The Program Evaluation Cycle Module 3. 2 Overview n Overview of the evaluation cycle n Major components of the cycle n Main products of an evaluation.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Needs Assessment A brief overview of needs assessment in the context of using ID to plan instructional programs.
Advertisements

Virginia - March 2014 (Content adapted from 2014 MSRRC Forum) Preparing for the State Systemic Improvement Plan.
Conducting the Community Analysis. What is a Community Analysis?  Includes market research and broader analysis of community assets and challenges 
Evaluation What, How and Why Bother?.
INTEGRATING BENEFICIARY FEEDBACK INTO EVALUATION- A STRUCTURED APPROACH Presentation to UKES Conference May 2015 Theme: Theory and practice of inclusion.
Evaluation is a professional and ethical responsibility and is a core part of PHN professional practice Commitment to evaluation helps build the PHN intelligence.
Chapter 3 Preparing and Evaluating a Research Plan Gay and Airasian
Title I Needs Assessment and Program Evaluation
In-depth look at ISACS Conducting small arms and light weapons surveys.
Evaluation. Practical Evaluation Michael Quinn Patton.
Session Five: Evaluating learning and teaching in the classroom Short Course in Learning and Teaching in the Classroom Janet Holmshaw and Jeff Sapiro Middlesex.
Compilation and interpretation of primary and secondary sources of information. The integration of different sources will consolidate the write up of the.
Evaluating Physical Activity Intervention Programs Thomas Schmid, PhD Physical Activity and Health Branch CDC Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
1 SUMMER CONFERENCE What is “Mixed Methods” Research Research studies that include both QUALitative and QUANtitative data. QUAL and QUAN data purposely.
The phases of research Dimitra Hartas. The phases of research Identify a research topic Formulate the research questions (rationale) Review relevant studies.
Title I Needs Assessment/ Program Evaluation Title I Technical Assistance & Networking Session October 5, 2010.
Conducting the IT Audit
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency The IAEA Safety Culture Assessment Methodology.
REC 375—Leadership and Management of Parks and Recreation Services Jim Herstine, Ph.D., CPRP Assistant Professor Parks and Recreation Management UNC Wilmington.
Process: A Generic View
Qualitative Techniques. Overview of Lecture Explore basic ideas of research methodology Explore basic ideas of research methodology Evaluating what makes.
Whilst the pharmaceutical industry plays a key role in developing and producing medicines, there is a tension between industry’s need to expand product.
USAID’s Experience and Lessons Learned in Approaches used in Monitoring and Evaluating Capacity Building Activities Duane Muller, USAID November 7, 2008.
ISTEP: Technology Field Research in Developing Communities Instructor: M. Bernardine Dias CAs: Sarah Belousov and Ermine Teves Spring 2009.
Designing Learning.
Unit 5:Elements of A Viable COOP Capability (cont.)  Define and explain the terms tests, training, and exercises (TT&E)  Explain the importance of a.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin ©2009 The McGraw-Hill Companies, All Rights Reserved Marketing Research, Primary Data, Secondary Data, Qualitative Research, Quantitative.
Module 4: Systems Development Chapter 13: Investigation and Analysis.
Evaluation Basics Principles of Evaluation Keeping in mind the basic principles for program and evaluation success, leaders of youth programs can begin.
CIS 321—IS Analysis & Design Chapter 4: Analysis— Investigating System Requirements.
Too expensive Too complicated Too time consuming.
Semester 2: Lecture 9 Analyzing Qualitative Data: Evaluation Research Prepared by: Dr. Lloyd Waller ©
DATA COLLECTION DATA COLLECTION Compilation and interpretation of primary and secondary sources of information. The integration of different sources will.
Scientific Process ► 1) Developing a research idea and hypothesis ► 2) Choosing a research design (correlational vs. experimental) ► 3) Choosing subjects.
INTERNATIONAL LABOUR ORGANIZATION Conditions of Work and Employment Programme (TRAVAIL) 2012 Module 13: Assessing Maternity Protection in practice Maternity.
Setting the Stage: Workshop Framing and Crosscutting Issues Simon Hearn, ODI Evaluation Methods for Large-Scale, Complex, Multi- National Global Health.
EVALUATION APPROACHES Heather Aquilina 24 March 2015.
1 MODEL ACADEMIC CURRICULUM MODULE 13 Assessing and Evaluating Responses.
Copyright © 2011, Terry Hudson Session 3. Copyright © 2011, Terry Hudson Chapter 9– Arguments of Definition Formal Definitions Formal Definitions Operational.
Jing Wan.  Introduction  Logic model  Evaluation methods(Design, data collection, analysis)  Communication & dissemination.
Vocabulary 1 Research Process. 1. Problem definition: the purpose of the study should be taken into account; the relevant background info; what info is.
DATA COLLECTION DATA COLLECTION Compilation and interpretation of primary and secondary sources of information. The integration of different sources will.
Chapter 8 New Wave Research: Contemporary Applied Approaches.
Chapter 3 Strategic Information Systems Planning.
UNFCCC WORKSHOP ON METHODOLOGIES ON CLIMATE CHANGE IMPACT AND ADAPTATION back-to-back with UNDP-GEF WORKSHOP FOR DEVELOPING AN ADAPTATION POLICY FRAMEWORK.
 2007 Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health Introduction to Program Evaluation Frances Stillman, EdD Institute for Global Tobacco Control Johns.
© 2002, CARE USA. All rights reserved. Applying Quality Standards in Impact Evaluation: Case of CARE Program Quality Framework and Evaluation Policy Ahmed.
Evaluation Revisiting what it is... Who are Stakeholders and why do they matter? Dissemination – when, where and how?
“Problems” in Marketing Research MAR 6648: Marketing Research January 6, 2010.
SOLUTION What kind of plan do we need? How will we know if the work is on track to be done? How quickly can we get this done? How long will this work take.
Program Assessment. Before you get started Need to determine if the program can be evaluated or should be evaluated. Is the answer already available?
ACTED AME Appraisal, Monitoring and Evaluation. Summary 1/ ACTED AME department 2/ AME Responsibilities 3/ AME throughout project cycle 4/ Involvement.
Advances In Software Inspection
The Strategic Communications Plan March 22, 2011.
Assessment of Your Program Why is it Important? What are the Key Elements?
PRACTICED BASED RESEARCH Overview 25 th November 2013.
© International Training Centre of the ILO Training Centre of the ILO 1 Research Process for Trade Unions.
Distance monitoring of SRH and GBV services in emergency Example of third party monitoring in Syria Nadine Cornier Humanitarian Advisor, Reproductive Health.
PROCESS ASSESSMENT AND IMPROVEMENT. Process Assessment  A formal assessment did not seem financially feasible at the onset of the company’s process improvement.
Evaluation Nicola Bowtell. Some myths about evaluation 2Presentation title - edit in Header and Footer always involves extensive questionnaires means.
Fifth Edition Mark Saunders, Philip Lewis and Adrian Thornhill 2009 Research Methods for Business Students.
Evaluation What is evaluation?
PROGRAM EVALUATION A TOOL FOR LEARNING AND CHANGE.
Right-sized Evaluation
Safety Culture Self-Assessment Methodology
Module 8- Stages in the Evaluation Process
Metrics for process and Projects
Qualitative/Quantitative Methodologies
Stakeholder Engagement
Integrating Gender into Rural Development M&E in Projects and Programs
Presentation transcript:

The Program Evaluation Cycle Module 3

2 Overview n Overview of the evaluation cycle n Major components of the cycle n Main products of an evaluation n The evaluation process in context

3 The Program Cycle Review Existing Programs Identify New Program Needs Design a Program Confirm Resources Develop Program Examine Future Program Needs Implementation Fine Tuning the Program Evaluate Program

4 Is there a legitimate need for an evaluation? n Is there an interest in: Accountability? Decision- Making ? Learning? n What information could an evaluation produce that we don’t have now? n Are there faster, better, more cost-effective ways of improving a program than conducting an evaluation?

5 Plan an Evaluation n Assess stakeholder’s needs n Prepare terms of reference to state Issues Methodology/Approach Schedule and cost n Prepare workplan to clarify Questions/Issues Evaluation methodology

6 Collect Data n Understand the potential data sources: people; documents; data bases; settings n Determine efficient and effective ways to collect the data - e.g.: interviews; checklists; questionnaires; focus groups; performance tests; observation; technical measurement n Collect quantitative and qualitative data

7 Analyze Data n Using qualitative approaches - e.g.: determining the important themes and messages n Using quantitative approaches - e.g.: counts; statistics n Integrating qualitative and quantitative approaches

8 Interpret Data & Formulate Findings n Weigh the evidence n Attribute effects or results: Formulate plausible cause-effect relationships n Formulate findings: Articulate what the data says so that everyone understands

9 Recommend Action n What are the big messages of the evaluation? n What would be helpful to recommend?

10 Communicate Evaluation Results n Decide: When to share information What to share Who to share it with How it should be presented

11 Use Results n Ownership: Who cares about follow-up? n Accountability: Who is responsible for follow-up?

12 When to invest in program evaluation Program Before During At the endIn the future To improve program design To improve program implementation For accountability To assess impact

13 Key Timing for Evaluation Program Before During At the endIn the future Evaluation Frameworks Mid-Term Evaluations End of Program Evaluation Impact Evaluation

14 Evaluation Products n Scope of Work/Terms of Reference (TOR) n Work Plan n Evaluation Framework n Briefings/Progress Reports n Summary of Results/Evaluation Report

15 The Evaluation Process in Context Resources Values Ethics Politics

16 Questions for Discussion n Does the program evaluation cycle always coincide with program milestones? n What issues can emerge?