NECAP 2007: District Results Office of Research, Assessment, and Evaluation February 25, 2008.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Freeman Elementary…state of the school.. Freeman Building Wide Goals Reading:  By May 2013, the percentage of K-2 students achieving benchmark standards.
Advertisements

Maryland School Assessment (MSA) 2012 Science Results Carolyn M. Wood, Ph.D. Assistant Superintendent, Accountability, Assessment, and Data Systems August.
Narragansett Elementary School Report Night Gail Dandurand, Principal Lisa Monahan, Assistant Principal.
1 New England Common Assessment Program (NECAP) Setting Performance Standards.
L AFAYETTE R EGIONAL S CHOOL New England Common Assessment Program (NECAP) Test Results.
Smarter Balanced Assessment: What do parents need to know? Paramount Unified School District Parent Presentation, Grades Great Things Are.
1 The New York State Education Department New York State’s Student Reporting and Accountability System.
Grade 3-8 English Language Arts and Mathematics Results August 8, 2011.
NECAP Results 2006 Chichester Central School Never Enough Children At Proficient!
Facts About the Florida Alternate Assessment Created from “Facts About the Florida Alternate Assessment Online at:
Leader & Teacher SLTs 2014 – ComponentEvaluation for TeachersEvaluation for School Leaders Setting GoalsTeachers set two SLTs in collaboration with.
DISTRICT MCAS RESULTS November 19, Charts by Grade vs. The State Charts by Grade Comparing 2001 through 2007 Longitudinal Comparisons CONTENTS.
New England Common Assessment Program (NECAP) Summary of October 2011 Results Developed for the Providence School Board February 27, 2012 Presented by:
Jack Buckley Commissioner National Center for Education Statistics December 7, 2011.
How to Interpret Test Scores. 1. What are standardized tests?  A standardized test is one that is administered under standardized or controlled conditions.
1 Paul Tuss, Ph.D., Program Manager Sacramento Co. Office of Education August 17, 2009 California’s Integrated Accountability System.
NECAP DATA ANALYSIS 2012 Presented by Greg Bartlett March, 2013.
Fall Testing Update David Abrams Assistant Commissioner for Standards, Assessment, & Reporting Middle Level Liaisons & Support Schools Network November.
SY PVAAS Scatter Plots State to IU Region to School District Grades 4-8, 11 Math & Reading PVAAS Statewide Team for PDE Contact your IU PVAAS contact.
Metairie Academy for Advanced Studies WELCOME LEAP Information February 18, 2014.
NAEP 2011 Mathematics and Reading Results Challis Breithaupt November 1, 2011.
NAEP 2011 Mathematics and Reading Results NAEP State Coordinator Mark DeCandia.
Fall 2007 MEAP Reporting 2007 OEAA Conference Jim Griffiths – Manager, Assessment Administration & Reporting Sue Peterman - Department Analyst, MEAP.
MEAP / MME New Cut Scores Gill Elementary February 2012.
NJ ASSESSMENTS CYCLE II REPORT GRADES 3-8 and 11 October 30, 2008 Haddonfield Public Schools.
Mathematics and Science Partnerships: Summary of the FY2006 Annual Reports U.S. Department of Education.
HANOVER HIGH SCHOOL GRADE 11 NECAP SCORES
1 New Hampshire – Addenda Ppt Slides State Level Results (slides 2-7) 2Enrollment - Grades 3-8 for 2005 and Reading NECAP 4Mathematics
Future Ready Schools National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) in North Carolina Wednesday, February 13, 2008 Auditorium III 8:30 – 9:30 a.m.
Iowa Assessment Results and Annual Goals.
NECAP Results and Accountability A Presentation to Superintendents March 22, 2006.
Teacher SLTs General Format for Teacher SLTs with a District-wide Common Assessment The percent of students scoring proficient 1 in my 8 th.
Slide 1 National Center on Educational Outcomes (NCEO) States’ Data-Based Responses to Low Achieving Students on State Assessments Martha L. Thurlow National.
School Improvement Planning Assessing School Impact October 6, 2010 Robert Dunn Superintendent of Education York Region District School Board.
ACT ASPIRE GROWTH REPORTS. DISTRICTS AND SCHOOLS THAT PARTICIPATED IN ACT ASPIRE ASSESSMENTS (READING, MATH, ENGLISH, SCIENCE AND WRITING) WITH AN N COUNT.
Georgia Milestones End of Grade (EOG) Assessment Grades 3, 4, and 5
Provincial Assessment Results Anglophone West School District November 26, 2015.
County-level M-STEP Data Mathematics From the Golden Package.
2015 State PARCC Results Presented to the Board of Elementary and Secondary Education Robert Lee MCAS Chief Analyst and Acting PARCC Coordinator October.
SAT-10/ARMT Results (Stanford 10),was administered to Alabama students in Grades 3-8 for the first time in April Norm-referenced scores Enable us.
University of Colorado at Boulder National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing Challenges for States and Schools in the No.
GEORGIA’S CRITERION-REFERENCED COMPETENCY TESTS (CRCT) Questions and Answers for Parents of Georgia Students February 11, 2009 Presented by: MCES.
AAE Updates: Learning Gains February 4, 2016 Polk County School District Assessment, Accountability & Evaluation.
NECAP Presentation Dunn’s Corners School Westerly, RI February 24, 2010.
2009 Grade 3-8 Math Additional Slides 1. Math Percentage of Students Statewide Scoring at Levels 3 and 4, Grades The percentage of students.
Kansas College and Career Ready Academic Assessment OR Kansas Assessment Program (KAP) Results.
KHS PARCC/SCIENCE RESULTS Using the results to improve achievement Families can use the results to engage their child in conversations about.
Connecticut Mastery Test Fourth Generation Grades 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8 Connecticut Academic Performance Test Third Generation Grade 10 Presented to the.
2011 MEAP Results Board of Education Presentation | 07 May 2012 Romeo Community Schools | Office of Curriculum and Instruction.
North Kingstown School Committee Feb. 29, 2012 MH 2/23/2012.
North Kingstown School Committee March 11, 2014 MH 3/11/2014.
Policy Definitions, Achievement Level Descriptors, and Math Standards.
Smarter Balanced Performance Levels and Scale Scores
Teacher SLTs
Lakeview Community Schools NeSA Results
Student Achievement Data Displays Mathematics & Reading Grade 3
2014 Assessment Results A-1.
PISA • PIRLS • TIMSS Program for International Student Assessment
2015 PARCC Results for R.I: Work to do, focus on teaching and learning
NECAP PRESENTATION.
Framework for a Next-Generation Accountability System
Delaware Department of Education
Framework for a Next-Generation Accountability System
Teacher SLTs
TABE II: Using TABE® Results to Inform Instruction
Leader SLTs
Leader SLTs
Alaska School Performance Index Annual Measurable Objectives Results
Welcome Reporting: Individual Student Report (ISR), Student Roster Report, and District Summary of Schools Report Welcome to the Reporting: Individual.
History of No Child Left Behind (NCLB)
Presentation transcript:

NECAP 2007: District Results Office of Research, Assessment, and Evaluation February 25, 2008

What is NECAP? Criterion-referenced standardized test State-mandated assessment of core content –Reading –Mathematics –Writing (Grades 5, 8, and 11) Administered to all students –Grades 3-8 –Grade 11 (reported separately)

Example: 340 Grade Level Scaled Score Types of Scores Reported on NECAP Achievement Levels –Use to make comparisons about achievement of standards –Reported in percent of n –Four proficiency levels Scaled scores –Use to make comparisons among students, schools, and districts –3-digit number –40 is the proficient cut score LevelDescriptor 4Proficient with Distinction 3Proficient 2Partially Proficient 1Substantially below Proficient

Reading Results District-wide (Achievement Levels): 40% of students scored proficient or higher as compared to 37% in % of students scored substantially below proficient in reading in 2007, the same as in A trend demonstrating an increase in percent proficient across a three-year period has emerged.

Reading Results Grade-level (Achievement Levels): Percent proficient ranged from 36% (gr. 6) to 43% (gr. 5) Percent substantially below proficient ranged from 22% (gr. 5) to 31% (gr. 4, 8) Grades 5, 7 & 8: –Trend - more students proficient –Trend - fewer students substantially below proficient Grade 3-5 Grade 6-8

Reading Results Scaled Scores: No grade displays a mean scaled score that attains Proficient (i.e., 40). Grades 5, 7, and 8: –continuous gain in mean scaled sore across three years. Grade 3-5 Grade 6-8

Writing Results District-wide (Achievement Levels): 28% of students scored proficient or higher as compared with 24% in % of students scored substantially below proficient as compared with 42% in 2006 Data is inconsistent for the district; trends do not emerge

Writing Results Grade-level (Achievement Levels): Percent proficient ranged from 20% (gr. 8) to 36% (gr. 5) Percent substantially below proficient ranged from 31% (gr. 5) to 37% (gr. 8) Trends do not emerge

Writing Results Scaled Scores: No grade displays a mean scaled score that attains Proficient (i.e., 40). Grade 8: –Trend - continuous one-point gains in mean scaled sore across three years.

Math Results District-wide (Achievement Levels): 28% of students scored proficient or higher as compared with 31% in % of students scored substantially below proficient as compared with 43% in 2006 Data is inconsistent for the district; trends do not emerge

Math Results Grade Level (Achievement Levels): Percent proficient ranged from 25% (gr. 8) to 34% (gr. 5) Percent substantially below proficient ranged from 40% (gr. 3) to 48% (gr. 8). 2 of 6 grade levels demonstrate some degree of decline in the percent of students substantially below proficient from 2006 to 2007 – grades 7 and 8. Grade 3-5 Grade 6-8

Math Results Scaled Scores: No grade displays a mean scaled score that attains Proficient (i.e., 40). 34% of students scored substantially below proficient as compared with 42% in 2006 Data is inconsistent for most grade levels; however, Grade 8 data reflects a positive trend in mean scaled sore Grade 3-5 Grade 6-8