Scholarly Publication: Responsibilities for Authors and Reviewers Jean H. Shin, Ph.D. Director, Minority Affairs Program American Sociological Association.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Conflict of Interest, Conflict of Commitment, and Outside Activities UTSA HOP 1.33 Non-covered UTSA staff 1.
Advertisements

What is Responsible Conduct of Research?
Building a Medical Records Compliance Program for Your Office: Charles B. Brownlow, OD, FAAO December 17, 2012.
B-BBEE VERIFICATION FRAMEWORK.  The BEE Verification process evolved since the release of the B- BBEE strategy in 2003  The dti was requested to provide.
ICS 417: The ethics of ICT 4.2 The Ethics of Information and Communication Technologies (ICT) in Business by Simon Rogerson IMIS Journal May 1998.
Ethics in Social Science Research and Experiments.
Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act What you need to know...
RESPONSIBLE AUTHORSHIP Office for Research Protections The Pennsylvania State University Adapted from Scientific Integrity: An Internet-based course in.
October 3, 2006TCBC Meeting October, 2006Slide 1 TCB Code of Practice Art Wall
ACCOUNTING ETHICS Lect. Victor-Octavian Müller, Ph.D.
CODE OF ETHICS South Australian Public Sector Public Sector Act, 2009.
Source: G. Stylianou - Writing for Computer Science, Justin Zobel Ethics.
Publication Issues GCP for clinical trials in India R.Raveendran Chief Editor Indian Journal of Pharmacology.
Ethics in Biostatistics Jessie McKinney Richard Kennedy.
Responsible Conduct of Research, Scholarship, and Creative Activities Peer Review Responsible Conduct of Research, Scholarship, and Creative Activities.
APA Ethics Guidelines for publication. Goals To ensure the accuracy of scientific knowledge To protect intellectual property rights.
UARC TRAINING 24 October 2007 Review of Internal Audit and Advisory Services California Conflict of Interest Laws and Regs Organizational Conflict of Interest.
Research Integrity: Collaborative Research Michelle Stickler, DEd Office for Research Protections
1 Civil Rights & Federal Financial Assistance General Overview  Various Federal civil rights laws apply to recipients of Federal financial assistance.
Understanding APA Editorial Style For Students in Social Work Courses Part I Prepared by: BJ Bryson, PhD James Madison University.
Academic Integrity in Scientific Publishing Mariann Burright Scholarly Communication Librarian Northwestern University Library.
AAA 3102 RESEARCH METHODOLOGY Lecture 2 The Research Process & Literature Review.
Notice of Privacy Practices Nebraska SNIP Privacy Subgroup July 18, 2002 Michael J. Brown, MHA, CPA Vice-President, Administrative & Regulatory Affairs,
Shobna Bhatia.  Telephone instrument  Computer  Software Instructions nearly always provided However, frequently not read At least, not until things.
Responsible Conduct of Research (RCR) Farida Lada October 16, 2013
Ethics In Research: Duties, Decisions and Dilemmas Colleen M. Gallagher, PhD, FACHE Chief & Executive Director Section of Integrated Ethics Associate Professor,
Responsible Conduct of Research (RCR) What is RCR? New Requirements for RCR Who Does it Affect? When? Data Management What is the Institutional Plan? What.
Coding Compliance Plan July 12, Benefits of a compliance program  To demonstrate our commitment to honest and responsible conduct, decrease the.
Safeguarding Good Scientific Practice in Germany Prof. Ulrike Beisiegel Chair of the DFG Ombudsman DFG Ombudsman Germany Director of the Institute of Molecular.
1 Investigating Fraud & Abuse Violations in Medical Research Janet Rehnquist, Esq. Venable LLP th Street, NW Washington, DC
Research Misconduct Adapted with permission from Virginia Tech University Office of the Vice-President for Research.
University of North Carolina at Greensboro Protecting Research Participants.
Chapter 19: Ethical Responsibilities Chapter 19 Ethical Responsibilities.
The right item, right place, right time. DLA Privacy Act Code of Fair Information Principles.
Ethical Issues in Journal Publication Barbara Gastel, MD, MPH Texas A&M University
Responsible Conduct of Research Publications. Authorship Acknowledging contributors Conflicts of interest Overlapping publications
Ethics and Research. Ethics is Educational Research Committee on Scientific and Professional Ethics of American Psychological Association -- Ethical Principals.
A.S. FlemingFall 2009 Acct 431 – Cost Management "Ethics in its broader sense, deals with human conduct in relation to what is morally good and bad, right.
Tuskegee Study Research Ethics Ethics matters in academic and scientific research. Study of ethics is no less and no more important in research than.
Publication and Research Misconduct Stephanie Harriman Deputy Medical Editor.
TCPS 2 Consultation: Revisions Relevant to Clinical Trials Laura-Lee Balkwill, PhD, Policy Analyst Secretariat on Responsible Conduct of Research CAREB.
INANE Meeting –Principles of Transparency and Best Practice in Scholarly Publishing Charon Pierson Geraldine Pearson August 5, 2015.
Authorship, peer review and conflicts of interest.
Ethics and Scientific Writing. Ethical Considerations Ethics more important than legal considerations Your name and integrity are all that you have!
ACADEMIC INTEGRITY VIOLATIONS OFFENSES, PENALTIES, AND PROCEDURES.
Science & Engineering Research Support soCiety Guest Editor Guidelines for Special Issue 1. Quality  Papers must be double -blind.
Paper III Qualitative research methodology. Objective 1.4 Discuss ethical considerations in qualitative research.
Ethics and Plagiarism AAHEP8 -- Amsterdam 2015 Erick Weinberg -- APS.
Today: Authorship and Conflicts of Interest Homework #7 (due 10/26 or 27) Notebooks will be turned when you turn in your inquiry 3 proposal.
Page  ASME 2013 Standards and Certification Training Module B – Process B7. The Appeals Process.
An Introduction to the ABCD For the Casualty Actuarial Society Course on Professionalism Copyright © 2015 American of Academy of Actuaries. All Rights.
Integrating Ethics into Graduate Training in the Environment Sciences Series Unit 1: Research Integrity in Responsible Authorship and Conflict of Interest.
Procedural Safeguards for Parents What Educators Should Know Michelle Mobley NELA Cohort III.
Challenges in Promoting RCR: Reflections from a Public Funder´s Perspective Secretariat on Responsible Conduct of Research [Canadian Institutes of Health.
1 The Nature of Ethics Ethics is generally concerned with rules or guidelines for morals and/or socially approved conduct Ethical standards generally apply.
ETHICS – FROM CODES TO PRACTICE KARIM MURJI, THE OPEN UNIVERSITY, UK.
Prof. Dr. Saw Aik Chief editor Malaysian Orthopaedic Journal University Malaya Medical Centre, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia Ethical Issues and Publication Misconducts.
PUBLICATION PRINCIPLES for PUBLICATION PROFESSIONALS
Promotion to Full Professor: Regulations and Procedures
Mojtaba Farjam, MD PhD, member of ethics committee for research
RCR Workshop on Authorship and Peer Review
Role of peer review in journal evaluation
What Are Publishers Doing About Publication Ethics?
Research Integrity & RMIT
Academic integrity Collaboration
Chapter 8 Developing an Effective Ethics Program
What the Editors want to see!
DFG Ombudsman Germany Safeguarding Good Scientific Practice Recommendation of the Germany Research Foundation Prof. Ulrike Beisiegel Chair of the DFG Ombudsman.
Ethics in scholar publishing: The journal editor's role
Promotion to Full Professor: Regulations and Procedures
Presentation transcript:

