Barbara F. Schloman, Ph.D., TRAILS Project Director Julie A. Gedeon, Ph.D., TRAILS Assessment Coordinator Kent State University Libraries and Media Services.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Big6, Information Literacy, Technology and Content Standards ALL TOGETHER Brenda Gehm, Media Specialist David Hogan, 5 th Grade Teacher Monroe Local School.
Advertisements

Goals-Based Evaluation (GBE)
A Guide to Implementation
STAFF DEVELOPMENT FOCUSING ON TEAM BUILDING & CONFLICT MANAGEMENT Teresa E. Simpson EDLD: 5345 Human Resource Development – Fall 2008.
Minnesota’s Professional Development Plan to Prepare for the 2014 GED Test Amy Vickers, Minneapolis Adult Education Astrid Liden, Minnesota Department.
Ken Burhanna Mary Lee Jensen Barbara Schloman Mixing It Up: Using a Blend of Projects to Create a College Transition Program Ken Burhanna Mary Lee Jensen.
Measuring Information Literacy from Third Grader to College Senior Carolyn Radcliff, M.L.S., SAILS Project Director Julie Gedeon, Ph.D., TRAILS Assessment.
Bill Zannini Business Programs Coordinator October 27, 2008.
Minnesota Manual of Accommodations for Students with Disabilities Training Guide
Assessing Information Literacy Skills for Targeted Instruction
Barbara F. Schloman Libraries & Media Services Profiling Students’ Understanding: Using TRAILS to Assess 9 th Grade Information.
Answer the questions on the 2 flipcharts by using the appropriate sticker for your type of institution.  Red = Public university/college  Blue = Private.
Schoolwide Planning, Part III: Strategic Action Planning
Minnesota Manual of Accommodations for Students with Disabilities Training Guide
Why you need to know your school librarian Jenny CorradoMichelle Melencio Nan Ropelewski November 6, 2012.
Designing and Implementing An Effective Schoolwide Program
Materials developed in collaboration with the Office of English Language Learners, New York City Department of Education RTI Model for ELL Academic SuccessLesaux,
Elementary Science Bellringers
Connecting Data to Improve Instructional Outcomes A presentation to the 25th Annual STATS-DC 2012 Data Conference by DeDe Conner Kentucky Department of.
Milwaukee Partnership Academy An Urban P-16 Council for Quality Teaching and Learning.
Strategic Priorities for Taking Charge of our Future.
Developing a programme of information literacy. Strategy Will you work at an institutional level? Will you work at a course level? Will you work at a.
Student Learning Objectives The SLO Process Student Learning Objectives Training Series Module 3 of 3.
Julie Gedeon, Coordinator of Assessment Barbara Schloman, Project Director Libraries and Media Services Profiling Students’ Understanding: Using TRAILS.
Technology Leadership
The Required Library Component: Assessing First-Year Teaching in the Small Academic Library Susan von Daum Tholl, PhD, Director Diane Zydlewski, Head of.
GTEP Resource Manual Training 2 The Education Trust Study (1998) Katie Haycock “However important demographic variables may appear in their association.
Assistant Principal Meeting August 28, :00am to 12:00pm.
PARENT COORDINATOR INFORMATION SESSION PARENT ACCOUNTABILITY Wednesday, July 20, 2011 Madelene Chan, Supt. D24 Danielle DiMango, Supt. D25.
Kindergarten Individual Development Survey (KIDS) District 97 pilot involvement December 11, 2012.
An Orientation of the Surveys of the Enacted Curriculum Ohio ELL Project Carolyn Karatzas Technical Assistance Provider SEC ELL Grant.
School Improvement Planning Today’s Session Review the purpose of SI planning Review the components of SI plans Discuss changes to SI planning.
Who Are We? CB Sellen What We Are 4 Four elementary districts 4 One regional high school district 4 Five boards of education 4 Three district economic.
KEDC MEETING OCTOBER 21, 2010 KCAS and CASL: Framework for Deconstructing Standards 1.
SASIT Thomas E. Gluck, Acting Secretary of Education Amy Morton, Deputy Secretary, Office of Elementary and Secondary Education Ed Vollbrecht, Ph.D., Director,
