Maintenance Policies Corrective maintenance: It is usually referred to as repair. Its purpose is to bring the component back to functioning state as soon.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Time to failure Probability, Survival,  the Hazard rate, and the Conditional Failure Probability.
Advertisements

Reliability Engineering (Rekayasa Keandalan)
MODULE 2: WARRANTY COST ANALYSIS Professor D.N.P. Murthy The University of Queensland Brisbane, Australia.
1 Non-observable failure progression. 2 Age based maintenance policies We consider a situation where we are not able to observe failure progression, or.
Fault Tree Analysis Part 12 – Redundant Structure and Standby Units.
6. Reliability Modeling Reliable System Design 2010 by: Amir M. Rahmani.
1 Logistics Measures and Considerations IEGR 459: Intro to Logistics Management and Supply Chain Sept. 19, 2011 Fall 2011 Maintainability System Effectiveness.
Markov Analysis Jørn Vatn NTNU.
SMJ 4812 Project Mgmt and Maintenance Eng.
Reliable System Design 2011 by: Amir M. Rahmani
A. BobbioReggio Emilia, June 17-18, Dependability & Maintainability Theory and Methods Part 2: Repairable systems: Availability Andrea Bobbio Dipartimento.
Dependability Evaluation. Techniques for Dependability Evaluation The dependability evaluation of a system can be carried out either:  experimentally.
Copyright 2007 Koren & Krishna, Morgan-Kaufman Part.2.1 FAULT TOLERANT SYSTEMS Part 2 – Canonical.
1 Fundamentals of Reliability Engineering and Applications Dr. E. A. Elsayed Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering Rutgers University
1 Review Definition: Reliability is the probability that a component or system will perform a required function for a given period of time when used under.
Introduction Before… Next…
THE MANAGEMENT AND CONTROL OF QUALITY, 5e, © 2002 South-Western/Thomson Learning TM 1 Chapter 13 Reliability.
Reliability Chapter 4S.
Copyright © 2014 by McGraw-Hill Education (Asia). All rights reserved. 4S Reliability.
1 Spare part modelling – An introduction Jørn Vatn.
Industrial Engineering
1 2. Reliability measures Objectives: Learn how to quantify reliability of a system Understand and learn how to compute the following measures –Reliability.
PowerPoint presentation to accompany
Reliability Engineering - Part 1
System Reliability. Random State Variables System Reliability/Availability.
Chapter 4. Continuous Probability Distributions
Exponential Distribution & Poisson Process
1 Reliability Application Dr. Jerrell T. Stracener, SAE Fellow Leadership in Engineering EMIS 7370/5370 STAT 5340 : PROBABILITY AND STATISTICS FOR SCIENTISTS.
-Exponential Distribution -Weibull Distribution
Review of Statistical Inference Prepared by Vera Tabakova, East Carolina University ECON 4550 Econometrics Memorial University of Newfoundland.
Reliability Engineering
Transition of Component States N F Component fails Component is repaired Failed state continues Normal state continues.
Background on Reliability and Availability Slides prepared by Wayne D. Grover and Matthieu Clouqueur TRLabs & University of Alberta © Wayne D. Grover 2002,
Software Reliability SEG3202 N. El Kadri.
Chapter 2 Machine Interference Model Long Run Analysis Deterministic Model Markov Model.
1 Basic probability theory Professor Jørn Vatn. 2 Event Probability relates to events Let as an example A be the event that there is an operator error.
Part 7 – Common-Mode Failures
Stracener_EMIS 7305/5305_Spr08_ System Reliability Analysis - Concepts and Metrics Dr. Jerrell T. Stracener, SAE Fellow Leadership in Engineering.
Biostatistics Class 3 Discrete Probability Distributions 2/8/2000.
An Application of Probability to
4s-1 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Operations Management, 2 nd Canadian Edition, by Stevenson & Hojati Copyright © 2004 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights.
1 Component reliability Jørn Vatn. 2 The state of a component is either “up” or “down” T 1, T 2 and T 3 are ”Uptimes” D 1 and D 2 are “Downtimes”
1 EXAKT SKF Phase 1, Session 2 Principles. 2 The CBM Decision supported by EXAKT Given the condition today, the asset mgr. takes one of three decisions:
Reliability Failure rates Reliability
4/25/2017 Reliability Chapter Ten Reliability Reliability.
Quality Improvement PowerPoint presentation to accompany Besterfield, Quality Improvement, 9e PowerPoint presentation to accompany Besterfield, Quality.
Maintainance and Reliability Pertemuan 26 Mata kuliah: J Manajemen Operasional Tahun: 2010.
Fault Tree Analysis Part 11 – Markov Model. State Space Method Example: parallel structure of two components Possible System States: 0 (both components.
Part.2.1 In The Name of GOD FAULT TOLERANT SYSTEMS Part 2 – Canonical Structures Chapter 2 – Hardware Fault Tolerance.
Reliability Engineering
Prof. Enrico Zio Availability of Systems Prof. Enrico Zio Politecnico di Milano Dipartimento di Energia.
4s-1 McGraw-Hill/Irwin Operations Management, Seventh Edition, by William J. Stevenson Copyright © 2002 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Copyright 2007 Koren & Krishna, Morgan-Kaufman Part.4.1 FAULT TOLERANT SYSTEMS Part 4 – Analysis Methods Chapter 2 – HW Fault Tolerance.
EMIS 7300 SYSTEMS ANALYSIS METHODS FALL 2005
Expectations of Random Variables, Functions of Random Variables
Software Metrics and Reliability
Discrete-time Markov chain (DTMC) State space distribution
Most people will have some concept of what reliability is from everyday life, for example, people may discuss how reliable their washing machine has been.
Availability Availability - A(t)
Non-observable failure progression
Software Test Termination
Reliability Failure rates Reliability
Reliability.
T305: Digital Communications
THE MANAGEMENT AND CONTROL OF QUALITY, 5e, © 2002 South-Western/Thomson Learning TM 1 Chapter 13 Reliability.
Continuous distributions
Production and Operations Management
RELIABILITY THEORY Presented By S.ITHAYA EZHIL MANNA Assistant Professor In Mathematics St.Joseph’s College Trichy-2.
Definitions Cumulative time to failure (T): Mean life:
Presentation transcript:

Maintenance Policies Corrective maintenance: It is usually referred to as repair. Its purpose is to bring the component back to functioning state as soon as possible. In some cases, it involves replacement of one or more components. Preventive maintenance: Its purpose is to reduce the probability of component failure. It may involve lubrication, small adjustment, or replacing components or parts of components that are beginning to wear out. Periodic testing and maintenance based on condition monitoring are also regarded as preventive maintenance.

Maintainability The ability of an item, under stated conditions of use, to be retained in, or restored to, a state in which it can perform its required functions, when maintenance is performed under stated conditions and using prescribed procedures and resources (BS 4778).

Availability The ability of an item (under combined aspects of its reliability, maintainability, and maintenance support) to perform its required function at a stated instant of time or over a stated period of time (BS 4778). When considering a production system, the average availability of the production is sometimes called the production regularity.

Corrective Maintenance Replacement/repair after failure

Transition of Component States N F Component fails Component is repaired Failed state continues Normal state continues

The Failure-to-Repair Process

Repair Probability - G(t) The probability that repair is completed before time t, given that the component failed at time zero. If the component is non-repairable

Repair Density - g(t)

Repair Rate - m(t) The probability that the component is repaired per unit time at time t, given that the component failed at time zero and has been failed to time t. If the component is non-repairable

Mean Time to Repair - MTTR

The Whole Process

Availability - A(t) The probability that the component is normal at time t, i.e., A(t)=Pr{X(t)=1}. For non-repairable components For repairable components

Unavailability - Q(t) The probability that the component fails at time t, i.e., For non-repairable components For repairable components

Unconditional Failure Density, w(t) The probability that a component fails per unit time at time t, given that it jumped into the normal state at time zero. Note, for non-repairable components.

Unconditional Repair Density, v(t) The probability that the component is repaired per unit time at time t, give that it jumped into the normal state at time zero.

Conditional Failure Intensity λ(t) The probability that the component fails per unit time, given that it is in the normal state at time zero and normal at time t. In general, λ(t)≠r(t). For non-repairable components, λ(t) = r(t). However, if the failure rate is constant (λ), then λ(t) = r(t) = λ for both repairable and non- repairable components.

Conditional Repair Intensity, µ(t) The probability that a component is repaired per unit time at time t, given that it is jumped into the normal state at time zero and is failed at time t, For non-repairable component, µ(t)=m(t)=0. For a constant repair rate m, µ(t)=m.

The Average Availability The average availability in a time interval is defined as This definition can be interpreted as the average proportion of interval where the component is able to function.

The Limiting Availability It can be shown that In the reliability literature, the symbol A is often used as notation both for the limiting availability and the average availability.

