Response to hate speech in Lithuania Eduardas Platovas LGL Dublin 2012.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Direct Discrimination Direct discrimination is defined as unlawful in the same areas specified in the Equality Act 2010 (i.e. services and public functions,
Advertisements

Hate Crimes and Hate Crime Laws Alli Jernow Senior Legal Advisor International Commission of Jurists.
How close is Estonia to a registered partnership law? Reimo Mets, lawyer. Copenhagen 2009.
 The 5 th Amendment limits the national government, but the 14 th guarantees that states cannot deprive rights without “Due Process.”  Due process.
Social, political, economic equality for all people.
Role of Hate Speech in International Criminal Law.
Well... by the end of this assembly you will know what HATE CRIME is !
Hate Speech Exploring the nature and definitions thereof.
Minority Rights and Cultural Rights 10 February 2011.
1 Caste based Discrimination and Untouchability (Offence and Punishment) Act 2011 Kathamandu, 14 th September 2011 Adv. Ratna K. Shrestha Human Rights/Legal.
Denmark and Cartoons of the Prophet Mohammed: Freedom of speech or hate speech? Mandana Zarrehparvar Senior Advisor Danish Institute for Human Rights
Profiles of Lithuanian tolerance: a sociological research.
©2015 Paul Read 7.5 Writing Discussion Essays in Part Two /sizes/z/in/photostream/
EU responses to hate crimes and support to the victims Linda Maria Ravo DG Justice – European Commission Unit C1.
Camden LGBT Forum History Month Presentation Thursday 19 November 2009 Camden LGBT Forum.
 The 5 th Amendment limits the national government, but the 14 th guarantees that states cannot deprive rights without “Due Process.”  Due process is.
Hate Crimes Understanding Hate/Bias Crimes and Incidents.
Minority Šarūnė Ramuckytė SD2.  What is minority?  Groups of minority  Statistics  Sexual minorities in Lithuanian society  Some facts about g 
NOTE: To change the image on this slide, select the picture and delete it. Then click the Pictures icon in the placeholder to insert your own image. CONTROVERSIAL.
The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms
1 DISCRIMINATION AND DRESS CODES IN PLACES OF PUBLIC ACCOMMODATION.
  Lithuanians 84.1 %  Poles 6.6 %  Russians 5,8 %  Belarussians 1,2 %  Ukrainians 0,5 %  Jews 0,1 %  Germans 0,1 %  Tartars 0,1 %  Latvians.
Case-Study on Hate Speech - A Danish Perspective Christoffer Badse, consultant, DIHR.
Human Rights & Harassment in the Workplace
Session 3 – Conflicts between the right to equality and the freedom of expression Anne Weber, Dr. iur. International standards of limiting the freedom.
Tackling homophobic and transphobic hate crimes: how case and data collection can support campaigning and advocacy work Veronica Scognamiglio, Amnesty.
1 st case: Mayor I. The Equal Treatment Authority initiated ex-officio proceedings against a mayor who made derogatory statements on a meeting of the.
Lithuania: legislative proposals to ban “homosexual propaganda”
Human Rights Sexual Orientation Red- Light Orange- Healing Yellow- Sunshine Green- Serenity Blue- Art Purple- Spirit.
Why did Hitler’s Nazi Party win power in 1933?. Germany 1928 Election time! How will the Nazis do?
Stockholm County Police Project on Hate Crimes Stockholm County Police Detective Inspector Wenche Déas-Mobergh Detective Sandra Emthén.
Reasonable Restrictions
90 The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. 90 Background The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms was entrenched (safeguarded) in the Canadian.
 According to Canada’s Criminal Code, a hate crime is “committed to intimidate, harm or terrify not only a person, but an entire group of people to which.
C Religious Studies and Ethics A2 Brockwell Topic 3 : Christianity, the Bible and homosexuality. Objective: to examine and compare Christian teachings.
A Test in European Directive Adherence By Thomas Free Speech Liability Services.
 Click to edit Master text styles Second level Third level Fourth level Fifth level TheUbuntuCentre Submission to: The Department of Home Affairs Portfolio.
Outline: What is the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms What are rights and freedoms Limits of rights and freedoms.
“Hate speech” and incitement Training workshop on media and freedom of expression law.
1 HATE SPEECH RACE, RELIGION AND SEXUAL ORIENTATION.
Practical aspects, future perspectives of imposition of punishment – administrative arrest Judge of Criminal Case Chamber of Riga Regional Court Juris.
LGBT Rights are Human Rights: AI’s support to freedom of expression and assembly in Europe Veronica Scognamiglio European Campaign Coordinator on Discrimination.
Claim of aggravating circumstance for homophobia and transphobia offences Philosophy of Law
HATE SPEECH ZORICA MRŠEVIĆ. Page  2  Constitution from 2006 prohibits discrimination but omits any mention of sexual orientation as a protected  Article.
Harassment and/or Discrimination August Definition Unlawful behavior based on race, color, national origin, age, religion, sex, or disability of.
RACE, RELIGION AND SEXUAL ORIENTATION
Monitoring and Detecting Online Hate Speech
Situation of LGBT+ people in Ukraine
The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms
Harassment and/or Discrimination
Croatian experience: from ‘no disability hate crime’ to a policy measure Branka Meić Salie Office of the ombudswoman for persons with disabilities.
Harassment and Discrimination
Commissioner for Protection
How does the UK Government promote Community Cohesion?
Human Rights Act 1977.
PRINCIPLES OF DEMOCRACY
Commissioner for Protection
The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms
The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms
The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms
Hate speech in electronic space Hate speech vs Freedom of speech
LEXICON The group of people who officially control a country
The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms
The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms
The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms
The Prevent Duty: The Legal Wider Context
The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms
Harassment and Discrimination
Presentation transcript:

Response to hate speech in Lithuania Eduardas Platovas LGL Dublin 2012

Comments on the internet inciting against a nationality, race, ethnic, religious or other group are classified under criminal offence against equality and freedom of conscience. Lithuanian laws assume criminal liability for these offences.

A 37-year-old man from Vilnius has been ordered in court to pay a fine of 450 euros (1560 Lithuanian litas) for a comment he posted under an article on Facebook about the Lady Gaga’s criticism of the Lithuanian Government.

The First District Court of Vilnius City judged that, in his public comment about gays, the man, currently employed as a furniture assembler, employed inflammatory rhetoric and encouraged mockery, defiance, discrimination and physical violence against a group of people or its members on the grounds of sexual orientation. Investigation into the comment was started after prosecutors received notification about it from Lithuanian Gay League (LGL).

The article concerned Lady Gaga’s performance in connection with Gay Pride events in Rome, during which she criticized governments of countries that violate the rights of homosexual people, including Lithuania. In his comment the man said: “What we need is another Hitler to exterminate those fags ‘cause there’s just too many of them multiplying.”

The Office of the Equal Opportunities Ombudsman also considered the reader’s comment to encourage mockery, defiance and discrimination of a group of people or its members. Experts stated that the style of the comment is clearly contemptuous and reveals hatred towards homosexuals. The wording of the comment also directly calls for violent actions.

During questioning the author of the comment admitted publishing the comment on Facebook, but argued that his comment was only his own personal view. “It was not my intention to call for violence against gays and I feel sorry for what was written – I did not expect that this comment would insult anyone in the public domain,” the man said.

In 2011, 328 pre-judicial investigations related to incitement against a nationality, race, ethnic, religious or other group (Article 170 of the Criminal Code of the Republic of Lithuania) were initiated. 208 of these were related to incitement against a group based on sexual orientation.

158 pre-judicial investigations were initiated under the same article of the Criminal Code in of these were related to incitement against a group based on sexual orientation.

Hate speech During municipal elections in February 2011, the political party Young Lithuania unveiled a slogan For A Lithuania Without Blue, Black, Red, and Gypsies From the Encampment. Young Lithuania explained the slogan saying, “for a Lithuania […] without blue […] the ideology of sexual perversion that is being imposed on us from abroad. Following complaints the Prosecutor General found no violation

Internet hate speech: 80% of investigated cases of hate speech are on the ground of sexual orientation

The decision of Vilnius district prosecutor’s office to terminate the pre-trial investigation on a comment posted by an internet user in September 2009 under an article about a lesbian couple in Norway who have taken a Lithuanian boy into custody: “Lesbians and fags must be shot at the wall like the Jews by the Germans. This caste must be destroyed, crushed without mercy”.

Prosecutor Darius Brubulis, who investigated the complaint of the Lithuanian Gay League for a year and a half, failed to find any basis for conclusion that the suspect had committed a criminal offence with direct intent.

LGL fears that the decision of the prosecutor may become a bad example to other prosecutors, which, in turn, might spark even more hatred in public. Therefore, we appealed the decision. Presently prosecutors are investigating four cases of threats in internet comments directed personally at the leader of the Lithuanian Gay League.

For more information see