.
Monica L. DeAngelis Marine Mammal Biologist National Marine Fisheries Service Long Beach, CA The Marine Mammal Protection.
Endangered Species Act 2005 Legislative Action. House of Representatives  On Sept. 29, 2005 the House passed H.R. 3824: Threatened and Endangered Species.
Program Implementation Lower Colorado River Multi-Species Conservation Program.
Oregon Department of Transportation Stormwater Management Initiative: Meeting New Challenges Presented by: William Fletcher, ODOT February 5, 2008.
Integrated Status and Trends Monitoring Demonstration Project Pacific Northwest Aquatic Monitoring Partnership Bernadette Graham Hudson, Lower Columbia.
Review of Department of Natural Resources’ Management of State-Owned Aquatic Lands Proposed Final Report Joint Legislative Audit & Review Committee June.
January 27, 2011 Examples of Recovery Evaluation Objectives in the Western U.S. Delta Stewardship Council Presentation by the Independent Consultant.
Columbia River Basin Monitoring, Evaluation, Research, and Reporting (MERR) Plan DRAFT Nancy Leonard Fish, Wildlife, Ecosystem Monitoring and Evaluation.
State Perspectives on Coastal and Ocean Management A Review of A Review of Coastal States Organization’s Recommendations to the US Commission on Ocean.
The science of conservation planning Course objective: a free-ranging examination of some key scientific principles and research needs pertaining to conservation.
NRC Environmental Reviews for Uranium Recovery Applicants and Licensees James Park (301)
THE ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT & THE FLORIDA BEACHES HABITAT CONSERVATION PLAN.
Take & Incidental Take Permit Take: means to harass, harm, pursue, hunt, shoot, wound, kill, trap, capture, collect or attempt to engage in such conduct.
NOAA’s National Marine Fisheries Service Biological Opinion for Water Supply, Flood Control Operations & Channel Maintenance by the Army Corps, SCWA, and.
August 1 st Draft of Offshore Aquaculture Amendment Gulf Council Meeting August 11-15, 2008 Key Largo, FL Tab J, No. 6.
TOWARDS A COMMON GOAL Coordinating actions under the Clean Water Act (FWPCA) and the Endangered Species Act (ESA)
South Florida Ecological Services Office - Vero Beach Conservation Opportunities and Partnerships in Collier County Endangered Species Protection through.
Environmental Issues Update - Endangered Species 1.
State of Minnesota Section 404 Assumption Feasibility Study
Endangered Species Act
Regional Habitat Conservation Plan Tom Hornseth, Comal County Engineer
Michigan Dept. of Environmental Quality Water Resources Division
Presentation transcript:

Draft HCP Review Primer

 Manages 2.6 million acres of aquatic lands for the benefit of all citizens of the state - a unique, distinct role among governments DNR Aquatic Resources Division

 Negotiated agreement with USFWS and NMFS (Federal Services)  Addresses harm to listed and sensitive species  Describes DNR’s commitment to avoid, minimize and compensate for harm to species  Basis for an Incidental Take Permit from the Federal Services What is a HCP?

 Foster water-dependent uses  Ensure environmental protection  Encourage direct public use and access  Utilize renewable resources And where consistent with the above, generate revenue The HCP is consistent with DNR’s Management Guidelines Identified in RCW

Meets DNR’s management goals and strategic plan for stronger emphasis on stewardship Habitat Conservation Plan

 2.6 Million Acres 56% Offshore Rivers 4% Lakes 15% 25% Nearshore Washington State Department of Natural Resources HCP Planning Area

Avoid and minimize impacts from  Shade  Contamination  Drift cell disruption  Noise  Compaction of sediments DNR Aquatic HCP Focus Conoco Pier Cherry Point

The draft HCP represents 6 years of research, outreach and application that establishes a programmatic approach to DNR’s stewardship of the state’s aquatic lands. In developing the draft HCP DNR evaluated impacts to aquatic habitat and species from the activities that we authorize to develop a comprehensive approach to avoid and reduce these impacts. In addition, we were careful to ensure that the practices we are adopted are also practical to implement. The HCP includes 8 chapters which are outlined in the following slides. Aquatic lands HCP Overview

a. Describes the purposes of the plan and DNR’s intent for developing the HCP; b. Provides a description of: The relationship between the ESA and the benefits provided under Section 10(a)(1)(B) of the Act; The area of State-managed aquatic land; The process used for selecting the activities proposed for coverage under the HCP; and The process for selecting the species proposes for coverage under the HCP HCP Chapter 1 Graphic: L. Prado

Chapter 2 discusses the history of aquatic land management in Washington State; the relationship of the Aquatic Lands HCP to DNR’s 3 other HCPs; and the regulatory environment affecting this HCP HCP Chapter 2 EPA Region 10 (Pacific Northwest)

Chapter 3 provides a description of covered activities, their effects and the extent to where they occurs of state-managed aquatic lands HCP Chapter 3 Photo: DNR staff

Herptofauna (5) - Columbia spotted frog, Northern leopard frog, Oregon spotted frog, Western toad, Pacific pond turtle Fish (18) - Bull trout, Chinook, Chum, Coastal cutthroat trout, Coho, Pink, Sockeye/Kokanee, Steelhead, Green & White sturgeon, Bocaccio, Canary & Yelloweye rockfish, Eulachon, Pacific herring, Pacific sand land, Surf smelt, Pacific lamprey HCP Chapter 4 Birds (5) - Black tern, Common loon, Harlequin duck, Marbled murrelet, Western snowy plover Marine Mammal – Southern resident orca Chapter 4 describes the aquatic species proposed for coverage in the HCP and the potential effects of the covered activities described in HCP Chapter 3 on these species

Chapter 5 includes the HCP goals and objectives, conservation measures for covered activities, Programmatic Strategies, and Standards that will be adopted to avoid and minimize the impacts to species described in HCP Chapter 4. Chapter 5 also describes the implementation process and funding, compliance monitoring and the HCP’s adaptive management program HCP Chapter 5 Shellfish Aquaculture Covered Activities Log booming and storage Overwater structures - Docks & wharves, Boat ramps/launches, Rafts, Mooring buoys, Nearshore buildings, Floating homes, Marinas, Shipyards & terminals

 Chapter 6:  Chapter 6: A description of the alternatives to this HCP that were considered and the reasons for their rejection  Chapter 7: HCP Glossary  Chapter 8: References HCP Chapters 6 - 8

Additional Information on the HCP can be found at: Photo by David Roberts