Institute for the Promotion of Innovation By Science and Technology in Flanders.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
RAPIDE – Assessment of Action Plans Brigitte Hatvan KWI Consultants GmbH EUROPEAN UNION European Regional Development Fund.
Advertisements

Strengthening innovation in chemical clusters
Technopolis Group 1 Summary of conference contributions Patries Boekholt.
European Research Policy: from coordination and cooperation to integration and the ERA Dr. Maria Nedeva MIoIR, MBS. The University of Manchester EULAKS.
University of Athens, GREECE Innovation and regional development : Prof. Lena J. Tsipouri.
Methodologies for Assessing Social and Economic Performance in JESSICA Operations Gianni Carbonaro EIB - JESSICA and Investment Funds JESSICA Networking.
THE DEVELOPMENT BANK OF SOUTHERN AFRICA
Regions as the driving forces of European competitiveness: From theory to practice Interregional Seminar and Partnership Fair Enhancing university-business.
Benchmarking Industry – Science Relationships Based on the OECD report, March 2002 Presented by: Inês Costa Vanessa Figueiredo.
FP7 Preparations ISTC meeting 31 March Content FP7 preparation approach and timetable Context for FP7 and for ICT in FP7 Research in New Financial.
Does FP7 offer the right tools for promoting excellence and innovation in the Regions? Paul Harris Senior Executive – EU Policy Scotland Europa (Brussels)
NMP-NCP meeting - Brussels, 27 Jan 2005 Towards FP 7: Preliminary principles and orientations… Nicholas Hartley European Commission DG Research DG Research.
South Africa’s S&T partnership with the European Union From FP4 to Horizon 2020 Daan du Toit Senior S&T Representative to the EU.
Agency for Innovation by Science and Technology Participation in Joint Programming Initiatives through IWT programmes Alain Deleener Coordinator European.
Building open regional innovation strategies: New opportunities provided by Smart Specialisation Strategies Claire Nauwelaers Independent STI policy expert.
1 European Policies to Promote EST into the Market INSTITUTO SUPERIOR TÉCNICO RGESD - Research Group on Energy and Sustainable Development Maria da Graça.
Regional Trajectories to the Knowledge Economy: A Dynamic Model IKINET-EURODITE Joint Conference Warsaw, May 2006.
Science of Science and Innovation Policy (SciSIP) Presentation to: SBE Advisory Committee By: Dr. Kaye Husbands Fealing National Science Foundation November.
EUREKA a catalyst for collaboration 1 SK/EID2004/SH EUREKA Information Days Trenčín and Nitra, March 2-3, 2004 Svatopluk HALADA EUREKA Secretariat, Brussels.
SME Access to Finance & Enterprise Europe Network Georgia Tzenou, National Documentation Centre Enterprise Europe Network-Hellas.
The Dutch R&D system characteristics and trends, with a focus on government funding Jan van Steen Ministry of Education, Culture and Science, The Netherlands.
DIVISION Landstingsdirektörens stab Coral Interreg Europe proposal Project proposal addresses objective 1.2 of the Interreg Europe Programme: Improve the.
Lisbon strategy, competitiveness and ERA Maja Bucar Centre of International Relations Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Ljubljana
1 From Disseminating Knowledge to Promoting Innovation: Challenges in reforming agricultural extension Rasheed Sulaiman V Centre for Research on Innovation.
THEORIES OF TECHNOLOGICAL CHANGE Definitions and Concepts.
The Framework Programme for Research and Innovation
1 Behavioural Additionality in Strategic Basic Research ‘New Frontiers in Evaluation’ Vienna, 24 April 2006 Jan Larosse, EC-DG RTD Paul Schreurs, IWT Flanders.
Ekin TAŞKIN Manager, R&D Section Aegean Exporters’ Associations.
Module 2: Concepts and Principles Supporting change through Capacity Development.
Work Programme for the specific programme for research, technological development and demonstration "Integrating and strengthening the European Research.
TEPSIE is a research project under EU’s 7th framework programme 1 TEPSIE: the theoretical, empirical and policy foundations for building social innovation.
Funding Structures some ideas for designing innovative funding instruments Brigitte Hatvan.
