Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Plant Event Summary and FPL/DAEC Actions.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Generic Pressurized Water Reactor (PWR): Safety Systems Overview
Advertisements

Nuclear Accident in Japan: A Summary
Nuclear Technology Taming the nucleus?. Outline Controlled Fission Reactions. Fuel enrichment Neutron moderation Control rods Nuclear Plant Design and.
Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Plant Event Summary and FPL/DAEC Actions.
1 NRC Meteorologists Role in Support of the Headquarters Operations Center During an International Event Kevin Quinlan Physical Scientist, NRO U.S. Nuclear.
Assessing the Challenges Resulting from the Events at Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station A Preliminary Discussion March 25, 2011 Walter L. Kirchner.
Vermont Yankee Presentation to VSNAP 7/17/13 VY/Entergy Fukushima Response Update Bernard Buteau.
FUKUSHIMA, DESCRIPTION OF THE ACCIDENT AND CONSEQUENCES TO THE ENVIRONMENT Dragoslav Nikezic Faculty of Science, University of Kragujevac, Serbia
Safety Implications of the Fukushima Nuclear Accident Sheldon L. Trubatch, Ph.D., J.D. Vice-Chairman Arizona Section American Nuclear Society.
n.ogv
Meltdown alert at Japan reactor Technicians are battling to stabilise a third reactor at a quake-stricken Japanese nuclear plant, which has been rocked.
Nuclear Accident at Fukushima Daiichi NPP A collection of images and data by Toro Laszlo Member of the Council of the RSRP National Institute of Public.
Overview of Incident at Fukushima Daiich Nuclear Power Station (1F) (Informal personal observations) April 2011.
Nuclear Energy. How does a nuclear reactor work? Is it a major energy source worldwide? Is it Green? Problems – Waste Disposal – Accidents Future – Research.
THE FUTURE OF FUKUSHIMA Can nuclear energy overcome its bad rap? CHAPTER 27 NUCLEAR FUTURE.
Nuclear Power.
Jed Harrison Office of Radiation & Indoor Air.  Review the Incident – What Happened  Describe the EPA Response  Review EPA’s RadNet Monitoring System.
Nuclear Plant Systems ACADs (08-006) Covered Keywords
Nuclear Fission & Fusion Nuclear Fusion - Energy released when two light nuclei combine or fuse However, a large amount of energy is required to start.
THE FUTURE OF FUKUSHIMA CHAPTER 23 NUCLEAR POWER Can nuclear energy overcome its bad rep?
Nuclear Energy General Concept. In 2001, total US generation of electricity was 3,777 billion kilowatt-hours.
Japanese Nuclear Accident And U.S. Response May 17, 2011.
1 Dale E. Klein, Ph.D., P.E. Assoc. Vice Chancellor for Research – The University of Texas System Associate Director – Energy Institute, The University.
Fukushima Incident Preliminary Analysis, Consequences and Safety Status of Indian NPPs Part-1 Dr. S.K.Jain Chairman & Managing Director NPCIL & BHAVINI.
1 OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE at JAPANESE NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS in 2005 October 12, 2006 Shigeyuki Wada Safety Information Division Japan Nuclear Energy Safety.
How they work and what happened at Fukushima Daiichi Plant.
Ivan Li and Kyle Krogman.  Nuclear reactor meltdown on March 11 th 2011 near Fukushima, Japan  An earthquake and the following tsunami knocked out electrical.
ACADs (08-006) Covered Keywords Containment Isolation, actuation logic, Description Supporting Material
What about Japan?. Unit 1 Unit 2 Unit 3 Unit 4 Unit 5 Unit 6.
Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill On April 20, 2010, an explosion on the Deepwater Horizon MC252 drilling platform in the Gulf of Mexico caused the rig to sink.
S A C C O N E A P E S Chapter 11: Nuclear Energy
Fukushima Nuclear Disaster Team Alpha Student1 Name, Student2 Name, Student3 Name, Student4 Name, Student5 Name.
Kevin Burgee Janiqua Melton Alexander Basterash
Worldwide Commercial Energy Production. Nuclear Power Countries.
Nuclear Power Plant Accidents Reporters: Uyangurin, Mareinne L. Suico, Monica Sharlyn L. Waresa, Daryl Mae B.
Nuclear Power Plant Meltdown Zach, Luke, and Nick.
Section 2Nuclear Changes Classroom Catalyst. Section 2Nuclear Changes Objectives Describe nuclear fission. Describe how a nuclear power plant works. List.
Nuclear Power. Fission Uranium-235 Plutonium-239 Neutron 10n10n 10n10n 10n10n Strontium-90 Xenon-144.
March 11, 2011 to Present. Presentation Overview Reactor Design and FeaturesChronology of EventsCurrent Status of Each ReactorRecovery Actions Kashiwazaki-Kariwa.
Nuclear Power Plant Orientation
Fukushima Power Plant – Japan Post March 11, 2011
Agenda Background Update on Fukushima Daini Update on Fukushima Dai-ichi – Summary of Events at Fukushima Dai-ichi Summary of Radiation and Reports.
The Curious Absence of New Nuclear Michael Hoeger Presented 02/06/2012.
Ta’Juan Dutrieuille November 4, 2009 Period 1
Nuclear Power Plant How A Nuclear Reactor Works.
A LTERNATIVE ENERGY : NUCLEAR Group 4 Bar Shida Keane.
Nuclear Power Plant How A Nuclear Reactor Works. Pressurized Water Reactor - Nuclear Power Plant.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Occupational Radiation Protection during High Exposure Operations Lecture 2-2 Lessons Learnt from Occupational.
FUKUSHIMA Nuclear Disaster By Miss Dammarell & Mrs. Schwartz.
MEHB 513 Introduction on nuclear technology assignment GROUP MEMBERS:ID: SEEH CHONG CHIN ME YEE QIAN WAHME TING DING PINGME LIM JIA YINGME
Coal-Fired Plant Coal is conveyed to boiler In primary water loop, water is boiled into steam Steam is sent through turbine Turbine spins the generator,
Enhancing Safety at America’s Nuclear Energy Facilities U.S. Industry’s Fukushima Response Joseph Pollock, Nuclear Energy Institute Christopher H. Mudrick,
FROM CHERNOBYL TO FUKUSIMA. Lesson Objectives  foster lexical and grammar skills;  develop comparison-contrast strategies;  activate scanning and monologue.
The March 2011 Earthquake and Tsunami in Japan: A Nuclear Perspective Mary Lou Dunzik-Gougar, PhD Associate Chair of Nuclear Engineering and Health Physics.
Japanese Nuclear Accident And U.S. Response April 20, 2011.
INTRODUCTION TO NUCLEAR TECHNOLOGY MEHB513 SEM 2,2014/2015 GROUP PROJECT : EVALUATE THE IMPACTS OF THE FUKUSHIMA NUCLEAR ACCIDENT ON THE TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT.
BASIC PROFESSIONAL TRAINING COURSE Module XV In-plant accident management Case Studies Version 1.0, May 2015 This material was prepared by.
Fukushima Daiichi Jourdan Robbins 12/6/ /16/16.
9.5 Nuclear Power Although nuclear power does not come from a fossil fuel, it is fueled by uranium, which is obtained from mining and is non-renewable.
Triple Disaster! Japan 2011.
The Fukushima Daiichi Incident – Dr
Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Plant Event Summary and FPL/DAEC Actions
Fukushima Lessons Learned
Session Name: Lessons Learned from Mega Projects
The Fukushima Daiichi Incident – Dr
The Fukushima Daiichi Incident – Dr. Matthias Braun - 05 April p.1
Japanese Nuclear Accident And U.S. Response
The Fukushima Daiichi Incident – Dr. Matthias Braun - 22 April p.1
The Fukushima Daiichi Incident – Dr. Matthias Braun - 01 June p
New Regulatory Requirements in Japan
Presentation transcript:

Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Plant Event Summary and FPL/DAEC Actions

Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Station Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Station Six BWR units at the Fukushima Nuclear Station: –Unit 1: 439 MWe BWR, 1971 (unit was in operation prior to event) –Unit 2: 760 MWe BWR, 1974 (unit was in operation prior to event) –Unit 3: 760 MWe BWR, 1976 (unit was in operation prior to event) –Unit 4: 760 MWe BWR, 1978 (unit was in outage prior to event) –Unit 5: 760 MWe BWR, 1978 (unit was in outage prior to event) –Unit 6: 1067 MWe BWR, 1979 (unit was in outage prior to event) Six BWR units at the Fukushima Nuclear Station: –Unit 1: 439 MWe BWR, 1971 (unit was in operation prior to event) –Unit 2: 760 MWe BWR, 1974 (unit was in operation prior to event) –Unit 3: 760 MWe BWR, 1976 (unit was in operation prior to event) –Unit 4: 760 MWe BWR, 1978 (unit was in outage prior to event) –Unit 5: 760 MWe BWR, 1978 (unit was in outage prior to event) –Unit 6: 1067 MWe BWR, 1979 (unit was in outage prior to event) Unit 1

Fukushima Daiichi Unit 1 Fukushima Daiichi Unit 1 Typical BWR 3 and 4 Reactor Design Some similarities to Duane Arnold Energy Center Typical BWR 3 and 4 Reactor Design Some similarities to Duane Arnold Energy Center

Fukushima Daiichi Unit 1 Fukushima Daiichi Unit 1

Event Initiation The Fukushima nuclear facilities were damaged in a magnitude 8.9 earthquake on March 11 (Japan time), centered offshore of the Sendai region, which contains the capital Tokyo. –Plant designed for magnitude 8.2 earthquake. An 8.9 magnitude quake is 7 times in greater in magnitude. Serious secondary effects followed including a significant tsunami, significant aftershocks and a major fire at a fossil fuel installation. The Fukushima nuclear facilities were damaged in a magnitude 8.9 earthquake on March 11 (Japan time), centered offshore of the Sendai region, which contains the capital Tokyo. –Plant designed for magnitude 8.2 earthquake. An 8.9 magnitude quake is 7 times in greater in magnitude. Serious secondary effects followed including a significant tsunami, significant aftershocks and a major fire at a fossil fuel installation.

Initial Response Nuclear reactors were shutdown automatically. Within seconds the control rods were inserted into core and nuclear chain reaction stopped. Cooling systems were placed in operation to remove the residual heat. The residual heat load is about 3% of the heat load under normal operating conditions. Earthquake resulted in the loss of offsite power which is the normal supply to plant. Emergency Diesel Generators started and powered station emergency cooling systems. One hour later, the station was struck by the tsunami. The tsunami was larger than what the plant was designed for. The tsunami took out all multiple sets of the backup Emergency Diesel generators. Reactor operators were able to utilize emergency battery power to provide power for cooling the core for 8 hours. Operators followed abnormal operating procedures and emergency operating procedures. Nuclear reactors were shutdown automatically. Within seconds the control rods were inserted into core and nuclear chain reaction stopped. Cooling systems were placed in operation to remove the residual heat. The residual heat load is about 3% of the heat load under normal operating conditions. Earthquake resulted in the loss of offsite power which is the normal supply to plant. Emergency Diesel Generators started and powered station emergency cooling systems. One hour later, the station was struck by the tsunami. The tsunami was larger than what the plant was designed for. The tsunami took out all multiple sets of the backup Emergency Diesel generators. Reactor operators were able to utilize emergency battery power to provide power for cooling the core for 8 hours. Operators followed abnormal operating procedures and emergency operating procedures.