Usability, the User Experience & Interface Design: The Role of Reference July 30, 2013.
Common Core State Standards: Supporting Implementation and Moving to Sustainability Based on ASCD’s Fulfilling the Promise of the Common Core State Standards:
TECHNOLOGY USE PLAN INFORMATIONAL LETTER: 7 POLICY CODE: IJND Technology Planning Guidelines July 26, 2002.
Using the National Institute for Literacy’s Discussion Lists as Professional Development Jackie Taylor, Moderator, Adult Literacy Professional Development.
BACK TO SCHOOL Welcome Back! Evaluation Task Force Findings.
Massachusetts Tiered System of Supports State Personnel Development Grant National Meeting Fall 2014 Madeline Levine
Jennifer Schwelik, MEd, TRAILS Project Manager, KSU Paula Baco, MLS, Trumbull Career and Technical Center Using TRAILS: (Tools for Real-Time Assessment.
RSU #4 Library Media Program Preparing Students for the 21st Century.
Virginia State University Summer Data Institute: Digging into Data to Identify the Learner-Centered Problem Presented by: Justina O. Osa, Ed.D.
The Liaison Librarian Program – Meeting Faculty Needs? Daphne Flanagan, AUS University Librarian, Alanna Ross, AUS Associate University.
Assessing Information Literacy with SAILS Juliet Rumble Reference & Instruction Librarian Auburn University.
Fidelity of Implementation A tool designed to provide descriptions of facets of a coherent whole school literacy initiative. A tool designed to provide.
Minnesota Manual of Accommodations for Students with Disabilities Training January 2010.
 “I have to teach the same information skills each year because students do not learn them.”  “I don’t have time to give tests so I do not assess student.
Jennifer Schwelik, MEd, WVIZ/PBS ideastream® TRAILS Project Manager Cool New (Free) Tools to Assess Information Literacy OELMA Conference October, 2010.
North Carolina MSP Data Collection Center. Primary Purposes To create a database application containing common information for all MSP’s across NC To.
Wisconsin Administrative Code PI 34 1 Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction - Elizabeth Burmaster, State Superintendent Support from a Professional.
Using Student Assessment Data in Your Teacher Observation and Feedback Process Renee Ringold & Eileen Weber Minnesota Assessment Conference August 5, 2015.
Jennifer Schwelik, MEd, TRAILS Project Manager, KSU Jennifer Flaherty, MLS, Beachwood High School Librarian Paula Baco, MLS, Trumbull County Career Center.
1 Using DLESE: Finding Resources to Enhance Teaching Shelley Olds Holly Devaul 11 July 2004.
How can I use a digital library to support my teaching? Find good resources to enhance existing curriculum  Search special collections aimed at your interests.
NGSS Resources Facilitator Notes:
Arts & Communication Workshop
6 Technology, Digital Media, and Curriculum Integration
BEST PRACTICES IN LIBRARY INSTRUCTION FORUM November 7, 2007
T2C – Lesson Plans.
Empowering Effective Implementation of Evidence-Based Practices
Gary Carlin, CFN 603 September, 2012
Finding Great Resources on the Internet
CURRICULUM & INSTRUCTION
Introduction Introduction
Annual Title I Meeting and Benefits of Parent and Family Engagement
MAP-IT: A Model for Implementing Healthy People 2020
Collaborating with the media specialist
Information Literacy: What is it and Why Should I Care?
Presentation transcript:

Barbara F. Schloman, Ph.D., TRAILS Project Director Julie A. Gedeon, Ph.D., TRAILS Assessment Coordinator Kent State University Libraries and Media Services Using Standardized Assessment to Guide Instruction and Leverage Collaboration AASL Fall Forum October 18, 2008

1.What is TRAILS 2.Use to date 3.Exploring how it might serve you Providing an Introduction

TRAILS is: Tool to measure information literacy competencies Assessments based on 6 th and 9 th grade standards Freely available on the Web A project of the Institute for Library & Information Literacy Education (ILILE) funded through the Institute of Museum and Library Services (IMLS) and the U.S. Department of Education. What is TRAILS?

