Electron-positron Annihilation Experimentation and theoretical application in Positron Physics Veronica Anderson, David Tsao, Mark A. Rodgers COSMOS, UC.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Instruments for Radiation Detection and Measurement Lab # 4.
Advertisements

NUCP 2371 Radiation Measurements II
Lab B4: The Creation and Annihilation of Antimatter SFSU Physics 490 Spring 2004 Professor Roger Bland.
P3 Exam Preparation. Gases Absolute zero = -273 ºC, 0 ºC = 273 K Increasing the temperature of a gas increases the speed of its particles The average.
Modern Physics By Neil Bronks Atoms C 12 6 Mass Number Mass Number - Number of protons + Neutrons. Atomic Number Atomic Number - Number of protons In.
Gamma-Ray Spectra _ + The photomultiplier records the (UV) light emitted during electronic recombination in the scintillator. Therefore, the spectrum collected.
A Short Introduction to Particle Physics What do we know? How do we know? What next? “Is there physics beyond the Standard Model?”
Chapter 29 Nuclear Physics.
These notes were typed in association with Physics for use with the IB Diploma Programme by Michael Dickinson For further reading and explanation see:
Compton Scattering James Durgin Physics 521 March 19, 2009.
Neutral Particles. Neutrons Neutrons are like neutral protons. –Mass is 1% larger –Interacts strongly Neutral charge complicates detection Neutron lifetime.
Presented by Steve Kliewer Muon Lifetime Experiment: A Model.
Chapter 4 Radioactivity and Medicine A CT scan (computed tomography) of the brain using X-ray beams.
GAMMA RAY SPECTROSCOPY
Compton Scattering Experiment John Klumpp And Ainsley Niemkiewicz.
Forward Detectors and Measurement of Proton-Antiproton Collision Rates by Zachary Einzig, Mentor Michele Gallinaro INTRODUCTION THE DETECTORS EXPERIMENTAL.
Gamma Spectroscopy HPT TVAN Technical Training
Interaction of Gamma-Rays - General Considerations uncharged transfer of energy creation of fast electrons.
Stopping Power The linear stopping power S for charged particles in a given absorber is simply defined as the differential energy loss for that particle.
Astro-2: History of the Universe Lecture 12; May
Nuclear Energy. Nuclear energy is all around us and can be used for medical purposes. Nuclear energy is when an atom is split and releases energy or particles.
Particles & Antiparticles
INTRODUCTION : Imaging antiprotons INTRODUCTION : Imaging antiprotons First results of real time imaging of the high energy gamma rays coming from antiproton.
Energy Resolution of a Parallel- Plate-Avalanche-Chamber Kausteya Roy Professors E. Norbeck and Y. Onel.
Radiation Detection and Measurement, JU, First Semester, (Saed Dababneh). 1 Spectrum if all energy is captured in detector. Allows identification.
The Nucleus and Radioactivity
Ttp:// Nuclear Chemistry.
Nuclear Changes Preview Understanding Concepts Reading Skills
Chapter 26 Relativity. General Physics Relativity II Sections 5–7.
My Chapter 30 Lecture.
Nuclear Decay Lesson 6. Objectives You will be able to write nuclear decay reactions You will be able to write nuclear decay reactions.
The Production of Cold Antihydrogen w. A Brief History of Antimatter In 1928, Paul Dirac proposes antimatter with his work in relativistic quantum mechanics.
Tools for Nuclear & Particle Physics Experimental Background.
SCINTILLATION COUNTER. PRINCIPLE When light radiations strike fluorescent material it produces flashes of light called scintillations. These are detected.
Jeopardy Jeopardy PHY101 Chapter 12 Review Study of Special Relativity Cheryl Dellai.
Fisica Generale - Alan Giambattista, Betty McCarty Richardson Copyright © 2008 – The McGraw-Hill Companies s.r.l. 1 Chapter 30: Particle Physics Fundamental.
Neutron Beam Intensity for the Spallation Neutron Source Beamline 13: The NPDGamma Experiment Analysis and Results Jeremy Stewart University of Tennessee.
S-145 What is the difference between the terms radioactive and radiation?
MEASUREMENT Of γ-RAY ENERGY SPECTRA BY A SCINTILLATION COUNTER
Seeing the Subatomic Stephen Miller Saturday Morning Physics October 11, 2003.
Physics 6.5.
Gamma Decay. Radioactive Decay Alpha Decay Radioactive Decay Alpha Decay Beta Decay.
Atomic Physics – Part 3 Ongoing Theory Development To accompany Pearson Physics PowerPoint presentation by R. Schultz
Modern Physics. Reinventing Gravity  Einstein’s Theory of Special Relativity  Theorizes the space time fabric.  Describes why matter interacts.  The.
Accelerator Physics, JU, First Semester, (Saed Dababneh). 1 In the figure: Photoelectric suppressed. Single Compton (effect of crystal dimensions).
Particles & Waves The Standard Model. Orders of Magnitude Human Scale Distance10 -3 ~ 10 2 m Measurable without additional technology Time10 0 ~ 10 2.
Nuclear Physics and Radioactivity AP Physics Chapter 30.
Mass-Energy Equivalence All matter is a form of stored energy.
Nuclear Changes Objectives: Students will:
GROUP 4 Firdiana Sanjaya ( ) Ana Alina ( )
ANTIMATTER Didsbury Scibar May 25 th 2009 Roger Barlow.
Interaction of x-ray photons (and gamma ray photons) with matter.
Nuclear Medicine Instrumentation 242 NMT 1 Dr. Abdo Mansour Assistant Professor of radiology
Integrated Science Mr. Danckers Chapter 10.
Radiation and Measurement Rad. Detect & Measure, 2008 (TKL) Dr: Mymona Abutalib Phone :
Particles – Learning Outcomes  Describe the production of new particles in particle accelerators.  Discuss the history of fundamental particles.  Discuss.
Overview. In Search of Giants Documentary Splitting the Atom Cockcroft and Walton shared the Nobel Prize for their work in splitting the atom.
The Standard Model of Particle Physics
Nuclear.
General Physics (PHY 2140) Lecture 27 Modern Physics Quantum Physics
Gamma-Gamma Correlations in Na-22
Scintillation Counter
Chapter 27 Early Quantum Theory
Subatomic Particles and Quantum Theory
(and why it may one day save your life!)
RADIOACTIVITY B.Sc. 5th sem.
SEMINAR ON ANTI-MATTER
Quantization of light, charge and energy Chapter 2-Class5
Technician’s Notes Activity 10S Software Based 'Bubble chamber photographs'
Modern Studies of the Atom
Presentation transcript:

Electron-positron Annihilation Experimentation and theoretical application in Positron Physics Veronica Anderson, David Tsao, Mark A. Rodgers COSMOS, UC Santa Cruz

Overview The purpose of our project and experiment is to measure (accurately) the mass of a positron through the gamma-ray detection of the annihilation between the positron and an electron

Antimatter In 1932 British physicist Paul Dirac derived the equation E 2 =m 2 c 4 +p 2 c 2 This equation tells us that for every type of particle of ordinary matter (e.g. protons and electrons) a particle of opposite charge and certain quantum properties exists, called antimatter Antimatter particles are rarely found in nature, and are therefore difficult to detect Antimatter is usually created in the modern universe during nuclear decays

Positrons Positrons are the antimatter equivalents of electrons Positrons have a mass equal to that of an electron, but have an opposite charge and certain quantum properties different from those of the electron Artist’s conception of the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratories’ electron linac 1, used for positron detection

Electron-positron Annihilation When matter and anti-matter collide, they destroy each other in a flash of high-energy radiation The gamma rays emitted in the annihilation are easily detectable In an electron-positron annihilation the  rays are emitted linearly Sometimes the electron and positron form a brief bond through the electromagnetic force, creating Positronium When electron-positron pairs first form Positronium, the direction of the energy emitted from their annihilation will not be linear

Positron detection The most practical method for detecting positrons is measuring the gamma emission of their annihilation with electrons Many larger experiments utilize particle accelerators, but we used simpler apparatus A large facility used for positron detection ( Photograph of the first detection of the anti- electron (positron), in 1932 at CERN positrons.web.cern.ch/ATHE NApositrons/wwwathena/an derson.html

Objective Our primary objective was to detect the gamma-ray (  -ray) emission of the annihilation during the collision of the positron and electron From the  -ray emission we hoped to determine the mass (m) of the positron itself Since Einstein’s equation E=mc 2  tells us that mass and energy are interchangeable, the energy of the emission should directly correlate with the mass of the positron We also hoped to apply what we have learned about particle physics and anti-matter to early universe astrophysics, particularly the baryon asymmetry problem

Apparatus We used a 22 Na positron source for our experiment. 22 Na emits most positrons (  rays), in addition to a small number of gammas. We used a stationary aluminum plate of about.5 cm thickness to prevent positrons from directly striking our detector Our detector was a Sodium Iodide Scintillator The entire experiment was encased in lead bricks with dimensions of about 5x10.5x20 cm Sodium Iodide Detector 2 ( gobain.com/Media/Documents/S /oper 20manl pdf) We fed our data into a Canberra Multi-channel Analyzer, and then transferred the data onto a computer for analysis

Our Apparatus Digital Oscilloscope -24 V Power Source High Voltage Lead Shielding Scintillator Canberra Below Screen

Canberra 35-Series Multi-channel Analyzer Our Positron Data on the Analyzer

Calibration To calibrate our Sodium Iodide Scintillator, we used two  sources of known energy levels: 137 Cs and 133 Ba The Cs isotope emitted a smooth radiation curve with a peak intensity of 662 KeV We also took a measurement with no source to determine what our background distribution would be, and we found that our Scintillator was picking up very little noise Our apparatus in calibration

Noise Reduction

Data Collection We collected our data using a Canberra 35-Series Multi- channel Analyzer We compared the data we received with the noise and with a calibration sources--the Barium isotope did not emit the spectrum we had expected to see The image at right is displaying the data that we received for the gamma emission of the cesium source, with which we compared our eventual positron ( 22 Na) annihilation energy Our Canberra Multi-channel Analyzer displaying Cesium data

Positron Data This is a graph of the number of counts at each energy level of the photons emitted from the Sodium-22 source The intensity peaks at about 537 KeV

Analysis We used several techniques for analysis of our data Using a computer program we wrote, we attempted to analyze the energy of the detected gamma-rays Although the program failed to produce results, we were able to make the calculations by hand We found that the intensity of the energy of detected gamma-rays peaked at 537 KeV Theoretical values have the positron with a mass-energy of about 511 KeV Several discrepancies may account for the difference in energy detected and the mass of the positron, especially the KE of the positron (and possibly the electron as well)

Calculations E=mc 2 E=537.0 keV (8.603x J), c 2 =8.988x10 16 m=(E/c 2 ) Mass (m) in kg=(8.603x )/(8.988x ) m=9.561x kg Theoretical mass= x kg

Conclusions Using the value we measured for the energy of the gamma-ray emitted from the annihilation, we were able to calculate the mass of the positron in kg We calculated that the mass of the positron is x kg, which is spectacularly close to the accepted mass of the electron: x kg Although we were slightly off from the mass we had hoped to find, our error was very slight--we didn’t take KE or thermal energy into account in our calculations

Acknowledgments We have not, fortunately, conducted this project alone. Among those to whom we owe the greatest thanks are Paul Graham and Dave Dorfan, our spectacular physics professors. Other thanks: Department of Physics, University of California, Santa Cruz Department of Physics, University of California, Berkeley Santa Cruz Institute for Particle Physics Fred Kuttner John and Jason Steve Kliewer Stuart Briber Nuri and Jessica (and the rest of the COSMOS staff)