Loss of Makeup Offsite power could not be restored and delays occurred obtaining and connecting portable generators. After the batteries ran out, residual heat could not be carried away any more. Reactor temperatures increased and water levels in the reactor decreased, eventually uncovering and overheating the core. Hydrogen was produced from metal-water reactions in the reactor. Operators vented the reactor to relieve steam pressure - energy (and hydrogen) was released into the primary containment (drywell) causing primary containment temperatures and pressures to increase. Operators took actions to vent the primary containment to control containment pressure and hydrogen levels. Required to protect the primary containment from failure. Primary Containment Venting is through a filtered path that travels through duct work in the secondary containment to an elevated release point on the refuel floor (on top of the reactor building). A hydrogen detonation subsequently occurred while venting the secondary containment. Occurred shortly after and aftershock at the station. Spark likely ignited hydrogen. Offsite power could not be restored and delays occurred obtaining and connecting portable generators. After the batteries ran out, residual heat could not be carried away any more. Reactor temperatures increased and water levels in the reactor decreased, eventually uncovering and overheating the core. Hydrogen was produced from metal-water reactions in the reactor. Operators vented the reactor to relieve steam pressure - energy (and hydrogen) was released into the primary containment (drywell) causing primary containment temperatures and pressures to increase. Operators took actions to vent the primary containment to control containment pressure and hydrogen levels. Required to protect the primary containment from failure. Primary Containment Venting is through a filtered path that travels through duct work in the secondary containment to an elevated release point on the refuel floor (on top of the reactor building). A hydrogen detonation subsequently occurred while venting the secondary containment. Occurred shortly after and aftershock at the station. Spark likely ignited hydrogen.

Core Damage Sequence Core Uncovered Fuel OverheatingFuel melting - Core Damaged Core Damaged but retained in vessel Some portions of core melt into lower RPV head Containment pressurizes. Leakage possible at drywell head Releases of hydrogen into secondary containment

Hydrogen Detonation at Unit 1 Hydrogen Detonation at Unit 1 Reactor Building Refuel Floor

Mitigating Actions The station was able to deploy portable generators and utilize a portable pump to inject sea water into the reactor and primary containment. Station was successful in flooding the primary containment to cool the reactor vessel and debris that may have been released into the primary containment. Boric acid was added to the seawater used for injection. Boric acid is “liquid control rod”. The boron captures neutrons and speeds up the cooling down of the core. Boron also reduces the release of iodine by buffering the containment water pH. The station was able to deploy portable generators and utilize a portable pump to inject sea water into the reactor and primary containment. Station was successful in flooding the primary containment to cool the reactor vessel and debris that may have been released into the primary containment. Boric acid was added to the seawater used for injection. Boric acid is “liquid control rod”. The boron captures neutrons and speeds up the cooling down of the core. Boron also reduces the release of iodine by buffering the containment water pH. Containment Flooding Effects Containment Flooding Effects

Emergency Response Equivalent of General Emergency declared to the event at Unit 1. Evacuation of public performed within 20 km (13 miles) of plant; approximately 200,000 people evacuated. Similar hydrogen detonation subsequently occurred at Unit 3 on Sunday, March 14 th (Japan time). Primary containment remained intact at Unit’s 1 and 3 throughout the accident. There was considerable damage to the secondary containment (reactor building). Highest recorded radiation level at the Fukushima Daiichi site was millirem. Radiation levels were subsequently reduced to 4.4 millirem after the after the containment was flooded. The NRC’s radiation dose limit for the public is 100 millirem per year. Several fatalities occurred at the station along with numerous injured workers. Authorities distributed Potassium-iodide tablets to protect the public from potential health effects of radioactive isotopes of iodine that could potentially be released. This is quickly taken up by the body and its presence prevents the take-up of iodine-131 should people be exposed to it. Over 300 after shocks have occurred and continue to challenge station response. Equivalent of General Emergency declared to the event at Unit 1. Evacuation of public performed within 20 km (13 miles) of plant; approximately 200,000 people evacuated. Similar hydrogen detonation subsequently occurred at Unit 3 on Sunday, March 14 th (Japan time). Primary containment remained intact at Unit’s 1 and 3 throughout the accident. There was considerable damage to the secondary containment (reactor building). Highest recorded radiation level at the Fukushima Daiichi site was millirem. Radiation levels were subsequently reduced to 4.4 millirem after the after the containment was flooded. The NRC’s radiation dose limit for the public is 100 millirem per year. Several fatalities occurred at the station along with numerous injured workers. Authorities distributed Potassium-iodide tablets to protect the public from potential health effects of radioactive isotopes of iodine that could potentially be released. This is quickly taken up by the body and its presence prevents the take-up of iodine-131 should people be exposed to it. Over 300 after shocks have occurred and continue to challenge station response.