Presumptive MACT For Municipal Solid Waste Landfills July 1999 Emission Standards Division US Environmental Protection Agency.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Cathy Beahm Technical Assistance Specialist NH DES, Air Resources
Advertisements

September 17, 2003 Workshop WEBCAST Hank Naour ILLINOIS EPA MACT Standards and Section 112f Residual Risk.
The Wonderful World of HAP Regulations
National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants: Municipal Solid Waste Landfills.
METAL COIL SURFACE COATING MACT OVERVIEW 40 CFR PART 63, SUBPART SSSS May CFR PART 63, SUBPART SSSS May 2006.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency April 13, 2011 Final Rules to Reduce Air Toxics from Boilers.
Composting Rules Source Separated Organics Update Tim Farnan 2013 SWANA/AWMA Landfill Operator Training.
Composting Rule Update Tim Farnan 2013 Minnesota Composting Council Fall Workshop.
Landfill Legislation Richard Campbell. INTRODUCTION  Prior to the mid-1980's, waste disposal sites were: sites that no one wanted, ie they were holes.
MSW LANDFILL MACT STANDARD DEVELOPMENT SWANA’s 22nd Annual Landfill Gas Symposium March 22-25, 1999 Michele Laur Emission Standards Division US Environmental.
Air Toxics Rule Changes (pursuant to Session Law ) North Carolina Division of Air Quality July 2013 Environmental Management Commission.
U.S. EPA Regulations Review Update: Subpart W NESHAPS (40 CFR 61) Uranium and Thorium Mill Tailings (40 CFR Part 192) Andrea Cherepy, Phil Egidi, Reid.
New Federal Regulations for Internal Combustion Engines Doug Parce.
Overview of the Clean Air Act and the Proposed Petroleum Refinery Sector Risk and Technology Review and New Source Performance Standards Public Outreach.
MCIC Workshop 2012 Complying with NC Air Quality Regulations Boiler MACT/GACT and 112j Steve Schliesser Division of Air Quality Environmental Engineer.
Boiler MACT and Other Air Developments 2011 Southern Section AWMA Conference Callaway Gardens, GA Boiler MACT and Other Air Developments 2011 Southern.
Division of Air Quality Update on EPA Boiler MACT Rules Steve Schliesser Environmental Engineer March 2012.
April 15, 2015 Betty Gatano, P.E. Permitting Section North Carolina Division of Air Quality, Raleigh, NC (919)
1 Year in Review: Clean Air Act Presented by: Tom Wood Stoel Rives LLP October 8, 2010 Things Are Getting Really Complicated.
Section 112J: The “HAMMER” Clause What is Illinois Doing about the PART 2; May 15, 2003 Deadline???? & How can P2 Play a Role? Hank Naour ILLINOIS EPA.
What options do states have? What is Georgia planning to do? What are some of the other states doing? What are the possible implications to permit fees?
Beyond Federal Standards Nevada Mercury Air Emission Control Program Leo M. Drozdoff, P.E. Administrator Nevada Division of Environmental Protection December.
A History and Status of CEMS Applications in USEPA Regulations Dale Evarts US EPA December 16, 2002 Better Air Quality in Asian Cities 2002
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Air Toxics in Region 4 A&WMA Annual Conference August 6, 2008 Lee Page Air Toxics Assessment and Implementation Section EPA, Region 4 Atlanta, Georgia.
1 Improving Environmental Protection and Reducing Administrative Burden North Carolina Division of Air Quality Improving Environmental Protection and Reducing.
Update on EPA Oil and Gas Activities Greg Green, Outreach and Information Division, OAQPS.
Actions to Reduce Mercury Air Emissions and Related Exposure Risks in the United States Ben Gibson Office of Air Quality and Planning and Standards U.S.
The Cost of Clean Air FEES REVISED: 2011 NACAA Membership Meeting Cleveland, OH October 5, 2011.
The Impact of Greenhouse Gas Regulation on Energy Production: Legal Framework for Greenhouse Gases Standards for Fossil-Fuel Fired Electric Generating.