Scholarly Publication: Responsibilities for Authors and Reviewers Jean H. Shin, Ph.D. Director, Minority Affairs Program American Sociological Association Howard University Graduate School Responsible Conduct of Research (RCR) Workshop October 10, 2012

Scholarly Publications: Responsibilities for Authors and Reviewers Presentation Outline I. Where Can You Find Resources? II. Responsibilities for Authors III. Responsibilities for Editors and Reviewers IV. Questions and Discussion

Scholarly Publications: Responsibilities for Authors and Reviewers Where Can You Find Resources? University Research Regulatory Compliance Offices (ORRC at Howard University) Publishers’ (of Journals and Books) Guidelines on Their Websites ◦ See an excellent example in Graf et al (2007) “Best Practice Guidelines on Publication Ethics: A Publisher’s Perspective” in International Journal of Clinical Practice (available free as an online download from Blackwell Publishing) Committees and Non-Profit Entities ◦ International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE)—guidelines Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE)—advice for authorship disputes Professional Associations and Disciplinary Societies

Scholarly Publications: Responsibilities for Authors and Reviewers Where Can You Find Resources? Example: American Sociological Association (ASA) Code of Ethics (1999; 2008) The ASA Code of Ethics sets forth the principles and ethical standards that underlie professional responsibilities and conduct. These principles and standards should be used as guidelines when examining everyday professional activities. They constitute normative statements and provide guidance on issues that may be encountered in professional work. This Code is also accompanied by the Rules and Procedures of the ASA Committee on Professional Ethics which describe the procedures for filing, investigating, and resolving complaints of unethical conduct.

