The Apartment Building Rockville, MD Penn State AE Senior Capstone Project Brian Bernens | Construction Option Advisor: Dr. Rob Leicht Courtesy DAVIS.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Riverview Heights Darren K. Howard Structural Option Architectural Engineering Spring Thesis 2005 Advisor: Dr. Ali Memari.
Advertisements

BIMception Proposal Thomas Villacampa Alexander Stough Christopher Russell Stephen Pfund.
A Medical Office Building For The Primary Health Network Daniel Goff I Structural Option Dr. Thomas Boothby l Faculty Advisor Sharon, Pennsylvania Source:
Penn State Hershey Medical Center Children’s Hospital Hershey, Pennsylvania Matthew Vandersall Structural Option AE Senior Thesis Dr. Richard Behr.
The University Sciences Building Northeast, USA Final Presentation Chris Dunlay Structural Option Dr. Boothby.
Penn State Architectural Engineering Senior Capstone Project Ramy Labna | Construction Option | Advisor: Prof Ray Sowers 2B + G + M + 7 Mansoura Development.
Kyle Goodyear BAE in Construction Management Pennsylvania State University Senior Thesis Presentation April 12, 2010.
University Health Building Thesis Final Presentation
Pennsylvania College Of Technology Dauphin Hall Williamsport, Pennsylvania Aubert Ndjolba Structural Option AE Senior Thesis Thesis Advisor: Dr.
2001 Winter Presentation. Site Location Site View.
Frank Burke Structural Option Sallie Mae HQ Reston, VA.
Courtesy of Holbert Apple Associates Georgia Avenue Building Introduction Statistics Gravity System Lateral System Problem Statement & Solution.
Daniel Suter Construction Management AE Senior Thesis Presentation The Pennsylvania State University Unknown Data Center Somewhere, USA
Christopher Havens Spring 2012 Dr. Chimay Anumba – CM Advisor Construction Management Penn State AE Senior Capstone Project The Northeastern Pennsylvania.
360 State Street New Haven  CT  Structural | Sabrina Duk | T. Boothby.
Northeast Hospital Expansion Penn State AE Senior Thesis Project Joshua Miller | Construction Management Option Faculty Advisor | Craig Dubler Courtesy.
George Read Hall The University of Delaware
Rockville Metro Plaza II Rockville Pike John Vais | Structural Option PSU AE Senior Thesis 2014 Faculty Advisor – Dr. Hanagan Rockville, Maryland
Senior Thesis Structural Option Ryan Friis Spring Morgan St. Chicago, IL 111 Morgan St. Chicago, IL Ryan Friis Structural Option.
All Hakuna Resort photos in courtesy of LMN Development LLC Young Jeon Structural Option Advisor: Heather Sustersic Hakuna Resort AE Senior Thesis 2015.
Introduction Connected to existing Benton Hall via skywalk Size: 103,154 SF above grade on 4 levels 82,661 SF below grade parking on 3 levels Cost: $23,651,159.
The Office Building Washington, D.C. Penn State Architectural Engineering Senior Capstone Project Brett Miller | Construction Option Advisor: Dr. Ed Gannon.
GARY NEWMAN STRUCTURES OPTION ADVISOR: DR. HANAGAN SENIOR THESIS PRESENTATION SPRING 2008.
Council Rock High School South Seth Glinski Construction Management Spring 2003 Thesis.
AMERICAN EAGLE OUTFITTERS Quantum II Corporate Headquarters Michael Sandretto Spring – 2007 Structural Option.
Charles Miller Construction Option Spring Dr. Riley WestEnd25.
BRYAN DARRIN SENIOR THESIS PRESENTATION MILLENNIUM HALL DREXEL CAMPUS PHILADELPHIA, PA.
Final Thesis Presentation Washingtonian Center Lee ResslerApril 15, 2008 Faculty Advisor: Dr. Memari.
SEAN BEVILLE STRUCTURAL OPTION ADVISOR: PROF. BOOTHBY APRIL 13, 2009 TEMECULA MEDICAL CENTER “STRUCTURAL SYSTEM OPTIMIZATION” THE DEPARTMENT OF ARCHITECTURAL.
Caitlin Ferrell Structural Option Senior Thesis Presentation Spring 2006 The Erie Convention Center and Sheraton Hotel Erie, Pennsylvania Architectural.
Nicole C. Drabousky Pennsylvania State University Architectural Engineering Structural Option Spring 2006 Senior Thesis Presentation.
Architectural Engineering Construction Management Senior Thesis April 11 th, 2011 Consultant: Dr. Riley Architectural Engineering Spring 2011 – Senior.
Greg Blatt Penn State Architectural Engineering Construction Management April 12, 2004.
