Deliberative, Pre-decisional – Do Not Quote, Cite or Distribute 1 Chesapeake Bay Water Quality Trading.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Water Quality Trading Claire Schary Water Quality Trading Coordinator U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Region 10 – Seattle Region 10 – Seattle
Advertisements

RTI International RTI International is a trade name of Research Triangle Institute. Economic Study of Nutrient Credit Trading for the Chesapeake.
What are TMDLs? and What Might They Mean to MS4 Permittees?
The Chesapeake Bay TMDL: Coming to an Impaired Water Near You? Sean M. Sullivan Williams Mullen 301 Fayetteville Street, Suite 1700 Raleigh, NC (919)
Improving Water Quality: Controlling Point and Nonpoint Sources Chapter 15 © 2004 Thomson Learning/South-Western.
TMDLs and the NACD TMDL Task Force TMDLs NACD TMDL Task Force TMDL Draft Policy Trading and TMDLs.
Pollutant Trading Discussion 22 July Why Allow Trading? §To make point sources pay §To lure nonpoint sources into doing pollution control so we.
Water Quality Trading Claire Schary Water Quality Trading Coordinator U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 10, Seattle, WA Region 10, Seattle,
Exploring Trading to Reduce Impacts of Acid Mine Drainage: Cheat River, West Virginia Evan Hansen: Downstream Strategies, LLC Paul Ziemkiewicz, Jerry Fletcher,
Nutrient Trading Framework in the Coosa Basin Alabama Water Resources Conference September 6, 2012 A Feasibility Study of Nutrient Trading in Support of.
Clean Water Act Integrated Planning Framework Sewer Smart Summit October 23, 2012.
Overview of TMDL Plans TMDL Plan Workshop April 24, 2015 Karl Berger, COG staff Outline: Details Schedule Plan Elements Issues 1.
Chesapeake Bay Restoration An EPA Perspective Jeff Corbin Senior Advisor to the Administrator U.S. EPA.
Watersheds on Wall Street? Water Pollutant Trading Becky Shannon, Missouri Department of Natural Resources Craig Smith, University of Missouri Extension.
Amy Callis, Agricultural NPS Implementation Coordinator Mary Anne Lowndes, Runoff Management Section Chief Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources.
ISO Standard is based on the management model of plan – do - check – act. Today we all be discussing the elements of the standard that deal with.
Impaired and TMDL Waterbody Listings Impacts on DoD Facilities Bill Melville, Regional TMDL Coordinator
Nutrient Trading and the Chesapeake Bay Paul K. Marchetti PENNVEST February 18, 2008.
Ann Swanson Executive Director Chesapeake Bay Commission May 2012 Market Solutions and Restoring the Chesapeake The Economics of Nutrient Trading.
Virginia Nutrient Credit Trading: Nonpoint Source Offset Options Kurt Stephenson Dept of Ag & Applied Economics Virginia Tech
Water Quality Trading in Washington Helen Bresler (360)
Developing Final Phase II WIPs and Milestones Katherine Antos Chesapeake Bay Program Office Jenny Molloy Water Protection Division DC Draft Phase II WIP.
Total Maximum Daily Loads in MS4 Storm Water Programs.
Water Quality Reduction Trading Program Draft Rule Language Policy Forum January 29,
1 IDEM Overview of March 14, 2008 Draft Antidegradation Rule Presented at the April 29, 2008 Antidegradation Stakeholder Meeting.
WATERSHED PERMITTING IN NORTH CAROLINA NPDES PERMIT NCC BECAME EFFECTIVE JAN 1, 2003 NEUSE RIVER COMPLIANCE ASSOCIATION MORRIS V. BROOKHART, P.E.
MS4 Remand Rule Intergovernmental Associations Briefing September 15, 2015.
1 Chesapeake Bay Program Management Board Meeting March 6, 2012 Discussion for the Final Evaluation of Milestones.
Phase II WIP Background & Development Process Tri-County Council – Eastern Shore June 2,