Air Toxics Rule Changes (pursuant to Session Law ) North Carolina Division of Air Quality Air Toxics Rule Changes Stakeholder Meeting March 20,
WILL ALLISON AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DIVISION APRIL 16, 2012 Oil and Natural Gas Air Pollution Standards.
Proposed Amendments to Chapter 32, Article V, Solid Waste Management, and to Chapter 38, Zoning Orange County Code Presented by the Orange County Environmental.
TITLE III UPDATE Joel Leon Air Quality Evaluation Section Bureau of Technical Services 1.
Blue Skies Delaware; Clean Air for Life NESHAPs Jim Snead October 8, 2008.
1. Carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) – Naturally occurring and man- made. 5,505.2 mmts emitted in 2009, GWP = 1 Methane (CH 4 ) - Naturally occurring and man-made.
URBAN AIR TOXICS – AREA SOURCE PROGRAM SALLY SHAVER, DIRECTOR EMISSION STANDARDS DIVISION October 5, 2004.
Assessment of Mercury Rules for Electric Generators in North Carolina September 9, 2015 Presented to the Environmental Management Commission – Air Quality.
NTEC -- April 24, Utility Air Toxics Regulatory Finding National Tribal Environmental Council April 24, 2001 William H. Maxwell U.S. EPA OAQPS/ESD/CG.
Stationary and Area Source Committee Update OTC Committee Meeting September 13, 2012 Washington, D.C. Hall of the States 1.
HAP Rule 372 Guidance Permitting Division Maricopa County Air Quality Department.
TCEQ Environmental Trade Fair
Web Resources Michael Gage New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection County Environmental and Waste Enforcement Special Investigations and Oversight.
Georgia’s 112(g) Experiences Eric Cornwell Acting Manager Permitting Program.
LEGAL ASPECT OF WASTE MANAGEMENT (INTERNATIONAL) NURUL MAISYARAH BINTI SAMSUDIN NORAINI BINTI ABD RAHMAN NOR AINI OTHMAN NUR NAZNIN BINTI ISHAK.
Overview of Air Permitting Fees In Illinois
Pollution Prevention in Air Quality A Government Perspective H. Patrick Wong, Chief Air Quality Management Division Miami-Dade County Department of Environmental.
CALIFORNIA’S AIR TOXICS PROGRAM: IMPROVEMENTS TO ASSESS HEALTH RISK Update to the Air Resources Board July 24, 2014 California Environmental Protection.
Current Status, New Directions
Discussion And Request For Direction Relative To Strategic Directive 8.3 Regulation Reviews For Alternative Daily Cover And Food/Green Waste Composting.
Life After Landfill – regulatory requirements Kate Hamer and Thomas Gallasch Waste to Resources, Regulation and Compliance EPA 27 th September 2007.
1 Special Information Session on USEPA’s Carbon Rules & Clean Air Act Section 111 North Carolina Division of Air Quality Special Information Session on.
REVISIONS TO THE FEDERAL WATER QUALITY STANDARDS RULE JILL CSEKITZ, TECHNICAL SPECIALIST TEXAS COMMISSION ON ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY.
Proposed Carbon Pollution Standard For New Power Plants Presented by Kevin Culligan Office of Air Quality Planning And Standards Office of Air and Radiation.
Pulp & Paper Sector Strategy & New Source Performance Standards Strategy Peter Tsirigotis, Director Sector Policies & Programs Division National Association.
Proposed Rulemaking: Additional RACT Requirements for Major Sources of NO x and VOCs (25 Pa. Code Chapters 121 and 129) Environmental Quality Board November.
Climate: ANPR, SIPs and Section 821 WESTAR October 2, 2008.
Evan Kane, DWR Ken Pickle, DEMLR Jon RisGAARD, DWR
Clean Air Act Glossary.
North Carolina Division of Air Quality Mike Abraczinskas
10 CFR Part 61 Low Level Waste Disposal Rulemaking Update
Rules for Existing Municipal Solid Waste Landfills
Groundwater and Waste Management Committee November 9, 2016
Department of Environmental Quality
Julie Woosley, Division of Waste Management
Major New Source Review (NSR) Part 2
Boiler Sheltered Initiative
Julie Woosley, Division of Waste Management
EPA’s Current Air Toxics Activities
Julie Woosley, Division of Waste Management
Presentation transcript:

Presumptive MACT For Municipal Solid Waste Landfills July 1999 Emission Standards Division US Environmental Protection Agency

Introduction The following presentation serves as an update to the July 1998 briefing*. The previous briefing served to identify the source category, discuss the industry profile and outline the maximum achievable control technology (MACT) rulemaking process. The purpose of this paper is to document the presumptive maximum achievable control technology (PMACT) recommendations. As discussed in the July 1998 briefing, the affected sources are municipal solid waste (MSW) landfills that are major sources of hazardous air pollutant (HAP) emissions and MSW landfills located at sites that are major sources of HAP emissions. In addition, area sources will be addressed in this rulemaking because they have been identified as contributors to urban air pollution in the urban air toxics (UAT) strategy. The statutory basis of the UAT strategy is section 112(k) of the Clean Air Act (CAA). *see

Overview of Presentation PMACT Definition Purpose of PMACT PMACT Recommendation Process PMACT Recommendations Next Steps Closing Comments Sites For Additional Information

PMACT Definition PMACT is an estimate of the MACT requirements for a source category based on available data that can be obtained quickly. PMACT is information to be considered by interested stakeholders and is not legally binding.

Purpose of PMACT To assist agencies, industry and the public in section 112(g) case-by-case MACT determinations and with section 112(j) hammer provision standards. To enhance up front planning (i.e., identify issues to be resolved early in the process). To make recommendations for the proposed regulatory path.

PMACT Recommendation Process The PMACT recommendations are based on a review of quickly available information such as source test data, technology in-use information, State regulations and permit information. From this information, pollutants of interest, emissions points and potential levels of control are identified. The pollutants of interest are the HAP listed in section 112(b) of the CAA that are emitted from MSW landfills. The emission points are the source category specific release points for the pollutants of interest. Using criteria specified in section 112(d) of the CAA (i.e., technology used by the top 12% performing sites), levels of control, technology/hardware and operational practices are recommended.

PMACT Recommendations Pollutants of Interest--Approximately 30 HAP have been identified as potential emissions. Emission Points--The “emission points” are: (1) landfill gas from decomposing waste, (2) landfill wastewater (leachate and condensate) and (3) petroleum contaminated daily cover soils. Levels of Control/Technology/Work Practices--For landfill gas emissions, comply with the control levels and practices in 40 CFR part 60 subpart WWW. For landfill wastewater, the level of control is no control.* For petroleum contaminated soil used as daily cover, the level of control is no control.* * If new emissions or control data become available and indicate that control is warranted, EPA’s position on these issues may change.

Next Steps Determine MACT floor--level of control based on an evaluation of information beyond PMACT. Identify alternatives beyond the MACT floor--more stringent levels of control with potentially greater environmental benefits. Consider costs, health, environmental and energy requirements of the alternatives. Determine MACT for major sources. Determine generally achievable control technology (GACT) requirements for area sources--MACT or something less stringent? Propose regulation and respond to public comments. Promulgate regulation.

Schedule of Next Major Steps Determine MACT Determine GACT Propose Rule Promulgate Rule September 1999 October 1999 April 2000 April 2001

Closing Comments PMACT is based on easily obtainable information. It indicates an initial regulatory path that serves as information for States and stakeholders to consider. Since the determination of PMACT, additional information has been gathered and evaluated. This information is being used to make MACT and GACT determinations and to move forward with the rulemaking process. If interested stakeholders have data and other information pertinent to this rulemaking effort, they should be sent to Michele Laur. To be useable, the information must be as detailed and complete as possible indicating facility location and other relevant information.

Sites For Additional Information Michele Laur US EPA MD-13 RTP, NC (919)