Expected Number of Failures (ENF)

ENF over an interval, W(t 1,t 2 ) Expected number of failures during (t1,t2) given that the component jumped into the normal state at time zero. For non-repairable components

ENR over an interval, Expected number of repairs during, given that the component jumped into the normal state at time zero. For non-repairable components

Mean Time Between Repairs, MTBR Expected length of time between two consecutive repairs. MTBR = MTTF + MTTR Mean Time Between Fails, MTBF Expected length of time between two consecutive failures. MTBF = MTBR

Let where

Failure Rate r(t) General r(t) Const. r(t)= RELATIONS AMONG PROBABILISTIC PARAMETERS FOR REPAIR-TO-FAILURE PROCESS (THE FIRST FAILURE) ●

Repair Rate m(t) General m(t) Const. m(t)=u RELATIONS AMONG PROBABILISTIC PARAMETERS FOR FAILURE-TO-REPAIR PROCESS ●

RepairableNon-repairable Fundamental Relations RELATIONS AMONG PROBABILISTIC PARAMETERS FOR THE WHOLE PROCESS ( Next ) ※ ※ ※ ◎

Stationary Values Remark

CALCULATION OF w(t) and v(t) (given f (t) and g (t)) Two types of components fail during [t, t+dt] : Type I Type II FNFNFNFN uu+dutt+dt time Probability of Type I : ( v (u) du ) ( f (t-u) dt ) Probability of Type II : f (t) dt OR

One type of components which is repaired during [t, t+dt] FNFN u u+dut t+dt time OR

[ EXAMPLE ]

TTF data Exponential Weibull Normal Log-normal Histogram f (t) MTTF assumption parameter identification polynomial approximation r (t) F (t) R (t)

TTR data Exponential Weibull Normal Log-normal Histogram g (t) G (t) m (t) MTTR assumption Polynomial approximation parameter identification

f (t), g (t) or w(0) = f(0), v(0) = 0 w (t), v (t) Q (t) A (t) = 1 - Q (t) A (t)

Constant-Rate Models Repair-to-Failure

NON-REPAIRABLE Good Failed 1 P (t) = probability that the component is good at time t = R(t) good at t and remained good failed at t and was repaired Initial Condition :

Constant-Rate Models Failure-to-Repair

Constant-Rate Models Dynamic Behavior of Whole Process (1) also

GoodFailed REPAIRABLE good and remained good failed and repaired μΔt λΔt 1-λΔt 1-μΔt

Initial Condition: P(0)=1

Constant-Rate Models Dynamic Behavior of Whole Process (2)

Constant-Rate Models Stationary Values of the Whole Process

Proof (1) From Laplace Transform

Proof (2) Rearrangement and Inversion

System Availability

Approximate Average (Limiting) System Unavailability

Preventive Maintenance Periodic Testing and/or Replacement

The Hidden Failures The protective devices, i.e. alarms, SVs, interlocks and trips, are passive components. There are two failure modes: “fail to function” (FTF) and “false alarm” (FA). The most important failure mode is (FTF) and is always a hidden failure. The maintenance policy of periodic testing, and repair or replacement is often needed to improve the reliability of components with hidden failures. After a test (repair), the component is considered to be “as good as new.”

The Component Up-Time Let T be the time to FTF failure of a component, with distribution function and probability density Consider the first test interval (0, ]. Let be the part of this time interval where the component is able to function and be the part where the component fails.

The Distribution of Up-Time It should be noted that these function are periodical. In other words, they are the same in the intervals

The Average Availability Consider the first test Interval (0, ], it can be shown that Since all test intervals have the same stochastic characteristics,

The Mean Fractional Dead Time (MFDT) The average unavailability is often called the mean fractional dead time, i.e.

Special Case – Constant Failure Rate Mean Up-Time

Special Case – Constant Failure Rate Average availability Mean fractional dead time

Special Case – Constant Failure Rate Expansion Approximation

Example

System Unavailability Consider a system of n independent components with constant failure rates, Failures in a test interval are neither detected nor repaired. Hence the component may be regarded as nonrepairable within the test interval.

System Unavailability The cut set unavailability The system unavailability where denotes the order of the minimal cut set and j = 1, 2, …, k.

The System MFDT

The k-out-of-n System Assume that there are n identical and independent system with constant failure rate. The system has C(n, n-k+1) cut sets of order (n-k+1).

MFDT of k-out-of-n Systems k \ n

Mean Time to Failure Let denote the time from the component is put into operation until its first failure where, Z is the number of test intervals until the component fails for the first time; is the down time in interval (0,τ).

The mean number of test intervals until the component fails – E[Z]

The Mean Down Time 0 =F(τ)

Mean Time to Failure Special Case: constant failure rate

The Critical Situation A critical situation occurs if a hazardous event occurs while the protective system is in a failed state. The hazard rate is constant β. A critical situation occurs in (0,τ] if 1. The protective system fails in (t,t+dt] where t<τ and, simultaneously 2. At least one hazardous event occurs in (t,τ].

The Probability of Critical Event The probability of at least one critical event in the interval (0,τ] is Since and MFDT