Competition Sensitive Dennis Asato June 28, 2001 XSuperNova / Acceleration Probe (SNAP) Propulsion.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Larry Phillips MAY 13th-17th, 2002 Micro Arcsecond Xray Imaging Mission: Pathfinder (MAXIM-PF) Launch Vehicle Information Final Version.
Advertisements

Marat Kulakhmetov.  AS8 AS8.
Liquid Rocket Engine Cycles
Schematics and Valves Reference info. Fundamentals -- Monoprop Blowdown System.
MAE 5391: Rocket Propulsion Overview of Propulsion Systems
Pistonless Dual Chamber Rocket Fuel Pump Steve Harrington, Ph.D Joint Propulsion Conference.
1 ESAIL proof of concept mission Juha-Pekka Luntama Pekka Janhunen Petri Toivanen.
Monopropellant Micro Propulsion system for CubeSats By Chris Biddy 174 Suburban Rd Suite 120 San Luis Obispo CA (805)
Attitude Determination and Control
AAE450 Spring 2009 Propellant Choice and Mass Estimates for the Translunar OTV Week 2 Presentation Thursday, Jan 22, 2009 Brad Appel Propulsion Group.
The Lander is at a 25 km Lunar altitude and an orbital period of approximately 110 minutes. After separation occurs the Lander is completely self sufficient.
AAE450 Spring 2009 Slide 1 of 8 Orbital Transfer Vehicle (OTV) Masses and Costs Ian Meginnis March 12, 2009 Group Leader - Power Systems Phase Leader -
AAE450 Spring 2009 More Attitude Control Thruster Options Brittany Waletzko Translunar/OTV Phase Week 7 Brittany Waletzko - ATT.
AAE450 Spring 2009 Translunar Orbit Transfer Vehicle (OTV): Propulsion System Setup for 100g & 10 kg Case Launch Vehicle Selection for Arbitrary Case Thermal.
Class 4: Fundamentals of Rocket Propulsion
Section 17.0 Propulsion Subsystem Michael S. Rhee Propulsion Lead 5 Space Technology “Tomorrow’s Technology Today” GSFC ST5 PDR June 19-20, 2001.
Spacecraft Propulsion Dr Andrew Ketsdever Lesson 13 MAE 5595.
A Comparison of Nuclear Thermal to Nuclear Electric Propulsion for Interplanetary Missions Mike Osenar Mentor: LtCol Lawrence.
Systems Considerations and Design Options for Microspacecraft Propulsion Systems Andrew Ketsdever Air Force Research Laboratory Edwards AFB, CA Juergen.
Josephine San Dave Olney 18 August, July 1999NASA/GSFC/IMDC2  Appears to be Feasible  Requirements  Coarse Pointing baselined on NGST  Future.
By Will Parnell. * The system creates propulsion using an inert gas such as Nitrogen or Helium as the fuel. * The gas is stored under high pressure, then.
Final Version Bob G. Beaman May 13-17, 2002 Micro-Arcsecond Imaging Mission, Pathfinder (MAXIM-PF) Electrical Power System (EPS)
Launch System Launch Vehicle Launch Complex Orbit Insertion Orbit Maneuvers.
Marco Concha Charles Petruzzo June 28, 2001 SuperNova/ Acceleration Probe (SNAP) Flight Dynamics.
Rocket Engine Physics and Design
Bob G. Beaman June 28, 2001 Electrical Power System SuperNova / Acceleration Probe (SNAP)
Final Version Micro-Arcsecond X-ray Imaging Mission Pathfinder (MAXIM-PF) Eric Stoneking Paul Mason May 17, 2002 ACS.
20a - 1 NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center Attitude Control System (ACS) Eric Holmes, Code 591 Joe Garrick, Code 595 Jim Simpson, Code 596 NASA/GSFC August.
EXTROVERTSpace Propulsion 02 1 Thrust, Rocket Equation, Specific Impulse, Mass Ratio.
Comprehend the different types of rockets Comprehend the propulsion and flight of rockets Comprehend the types of launch vehicles Comprehend the factors.
Electric Propulsion System Setup S From PCDU S/C Communication 9 9 Xenon System Thermal System Power / Intercomm.
Thermal Model of MEMS Thruster Apurva Varia Propulsion Branch Code 597.
Mechanical SuperNova/Acceleration Probe SNAP Study Dave Peters George Roach June 28, a man who's willing to make a decision in the first place can.
Dr. Aprille Ericsson Eric Stoneking June 28, 2001 SuperNova/ Acceleration Probe (SNAP) Attitude Control Systems.
How Rocket Engines Operate List the Types and Characteristics of Rocket Engines How Rockets Work.
1 Weekly Summary Asteroid Sample Return Spring Semester March 5, 2008 Ashley Chipman.
AAE 450- Propulsion LV Stephen Hanna Critical Design Review 02/27/01.
Low Thrust Transfer to Sun-Earth L 1 and L 2 Points with a Constraint on the Thrust Direction LIBRATION POINT ORBITS AND APPLICATIONS Parador d'Aiguablava,
ROCKET PROPULSION LECTURE 1: INTRODUCTION Propulsion Lecture 1 - INTRODUCTION.
SPHERES Reconfigurable Control Allocation for Autonomous Assembly Swati Mohan, David W. Miller MIT Space Systems Laboratory AIAA Guidance, Navigation,
Computational Modeling of Hall Thrusters Justin W. Koo Department of Aerospace Engineering University of Michigan Ann Arbor, Michigan
Propulsion Workshop 23 March, 2011 In-Space Propulsion Technology Area 02 Alfred Herzl © 2011 Lockheed Martin Corporation. All Rights Reserved.
THEMIS FDMO Review Propellant Budget Update − 1 October 5, 2004 PROPELLANT BUDGET UPDATE Vassilis Angelopoulos Covered in this presentation: Allocations.
Competition Sensitive Gabe Karpati June 28, 2001 SuperNova / Acceleration Probe (SNAP) System Overview.
John Martin April 5, 2001 SuperNova/ Acceleration Probe (SNAP) Introduction.
20c - 1 NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center Propulsion Chuck Zakrwski NASA/GSFC Code 597 August 16-17, 2005.
Final Version Gary Davis Robert Estes Scott Glubke Propulsion May 13-17, 2002 Micro Arcsecond X-ray Imaging Mission, Pathfinder (MAXIM-PF)
Wes Ousley June 28, 2001 SuperNova/ Acceleration Probe (SNAP) Thermal.
Spacecraft Systems Henry Heetderks Space Sciences Laboratory, UCB.
AAE450 Spring 2009 Final Lander Volume and Mass 10kg, 100g, Arbitrary March 12, 2009 Lunar Descent Phase Group [Ryan Nelson] [STRC] 1.
Uncontrolled copy not subject to amendment Rocketry Revision 1.00.
ACE Science Workshop March 10 th, 2009 Armin T. Ellis, Deborah Vane, Mark Rokey Jet Propulsion Laboratory.
Propulsion Trade Study for Translational Motion Main ThrustersIsp (s)FuelCatalystOxidizerPower ReqThrust rangeExample Flight HistoryComplexity solid rocket.
Micro Arcsecond X-ray Imaging Mission Pathfinder (MAXIM-PF) Mechanical George Roach Dave Peters 17 May 2002 “Technological progress is like an axe in the.
Technical Resource Allocations
Integrated Thermal Analysis of the Iodine Satellite (iSAT) from Preliminary to Critical Design Review October 20th 2016 Stephanie Mauro NASA Marshall Space.
ELECTRIC PROPULSION OVERVIEW
HOW SPACE SHUTTLES WORK presented by, A
Rocket Engines Liquid Propellant Solid Propellant Hybrid Nuclear
Development and Principles of Rocketry
Week 6 Presentation Thursday, Feb 19, 2009
Micro-Arcsecond X-ray Imaging Mission Pathfinder (MAXIM-PF)
Matthew Prevallet 4/26/16 Arizona/NASA Space Grant Symposium
Development and Principles of Rocketry
Derivation of the FSOA in Ariane 6 Specifications
High Power Electric Propulsion for Space Exploration
Week 4 Presentation Thursday, Feb 5, 2009
Final Slides Attitude Control System (ACS) – Lunar Transfer
Team A Propulsion 1/16/01.
Propulsion Jon Lewis Mike Rhee 8/19/99
Presentation transcript:

Competition Sensitive Dennis Asato June 28, 2001 XSuperNova / Acceleration Probe (SNAP) Propulsion

SNAP, June 28, 2001 Goddard Space Flight Center Propulsion Page 2 SNAP Propulsion System FUNTIONAL REQUIREMENTS Provide capability for multiple burn, 136 m/s  V Provide capability for 3-axis momentum unload KEY DESIGN DRIVERS Initial payload mass = 1619 kg ACS momentum unload = 3.5 kg/yr for 5 yrs No S/C orientation constraints during orbit transfer thruster firings (e.g., instrument protected with covers) Contamination sensitive instrument & sensors S/C power constrained to “several hundred watts”

SNAP, June 28, 2001 Goddard Space Flight Center Propulsion Page – 250 mN 22 N THRUST OPTION ISP (s) W 5 W/thruster during firing + TBD W orbit ave. 9.1 W orbit 25% d.c W/thruster during firing POWER (W) (+) High Isp (-) High power (-) Thrust too low for orbit transfer; better suited for attitude control, SK, drag compensation (-) High Cost for low  V mission 13 – 44 (excl. ACS) “Low Power” EP Options  Hall  PPT  Arcjet (+) Higher Isp than N2H4 (+) Lower orbital ave. heater power than N2H4 system (-) Complex fuel/oxidizer manifold design (?) Fuel slosh issues during science (TBD) (?) Plume contamination issue (TBD) 91MMH/NTO (+) Simple manifold design, low plume contamination, low HW mass (-) Low Isp (?) Fuel slosh issues during science (TBD) 117N2H4 COMMENTSPROPELLANT MASS (kg) OPTIONS “Low Power” EP Assumptions POWER (kW)ISP (s)THRUST (mN)EP SYSTEM N2H4 Arcjet Xe Hall SNAP Propulsion System Design Trade

SNAP, June 28, 2001 Goddard Space Flight Center Propulsion Page 4 SNAP Propulsion System Design Trade Conclusions  Baseline Design: “Blowdown” (unregulated pressure) N2H4 System with 4x22N canted thrusters & three  48.3 cm dia. propellant tanks  Merits: Simple manifold design, low contamination, relatively low component mass & orbital ave. power  Negatives: Low Isp (large tanks)  Propulsion System Options to Reduce Volume  MMH/NTO, pressure-regulated bipropellant system option would reduce the propellant tank diameter to 35 cm (4 tanks) + a 20 cm dia. pressurant tank.  Orbit transfer with single high DV burn would allow use of solid motor + small N2H4 system (ACS unload & small DV orbit adjust)  2 kW power system would be required to use EP thrusters (N2H4 arcjet, Xe Hall) – low thrust; long orbit transfer time.

SNAP, June 28, 2001 Goddard Space Flight Center Propulsion Page 5 SNAP Propulsion System F/D Valve N2H4 Tanks w/ AFE-332 or PMD Pressure Transducer P Filter Latching Isolation Valve LV Primary & Redundant 22 N Thrusters with Dual Seat Valves SNAP N2H4 PROPULSION SYSTEM N2H4 Propulsion System Design N2H4 mass (10% contingency) = 130 kg “Dry” mass (4 Tank Design) = 34.1 kg Three 48.3 cm dia tanks with AFE-332 elastomer diaphragm Primary & Redundant set of 22N thrusters mounted on –X axis & canted 15 o off X-axis Orbit Ave Power D.C.) = 23 W Catalyst Bed + Thruster Power (During Firing) = 10.2 W per thruster 15 o XY ZZ

SNAP, June 28, 2001 Goddard Space Flight Center Propulsion Page 6 SNAP Propulsion System

SNAP, June 28, 2001 Goddard Space Flight Center Propulsion Page 7 Regulated BiPropellant System Option SNAP Propulsion System