Presentation to the Chesapeake Bay and Water Resources Policy Committee July 30, 2010.
Chesapeake Bay TMDL & Watershed Implementation Plans The Role of Local Governments Jeff Corbin Senior Advisor to the Administrator U.S. EPA Presentation.
Restoring VA Waters the TMDL Way Jeff Corbin Senior Advisor to the Regional Administrator U.S. EPA Region 3.
EPA’s Proposed Federal Clean Power Plan Steve Burr AQD, SIP Section October 6, 2015.
Preparing for Regulatory Change WATER RESOURCES WORKSHOP February 20, 2004 Donald J. Brady, Ph.D.
Virginia’s Chesapeake Bay Nutrient Credit Trading Program
Water Quality Trading St. Cloud, MN August 5 th, 2008.
Status Report on Chesapeake Bay Clean Up Plan Wastewater Sector June 2, 2010.
Chesapeake Bay Policy in Virginia - TMDL, Milestones and the Watershed Agreement Russ Baxter Deputy Secretary of Natural Resources for the Chesapeake Bay.
EPA Chesapeake Bay Trading and Offsets Workplan June 1, 2012.
Robert M. Summers, Ph.D. September 16, 2015 How can we make sure the Chesapeake Bay Restoration really works?
Critical Issues in Implementing Trading Programs in the Chesapeake Bay Watershed STAC Workshop May 14, 2013 Annapolis, MD.
John Kennedy VA DEQ - Ches. Bay Program Mgr Tributary Strategies: Point Source Nutrient Controls Potomac Watershed.
New Development and Significant Development 12/21/20151 New Development & Significant Redevelopment.
Preserving York County 2010 Municipal Educational Series January 28, 2010 Rick Keister, Alliance for the Chesapeake Bay Jake Romig, York County Circuit.
Chesapeake Bay TMDL 2017 Midpoint Assessment: A Critical Path Forward Lucinda Power EPA Chesapeake Bay Program Office Citizens Advisory Committee Meeting.
Introduction to Water Quality Trading National Forum On Water Quality Trading July 22-23, 2003 Chicago, Illinois.
Maryland Association of Counties Conference August 12, 2009 Bob Koroncai USEPA Region III The Chesapeake Bay TMDL.
1 US EPA Straw Proposals for Modifying the 12/2005 draft Policy Statement Jim Hanlon, Director Office of Wastewater Management, OW Expanded Steering Committee.
Overview of the Total Maximum Daily Load Program.
Chesapeake Bay Watershed Implementation Plans: Why, What, and When Katherine Antos U.S. EPA Chesapeake Bay Program Office MACo Winter Conference January.
Maryland’s Nutrient Trading Program How Trading Works John Rhoderick Maryland Department of Agriculture.
CITIZENS ADVISORY COMMITTEE SPRING MEETING MARCH 1—2, 2012 CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA EPA’s Evaluation of Bay Jurisdictions’ Draft Phase II WIPs & Final
Nutrient Trading: Principles and Issues April 7, 2006 presentation to Potomac Watershed Roundtable.
Northern Virginia Regional Commission MS4 Meeting March 17, 2011 Virginia Phase II Watershed Implementation Plan (WIP) Approach.
Northern Virginia Regional Commission MS4 Workgroup March 17, 2011.
Slide 1 California Implementation Water Board Policies.
Improving Local Water Quality in Pennsylvania and Restoring the Chesapeake Bay.
New York’s Chesapeake Bay WIP
Framework for CSO Control Planning
MS4 and Trading Considerations
Water Quality Credit Trading
Developing a Water Quality Trading Framework
Presentation to Maryland’s Trading Advisory Committee March 21, 2016
What is a Watershed Implementation Plan?
High Rock Lake TMDL Development
Jon Capacasa, Director Water Protection Division U.S. EPA Region III
Presentation to Maryland’s Trading Advisory Committee March 21, 2016
Implementation of Water Quality Standards and the WQ Based Approach
EPA’S ROLE IN APPROVING BASIN PLAN AMENDMENTS
2018 BMP Verification Assessment
Presentation transcript:

