Interfacing Sensors with (VR)Application Equipment Scott Drummond Ken Sudduth IT Specialist Agricultural Engineer.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Objectives Control Terminology Types of controllers –Differences Controls in the real world –Problems –Response time vs. stability.
Advertisements

FIELD-SCALE N APPLICATION USING CROP REFLECTANCE SENSORS Ken Sudduth and Newell Kitchen USDA-ARS Translating Missouri USDA-ARS Research and Technology.
“Spray Application Accuracy” Nozzle Selection. Why are you here???? Are you concerned with accuracy? n $$ go bye, bye n Changing rates (< an ounce/acre)
when calibrating the sprayer
Calibration 2014 Wisconsin Pesticide Applicator Training Program University of Wisconsin Extension 1 of 40.
Application Equipment and Calibration G. S. Manual - Chap. 7 Workbook - pp Application Calibration & Calculations
High Power Hg Target Conceptual Design Review Hg Target System Controls V.B. Graves P.T. Spampinato T.A. Gabriel Oak Ridge National Laboratory February.
Pulse Width Modulation Robert E. Wolf Extension Specialist Application Technology Biological and Agricultural Engineering.
when calibrating the sprayer
Using Pulse Width Modulation to Control Spray Droplet Size Robert E. Wolf Extension Specialist Application Technology Biological and Agricultural Engineering.
when calibrating the sprayer
Replacing Your Spray Nozzle Biological and Agricultural Engineering Robert E. Wolf Extension Specialist Application Technology.
MSU Extension Pesticide Education Turfgrass Pest Management (Category 3A) Application Calculations and Calibration Chapter 5.
Comparison of Active Optical Sensors
Outline Introduction – Importance for SE Mississippi State – Sensor Comparison – Wavelength/Index Analysis University of Arkansas – Active detection of.
Presented by Emil Melamed
GreenSeekerTM Variable Rate Applicator Equipment and Applications
Comparison of Commercial Crop Canopy Sensors Ken Sudduth Newell Kitchen Scott Drummond USDA-ARS, Columbia, Missouri.
 It is the material removal process where the material is removed by high velocity stream of air/gas or water and abrasive mixture.  An abrasive is.
Chemical Engineering 3P04
Field-IQ System Boom Height Control. Benefits  Maintain boom height in uneven terrain  Reduce operator fatigue  Consistent spray tip height reduces.
Agronomic Spatial Variability and Resolution What is it? How do we describe it? What does it imply for precision management?
Temperature Control Loop
April 19, 2003SOIL/BAE 4213 Variable Seeding Rate Technologies By Kody R. Featherston.
New Technology for the Application of Crop Protection Products Using Ground Application? Robert E. Wolf Extension Specialist Agrichemical Technology Biological.
Precision Farming Profitability Reference E: Variable-Rate Technologies By Case Medlin, Stephen Hawkins, Keith Morris, Sam Parsons.
A Compact Precision Agriculture Sprayer for Use in University and Extension Educational Programs A.R. Dickinson, D.M. Johnson, and G.W. Wardlow Department.
Precision Agriculture in Agricultural Aviation Jonathan Kelly.
GPS Capabilities and Future Products Robert E. Wolf, Randy K.Taylor Biological and Agricultural Engineering Dept. Kansas State University.
SPRAY EQUIPMENT Basic Components and Operations. Purposes  Used to apply agricultural chemicals  Spray pressures range from near 0 to over 300 pounds.
Lesson 3 Understanding Equipment Monitoring Systems.
Crop Spec, A Collaborative Partnership A real time integrated plant nutrient monitoring and application system for Agricultural equipment.
Field-Scale Sensor Evaluation Ken Sudduth, Newell Kitchen, Scott Drummond USDA-ARS Columbia MO.
Variable Rate Nozzles By: Kyle Dollins. What Can VRT Be Used For?
Variable Rate Irrigation Cody Daft April 13 th, 2007.
Randy Taylor Biosystems and Agricultural Engineering Oklahoma State University.
Tracy Blackmer Peter Kyveryga Advancing Agricultural Performance ® 1 Iowa Soybean Association On-Farm Network®
Automating Continuous Gas Lift
For more information contact:
Top 10 lessons learned in 6 years of on-farm sensor demos Peter Scharf University of Missouri > ?
Missouri algorithm: Design & objectives Peter Scharf University of Missouri Peter Scharf Newell Kitchen, Ken Sudduth, Glenn Davis, John Lory, Vicky Hubbard,
Variable-Rate N Fertilization of Wheat and Corn in the Mid-Atlantic Variable-Rate N Fertilization of Wheat and Corn in the Mid-Atlantic Wade Thomason,
West Hills College Farm of the Future The Precision-Farming Guide for Agriculturalists Chapter Seven Variable Rate Technologies.
By Patrick Opdenbosch website:
Yield Monitors and Maps
Precision Spraying Soil 4213 Dr. Blake. Definition of Spraying Spray  Water or other liquid moving in a mass of dispersed droplets, as from a wave.
Refinement of the Missouri Corn Nitrogen Algorithm Using Canopy Reflectance Newell Kitchen, Ken Sudduth, and Scott Drummond USDA-Agricultural Research.
“Spray Application Accuracy” Nozzle Selection. Why are you here???? Points??? Are you concerned with accuracy?
State of Engineering in Precision Agriculture, Boundaries and Limits for Agronomy.
Yield Cleaning Software and Techniques OFPE Meeting
Calibrating Spray Equipment
RAMPs in SBNM In-Service Training Stillwater, OK January 18-19, 2007.
Variable Rate Application
Application of Sprayer Technologies in Field Equipment
Calibration of your Field Sprayers using Shortcut Methods
Agronomic Spatial Variability and Resolution What is it? How do we describe it? What does it imply for precision management?
Precision Ag Solutions Scott Strehle
Variable Rate Application Equipment and Mechanisms.
Cecil Tharp MSU Pesticide Education Program Pesticide Education Specialist Department of Animal and Range Montana State University.
Precision Agriculture John Nowatzki Extension Ag Machine Systems Specialist.
Technology for Crop Production John Nowatzki Extension Ag Machine Systems Specialist.
Variable Rate Technologies
Subsystems of EFI Chapter 22 Lesson 2.
Equipment Limitations and Challenges in Precision N Management
Redball NUE Conference August 9, 2007
Agronomic Spatial Variability and Resolution
Intro to Precision Agriculture
UNL Algorithm for N in Corn
Newell R. Kitchen, Kenneth A. Sudduth USDA-ARS, Columbia, MO
Electronics and Control Systems
Presentation transcript:

Interfacing Sensors with (VR)Application Equipment Scott Drummond Ken Sudduth IT Specialist Agricultural Engineer

Objectives Understand the “big picture” of developing a sensor based system for VRA of N. Recognize design details that often get ignored or at least “underappreciated”. See how these details affect the design and development of one such research system.

Sense Decide Control

Crop Sensing Remote sensing –Satellite based –Aerial based Real time sensing –Passive Sensors –Active Sensors

Active Sensors By using an internal light source, these sensors eliminate problems with sun angle and cloud variations –GreenSeeker by NTech –Crop Circle by Holland Scientific –CropSpec by Topcon

Effect of soil on active sensors? V7 corn with 0 N

Is soil an important part of the signal? Do we need to consider a way to remove the effect of soil? What happens when the soil “color” varies across time or across the landscape?

Stability of sensor readings? Courtesy: Dr. Peter Scharf

Is variable crop height an issue?

If more H 2 O affects readings – how about less?

Variable Rate Controllers Things you must consider when selecting the controller for your VRA system… –VRA control type –Range of rates –Response time –Precision and accuracy –Communication method(s)

Variable Rate Controllers Many systems claim VRA control but… –Real time control Message based Controller includes decision module –Map based control Useful for image based methods – much less attractive for active sensor applications

Variable Rate Controllers Range of rates for: –Dry fertilizers Range generally not an issue –Liquid fertilizers Standard pressure regulated Capstan spray system (PWM) SprayTarget variable flow nozzles

Variable Rate Controllers What COULD happen IF our response time was too slow?

Variable Rate Controllers Communication issues –Serial (RS-232/RS-422/RS-485) –CAN Bus –As applied maps – stored where/how? –Message formats can be open or proprietary

Sense Decide Control

Decision Module Things to consider when selecting the decision module for your VRA system… –Communication –Algorithm(s) –Flexibility

Decision Module Questions to ask yourself… –How many algorithms are available? –Is my algorithm “stable”? –Can I adjust (timing/layout/parameters)? –What happens when a new piece of information (sensor/map) appears?

Designing a VRA System Now that we have an idea of some of the questions to ask… let’s look into the design of a system based upon a set of requirements. This system was designed for research applications, and may have more stringent requirements than some.

Requirements Use existing Spra-Coupe Plot sizes down to 5x10 m in size Range = lb/a N Precision = 30 lb/a Accuracy < 5% of full scale. Map based and sensor based VRA needed GS & CC sensor data collected and/or used Algorithm – complete flexibility needed

Application System Used existing AGCO Fieldstar controller in the SpraCoupe to change system operating pressure to compensate for changes in ground speed. To get fast response, we chose a “bypass” or 3-way valve system. –When a particular valve (1x, 2x, or 4x) was not sending N to the ground, that same volume of flow was returned to the sprayer tank through a matched orifice. –The pump was always putting out the same volume at the same pressure, and the pressure control system did not have to respond (at least theoretically).

Application System We chose a 6-row system for reasonable plot widths –Near maximum capacity of the SpraCoupe pump at normal operating speeds Drop nozzles with 1x, 2x, and 4x orifice plates were installed in row middles Nominal application rates: –1x = 30 lb N/acre –2x = 603x = 90 –4x = 1205x = 150 –6x = 1807x = 210

Data Flow Collect Reference Strip Data Interpolate/ extrapolate whole-field reference map Get Current GPS data Prior to Application Get Reference Value at Current Point N Recommendation Algorithm Smoothing, Deadband, Hysteresis Solenoid Valve Control 0, 1x, 2x, 3x, 4x, 5x, 6x, or 7x Green GreenSeeker 1 Green GreenSeeker 2 Crop Circle 3 Crop Circle 4 Select and/or Combine Sensor Outputs Spatial or time-base filtering Decision Module

Finding the target sensor data… Drop Nozzles N Sensors a b Given that: Sensor data buffered at 10 Hz v = GPS velocity (m/s) a+b = dist from sensors to drops (m) L = system latency (s) The target sensor data was taken this many readings ago… t = 10*(((a+b)/v)+L) In practice, we have averaged 1s of data (10 values per sensor) centered around this target point.

Positioning details… Drop Nozzles N Sensors GPS Antenna Gives Easting(x), Northing(y), h(eading) and v(elocity) a b Application Boom Center e boom = cos(90-h)*b+e gps n boom = sin(90-h)*b+n gps Individual Sensor Locations e right = cos(90-(h+atn(c/a))*sqrt(c 2 +a 2 )+e gps n right = sin(90-(h+atn(c/a))*sqrt(c 2 +a 2 )+n gps e left = cos(90-(h-atn(d/a))*sqrt(d 2 +a 2 )+e gps n left = sin(90-(h-atn(d/a))*sqrt(d 2 +a 2 )+n gps c d Sensor Boom Location e sens = cos(90-h)*a+e gps n sens = sin(90-h)*a+n gps

Software Control Loop… Collect store and buffer data: sensors, GPS, psi, status, etc. Find Target Data Find N-Ref Data Calc Raw N-Rate Time >1s? N-Rate < MIN? N-Rate > MAX? Map to 0X-7X Beyond Deadband? N-Rate = MIN N-Rate = MAX Send New Rate To Controller No Yes

How Well Did it Work ? Accuracy and consistency of response