The Towers at the City College of New York Robin Scaramastro - Structural Option - Advisor: Dr. Memari Senior Thesis Final Presentation – Spring 2007.
URS – ARENA DISTRICT OFFICE BUILDING DAVID LEE STRUCTURAL OPTION.
Third Avenue NY, New York Michelle L. Mentzer Structural Option.
Waynesburg Central High School Waynesburg, Pennsylvania Robert Owen Brennan The Pennsylvania State University Construction Management.
Whiteland Village Mary Longenecker Structural Option Senior Thesis August 7, 2007.
Welcome to Daniel Painter’s Architectural Engineering Senior Thesis Presentation of Two Freedom Square April 16, 2003 Pennsylvania State University.
Government Office Center Mid-Atlantic U.S. Penn State AE Senior Thesis Project Alexander Ward | Construction Management James Faust | CM Advisor.
Senior Thesis 2006 The Pennsylvania State University
Jonathan Goodroad Structural Option 2005 Thesis Penn State AE Delaware State University Administration and Student Services Building.
T IMOTHY H P ARK – S TRUCTURAL O PTION. Building Summary Current Systems Proposal Description Gravity Lateral Other Structural Factors Breadth Options.
Todd McCaskey Spring 2006 Senior Thesis Construction Management Penn State University Todd McCaskey’s Senior Thesis The Pennsylvania State University Architectural.
Andrew Diehl The Pennsylvania State University Architectural Engineering Department Structural Option 5 th Year Senior Thesis Project “The Comparison of.
Brad Oliver – Structural Option Advisor – Professor Memari.
Craig Owsiany Architectural Engineering – Construction Management STEM Building Hagerstown Community College Hagerstown, Maryland Science Technology.
151 First Side William J. Buchko introduction overview proposal structural depth acoustics breadth cm breadth conclusions 151 First Side Pittsburgh, PA.
Computer Associates International, Regional Office
The Mary J. Drexel Home Assisted Living Addition Bala Cynwyd, PA Penn State AE Senior Capstone Project Gjon Tomaj – Construction Management Option Advisor:
Park Potomac Office Building “E” Kyle Wagner l Structural Option AE Senior Thesis l Spring 2010 Faculty Consultant l Prof. Kevin Parfitt.
Eastern USA University Academic Center Alexander AltemoseIStructural Option.
Presented by Cameron Mikkelson April 16, 2014 Silverado Senior Living Brookfield, WI Analysis Topics On-site Prefabrication of Interior Wall Panels Installation.
SteelStacks Performing Arts Center Sarah Bednarcik | Structural BAE/MAE Faculty Advisors: Dr. Linda Hanagan & Dr. Ali Memari Spring Thesis 2013Bethlehem,
Wardman West Residential Penn State AE Senior Thesis Project Kevin Kroener │Construction Option Faculty Advisor │Ray Sowers.
Brandon mckee ae senior thesis 2007 construction management penn state university ambridge area high school Ambridge Area High School ambridge, pennsylvania.
Biobehavioral Health Building The Pennsylvania State University Daniel Bodde Structural Option Advisor – Heather Sustersic.
THE NORTHBROOK CORPORATE CENTER Redesign of the Lateral Load Resisting System.
PENN STATE AE SENIOR CAPSTONE PROJECT Adam Lasher │Construction Management Dr. Robert Leicht Susquehanna Health Patient Tower Expansion Williamsport, PA.
ANTONIO DESANTIS VERNE STRUCTURAL OPTION ADVISOR: PROF. PARFITT APRIL 14, 2008 BRIDGESIDE POINT II PITTSBURGH, PA “BUILDING SYSTEM OPTIMIZATION” THE DEPARTMENT.
Manoa Elementary School Amanda Cronauer Faculty Advisor: Dr. William Bahnfleth 14 April 2010.
North Hall | American University| Washington D.C.
Pearl Condominiums Philadelphia, PA
CONDOMINIUM TOWER & PARKING
Advisor: Professor M. Kevin Parfitt
Introduction James W. & Frances G. McGlothlin Medical Education Center
Outline Introduction Structural Redesign Gravity System
Project Background Type of building: Mixed-use residential building
North Shore at Canton The Pennsylvania State University
Mitre III Building McLean VA Debra Schroeder Structural Option.
Presentation transcript:

The Apartment Building Rockville, MD Penn State AE Senior Capstone Project Brian Bernens | Construction Option Advisor: Dr. Rob Leicht Courtesy DAVIS

I.INTRODUCTION I.Project Background II.Analyses Overview and Focus II.ANALYSIS 1 – SITE LOGISTICS ALTERATIONS I.Existing Means, Methods, and Site Logistics II.Proposed Logistics III.Schedule Impacts IV.Cost Impacts III.ANALYSIS 3 – WOOD STRUCTURE MODIFICATION I.Existing Structure II.Infinity System Overview III.Structural Breadth IV.Schedule and Cost Impacts IV.ANALYSIS 4 – LSM OF INTERIOR TRADES I.Existing Sequencing II.Implementation III.Schedule Impacts V.RESULTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS VI.ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The Apartment Building Rockville, MD Introduction Brian Bernens Construction Option Project Background LocationRockville, MD ContractorJames G. Davis Construction ArchitectThe Preston Partnership Building Type Retail, Multi-Family Residential, Parking Garage Project Size310,800 GSF Number of Stories5 (4 residential) Project Schedule August 1, 2013 – May 18, 2015 Project Cost$34M BLDG 300 BLDG 100 BLDG 200 Courtesy DAVIS

I.INTRODUCTION I.Project Background II.Analyses Overview and Focus II.ANALYSIS 1 – SITE LOGISTICS ALTERATIONS I.Existing Means, Methods, and Site Logistics II.Proposed Logistics III.Schedule Impacts IV.Cost Impacts III.ANALYSIS 3 – WOOD STRUCTURE MODIFICATION I.Existing Structure II.Infinity System Overview III.Structural Breadth IV.Schedule and Cost Impacts IV.ANALYSIS 4 – LSM OF INTERIOR TRADES I.Existing Sequencing II.Implementation III.Schedule Impacts V.RESULTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS VI.ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The Apartment Building Rockville, MD Introduction Brian Bernens Construction Option Analysis 1 – Site Logistics Alterations Analysis 3 – Wood Structure Modification Analysis 4 – Linear Scheduling Method of Interior Trades Breadth 1 – Structural Breadth 2 – Acoustics Courtesy DAVIS Courtesy of AE 476 Courtesy of Morrow Cranes Courtesy of Infinity Structures

I.INTRODUCTION I.Project Background II.Analyses Overview and Focus II.ANALYSIS 1 – SITE LOGISTICS ALTERATIONS I.Existing Means, Methods, and Site Logistics II.Proposed Logistics III.Schedule Impacts IV.Cost Impacts III.ANALYSIS 3 – WOOD STRUCTURE MODIFICATION I.Existing Structure II.Infinity System Overview III.Structural Breadth IV.Schedule and Cost Impacts IV.ANALYSIS 4 – LSM OF INTERIOR TRADES I.Existing Sequencing II.Implementation III.Schedule Impacts V.RESULTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS VI.ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The Apartment Building Rockville, MD Introduction Brian Bernens Construction Option Thesis Focus 456 work-day schedule 206 apartments for rent Courtesy of DAVIS Courtesy DAVIS

I.INTRODUCTION I.Project Background II.Analyses Overview and Focus II.ANALYSIS 1 – SITE LOGISTICS ALTERATIONS I.Existing Means, Methods, and Site Logistics II.Proposed Logistics III.Schedule Impacts IV.Cost Impacts III.ANALYSIS 3 – WOOD STRUCTURE MODIFICATION I.Existing Structure II.Infinity System Overview III.Structural Breadth IV.Schedule and Cost Impacts IV.ANALYSIS 4 – LSM OF INTERIOR TRADES I.Existing Sequencing II.Implementation III.Schedule Impacts V.RESULTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS VI.ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The Apartment Building Rockville, MD Analysis 1 – Site Logistics Alterations Brian Bernens Construction Option Problem Identification The current site is congested and the current methods for assisting concrete and framing placement aren’t the most effective methods Courtesy DAVIS

I.INTRODUCTION I.Project Background II.Analyses Overview and Focus II.ANALYSIS 1 – SITE LOGISTICS ALTERATIONS I.Existing Means, Methods, and Site Logistics II.Proposed Logistics III.Schedule Impacts IV.Cost Impacts III.ANALYSIS 3 – WOOD STRUCTURE MODIFICATION I.Existing Structure II.Infinity System Overview III.Structural Breadth IV.Schedule and Cost Impacts IV.ANALYSIS 4 – LSM OF INTERIOR TRADES I.Existing Sequencing II.Implementation III.Schedule Impacts V.RESULTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS VI.ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The Apartment Building Rockville, MD Analysis 1 – Site Logistics Alterations Brian Bernens Construction Option Existing Methods 150 ton crawler crane 5,000 lb. capacity forklift Courtesy of DAVIS Courtesy DAVIS

I.INTRODUCTION I.Project Background II.Analyses Overview and Focus II.ANALYSIS 1 – SITE LOGISTICS ALTERATIONS I.Existing Means, Methods, and Site Logistics II.Proposed Logistics III.Schedule Impacts IV.Cost Impacts III.ANALYSIS 3 – WOOD STRUCTURE MODIFICATION I.Existing Structure II.Infinity System Overview III.Structural Breadth IV.Schedule and Cost Impacts IV.ANALYSIS 4 – LSM OF INTERIOR TRADES I.Existing Sequencing II.Implementation III.Schedule Impacts V.RESULTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS VI.ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The Apartment Building Rockville, MD Analysis 1 – Site Logistics Alterations Brian Bernens Construction Option Existing Methods & Site Logistics 150 ton crawler crane 5,000 lb. capacity forklift Courtesy of DAVIS Courtesy DAVIS

I.INTRODUCTION I.Project Background II.Analyses Overview and Focus II.ANALYSIS 1 – SITE LOGISTICS ALTERATIONS I.Existing Means, Methods, and Site Logistics II.Proposed Logistics III.Schedule Impacts IV.Cost Impacts III.ANALYSIS 3 – WOOD STRUCTURE MODIFICATION I.Existing Structure II.Infinity System Overview III.Structural Breadth IV.Schedule and Cost Impacts IV.ANALYSIS 4 – LSM OF INTERIOR TRADES I.Existing Sequencing II.Implementation III.Schedule Impacts V.RESULTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS VI.ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The Apartment Building Rockville, MD Analysis 1 – Site Logistics Alterations Brian Bernens Construction Option Existing Methods & Site Logistics 150 ton crawler crane 5,000 lb. capacity forklift Courtesy of DAVIS Courtesy DAVIS

I.INTRODUCTION I.Project Background II.Analyses Overview and Focus II.ANALYSIS 1 – SITE LOGISTICS ALTERATIONS I.Existing Means, Methods, and Site Logistics II.Proposed Logistics III.Schedule Impacts IV.Cost Impacts III.ANALYSIS 3 – WOOD STRUCTURE MODIFICATION I.Existing Structure II.Infinity System Overview III.Structural Breadth IV.Schedule and Cost Impacts IV.ANALYSIS 4 – LSM OF INTERIOR TRADES I.Existing Sequencing II.Implementation III.Schedule Impacts V.RESULTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS VI.ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The Apartment Building Rockville, MD Analysis 1 – Site Logistics Alterations Brian Bernens Construction Option Liebherr 290 HC Max Jib Length230’ Capacity6,610 lbs. Max Hook Height229’ Max Capacity22,045 86’ Self Weight183 kips Soil Bearing Pressure5 ksf Footing Size18’ x 18’ x 3’ Courtesy DAVIS

I.INTRODUCTION I.Project Background II.Analyses Overview and Focus II.ANALYSIS 1 – SITE LOGISTICS ALTERATIONS I.Existing Means, Methods, and Site Logistics II.Proposed Logistics III.Schedule Impacts IV.Cost Impacts III.ANALYSIS 3 – WOOD STRUCTURE MODIFICATION I.Existing Structure II.Infinity System Overview III.Structural Breadth IV.Schedule and Cost Impacts IV.ANALYSIS 4 – LSM OF INTERIOR TRADES I.Existing Sequencing II.Implementation III.Schedule Impacts V.RESULTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS VI.ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The Apartment Building Rockville, MD Analysis 1 – Site Logistics Alterations Brian Bernens Construction Option New Project Duration: 446 work days Savings: 11 work days, 17 days ORIGINAL SCHEDULENEW SCHEDULE ActivityDuration (days)StartFinishActivityDuration (days)StartFinish Notice to Proceed012/16/2013-Notice to Proceed012/16/2013- Mobilization1012/16/201312/30/2013Mobilization1012/16/201312/30/2013 Demolition2612/31/20132/5/2014Demolition2612/31/20132/5/2014 Excavation and Utilities341/20/20143/12/2014Excavation and Utilities341/20/20143/12/2014 Precast Garage Erection743/13/20146/26/2014Precast Garage Erection743/13/20146/26/2014 Building 100 Concrete685/2/20148/6/2014Building 100 Concrete575/2/20147/22/2014 Building 200 Concrete547/3/20149/17/2014Building 200 Concrete446/27/20148/28/2014 Project Up to Podium0-8/27/2014Project Up to Podium0-8/7/ Framing617/1/20149/23/ Framing466/20/20148/25/ Framing688/12/201411/13/ Framing547/30/201410/13/2014 Structures Complete to Roof0-11/7/2014Structures Complete to Roof0-10/13/2014 Elevators889/10/20141/15/2015Elevators888/12/201411/20/2014 Facades1238/8/20142/2/2015Facades1237/23/20141/15/2015 All Buildings Watertight0-2/2/2015All Buildings Watertight0-1/15/2015 MEP Rough Ins938/13/201412/19/2014MEP Rough Ins937/29/201412/4/2014 Finishes1549/26/20145/5/2015Finishes1549/11/20144/20/2015 Turnover and Inspections602/24/20155/18/2015Turnover and Inspections602/9/20155/1/2015 Project Completion0-5/18/2015Project Completion0-5/1/2015 Total Project4578/1/20135/18/2015Total Project4468/1/20135/1/2015 Courtesy DAVIS

I.INTRODUCTION I.Project Background II.Analyses Overview and Focus II.ANALYSIS 1 – SITE LOGISTICS ALTERATIONS I.Existing Means, Methods, and Site Logistics II.Proposed Logistics III.Schedule Impacts IV.Cost Impacts III.ANALYSIS 3 – WOOD STRUCTURE MODIFICATION I.Existing Structure II.Infinity System Overview III.Structural Breadth IV.Schedule and Cost Impacts IV.ANALYSIS 4 – LSM OF INTERIOR TRADES I.Existing Sequencing II.Implementation III.Schedule Impacts V.RESULTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS VI.ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The Apartment Building Rockville, MD Analysis 1 – Site Logistics Alterations Brian Bernens Construction Option Equipment/Labor Savings: $212,945 General Conditions Savings: $21,070 Foundation Cost: $22,070 Courtesy DAVIS

I.INTRODUCTION I.Project Background II.Analyses Overview and Focus II.ANALYSIS 1 – SITE LOGISTICS ALTERATIONS I.Existing Means, Methods, and Site Logistics II.Proposed Logistics III.Schedule Impacts IV.Cost Impacts III.ANALYSIS 3 – WOOD STRUCTURE MODIFICATION I.Existing Structure II.Infinity System Overview III.Structural Breadth IV.Schedule and Cost Impacts IV.ANALYSIS 4 – LSM OF INTERIOR TRADES I.Existing Sequencing II.Implementation III.Schedule Impacts V.RESULTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS VI.ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The Apartment Building Rockville, MD Analysis 3 – Wood Structure Modification Brian Bernens Construction Option Opportunity While wood structures are popular in the industry right now, an alternate system called the Infinity System will be explored to understand the benefits versus the current wood structure Courtesy DAVIS

I.INTRODUCTION I.Project Background II.Analyses Overview and Focus II.ANALYSIS 1 – SITE LOGISTICS ALTERATIONS I.Existing Means, Methods, and Site Logistics II.Proposed Logistics III.Schedule Impacts IV.Cost Impacts III.ANALYSIS 3 – WOOD STRUCTURE MODIFICATION I.Existing Structure II.Infinity System Overview III.Structural Breadth IV.Schedule and Cost Impacts IV.ANALYSIS 4 – LSM OF INTERIOR TRADES I.Existing Sequencing II.Implementation III.Schedule Impacts V.RESULTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS VI.ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The Apartment Building Rockville, MD Analysis 3 – Wood Structure Modification Brian Bernens Construction Option Existing Residential StructureProposed Residential Structure Courtesy of Infinity Structures Courtesy of DAVIS Courtesy DAVIS

I.INTRODUCTION I.Project Background II.Analyses Overview and Focus II.ANALYSIS 1 – SITE LOGISTICS ALTERATIONS I.Existing Means, Methods, and Site Logistics II.Proposed Logistics III.Schedule Impacts IV.Cost Impacts III.ANALYSIS 3 – WOOD STRUCTURE MODIFICATION I.Existing Structure II.Infinity System Overview III.Structural Breadth IV.Schedule and Cost Impacts IV.ANALYSIS 4 – LSM OF INTERIOR TRADES I.Existing Sequencing II.Implementation III.Schedule Impacts V.RESULTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS VI.ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The Apartment Building Rockville, MD Analysis 3 – Wood Structure Modification Brian Bernens Construction Option Proposed Residential Structure Courtesy of Infinity Structures Infinity System Overview 22 gage composite metal deck (EPICORE MSR) WWF for shrinkage and temperature Regular weight 4,000 psi concrete slab Can span up to 27’ Prefabricated Load-Bearing Metal Stud Walls 3 5/8” or 6” galvanized studs 12”, 16”, or 24” o.c. Advantages No mold or rotting Faster installation due to prefabrication Higher quality of connections (welded) Higher UL rating Higher STC/IIC rating Larger floor-to-floor height Rigid diaphragm: better distribution of forces Courtesy DAVIS

I.INTRODUCTION I.Project Background II.Analyses Overview and Focus II.ANALYSIS 1 – SITE LOGISTICS ALTERATIONS I.Existing Means, Methods, and Site Logistics II.Proposed Logistics III.Schedule Impacts IV.Cost Impacts III.ANALYSIS 3 – WOOD STRUCTURE MODIFICATION I.Existing Structure II.Infinity System Overview III.Structural Breadth IV.Schedule and Cost Impacts IV.ANALYSIS 4 – LSM OF INTERIOR TRADES I.Existing Sequencing II.Implementation III.Schedule Impacts V.RESULTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS VI.ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The Apartment Building Rockville, MD Analysis 3 – Wood Structure Modification Brian Bernens Construction Option Structural Breadth Courtesy of Infinity Structures Courtesy DAVIS

I.INTRODUCTION I.Project Background II.Analyses Overview and Focus II.ANALYSIS 1 – SITE LOGISTICS ALTERATIONS I.Existing Means, Methods, and Site Logistics II.Proposed Logistics III.Schedule Impacts IV.Cost Impacts III.ANALYSIS 3 – WOOD STRUCTURE MODIFICATION I.Existing Structure II.Infinity System Overview III.Structural Breadth IV.Schedule and Cost Impacts IV.ANALYSIS 4 – LSM OF INTERIOR TRADES I.Existing Sequencing II.Implementation III.Schedule Impacts V.RESULTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS VI.ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The Apartment Building Rockville, MD Analysis 3 – Wood Structure Modification Brian Bernens Construction Option Unit Load Path Courtesy DAVIS

The Apartment Building Rockville, MD Analysis 3 – Wood Structure Modification Brian Bernens Construction Option I.INTRODUCTION I.Project Background II.Analyses Overview and Focus II.ANALYSIS 1 – SITE LOGISTICS ALTERATIONS I.Existing Means, Methods, and Site Logistics II.Proposed Logistics III.Schedule Impacts IV.Cost Impacts III.ANALYSIS 3 – WOOD STRUCTURE MODIFICATION I.Existing Structure II.Infinity System Overview III.Structural Breadth IV.Schedule and Cost Impacts IV.ANALYSIS 4 – LSM OF INTERIOR TRADES I.Existing Sequencing II.Implementation III.Schedule Impacts V.RESULTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS VI.ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Courtesy of Infinity Structures Infinity System Schedule 30 days each building Wood Structure Schedule 34 days each building Structural Cost Comparison Infinity System Cost Increase: $1,220,689 Courtesy DAVIS

I.INTRODUCTION I.Project Background II.Analyses Overview and Focus II.ANALYSIS 1 – SITE LOGISTICS ALTERATIONS I.Existing Means, Methods, and Site Logistics II.Proposed Logistics III.Schedule Impacts IV.Cost Impacts III.ANALYSIS 3 – WOOD STRUCTURE MODIFICATION I.Existing Structure II.Infinity System Overview III.Structural Breadth IV.Schedule and Cost Impacts IV.ANALYSIS 4 – LSM OF INTERIOR TRADES I.Existing Sequencing II.Implementation III.Schedule Impacts V.RESULTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS VI.ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The Apartment Building Rockville, MD Analysis 4 – LSM of Interior Trades Brian Bernens Construction Option Problem Identification Currently, the longest work breakdown structure is Finishes for both buildings. Finishes are also the last item before building turnover. Problem Identification CPM Schedules are not an accurate representation of production rates or actual rates. Courtesy DAVIS

I.INTRODUCTION I.Project Background II.Analyses Overview and Focus II.ANALYSIS 1 – SITE LOGISTICS ALTERATIONS I.Existing Means, Methods, and Site Logistics II.Proposed Logistics III.Schedule Impacts IV.Cost Impacts III.ANALYSIS 3 – WOOD STRUCTURE MODIFICATION I.Existing Structure II.Infinity System Overview III.Structural Breadth IV.Schedule and Cost Impacts IV.ANALYSIS 4 – LSM OF INTERIOR TRADES I.Existing Sequencing II.Implementation III.Schedule Impacts V.RESULTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS VI.ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The Apartment Building Rockville, MD Analysis 4 – LSM of Interior Trades Brian Bernens Construction Option Hang Drywall to Blinds Activities after are fixed 24 days Most activities have SS and/or FF dependencies, so they can be re- sequenced Better visualization Finish Activities per floor Focus Courtesy DAVIS

I.INTRODUCTION I.Project Background II.Analyses Overview and Focus II.ANALYSIS 1 – SITE LOGISTICS ALTERATIONS I.Existing Means, Methods, and Site Logistics II.Proposed Logistics III.Schedule Impacts IV.Cost Impacts III.ANALYSIS 3 – WOOD STRUCTURE MODIFICATION I.Existing Structure II.Infinity System Overview III.Structural Breadth IV.Schedule and Cost Impacts IV.ANALYSIS 4 – LSM OF INTERIOR TRADES I.Existing Sequencing II.Implementation III.Schedule Impacts V.RESULTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS VI.ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The Apartment Building Rockville, MD Analysis 4 – LSM of Interior Trades Brian Bernens Construction Option WORK FLOW New Sequence 27 apartments per floor 9 apartments per section Combined Activities Hang/Finish Drywall reduced to Hang Drywall; Finish included in Paint Sprinkler, Electrical, and Low Volt Trim Turn Water on to Units and Turn Gas on to Units Final Point Up and First Punchout New Finish Durations per section Courtesy DAVIS

I.INTRODUCTION I.Project Background II.Analyses Overview and Focus II.ANALYSIS 1 – SITE LOGISTICS ALTERATIONS I.Existing Means, Methods, and Site Logistics II.Proposed Logistics III.Schedule Impacts IV.Cost Impacts III.ANALYSIS 3 – WOOD STRUCTURE MODIFICATION I.Existing Structure II.Infinity System Overview III.Structural Breadth IV.Schedule and Cost Impacts IV.ANALYSIS 4 – LSM OF INTERIOR TRADES I.Existing Sequencing II.Implementation III.Schedule Impacts V.RESULTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS VI.ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The Apartment Building Rockville, MD Analysis 4 – LSM of Interior Trades Brian Bernens Construction Option New Finish Durations per section Courtesy DAVIS

I.INTRODUCTION I.Project Background II.Analyses Overview and Focus II.ANALYSIS 1 – SITE LOGISTICS ALTERATIONS I.Existing Means, Methods, and Site Logistics II.Proposed Logistics III.Schedule Impacts IV.Cost Impacts III.ANALYSIS 3 – WOOD STRUCTURE MODIFICATION I.Existing Structure II.Infinity System Overview III.Structural Breadth IV.Schedule and Cost Impacts IV.ANALYSIS 4 – LSM OF INTERIOR TRADES I.Existing Sequencing II.Implementation III.Schedule Impacts V.RESULTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS VI.ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The Apartment Building Rockville, MD Analysis 4 – LSM of Interior Trades Brian Bernens Construction Option Accelerating Trades Courtesy DAVIS

I.INTRODUCTION I.Project Background II.Analyses Overview and Focus II.ANALYSIS 1 – SITE LOGISTICS ALTERATIONS I.Existing Means, Methods, and Site Logistics II.Proposed Logistics III.Schedule Impacts IV.Cost Impacts III.ANALYSIS 3 – WOOD STRUCTURE MODIFICATION I.Existing Structure II.Infinity System Overview III.Structural Breadth IV.Schedule and Cost Impacts IV.ANALYSIS 4 – LSM OF INTERIOR TRADES I.Existing Sequencing II.Implementation III.Schedule Impacts V.RESULTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS VI.ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The Apartment Building Rockville, MD Analysis 4 – LSM of Interior Trades Brian Bernens Construction Option Accelerating Trades Courtesy DAVIS

I.INTRODUCTION I.Project Background II.Analyses Overview and Focus II.ANALYSIS 1 – SITE LOGISTICS ALTERATIONS I.Existing Means, Methods, and Site Logistics II.Proposed Logistics III.Schedule Impacts IV.Cost Impacts III.ANALYSIS 3 – WOOD STRUCTURE MODIFICATION I.Existing Structure II.Infinity System Overview III.Structural Breadth IV.Schedule and Cost Impacts IV.ANALYSIS 4 – LSM OF INTERIOR TRADES I.Existing Sequencing II.Implementation III.Schedule Impacts V.RESULTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS VI.ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The Apartment Building Rockville, MD Analysis 4 – LSM of Interior Trades Brian Bernens Construction Option 60 days of turnover Begin after finishes are complete Savings of 52 work days 74 days Project Completion March 6, 2015 Schedule Savings Courtesy DAVIS

I.INTRODUCTION I.Project Background II.Analyses Overview and Focus II.ANALYSIS 1 – SITE LOGISTICS ALTERATIONS I.Existing Means, Methods, and Site Logistics II.Proposed Logistics III.Schedule Impacts IV.Cost Impacts III.ANALYSIS 3 – WOOD STRUCTURE MODIFICATION I.Existing Structure II.Infinity System Overview III.Structural Breadth IV.Schedule and Cost Impacts IV.ANALYSIS 4 – LSM OF INTERIOR TRADES I.Existing Sequencing II.Implementation III.Schedule Impacts V.RESULTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS VI.ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The Apartment Building Rockville, MD Results and Recommendations Brian Bernens Construction Option Analysis 1 – Site Logistics Alterations Schedule Savings: 11 work days Cost Savings: $211,691 Recommended Analysis 3 – Wood Structure Modification Schedule Savings: 9 work days Cost Increase: $1,200,689 Recommended Analysis 4 – LSM of Interior Trades Schedule Savings: 52 work days Recommended Courtesy DAVIS

I.INTRODUCTION I.Project Background II.Analyses Overview and Focus II.ANALYSIS 1 – SITE LOGISTICS ALTERATIONS I.Existing Means, Methods, and Site Logistics II.Proposed Logistics III.Schedule Impacts IV.Cost Impacts III.ANALYSIS 3 – WOOD STRUCTURE MODIFICATION I.Existing Structure II.Infinity System Overview III.Structural Breadth IV.Schedule and Cost Impacts IV.ANALYSIS 4 – LSM OF INTERIOR TRADES I.Existing Sequencing II.Implementation III.Schedule Impacts V.RESULTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS VI.ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The Apartment Building Rockville, MD Acknowledgements Brian Bernens Construction Option Academic Special Thanks Dr. Rob Leicht Advisor PSU Architectural Engineering Faculty James G. Davis Construction Dr. Jonathan Dougherty Jack Nill Ray Sowers Bob MacDaniels My Family and Friends Courtesy DAVIS

I.INTRODUCTION I.Project Background II.Analyses Overview and Focus II.ANALYSIS 1 – SITE LOGISTICS ALTERATIONS I.Existing Means, Methods, and Site Logistics II.Proposed Logistics III.Schedule Impacts IV.Cost Impacts III.ANALYSIS 3 – WOOD STRUCTURE MODIFICATION I.Existing Structure II.Infinity System Overview III.Structural Breadth IV.Schedule and Cost Impacts IV.ANALYSIS 4 – LSM OF INTERIOR TRADES I.Existing Sequencing II.Implementation III.Schedule Impacts V.RESULTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS VI.ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The Apartment Building Rockville, MD Questions? Brian Bernens Construction Option Thank You Courtesy DAVIS

I.INTRODUCTION I.Project Background II.Analyses Overview and Focus II.ANALYSIS 1 – SITE LOGISTICS ALTERATIONS I.Existing Means, Methods, and Site Logistics II.Proposed Logistics III.Schedule Impacts IV.Cost Impacts III.ANALYSIS 3 – WOOD STRUCTURE MODIFICATION I.Existing Structure II.Infinity System Overview III.Structural Breadth IV.Schedule and Cost Impacts IV.ANALYSIS 4 – LSM OF INTERIOR TRADES I.Existing Sequencing II.Implementation III.Schedule Impacts V.RESULTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS VI.ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The Apartment Building Rockville, MD Brian Bernens Construction Option Appendix Footing Size CalculationTower Crane Temporary Power Calculation Courtesy DAVIS

I.INTRODUCTION I.Project Background II.Analyses Overview and Focus II.ANALYSIS 1 – SITE LOGISTICS ALTERATIONS I.Existing Means, Methods, and Site Logistics II.Proposed Logistics III.Schedule Impacts IV.Cost Impacts III.ANALYSIS 3 – WOOD STRUCTURE MODIFICATION I.Existing Structure II.Infinity System Overview III.Structural Breadth IV.Schedule and Cost Impacts IV.ANALYSIS 4 – LSM OF INTERIOR TRADES I.Existing Sequencing II.Implementation III.Schedule Impacts V.RESULTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS VI.ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The Apartment Building Rockville, MD Brian Bernens Construction Option Appendix Sample Axial Load CalculationAnalysis 4 Summary Schedule Table Courtesy DAVIS