Deliberative, Pre-decisional – Do Not Quote, Cite or Distribute 1 Chesapeake Bay Water Quality Trading

Deliberative, Pre-decisional – Do Not Quote, Cite or Distribute 2 What is Water Quality Trading? Voluntary exchange of pollutant reduction credits. Sources with higher pollutant control costs may purchase pollutant reduction credits from sources with lower control costs. How are Trading and Offsets Related? Trading is the economic activity used to purchase sufficient pollutant loadings to offset a facility’s excess discharge.  Trade = Economic  Offset = Pollutant

Deliberative, Pre-decisional – Do Not Quote, Cite or Distribute 3 What is Being Traded? Pollutant Reduction Credits :  A unit of pollutant reduction needed by a buyer usually measured in pounds equivalent.  Generated by a point source (regulated) over- controlling its discharge.  Generated by a non-point source (unregulated) from the installation of best management practices beyond those required for baseline.

Deliberative, Pre-decisional – Do Not Quote, Cite or Distribute 4 Baselines for Credit Generators A source that wants to sell pollutant reduction credits must first meet a baseline level of discharge. Point Source Pre-TMDL -WQBEL in permit TMDL -WQBEL in permit which is consistent with the TMDL wasteload allocation (WLA) Non-point Source Pre-TMDL -State and local requirements and/or existing practice TMDL -TMDL load allocation (LA)

Deliberative, Pre-decisional – Do Not Quote, Cite or Distribute 5 Trade Ratios In most cases, pollutant credits are not generated on a 1:1 basis. Rather a trading ratio is used to normalize differences between the sources’ discharges. There are four types of trade ratios:  Delivery or Location Ratios Account for fate and transport, pollutant attenuation  Equivalency Ratio Account for different forms of the same pollutant (e.g., total vs. dissolved nitrogen)  Uncertainty Ratio Account for uncertainty about the actual volume of credits produced (generally seen with PS-NPS trading)  Retirement Ratio Accelerate the rate of water quality improvement

Deliberative, Pre-decisional – Do Not Quote, Cite or Distribute 6 When Can Trading Not Occur? Trading cannot be used to meet technology-based effluent limitations. Trades cannot cause nonattainment of an applicable water quality standard. Trading cannot cause an exceedance of a cap established under a TMDL.

Deliberative, Pre-decisional – Do Not Quote, Cite or Distribute 7 EPA’s New Dischargers and Offsets Rulemaking Will address the appropriate use of offsets to compensate for new discharger loadings both prior to the issuance of a TMDL and where a TMDL is in place. Potential schedule: -March 2012: Options Selection -Summer 2012: Proposed Rule/Public Comment.

Deliberative, Pre-decisional – Do Not Quote, Cite or Distribute The Chesapeake Bay TMDL and Trading’s Role in Meeting its Goals The question is what can be done in the interim? In Section 10 and Appendix S of the Chesapeake Bay TMDL established on December 29, 2010, EPA states it will use the full scope of its authority to ensure offsets and trades for nitrogen, phosphorus, and sediment are fully consistent with the Clean Water Act, its implementing regulations and NPDES permits. Unlike the Clean Air Act, under the Clean Water Act EPA lacks clear authority to establish requirements for water quality trading programs. Thus, the offset appendix provides EPA’s “expectations” for water quality trading in the Chesapeake Bay under the new TMDL 8

Deliberative, Pre-decisional – Do Not Quote, Cite or Distribute The Chesapeake Bay TMDL and Trading’s Role in Meeting its Goals Appendix S (Offsets) outlines the minimum common elements for the Chesapeake Bay jurisdictions’ offset and trading programs. Authority Offsets Baseline: That any point or non-point source generating a credit has implemented practices or met any reductions necessary to be consistent with the Bay TMDL allocations. Minimum Controls: That any point or non-point source using a credit has implemented certain minimum controls (e.g., a discharger using a credit will meet on-site any relevant minimum technology based standards or secondary treatment standards). 9

Deliberative, Pre-decisional – Do Not Quote, Cite or Distribute The Chesapeake Bay TMDL and Trading’s Role in Meeting its Goals Eligibility Credit Calculation and Verification: Ensuring that credits are quantified using appropriate metrics and are verified to ensure that they are producing the expected reductions. For example, accounting for uncertainty of source reductions due to factors such as practice efficiencies related to the use of BMPs, a lack of required reporting compared to other sources, and/or lack of regulation of the source by federal, state and/or local regulations. This process also entails verifying the credit was and continues to be generated, via monitoring, inspection, reporting or some other mechanism. Issue is the scope of information gathering and inspection authority (non- point sources vs. point sources). 10

Deliberative, Pre-decisional – Do Not Quote, Cite or Distribute The Chesapeake Bay TMDL and Trading’s Role in Meeting its Goals Safeguards: Including in the basis and record for any offset, safeguards to ensure that the entire delivered load is accounted for and that water quality will be protected. Safeguards include restricting the use or generation of offsets by an unpermitted point source or a source in noncompliance with its NPDES permit. Additionally, EPA and states must ensure temporal consistency between the period when a credit or offset is generated and when it is used. 11

Deliberative, Pre-decisional – Do Not Quote, Cite or Distribute The Chesapeake Bay TMDL and Trading’s Role in Meeting its Goals Certification and Enforceability: Designating the process to be used and responsibility for credit/offset certification and ensuring the enforceability of permits and offset transactions. Must ensure an NPDES permittee remains accountable for meeting the water quality based effluent limits in its permit. After all, CWA Section 309 enforcement provisions do not apply to non point source credit generators. 12

Deliberative, Pre-decisional – Do Not Quote, Cite or Distribute The Chesapeake Bay TMDL and Trading’s Role in Meeting its Goals Accountability and Tracking: Developing accountability and tracking system(s) that are holistic and focused on performance outcomes while providing maximum transparency, operational efficiency, and accessibility to all interested parties. The systems should include the NPDES permit number or other identification of the purchaser of the offset or credit, where and when the credit was generated, and documentation of agreements between parties to the offset transaction. 13

Deliberative, Pre-decisional – Do Not Quote, Cite or Distribute The Chesapeake Bay TMDL and Trading’s Role in Meeting its Goals Nutrient-impaired Segments: Ensuring that offsets in nutrient-impaired water segments result in progress toward attainment of WQS in the impaired segment and do not lead to exceedances of WQS elsewhere. Credit Banking: Articulating whether aggregation and/or banking of offsets is permissible under the jurisdiction’s program and, if so, under what circumstances these will be allowed and the procedures for such activity. 14

Deliberative, Pre-decisional – Do Not Quote, Cite or Distribute The Chesapeake Bay TMDL and Trading’s Role in Meeting its Goals EPA intends to maintain regular oversight of jurisdictions’ offset and trading programs through periodic audits and evaluations. EPA will report its findings to the respective jurisdiction. First such review of jurisdictional offset and trading programs will take place in calendar year Expectation is that the findings of this review will inform offset and trading provisions included in the jurisdictions’ Phase II Watershed Implementation Plans (WIPs). 15

Deliberative, Pre-decisional – Do Not Quote, Cite or Distribute Bay Jurisdictions’ Existing Trading Programs Jurisdictions with existing water quality trading statutes, regulations and/or policies: Maryland,Pennsylvania, Virginia, West Virginia Jurisdictions that do not have water quality trading statutes, regulations and/or policies: New York, Delaware, District of Columbia 16

Deliberative, Pre-decisional – Do Not Quote, Cite or Distribute Review: Legal and Technical Considerations Baseline: that any PS or NPS generating a credit has implemented practices or met any reductions necessary to be consistent with the Bay TMDL allocations. Minimum controls: any PS or NPS using a credit has implemented certain minimum controls. Credit calculation and verification: ensure credits are quantified using appropriate metrics and verified to ensure they produce the expected reductions. Concerns exist about the scope of CWA Section 308 and how it applies to nonpoint sources. 17

Deliberative, Pre-decisional – Do Not Quote, Cite or Distribute Review: Legal and Technical Considerations Safeguards: Restrict the use or generation of offsets by an unpermitted PS or a source in noncompliance with its NPDES permit. Ensure the entire delivered load is accounted for and water quality will be protected. Accountability and tracking: holistic and focused on performance outcomes while providing maximum transparency, operational efficiency, and accessibility to all interested parties. Certification and enforceability: ensure an NPDES permittee remains accountable for meeting the WQBELs in its permit. CWA Section 309’s enforcement provisions do not apply to NPS credit generators. 18

Deliberative, Pre-decisional – Do Not Quote, Cite or Distribute Review: Legal and Technical Considerations Nutrient-impaired Segments: ensure that offsets in nutrient-impaired water segments result in progress toward attainment of WQS in the impaired segment and do not lead to exceedances of WQS elsewhere. Credit Banking: articulate whether aggregation and/or banking of offsets is permissible under the jurisdiction’s program and, if so, under what circumstances these will be allowed and the procedures for such activity. 19