SUPERINTENDENT’S RECOMMENDATIONS Capacity Utilization Arlington Public Schools December 17, 2009.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
PATHWAY TO EXCELLENCE AND EQUITY Progress Report January 8, 2008.
Advertisements

District Leadership Team Stakeholder Involvement in the District Strategic Plan! Session #4 April 12th, 2011.
January – May 2013 Existing Curriculum and Space Needs Summary Facilities staff meets individually with all school principals, as well as Academics and.
WALLED LAKE CONSOLIDATED SCHOOL DISTRICT Redistricting Plan for the school year.
Elk Island Public Schools
EADM 732 Maria E. Haigh Lupe Valdivia Marissa Fulache.
OFFICE OF DIVERSITY AND INCLUSION Climate Study Working Group Process February 3, 2012.
Middle School Recommendations December Middle School Design Team (MSDT) 1. Support for the Middle School Model as Implemented in APS 2. Focus on.
Middle School Scheduling Community Feedback Presentation Revised 1.
Creating an Education Destination through Strategic Planning Lodi Unified School District Board Study Session Presentation August 16, 2011.
Planning for Secondary Growth DIPBLE nvironments CCRCTEL earning 2014RISDF lexible September 22, 2014.
SUPERINTENDENT’S RECOMMENDATIONS Capacity Utilization Arlington Public Schools December 3, 2009.
Class Size, Capacity and Planning Factors: Additional Information Joint FAC & BAC Meeting Arlington Public Schools January 7, 2010.
Strong Schools, Strong Communities Strategic Plan Implementation Process and Roles Saint Paul Public Schools has designed the following process and roles.
Space Utilization Project Chandler Unified School District 2010.
City Council October 21, 2013 Strategic Planning Retreat Next Steps.
Strongsville City Schools Recommendations on Building Utilization.
Missoula County Public Schools Overview of Planning January 2014.
EVALUATION AND APPRAISAL REPORT MAJOR COMMUNITY ISSUES RELATED TO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN Board of County Commissioners/ Local Planning Agency Joint Meeting.
More Seats for Students History of Tuckahoe Capacity and APS Actions.
Burke Community Church August 25, 2013 Town Hall Meeting.
RFP# 99FY12 Ashlawn ES/Williamsburg ES June 8, 2012.
Iredell-Statesville Attendance Line Review Spring Area Advisory Meetings.
Presentation to the School Board Facilities and Operations April 30, 2009 Arlington Public Schools Arlington Facilities and Student Accommodation Plan.
Planning and Community Development Department Housing Element City Council February 03, 2014.
2008 Lamar CISD Thomas Elementary Meeting Agenda January 12, 2009  Welcome - Representatives from Campbell Elementary, Wessendorff MS, Dickinson.
Update on Capacity Utilization Process Arlington Public Schools September 24, 2009.
Recommendations to Address Kindergarten Over Enrollment at Impacted Schools Alameda Unified School District Board of Education March 10, 2009.
Lincoln Consolidated Schools Citizens Steering Committee Bond Issue Final Recommendation Board of Education Meeting October 18, :00 p.m.
ACPS & City of Alexandria 1.  Long Range Educational Facilities Plan to improve facilities planning, accommodate the growing student population, and.
11 School Board Monitoring Report: Capacity Update Arlington Public Schools April 29, 2010.
BOARD OF EDUCATION OF HARFORD COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL REDISTRICTING INITIATIVE FOCUS GROUP PRESENTATION PROPOSED ELEMENTARY SCHOOL ATTENDANCE.
NEXT STEPS – BOND PROGRAM Facilities Master Plan Update Facilities Subcommittee – March 17, 2015.
90-Day Goal Performance Funding Presented to the Illinois Board of Higher Education April 12, 2011.
SHORTER COLLEGE Assessment Week Sponsored by the Office of Institutional Effectiveness and Assessment & the Division of Academic Affairs.
West Sylvan Enrollment and Capacity
Anglophone West School District Education Council Sustainability Study – Bath Elementary and Middle Schools Executive Summary April 23, 2015.
Federal Support for World-Class Schools Gwinnett County Public Schools 4/18/13.
Amendments to Concurrency Management Regulations.
Community Budget Forum FY 2015 Budget Development Dr. Patrick K. Murphy, Superintendent Deirdra McLaughlin, Assistant Superintendent, Finance & Management.
Alton Village School Boundary Review March 8, 2012 Open House/Community Information Meeting 1.
Elementary Crowding and Capacity Committee (ECCC) September 10, 2007.
OCTOBER 15, 2015 SCHOOL CONSOLIDATION & REDISTRICTING Dr. Karen M. Couch, Superintendent Ron Kauffman, RK Educational Planning, LLC.
Elementary and Middle School Options to Reduce Crowding November 2008.
Community Development Block Grant (CDBG)Program December 17, 2014 Citizens Advisory Task Force Public Hearing.
SPC Advisory Committee Training - TAC Fall 2015 Institutional Research President’s Office 1 Abridged from the SPC Advisory Committee Training on October.
SPC Advisory Committee Training Fall 2015 Institutional Research President’s Office SPC 10/9/20151.
Elementary Crowding and Capacity Committee (ECCC) Drew Meeting October 30, 2007.
Planning for the Future: Superintendent’s Acceleration Agenda Phase II: Strengthening Operations Presentation to the Boston School Committee May 8, 2008.
School Site Council Committee SSC. What is the School Site Council The school site council is a group of teachers, parents, classified employees, and.
- 0 - School Portfolio Management MSDF Impact Assessment.
1 School Board and Superintendent Continuous Improvement and Evaluation Quality New Mexico June 9, 2011.
1 SCHOOL SITE COUNCIL. 2 Purpose: School Site Council The organization by which the school community comes together to chart the school’s path to improvement.
March 8, Presentation Overview  Review of the Past  Board Motions:  January, February, November – 2015  February – 2016  Education Act and.
Proposed Budget and Superintendent’s Message FY Presented to the Board of Education April 14,
ESPLOST Update Savannah-Chatham County Public Schools December 5, 2007.
Presentation to Board of Education 1 August 2014 Facilities Capital Plan Board of Education August 4, 2014 Stakeholder Engagement and Communications Services.
2016 District Enrollment & Facility Study Team Board Update May 23, 2016.
SUPERINTENDENT’S RECOMMENDATIONS – Community Forum Capacity Utilization Arlington Public Schools December 9, 2009.
Presentation to Board of Education 1 August 2014 Facilities Capital Plan Board of Education Update August 18,
Board of Early Education and Care
Core Service Review Schedule Considerations May 31, 2016 Ron Taylor
SUPERINTENDENT’S RECOMMENDATIONS: Additional Information
1300+ High School Seats School Board Work Session May 15, 2017
Short- and Long-Term Capacity Needs
March 19, 2018 CCPTA.
DRAFT Buffer Zone Policy
Fall 2018 Elementary School Boundary Process: Superintendent’s Recommendation (To take effect September 2019) November 8, 2018.
Attendance Boundary Development & Revisions
Presentation transcript:

SUPERINTENDENT’S RECOMMENDATIONS Capacity Utilization Arlington Public Schools December 17, 2009

Underlying Considerations These recommendations considered: previous boundary studies a commissioned study from MGT of America ongoing staff work the work of the Projections/Capacities Sub- Committee of the Facilities Advisory Council (P/CS), input from over 250 parents and citizens at − summer open houses with staff − Summer Superintendent Chats − s to and open-office hours with the School Board − over 450 responses to an online survey

Community Input –Likes the schools their children currently attend –Reluctant to make boundary changes –Wants effective use of resources and capacity –Supports strategic use of relocatables –Supports reasoned changes Financial Climate Increasing Enrollment Maximizing Efficiency Underlying “Givens”

Progressive Planning Model – Timing Phase I – Immediate FY 2010 Plan Phase II – Short-Term Approximately 1-3 Years (may need to be accelerated) PlanPhase III – Mid-Term Approximately 4-6 Years (may need to be accelerated) Plan Phase IV – Long-Term Approximately 6+ Years (may need to be accelerated)

Progressive Planning Model Phase I Consider for Immediate Action for September 2010 ElementarySecondary Convert computer labs and/or other available space to classrooms (e.g., convert six existing computer labs to classrooms)* Implement 6/7 scheduling model Increase class size by one based on recommended maximum class size* Add relocatable classrooms* Consider moving individual preK classes * Options dependent on and to be addressed as part of the FY 2011 budget process

Progressive Planning Model Phase II Consider in the Short-Term (may need to be accelerated) ElementarySecondary Add relocatable classrooms Convert computer labs and/or other available space to classrooms Increase recommended maximum class size by an additional one student

Progressive Planning Model Phase III Consider in the Mid-Term (may need to be accelerated) ElementarySecondary Consolidate program by creating centers (e.g., preK) Implement a staggered school day with two-bell schedules at high schools Utilize other county building space Consider flexible school day at high school Team options Consider use of Career Center Countywide options

Progressive Planning Model Phase IV Consider in the Long-Term (may need to be accelerated) ElementarySecondary Develop Wilson siteRedistrict secondary schools Redistrict elementary schools

Next Steps Begin implementation of Phase I As we move to implementation of Phase I, continue the process to research, study and plan for Phases II, III, and IV Monitor through an ongoing process – including an update to the School Board in March 2010 and a twice yearly review of capacity and enrollment Implement each phase, or elements within a phase, as needed or revised to meet changing needs, challenges, and resources Continue, consistent with the cycle of improvement model (Plan, Do, Study, Act), the review and analysis of the MGT report Continue to work with the Projections/Capacities Sub- Committee of the Facilities Advisory Council (P/CS), to monitor the progress of addressing our capacity issues

Proposed School Board Action The School Board approves the Progressive Planning Model, as described in the memorandum dated December 17, 2009, to address crowding, capacity, and enrollment at elementary and secondary schools based on projections for the next six years to **** This model, each phase of the model, and/or elements within a phase can be implemented as needed or revised by the School Board to meet changing needs, challenges, and resources. Next steps to implementing this model will involve: working with the Facilities Advisory Council (FAC) and the Projections/Capacity Sub-Committee (P/CS) of the FAC and providing the School Board with twice yearly reviews including capacity and enrollment data and the progress and forecast for each upcoming phase. Any actions that require budgetary or policy changes must be approved by the School Board.

SUPERINTENDENT’S RECOMMENDATIONS Capacity Utilization Arlington Public Schools December 17, 2009