Goal: To develop a tool to assist library media specialists in measuring the information literacy competencies of students. Specific objectives: –Standards-based –Available on the Web at no cost –Easy to administer –Insure privacy –Report outcomes by student and by class TRAILS

TRAILS Development Process 1. Standards reviewed for information literacy: –Ohio Academic Content Standards: Identified all Ohio standards, benchmarks, indicators that relate to information literacy at the 6 th /9 th grade level. –AASL Information Power: Reviewed standards and indicators.

Information Literacy Categories 2. Standards categorized into five measurable information literacy categories: Develop topic Identify potential sources Develop, use, and revise search strategies Evaluate sources and information Recognize how to use information responsibly, ethically, and legally

Developing Assessment Items 3. Priority competencies determined. Within each category the information literacy skills common across the standards were identified and prioritized. 4. Objectives developed. Student learning objectives were developed to address the priority competency areas. 5. Items written. Items were then written to address the objectives for each category.

Testing and Revising Items 6. Items field tested by library media specialists and then revised. –Are the items understandable as written? –Are they measuring what was intended? TRAILS-9: Field testing of items by volunteer library media specialists working with a small number of 9 th grade students. TRAILS-6: Sample assessments being administered to 6 th grade students in over 130 schools nationwide during October 2007.

Available Assessments TRAILS-9: Two 30-item general assessments covering all five of the information literacy categories. Two sets of 10-item assessments for each of the five categories. TRAILS-6: Two 25-item general assessments covering all five of the information literacy categories.

How TRAILS Works Sign up for an account Create a class session –Choose desired assessment –Consider use of student codes Administer assessment Close session and generate reports –Class report by info literacy category –Student report by code

View Assessment

TRAILS Use TRAILS-9 live in January 2006 TRAILS-6 live in January 2008 In administered to almost 8,500 (6 th ) and 49,400 (9 th ) students Geographic distribution: All 50 states plus the District of Columbia and the Virgin Islands; over 30 countries To date administered to over 100,000 students

How TRAILS has been used to integrate information literacy Collaboration with classroom teachers for a specific class With a particular grade level To target librarian instruction To share results with administration As part of an overall school improvement plan As a professional development opportunity For personal development

“I am an Illinois high school media specialist and have been using TRAILS with my ninth grade students. Thank you for your work. TRAILS provides an objective evaluation of information skills that would otherwise be difficult to achieve by sole practitioners.” [Illinois] “I have been using a couple of the #2 assessments with Seniors taking a Research Paper class. They have been extremely helpful to reinforce specific information literacy skills for which they have received instruction.” [Minnesota] “We are using Trails 9 to gather baseline assessments. I'm setting up logins by grade level but we are not tracking each student by name. Our goal is to find out where our students currently stand with competencies.” [New York] Users Report

Benchmarking Data Benchmarks now possible due to level of use –For 9 th grade General Assessments –Reporting for total dataset, plus for some high usage states Reported by TRAILS category

Ranked Category% Correct 5. Recognize how to use info responsibly, ethically, legally 72.6% 2. Identify potential sources68.7% 3. Develop, use, revise search strategies 61.4% 1. Develop topic59.8% 4. Evaluate sources and info44.1% Performance on 9th Grade General Assessment I

In the breakout sessions, participants will: Develop a better understanding of TRAILS options and the potential role of assessment in furthering an information literacy program Collaborate with participants in similar settings to define challenges, barriers, opportunities Set information literacy goals utilizing assessment Develop an implementation plan with timeline and resources needed