Scholarly Publications: Responsibilities for Authors and Reviewers Responsibilities for Authors (from ASA Code of Ethics) Authorship Credit (a) Sociologists take responsibility and credit, including authorship credit, only for work they have actually performed or to which they have contributed. (b) Sociologists ensure that principal authorship and other publication credits are based on the relative scientific or professional contributions of the individuals involved, regardless of their status. In claiming or determining the ordering of authorship, sociologists seek to reflect accurately the contributions of main participants in the research and writing process. (c) A student is usually listed as principal author on any multiple-authored publication that substantially derives from the student’s dissertation or thesis.

Scholarly Publications: Responsibilities for Authors and Reviewers Responsibilities for Authors (from ASA Code of Ethics) Publication Process 1) Submission of Manuscripts for Publication (a) In cases of multiple authorship, sociologists confer with all other authors prior to submitting work for publication and establish mutually acceptable agreements regarding submission.

Scholarly Publications: Responsibilities for Authors and Reviewers Responsibilities for Authors (from ASA Code of Ethics) 1) Submission of Manuscripts for Publication cont’d (b) In submitting a manuscript to a professional journal, book series, or edited book, sociologists grant that publication first claim to publication except where explicit policies allow multiple submissions. Sociologists do not submit a manuscript to a second publication until after an official decision has been received from the first publication or until the manuscript is withdrawn. Sociologists submitting a manuscript for publication in a journal, book series, or edited book can withdraw a manuscript from consideration up until an official acceptance is made.

Scholarly Publications: Responsibilities for Authors and Reviewers Responsibilities for Authors (from ASA Code of Ethics) 1) Submission of Manuscripts for Publication cont’d (c) Sociologists may submit a book manuscript to multiple publishers. However, once sociologists have signed a contract, they cannot withdraw a manuscript from publication unless there is reasonable cause to do so.

Scholarly Publications: Responsibilities for Authors and Reviewers Responsibilities for Authors (from ASA Code of Ethics) 2) Duplicate Publication of Data When sociologists publish data or findings that they have previously published elsewhere, they accompany these publications by proper acknowledgement.

Scholarly Publications: Responsibilities for Authors and Reviewers Responsibilities for Editors and Reviewers (from ASA Code of Ethics) 1) Responsibilities of Editors (a) When serving as editors of journals or book series, sociologists are fair in the application of standards and operate without personal or ideological favoritism or malice. As editors, sociologists are cognizant of any potential conflicts of interest. (b) When serving as editors of journals or book series, sociologists ensure the confidential nature of the review process and supervise editorial office staff, including students, in accordance with practices that maintain confidentiality.

Scholarly Publications: Responsibilities for Authors and Reviewers Responsibilities for Editors and Reviewers (from ASA Code of Ethics) 1) Responsibilities of Editors, cont’d (c) When serving as editors of journals or book series, sociologists are bound to publish all manuscripts accepted for publication unless major errors or ethical violations are discovered after acceptance (e.g., plagiarism or scientific misconduct). (d) When serving as editors of journals or book series, sociologists ensure the anonymity of reviewers unless they otherwise receive permission from reviewers to reveal their identity. Editors ensure that their staff conform to this practice.

Scholarly Publications: Responsibilities for Authors and Reviewers Responsibilities for Editors and Reviewers (from ASA Code of Ethics) 1) Responsibilities of Editors, cont’d (e) When serving as journal editors, sociologists ensure the anonymity of authors unless and until a manuscript is accepted for publication or unless the established practices of the journal are known to be otherwise. (f) When serving as journal editors, sociologists take steps to provide for the timely review of all manuscripts and respond promptly to inquiries about the status of the review.

Scholarly Publications: Responsibilities for Authors and Reviewers Responsibilities for Editors and Reviewers (from ASA Code of Ethics) 2) Responsibilities of Reviewers (a) In reviewing material submitted for publication, grant support, or other evaluation purposes, sociologists respect the confidentiality of the process and the proprietary rights in such information of those who submitted it. (b) Sociologists disclose conflicts of interest or decline requests for reviews of the work of others where conflicts of interest are involved.

Scholarly Publications: Responsibilities for Authors and Reviewers Responsibilities for Editors and Reviewers (from ASA Code of Ethics) 2) Responsibilities of Reviewers, cont’d (c) Sociologists decline requests for reviews of the work of others when they believe that the review process may be biased or when they have questions about the integrity of the process. (d) If asked to review a manuscript, book, or proposal they have previously reviewed, sociologists make it known to the person making the request (e.g., editor, program officer) unless it is clear that they are being asked to provide a reappraisal.

Scholarly Publications: Responsibilities for Authors and Reviewers Questions and Discussion Contact information: Jean H. Shin, Ph.D. Director, Minority Affairs Program American Sociological Association 1430 K Street NW #600 Washington, DC The ASA Code of Ethics can be found at: