A few slides to summarise what Alessandro and I were up to for March 24th video meeting Taking for granted that W+/- are good measurements to make- are.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Low-x and PDF studies at LHC Sept 2008 A M Cooper-Sarkar, Oxford At the LHC high precision (SM and BSM) cross section predictions require precision Parton.
Advertisements

Chris Hays Duke University TEV4LHC Workshop Fermilab 2004 W Mass Measurement at the Tevatron CDF DØDØ.
Recent Electroweak Results from the Tevatron Weak Interactions and Neutrinos Workshop Delphi, Greece, 6-11 June, 2005 Dhiman Chakraborty Northern Illinois.
Standard Model Physics in ATLAS Monika Wielers RAL.
Sept 30 th 2004Iacopo Vivarelli – INFN Pisa FTK meeting Z  bb measurement in ATLAS Iacopo Vivarelli, Alberto Annovi Scuola Normale Superiore,University.
1 Andrea Bangert, ATLAS SCT Meeting, Monte Carlo Studies Of Top Quark Pair Production Andrea Bangert, Max Planck Institute of Physics, CSC T6.
A simulation study of the rapidity distributions of leptons from W boson decays at ATLAS Laura Gilbert.
1 A Feasibility Study for a Strange Sea Asymmetry Analysis at ATLAS: update II Laura Gilbert and Jeff Tseng 13/12/07.
Jake Anderson, on behalf of CMS Fermilab Semi-leptonic VW production at CMS.
Why are PDF’s important for ATLAS Durham, Sep 18 th 2006 A M Cooper-Sarkar, Oxford SM CSC notes UK effort Min bias Glasgow, Sheffield W/Z cross-section.
Heavy charged gauge boson, W’, search at Hadron Colliders YuChul Yang (Kyungpook National University) (PPP9, NCU, Taiwan, June 04, 2011) June04, 2011,
W properties AT CDF J. E. Garcia INFN Pisa. Outline Corfu Summer Institute Corfu Summer Institute September 10 th 2 1.CDF detector 2.W cross section measurements.
Associated top Higgs search: with ttH (H  bb) Chris Collins-Tooth, 17 June 2008.
Early Electroweak Measurements in CMS and ATLAS J. Alcaraz (CIEMAT - Madrid) XLII Rencontres de Moriond (EW), La Thuile 11 March 2007.
Gideon Bella Tel Aviv University On behalf of the ATLAS collaboration ATL-PHYS-PUB ATL-PHYS-PUB Prospects of measuring ZZ and WZ polarization.
Z AND W PHYSICS AT CEPC Haijun Yang, Hengne Li, Qiang Li, Jun Guo, Manqi Ruan, Yusheng Wu, Zhijun Liang 1.
W+jets and Z+jets studies at CMS Christopher S. Rogan, California Institute of Technology - HCP Evian-les-Bains Analysis Strategy Analysis Overview:
Gavril Giurgiu, Carnegie Mellon, FCP Nashville B s Mixing at CDF Frontiers in Contemporary Physics Nashville, May Gavril Giurgiu – for CDF.
August 30, 2006 CAT physics meeting Calibration of b-tagging at Tevatron 1. A Secondary Vertex Tagger 2. Primary and secondary vertex reconstruction 3.
Study of the to Dilepton Channel with the Total Transverse Energy Kinematic Variable Athens, April 17 th 2003 Victoria Giakoumopoulou University of Athens,
Commissioning Studies Top Physics Group M. Cobal – University of Udine ATLAS Week, Prague, Sep 2003.
HERA-LHC, CERN Oct Preliminary study of Z+b in ATLAS /1 A preliminary study of Z+b production in ATLAS The D0 measurement of  (Z+b)/  (Z+jet)
LHC France 2013, 3 rd April ATLAS results on inclusive top quark pair production cross section in dilepton channel Frédéric Derue, LPNHE Paris Rencontres.
Standard Model Physics in ATLAS Monika Wielers RAL On behalf of the ATLAS collaboration.
María Cepeda (CIEMAT, Madrid) Valencia, II CPAN days 1.
Measurement of the branching ratios for Standard Model Higgs decays into muon pairs and into Z boson pairs at 1.4 TeV CLIC Gordana Milutinovic-Dumbelovic,
Searches for the Standard Model Higgs at the Tevatron presented by Per Jonsson Imperial College London On behalf of the CDF and DØ Collaborations Moriond.
1 Direct Photon Studies in the ATLAS Detector Ivan Hollins 11/04/06 The University of Birmingham.
Precision Cross section measurements at LHC (CMS) Some remarks from the Binn workshop André Holzner IPP ETH Zürich DIS 2004 Štrbské Pleso Štrbské Pleso.
Precision Measurements of W and Z Boson Production at the Tevatron Jonathan Hays Northwestern University On Behalf of the CDF and DØ Collaborations XIII.
LHCb: Xmas 2010 Tara Shears, On behalf of the LHCb group.
Z, W bosons: well calibrated probe in pp LHC energies: access to Z, W in pA and AA Electroweak bosons in dilepton channel: No final state modification.
Emily Nurse W production and properties at CDF0. Emily Nurse W production and properties at CDF1 The electron and muon channels are used to measure W.
CALOR April Algorithms for the DØ Calorimeter Sophie Trincaz-Duvoid LPNHE – PARIS VI for the DØ collaboration  Calorimeter short description.
Study of pair-produced doubly charged Higgs bosons with a four muon final state at the CMS detector (CMS NOTE 2006/081, Authors : T.Rommerskirchen and.
Alternatives: Beyond SUSY Searches in CMS Dimitri Bourilkov University of Florida For the CMS Collaboration SUSY06, June 2006, Irvine, CA, USA.
1 TOP MASS MEASUREMENT WITH ATLAS A.-I. Etienvre, for the ATLAS Collaboration.
Thibault Guillemin LAPP, Annecy, France W and Z total cross sections measurements ATLAS-LAPP & LAPTH – Japan meeting, 21/01/08.
7/20/07Jiyeon Han (University of Rochester)1 d  /dy Distribution of Drell-Yan Dielectron Pairs at CDF in Run II Jiyeon Han (University of Rochester) For.
W/Z+Jets production studies in ATLAS
Jet Studies at CDF Anwar Ahmad Bhatti The Rockefeller University CDF Collaboration DIS03 St. Petersburg Russia April 24,2003 Inclusive Jet Cross Section.
Isabell-A. Melzer-Pellmann DIS 2007 Charm production in diffractive DIS and PHP at ZEUS Charm production in diffractive DIS and PHP at ZEUS Isabell-Alissandra.
Susan Burke DØ/University of Arizona DPF 2006 Measurement of the top pair production cross section at DØ using dilepton and lepton + track events Susan.
October 2011 David Toback, Texas A&M University Research Topics Seminar1 David Toback Texas A&M University For the CDF Collaboration CIPANP, June 2012.
Future of DIS: PDF studies at LHC April 18 th DIS 2007 A M Cooper-Sarkar, Oxford At the LHC high precision (SM and BSM) cross section predictions require.
26/07/2002C.Diaconu High Pt Multileptons at HERA 1 Cristinel Diaconu CPP Marseille On behalf of H1 and ZEUS collaboration Lepton pair production in ep.
Kinematics of Top Decays in the Dilepton and the Lepton + Jets channels: Probing the Top Mass University of Athens - Physics Department Section of Nuclear.
Régis Lefèvre (LPC Clermont-Ferrand - France)ATLAS Physics Workshop - Lund - September 2001 In situ jet energy calibration General considerations The different.
RHIC-PV, April 27, 2007 M. Rijssenbeek 1 The Measurement of W ’s at the CERN and FNAL hadron colliders W ’s at RHIC ! W ’s at CERN – UA2 W ’s at FNAL -
Trilepton+top signal from chargino-neutralino decays of MSSM charged Higgs bosons 17 June 2004, 9 th Nordic LHC Physics Workshop, Copenhagen Christian.
Stano Tokar, slide 1 Top into Dileptons Stano Tokar Comenius University, Bratislava With a kind permissison of the CDF top group Dec 2004 RTN Workshop.
W→e and W→e +jets: a data-driven selection method By Alessandro Tricoli ATLAS UK SM Meeting 4 th June 2008 In Collaboration with M. Wielers (RAL) D. Prieur.
Viktor Veszpremi Purdue University, CDF Collaboration Tev4LHC Workshop, Oct , Fermilab ZH->vvbb results from CDF.
PHENIX J/  Measurements at  s = 200A GeV Wei Xie UC. RiverSide For PHENIX Collaboration.
E. Soldatov Tight photon efficiency study using FSR photons from Z  ll  decays E.Yu.Soldatov* *National Research Nuclear University “MEPhI”
ATLAS results on inclusive top quark pair
Impacts and constraints on PDFs at ATLAS April 17th DIS 2007 A M Cooper-Sarkar, Oxford At the LHC high precision (SM and BSM) cross section predictions.
Early EWK/top measurements at the LHC
ttH (Hγγ) search and CP measurement
Venkat Kaushik, Jae Yu University of Texas at Arlington
W and Z production: cross section and asymmetries at the LHC
W Charge Asymmetry at CDF
Jessica Leonard Oct. 23, 2006 Physics 835
PDF4LHC: LHC needs February 2008 A M Cooper-Sarkar, Oxford
Observation of Diffractively Produced W- and Z-Bosons
Alessandro Tricoli W production at LHC By
Ronan McNulty University College Dublin
Susan Burke, University of Arizona
Study of Top properties at LHC
Measurement of b-jet Shapes at CDF
Presentation transcript:

A few slides to summarise what Alessandro and I were up to for March 24th video meeting Taking for granted that W+/- are good measurements to make- are they really good standard candles? PDF uncertainty is larger than you might have heard – comes from low-x gluon dominantly Maybe we can even use early LHC data to improve it But studies have only been done at ATLFAST level, need trigger efficiencies as a function of rapidity and Pt to go further

Look at the lepton rapidity spectra and asymmetry at generator level -TOP and after passing through ATLFAST –BOTTOM Generation with HERWIG+k-factors using CTEQ6.1M ZEUS_S MRST2001 PDFs with full uncertainties

Study the effect of including the W Rapidity distributions in global PDF Fits by how much can we reduce the PDF errors? Generate data with CTEQ6.1 PDF, pass through ATLFAST detector simulation and then include this pseudo-data in the global ZEUS PDF fit. Central value of prediction shifts and uncertainty is reduced BEFORE including W dataAFTER including W data W + to lepton rapidity spectrum data generated with CTEQ6.1 PDF compared to predictions from ZEUS PDF W + to lepton rapidity spectrum data generated with CTEQ6.1 PDF compared to predictions from ZEUS PDF AFTER these data are included in the fit ~1day of data-taking at low Lumi Specifically the low-x gluon shape parameter λ, xg(x) = x –λ, was λ = ±.046 for the ZEUS PDF before including this pseudo-data. It becomes λ = ±.030 after including the pseudo-data

Event Selection Criteria for W +- -> l +- l Cross section for pp→W+X with W→lν, l=e,μ is ~30 nb (10 time larger than Tevatron) 300M evts/y at low Lumi. Atlas TDR  Electrons and Muons: Pt > 25 GeV |η| < 2.4  Missing Et > 25 GeV  To reject QCD bkg: No reconstructed jets in the event with Pt > 30 GeV Recoil on transverse plane should satisfy |u|< 20 GeV Cuts acceptance ~25% Assuming Lepton reconstruction efficiency ~ 90% & identification efficiency ~ 80% Total Selection Efficiency ~20% 60 M W’s/y al low Lumi. (10 fb -1 )

W+ -> e+ |  | <1 : W+ -> e+ |  | >1 : W- -> e- |  | <1 : W- -> e- |  | >1 : Signal Selection Efficiency (DET-AfterCuts / GEN-AfterCuts) Rome Production W +- -> e +- Sample - Full Simulation Detector and Generator levels Comparison (after selection cuts application) Generator Level Detector level (Full Simulation) Generator Level Detector level (Full Simulation) Generator Level Detector level (Full Simulation) Positron Pseudo-Rapidity Electron Pseudo-Rapidity Transverse W Mass

Detector Acceptance and Efficiency Rome W->e+ sample

W Rapidity distributions are good observables to constrain PDF’s at LHC LHC can significantly constrain the gluon distribution We are not limited by statistic but by systematic uncertainties –To discriminate between conventional PDF sets we need to achieve an accuracy ~3% on rapidity distributions. Substantial agreement between AtlFast and Full simulation analyses. We are planning to fully reproduce our AtlFast analysis with the Full Simulation Explore various sources of systematic uncertainties: detector misalignments, detector efficiency, backgrounds etc. Outlook

EXTRAS

Rome Production W +- -> e +- Sample Full Simulation In collaboration with Cigdem Issever and Monika Wielers Rome Production W +- -> e +- Sample –HERWIG + CTEQ5L, U.E. with Jimmy –~67K fully simulated events. –Reconstruction with Athena v10 –Analysis based on AOD’s In the next Transparencies I am going to show: –W->e Rapidity distributions at GEN and DET Level –W->e Asymmetry and Ratio at GEN and DET Level To Discriminate PDF Sets To possibly Minimise PDF Errors

Rome Production W +- -> e +- Sample - Full Simulation Generator Level for W’s W Asymmetry CTEQ5L PDF y W- W+ y y W - /W + Ratio W + and W - Rapidity

Rome Production W +- -> e +- Sample - Full Simulation Generator level for e+ and e- e + - e - Asymmetry e - /e + Ratio  e-e+ Selection Cuts applied e + e - Pseudo-Rapidity   TDR Selection Cuts:  Electrons: |η| 25 GeV  Neutrino Pt > 25 GeV  No reconstructed jets in the event with Pt>30 GeV  Recoil on transverse plane |u|<20 GeV Selection Cuts applied Selection Cuts applied

Rome Production W +- -> e +- Sample - Full Simulation Detector level e + - e - Asymmetry e - /e + Ratio Selection Cuts applied Selection Cuts applied  TDR Selection Cuts:  Electrons: |η| 25 GeV  Missing Et > 25 GeV  No reconstructed jets in the event with Pt>30 GeV  Recoil on transverse plane |u|<20 GeV  Standard Rome Electron Identification Selection Cuts applied e-e+ e + e - Pseudo-Rapidity   

 1M W ->  -> e  events with HERWIG + CTEQ5L  1M Z ->      -> e +  e -  events with HERWIG + CTEQ5L  1M Z -> e + e -  events with HERWIG + CTEQ5L  600K QCD events with HERWIG + CTEQ5L : IPROC=1500 all 2 -> 2 processes involving q,q,g _ Also 1M Signal events: W -> e  with HERWIG + CTEQ6.1 e,  W +- -> e +- l Background to W +- -> e +- e with ATLFAST Background Generation: Stat too little!!

e +- Rapidity distributions of Background vs Signal e + No Cutse - No Cuts e + All Cutse - All Cuts Signal: W -> e  CTEQ6.1   W ->  Z -> e - e + Z ->     QCD    Backgrounds sums: AtlFast

Z -> e + e - sample from ATLAS Full Simulation: ~98K events, Herwig+CTEQ5L, U.E with Jimmy Event Selection: –Standard Rome Electron identification –Events with 2 or more Charged Electromagnetic Objects in the E.M. calorimeter –Only 2 Elec.Obj. with E t > 25 GeV –E/p < 2 (bremsstrahlung rejection) –|  | < 2.4 –Look for the Charged Electromagnetic Pair with inv. mass M ee closest to the M Z –Select only events in which 70 GeV < M ee <110 GeV –Tag charge of the best reconstructed leg of the Pair (1 st leg) [n. of hits selection] Look if the charge of the 2 nd leg is the same as the 1 st leg Charge Misidentification Real Data Analysis Simulation Charge Misidentification 1 st Leg 2 nd Leg Z0Z0 e >0 e >0 ? M Z [GeV]

Charge Misidentification W->e Rome Sample MC-Truth Check   F-F- F+F+ In agreement with the Z->ee data-like analysis

Charge Misidentification Z->ee Rome Sample MC-Truth Check   F-F- F+F+ In agreement with the Z->ee data-like analysis

Charge Misidentification dilutes the Charge Asymmetry –Correction: Use Z -> e+e- sample from ATLAS Full Simulation Rome production ~98K events, Herwig+CTEQ5L data-like analysis (No use of MC-Truth) –Mis-ID rate negligible? Systematic Uncertainties using Full Simulation: Charge Misidentification A RAW = Measured Asymmetry A TRUE = Corrected Asymmetry F - = rate of true e - misidentified as e + F + = rate of true e + misidentified as e - F-F- F+F+   Detector Level