Development and Transfer of Technologies UNFCCC Expert Workshop On Technology Information Technology Transfer Network and Matchmaking Systems: a LA & C.
EN Regional Policy EUROPEAN COMMISSION Innovation and the Structural Funds, Antwerp, 16 January 2007 Veronica Gaffey Innovative Actions Unit.
SSHRC Partnership and Partnership Development Grants Rosemary Ommer 1.
European Broadband Portal Phase II Application of the Blueprint for “bottom-up” broadband initiatives.
RTD-B.4 - Regions of Knowledge and Research Potential Regional Dimension of the 7th Framework Programme Regions of Knowledge Objectives and Activities.
SME Policy – Beyond the crises Steiermark/Croatian Regions Brussels, 28 May 2009 Daniel Gassmann, Head of Sector Services, Quality and Reporting Executive.
1 NEST New and emerging science and technology EUROPEAN COMMISSION - 6th Framework programme : Anticipating Scientific and Technological Needs.
1 Tools for Regional Development Thomas Wobben Representation of Saxony-Anhalt to the EU Boulevard Saint Michel 80 B-1040 Brussels
I S F nvesting in ecurity ood. UNCFD Programmatic Evolution in African LDCs Thematic integration/Capacity Time (years) PED and.
Innovation Policy IP INNO-FOREST, 28 August 2007, Sopron Ewald Rametsteiner.
The Role of Government in Building Absorptive Capacity Ken Warwick DTI Knowledge Economy Forum VI 17 April 2007.
European Universities: global challenges and regional contexts Frans van Vught Rector Magnificus University of Twente The Netherlands.
1 SMEs – a priority for FP6 Barend Verachtert DG Research Unit B3 - Research and SMEs.
Behavioural Additionality Luke Georghiou PREST, Manchester Business School, University of Manchester.
European policy perspectives on social experimentation Antoine SAINT-DENIS and Szilvia KALMAN, European Commission - DG Employment, social affairs and.
EU Projects – FP7 Workshop 6: EU Funding –What’s Next? Carolina Fernandes Innovation & Funding Manager GLE Group.
RAPIDE – Assessment of Action Plans Brigitte Hatvan KWI Consultants GmbH EUROPEAN UNION European Regional Development Fund.
Monitoring and Evaluation of Roma projects and policies, Brussels, 30/11/2010 Evaluating the European Social Fund support to Roma inclusion: processes,
Strengthening the Strategic Cooperation between the EU and Western Balkan Region in the field of ICT Research Key Barriers & Challenges in ICT Research:
E u r o p e a n C o m m i s s i o nCommunity Research Global Change and Ecosystems EU environmental research : Part B Policy objectives  Lisbon strategy.
1 EUROPEAN INNOVATION POLICY: Innovation policy: updating the Union’s approach in the context of the Lisbon strategy Thursday, 9 October 2003 Sofia, Bulgaria.
Enterprise Directorate General European Commission Kurt König Head of Unit “Communication and Awareness” Innovation Directorate
Evaluating Research Dynamics Using Network Analysis (in the context of EU funded R&D) Frank Cunningham DG Information Society and Media European Commission.
"The challenge for Territorial Cohesion 2014 – 2020: delivering results for EU citizens" Veronica Gaffey Acting Director EUROPEAN COMMISSION, DG for Regional.
Policies to Support Innovation Driven Growth 2 nd Operational Meeting of the PAM Panel on External Trade and Investments in the Mediterranean José Palacín.
Regional Policy support to research and innovation in the EU 2020 synergies with other policies smart specialisation Pierre GODIN Policy Analyst, EU Commission,
EUROPEAN NEIGHBOURHOOD AND PARTNERSHIP INSTRUMENT - ENPI CROSS-BORDER COOPERATION PROGRAMMES.
Role of government in making a link between expectations of business sector and the need for independence of research sector, and in fostering link between.
Design of foresight-based evaluation in Tekes Activities
Commitment 9: Set out EIT strategic agenda
Regional Research-driven clusters as a tool for strenghthening regional economic development: the FP7 Regions of Knowledge Programme and its synergies.
European External Investment Plan
Claire NAUWELAERS, independent policy expert
Regions for Economic Change – Tools for smart regions
COMMERCILIZATION ISSUES AND CHALLANGES
Flanders Innovation and Entrepeneurship
EU Social Impact Financing Initiatives
Design And Evaluation Of Innovation Policy: A Conceptual Framework
Presentation transcript:

Institute for the Promotion of Innovation By Science and Technology in Flanders

Instituut voor de Aanmoediging van Innovatie door Wetenschap en Technologie in Vlaanderen BEHAVIOURAL ADDITIONALITY Evaluation Beyond the Linear Innovation Model Research and the Knowledge Based Society – Measuring the Link European Conference on good practices in research evaluation and indicators Galway, May 24 th 2004 Jan Larosse, IWT-Flanders

home > sitemap > Behavioural Additionality 3 Behavioural Additionality : Overview 1.Why Behavioural Additionality? 2.R&D Subsidies in 'interactive mode' 3.BA in many dimensions 4.Traditional vs Behavioural Additionality 5.IWT practice: 'internalised' additionality 6.Challenges for evaluation methodoloy

home > sitemap > Behavioural Additionality 4 Behavioural Additionality: Why? 1. Need for 'systemic' evaluations - Different nature of knowledge as production factor - Social return= (Private Return + Spillovers)*Additionality -Additionality: role of governments -Behaviour catches interaction effects in innovation system 2. Need for ‘bridging’ concept: -Bridging different traditions of evaluation -Micro-foundation of systemic evaluation - Theory has to catch-up on policy practice

5 home > sitemap > deze pagina is voorbehouden voor grote schema's 5 home > sitemap > 5 Sector Cluster Partner Spillovers Project Design Firms International and local environment R&D Innov. Effect Input Publicity CriteriaMilestones Interaction Output : Projects succeeded Proces Research Infrastructure Intermediaries Framework Conditions Government Others Evaluation Impact Complementairy Impacts Budget Policy Objectives. Application ContractFollow-up INNOVATIONSYSTEMINNOVATIONSYSTEM IWTIWT CLIENTCLIENT

6 home > sitemap > 6 home > sitemap > 6 Project Design Firms R&D Innov. Effect Input Awareness Intake Criteria Milestones INTERACTION Output Projects accomplished Proces Government Budget Policy Objectives ApplicationContractFollow-up IWTIWT CLIENTCLIENT Evaluation Impact

home > sitemap > Behavioural Additionality 7 7 home > sitemap > Behavioural Additionality in many dimensions

home > sitemap > Behavioural Additionality 8 Traditional Additionality vs Behavioural Additionality 1.Linear model: Input Add. proxy for innovation outcome 2.Behaviour of applicants as 'black box‘ 3.Allocation behaviour as sufficient theoretical foundation) 4.'Optimality' of allocations as reference 1.Non-linear model Interactivity key to innovation performance 2.Behaviour of applicants is focus 3.Different kinds of behaviour (markets, hierarchies, networks) in innovation system 4.‘Real world’ as reference

home > sitemap > Behavioural Additionality 9 Traditional Additionality vs Behavioural Additionality 6. Focus on evalution of impact on the firm 7. Evaluation of single instruments 8. Impact assessment is main challenge 9. Problem of counterfactual analysis (finding identical control groups) 6. Shift to evaluation of spillovers to the system 7. Evaluation of complementarity of instruments (leverage) 8. Policy learning is main challenge (improving policy design) 9. Problem of comparative analysis (similar situations, never alike)

home > sitemap > Behavioural Additionality 10 Traditional Additionality vs Behavioural Additionality 10. Money transfer is central : Redistributive role of government Additionality versus ‘crowding out’ = negative connotation 10. Interaction is central: Catalyser role of government Additionality as ‘value added’ = positive connotation

home > sitemap > Behavioural Additionality 11 home > sitemap > IWT Bottom-up R&D Stimulation Instrument Additionality? TargetObjectiveMotivationIncentiveValue-Add Basic researchMoreUnder- investment (uncertainty) 50% (vs 25%) Portfolio (Programme financing Eureka (Internat Co-op) MoreCoordination cost + 10%EU Contact Point NetworkingMoreCoordination cost + 10%Platforms (Thematic Clusters) SMEMoreBarriers+ 10%Innovation trajectory

home > sitemap > Behavioural Additionality 12 home > sitemap > IWT Bottom-up R&D Stimulation Instrument Additionality? TargetObjectiveMotivationIncentiveValue-Add SME Doubling of SME applications Specific needs (Feasibility Studies) Specific costs (80%) Capabilities (Innovation Management) Sustainable Techn.Dev. Share in IWT portfolio above 16% Negative Externalities Priority arrangement + 10% Combination of instruments (consistency in time) Start-upsAccess to capital market (near- capital) Capital market failure Subordinated loans (up to 75%) Support VC Capital (missing link)

home > sitemap > Behavioural Additionality 13 Evaluation of Effectiveness with BA : Beyond the Linear Innovation Model 1. Traditional evaluation (linear model) - Innovaton performance = mechanical result (output follows input) - Market failure : government can correct underinvestment by innovating firms - Input additionality (proxy for output additionality) 2. Systemic evaluation (interactive model) - Innovation performance = result of interaction (mutual adaptation) - Systemic failures : government as a co-actor - Behavioural additionality (micro-foundation for systemic evaluation of role government)

home > sitemap > Behavioural Additionality 14 Evaluation of Effectiveness with BA : Policy Learning 1.Is Additionality (still) a useful concept? - ‘making the difference’! - learning versus optimality 2.What adaptations are needed to evaluation methodologies? - complexity as a solution? - comparative vs counterfactual method? 3.How to use the evaluation of BA in policy learning - include behaviour of agencies! - policy mix is implied!

home > sitemap > Behavioural Additionality 15 Evaluation of Effectiveness with BA : Taking it Further 1. Research Agenda - Conceptual clarification - Measurement as occasion for learning (not only legitimising) - Comparative research as (international) policy learning 2. How to organise learning - Communities of practice of evaluators - Communication with policy makers 3. Integration in broader agenda’s - Oecd-TIP / TAFTIE / EU

Bischoffsheimlaan 25 B-1000 Brussels Tel.: +32 (0) Fax.: +32 (0) Institute for the Promotion of Innovation By Science and Technology in Flanders