1 Multi-body B-decays studies in BaBar Ben Lau (Princeton University) On behalf of the B A B AR collaboration The XLIrst Rencontres de Moriond QCD and.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Measurement of  David Hutchcroft, University of Liverpool BEACH’06      
Advertisements

Direct CP Asymmetries in hadronic D decays Cai-Dian Lü ( 吕才典 ) IHEP, Beijing Based on work collaborated with Hsiang-nan Li, Fu-Sheng Yu, arXiv: ,
Phenomenology of Charmless Hadronic B Decays Denis Suprun University of Chicago Thanks to C.-W. Chiang, M. Gronau, Z. Luo, J. Rosner for enjoyable collaborations.
Measurements of the angle  : ,  (BaBar & Belle results) Georges Vasseur WIN`05, Delphi June 8, 2005.
Measurements of the angles of the Unitarity Triangle at B A B AR Measurements of the angles of the Unitarity Triangle at B A B AR PHENO06 Madison,15-18.
Measurements of sin2  from B-Factories Masahiro Morii Harvard University The BABAR Collaboration BEACH 2002, Vancouver, June 25-29, 2002.
6/2/2015Attila Mihalyi - Wisconsin1 Recent results on the CKM angle  from BaBar DAFNE 2004, Frascati, Italy Attila Mihalyi University of Wisconsin-Madison.
Charm results overview1 Charm...the issues Lifetime Rare decays Mixing Semileptonic sector Hadronic decays (Dalitz plot) Leptonic decays Multi-body channels.
EPS, July  Dalitz plot of D 0   -  +  0 (EPS-208)  Kinematic distributions in  c   e + (EPS-138)  Decay rate of B 0  K * (892) +  -
Study of B  D S ( * )  D*  *   and D ( * ) (4  )   at CLEO Jianchun Wang Syracuse University Representing The CLEO Collaboration DPF 2000 Aug 9.
Title Gabriella Sciolla Massachusetts Institute of Technology Representing the BaBar Collaboration Beauty Assisi, June 20-24, 2005 Searching for.
16 May 2002Paul Dauncey - BaBar1 Measurements of CP asymmetries and branching fractions in B 0   +  ,  K +  ,  K + K  Paul Dauncey Imperial College,
.. Gabriella Sciolla Massachusetts Institute of Technology On behalf of the BaBar Collaboration APS/DPF Meeting Philadelphia, April 5 - 8, 2003 Cracking.
Direct CP and Rare B A B AR BEAUTY 05 - Assisi Jamie Boyd Bristol University On behalf of the B A B AR collaboration.
Measurements of Radiative Penguin B Decays at BaBar Jeffrey Berryhill University of California, Santa Barbara For the BaBar Collaboration 32 nd International.
Polarization fraction & time-dependent CP analysis of measured at Belle. March 2008 – Geneva Swiss Physical Society – Annual meeting Kim Vervink.
Measurements of  and future projections Fabrizio Bianchi University of Torino and INFN-Torino Beauty 2006 The XI International Conference on B-Physics.
Sin2  1 /sin2  via penguin processes Beauty 2006 Sep.25-29, Univ. of Oxford Yutaka Ushiroda (KEK)
B Decays to Open Charm (an experimental overview) Yury Kolomensky LBNL/UC Berkeley Flavor Physics and CP Violation Philadelphia, May 18, 2002.
1. 2 July 2004 Liliana Teodorescu 2 Introduction  Introduction  Analysis method  B u and B d decays to mesonic final states (results and discussions)
1. Outline 2 Dr. Prafulla Kumar Behera, IIT Madras 9 th June 2015.
Constraints on  from Charmless Two- Body B Decays: Status and Perspectives James D. Olsen Princeton University Workshop on the CKM Unitarity Triangle.
1 Disclaimer This talk is not for B physics experts. Taipei101 If you did it, you may check s during my talk. B0B0 B0B0.
Φ 3 measurements at B factories Yasuyuki Horii Kobayashi-Maskawa Institute, Nagoya University, Japan Epiphany Conference, Cracow, 9th Jan
Measurement of the Branching fraction B( B  D* l ) C. Borean, G. Della Ricca G. De Nardo, D. Monorchio M. Rotondo Riunione Gruppo I – Napoli 19 Dicembre.
Luca Lista L.Lista INFN Sezione di Napoli Rare and Hadronic B decays in B A B AR.
DPF 2009 Richard Kass 1 Search for b → u transitions in the decays B → D (*) K - using the ADS method at BaBar Outline of Talk *Introduction/ADS method.
Philip J. Clark University of Edinburgh Rare B decays The Royal Society of Edinburgh 4th February 2004.
A window for New Physics in B s →KK decays Joaquim Matias Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona David London & JM, PRD (2004) David London &JM & Javier Virto,
August 20, 2007 Charmless Hadronic B decays at BaBar1 Charmless Hadronic B Decays at BaBar Woochun Park University of South Carolina Representing the BaBar.
Max Baak1 Impact of Tag-side Interference on Measurement of sin(2  +  ) with Fully Reconstructed B 0  D (*)  Decays Max Baak NIKHEF, Amsterdam For.
Introduction to Flavor Physics in and beyond the Standard Model
1 CP violation in B → ,  Hiro Sagawa (KEK) FLAVOR PHYSICS & CP VIOLATION, Ecole Polytechnique, Paris, France on June 3-6, 2003.
M. Adinolfi - University of Bristol1/19 Valencia, 15 December 2008 High precision probes for new physics through CP-violating measurements at LHCb M. Adinolfi.
Search for CP Violation in B 0  h decays and B 0  h decays with B A B AR International Europhysics Conference on High Energy Physics, July 17 th -23.
1 ICHEP’04, Beijing, Aug 16-22, 2004 A. Höcker – sin2  in Loop-Dominated Decays with B A B AR The Measurement of sin2β (eff) in Loop-Dominated B Decays.
Pavel Krokovny Heidelberg University on behalf of LHCb collaboration Introduction LHCb experiment Physics results  S measurements  prospects Conclusion.
Pavel Krokovny, KEK Measurement of      1 Measurements of  3  Introduction Search for B +  D (*)0 CP K +  3 and r B from B +  D 0 K + Dalitz.
WIN-03, Lake Geneva, WisconsinSanjay K Swain Hadronic rare B decays Hadronic rare B-decays Sanjay K Swain Belle collaboration B - -> D cp K (*)- B - ->
1 Highlights from Belle Jolanta Brodzicka (NO1, Department of Leptonic Interactions) SAB 2009.
11 th July 2003Daniel Bowerman1 2-Body Charmless B-Decays at B A B AR and BELLE Physics at LHC Prague Daniel Bowerman Imperial College 11 th July 2003.
CP-Violating Asymmetries in Charmless B Decays: Towards a measurement of  James D. Olsen Princeton University International Conference on High Energy.
1 BaBar & Belle: Results and Prospects Claudio Campagnari University of California Santa Barbara.
1 A New Physics Study in B  K  & B  K*  Decays National Tsing Hua University, October 23, 2008 Sechul OH ( 吳世哲 ) ( 오세철 ) C.S. Kim, S.O., Y.W. Yoon,
Thomas Latham University of Warwick.  Charmless B decays have many great features  Several contributing (and interfering) diagrams  Potential to measure.
Study of exclusive radiative B decays with LHCb Galina Pakhlova, (ITEP, Moscow) for LHCb collaboration Advanced Study Institute “Physics at LHC”, LHC Praha-2003,
Measurement of sin2  at B A B AR Douglas Wright Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory B A B AR For the B A B AR Collaboration 31st International Conference.
Recent B A B AR Measurements of Hadronic B Branching Fractions David N. Brown University of Louisville For the B A B AR Collaboration Meeting of the Division.
1# CKM Unitarity angles    and     Recent results from the B factories. ) Hassan Jawahery Univ. of Maryland Lepton-Photon Symposium Fermi.
CP Violation Studies in B 0  D (*)  in B A B A R and BELLE Dominique Boutigny LAPP-CNRS/IN2P3 HEP2003 Europhysics Conference in Aachen, Germany July.
1 EPS03, July 17-23, 2003Lorenzo Vitale Time dependent CP violation studies in D(*)D(*) and J/ψ K* Lorenzo Vitale INFN Trieste On behalf of BaBar and Belle.
Maria Różańska, INP Kraków HEP2003 Europhysics Conference –Aachen, July 18th 1 CPV in B → D (*) K (*) (and B → D K  ) in BaBar and Belle Outline: CPV.
1 Koji Hara (KEK) For the Belle Collaboration Time Dependent CP Violation in B 0 →  +  - Decays [hep-ex/ ]
Measurement of  2 /  using B   Decays at Belle and BaBar Alexander Somov CKM 06, Nagoya 2006 Introduction (CP violation in B 0   +   decays) Measurements.
1 Absolute Hadronic D 0 and D + Branching Fractions at CLEO-c Werner Sun, Cornell University for the CLEO-c Collaboration Particles and Nuclei International.
Andrzej Bożek for Belle Coll. I NSTITUTE OF N UCLEAR P HYSICS, K RAKOW ICHEP Beijing 2004  3 and sin(2  1 +  3 ) at Belle  3 and sin(2  1 +  3 )
Update on Measurement of the angles and sides of the Unitarity Triangle at BaBar Martin Simard Université de Montréal For the B A B AR Collaboration 12/20/2008.
Final state interactions in heavy mesons decays. A.B.Kaidalov and M.I. Vysotsky ITEP, Moscow.
5 Jan 03S. Bailey / BaBar : B decays to Measure gamma1 B Decays to Measure  Stephen Bailey Harvard University for the BaBar Collaboration PASCOS 2003.
Chunhui Chen, University of Maryland PASCOS CP Violation in B Physics Chunhui Chen University of Maryland The 12 th International Symposium on Particles,
New Results in Charmless B Meson Decays at New Results in Charmless B Meson Decays at Justin Albert Univ. of Victoria 20 July, 2013 Representing the BaBar.
C.D. LuMoriond1 Charmless hadronic B s Decays Cai-Dian Lü (IHEP, Beijing) Thanks Ali, Kramer and Li, Shen,Wang The study of hep-ph/
Measurements of   Denis Derkach Laboratoire de l’Accélérateur Linéaire – ORSAY CNRS/IN2P3 FPCP-2010 Turin, 25 th May, 2010.
Recent results on non-DDbar decays of  (3770) at BES HaiLong Ma [For BES Collaboration] The IVIIth Rencontres de Moriond session devoted to QCD AND HIGH.
Measurements of  1 /  Flavor Physics and CP Violation 2010, May 25, 2010, Torino, Italy, K. Sumisawa (KEK)
V.Tisserand, LAPP-Annecy (IN 2 P 3 /France), on behalf of the B A B AR collaboration. Aachen (Germany), July 17 th -23 rd Charmed B hadrons with.
Measurements of a and future projections
Attila Mihalyi University of Wisconsin-Madison
B  at B-factories Guglielmo De Nardo Universita’ and INFN Napoli
Charmless Quasi-two-Body Modes at BaBar
Presentation transcript:

1 Multi-body B-decays studies in BaBar Ben Lau (Princeton University) On behalf of the B A B AR collaboration The XLIrst Rencontres de Moriond QCD and high energy hadronic interactions

2 Multi-body decay and CP violation Sides are determined from the rates for various processes involving b quarks Angles are determined from CP-violating asymmetries Area is proportional to the amount of CP violation   “The” Unitarity Triangle Surprising, the best  and  estimation are coming from multi-body decay! B 0   B +  D  dalitz

3 Introduction to analysis technique  (m ES )  3 MeV e - (9 GeV) e + (3.1 GeV)  (4S) B background signal Event selection: Quality cuts for tracks and showers Continuum rejection using event shape variables Kinematic signal identification with m ES and  E: Maximum Likelihood Fit to determine yields and asymmetries

4 Measuring  in b → uud WW WW      a 1 +    , a 1 - (direct CPV) Goal: Measure time dependent A CP B 0     large penguin B 0    need time-dependent dalitz plot B 0     small penguin, mostly longitudinal polarization If tree dominated: Unfortunately, there is penguin pollution “effective” value of 

5 CKM  and Isospin Analysis Isospin Analysis disentangles penguin contributions to S=sin2α eff using SU(2) symmetry relations between the B →  modes (analogous to B → ππ system) We need branching fraction measurements:  B (B ± → ρ ± ρ 0 ), B (B 0 → ρ + ρ - ), B (B 0 → ρ + ρ - ), B (B 0 → ρ 0 ρ 0 ), B (B 0 → ρ 0 ρ 0 ) BaBar has an improved measurement on Bf(B ± →ρ ± ρ 0 ) Gronau-London Method (PRL 65, 3381) In this construction κ = 2(α eff -α) S and C are parameters relating to the CP asymmetry of the ρ+ρ- mode. κ

6 BaBar Updated Results (230M BB) Branching Fractions: Previous measurement: Consistent with hypothesis that EW penguin pollution is small Differential decay rate: Charge Asymmetry: The new measurement is in better agreement with the isospin symmetry

7 Motivation: Can be used to give a new measurement of  by time-dependent A CP analysis Observation of B 0  a 1 (1260) +    ±  events Branching Fractions: Fitted a 1 (1260) resonance parameters: Next step: Measure  using time-dependent CP analysis

8 Motivated by B  , with sufficient statistics one can measure  Little is known about these 5-body states Theory prediction for Branching Fraction (from 1987): BR(B 0  a 1  )=43x10 -6 Search for B 0  a 1  Place an upper Limit < 30 × (90% C.L.)  extraction will be difficult due to small statistics BaBar performed a search using 110M BB events BaBar Preliminary Fit results: 68 ± 34 events

9 sin(2  +  ) in B 0  D (*) ,D  Favored b  c transition Doubly-Cabibbo suppressed b  u transition u,c,t V * ub Interference between:  = strong phase difference V cd V cb V * ud - CP asymmetry proportional to ratio r of amplitudes r~0.02 (from CKM elements) small CP asymmetry

10 B 0  D s *  and SU(3) Such an important parameter |r D  | cannot be calculated accurately… need measurement.. Need D s mode. Because |r D  | is extremely difficult to measure (background too huge) Measurement of B ( B 0  D s +  - ) would help measure |r D  | using SU(3)* s b d d u c B0B0 -- Ds+Ds+ W b d d u c B0B0  D+D+ W d flavor SU(3) SU(3) first order corrections *W exchange amplitude assumed to be small and neglected in this SU(3) analysis

11 B 0  D s *  /K results 6 sigma 5 sigma First observation of B 0  D s *+  - /D s *+ K - ! D modeD* mode r D    

12 Direct CP Violation and Polarization in B  K*  An interesting mode: B → K* ρ are charmless hadronic B decays. Proceed through the dominant gluonic penguin and Cabibbo-suppressed tree level diagram B  uus Goal:Measure the polarization: Will f L ~ 100% like tree dominated  Or f L ~ 50% like penguin dominated  K* ? It is interesting to look for the connection

13 Results for B +  f 0 (980)K* + Branching Fractions Direct CP violation: B +  f 0 (980)K* + 5 sigma B +   0 K* sigma Upper Limit: <5.9 x (90% C.L.) Branching Fraction:  K* is a vector-vector decay efficiency depends on polarization need to extract f L from the fit: Results for B +    K* +

14 Summary Multibody B decays are playing a critical role in the study of CP violation at the B Factories  Currently, the best measurements of  and  are coming from multibody decays BaBar measurements of  :  Updated measurement of      Expanding into a 1 X modes: First observation of B 0 → a 1 (1260) +   search for B 0 → a 1 +   Measurement of  /direct CP violation  First observation of D s (*)  /K, useful in getting sin(2  +  ) in D*   Searching for direct CP violation in B   K*