1 Task Force on Metadata and Electronic Resources Interim Report OCLC CJK Users Group 2003 Annual Meeting Friday, March 28, 2003 Flushing Branch Library.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
OCLC Online Computer Library Center Product Development Update 2003 OCLC CJK Users Group Meeting March 28, 2003 Queens Borough (Flushing) Public Library,
Advertisements

OCLC Online Computer Library Center Connexion Overview Session OCLC CJK Users Group 2007 Annual Meeting March 24, 2007, Boston.
Group Purchases of Korean Online Databases Mikyung Kang Korean Studies Librarian UCLA.
LC-CEAL Cataloging Internship Program a Progress Report April 2008 by Joy Kim Chair, Task Force on LC-CEAL Cataloging Internship Program.
Outsourcing Cataloging for Japanese Language Materials -- a progress report from Yale -- Keiko Suzuki Japanese Catalog Librarian East Asia Library, Yale.
Vendor Records: A Brief Survey 2007 OCLC CJK Users Group Meeting Karen T. Wei University of Illinois March 24, 2007.
1 Subject Authority Control and Cooperative Cataloging May 18, 2005.
CJK NACO Project CEAL Conference, Boston, March 21, 2007 Jiping Wu.
34th Consultative Meeting of INIS Liaison Officers 3 – 5 November 2008 Vienna - Austria INIS User Needs Study (Summary of Japan’s study) Junichi KURAKAMI.
The US RDA Test: Status & Next Steps For the Authority Control Interest Group, American Library Association Midwinter Meeting, January 9, 2011 Presented.
Highlights of the Survey on Metadata Standards and Best Practices for Chinese E-Resources Susan Xue, UC Berkeley March 25, 2014.
ELECTRONIC RESOURCES MANAGEMENT UC-SANTA BARBARA revised July 23, 2007 prepared by J. Elaine McCracken.
Providing Online Access to the HKUST University Archives: EAD to INNOPAC Sintra Tsang and K.T. Lam The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology 7th.
EAALC Meeting (10/05 San Diego)1 California Digital Library East Asian Digital Resources Project: An Update Shirley W. Leung.
Embracing Digital Collections: Embracing Digital Collections: Access Issues and Practices for Academic Libraries Oregon Library Association Salem, OR April.
NCC’s E-Resource Training Initiative and the E-Resource Training Session at UCSD Report Toshie Marra, UCLA, EAALC Meeting, October 7, 2005, UCSD.
Digitization Projects: Internal Development vs. Outsourcing Production or D.I.Y. vs. The Pros.
1 Cataloging for School Librarians — It Matters! Margaret Maurer Head, Catalog and Metadata Kent State University Libraries and Media Services 2006 ILF.
Employers’ Expectation for Entry-Level Catalog Librarians: What Position Announcement Data Indicate.
Scholar Services at the University Library: The Scholarly Commons Report.
ISD Mission To promote scientific and technical information usage among KISR researchers and the public.
Metadata: Its Functions in Knowledge Representation for Digital Collections 1 Summary.
At the NATIONAL TRANSPORTATION LIBRARY CIL 2007 Washington, DC Joyce W. Koeneman Digital Librarian, NTL Research and Innovative Technology Administration.
Testing Resource Description and Access (RDA) Presentation for ALA Annual, Chicago July 11, 2009 Barbara Bushman Assistant Head, Cataloging Section National.
Session 7 Selection of Online Resources and Options for Providing Access.
Cataloging in digital age Li Sun Asian Languages Cataloger Metadata Librarian Cataloging and Metadata Services Rutgers University Libraries CEAL Annual.
Project EIFL Direct in Lithuania By Ausra Vaskeviciene Martynas Mazvydas National Library of Lithuania, Lithuanian Research Library Consortium.
1 RDA and CJK Materials CEAL CTP Training Workshop March 13, 2012 Location: Room 2214, Ontario Institute for Studies in Education, University of Toronto.
Texas Library Association Webinar
FRAD: Functional Requirements for Authority Data.
Berkeley’s Participation in the CJK NACO Project March 21, 2007 Evelyn Kuo East Asian Library University of California Berkeley.
7th Congress of Baltic Librarians, September 30 - October 2, 2004 The Lithuanian Research Library Consortium under the Umbrella of the Electronic Information.
Japanese Vendor Cataloging: Yale's case OCLC User Group Meeting AAS/CEAL 2007 Annual Meeting in Boston, MA March 24, 2007 Keiko Suzuki 鈴木啓子 Japanese Catalog.
Organizing Internet Resources OCLC’s Internet Cataloging Project -- funded by the Department of Education -- from October 1, 1994 to March 31, 1996.
Open Source Software in Libraries An Infopeople Webcast Presenter: Eric Lease Morgan Tuesday, January 27, :00 noon to.
Group. “Your partner in developing future Lifelong Learners” UROWNE UNIVERSITY LIBRARY.
11 RDA & CJK Materials Workshop Session five—Training resources Prepared by Charlene Chou.
1 Prepared by Cooperative Programs Section & Associates NACO Training for OCLC Libraries.
“Asia-Pacific Central Securities & Depositories Group” Overview of ACG by T aiwan D epository & C learing C orporation.
Metadata and Documentation Iain Wallace Performing Arts Data Service.
Module 6: Preparing for RDA... LC RDA for NASIG - June 1, 2011.
PREPARING FOR RESOURCE DESCRIPTION AND ACCESS (RDA) CATHY SALIKA NICOLE SWANSON CARLI Annual Meeting, Nov 9, 2012.
Japanese Librarian Training Needs Survey Results Survey was conducted by the NCC Librarian Professional Development Committee (LPDC) Survey Period: July.
Citation Standards for Statistics and Data or Where are we today? Gaëtan Drolet Data Liberation Initiative Communications and Library Services Division.
Asia Pacific Regional Council OCLC Record Use Policy Some Recent Developments OCLC Asia Pacific Regional Council Meeting National Library of Australia.
Improving Description through Collaboration: The Ethnomusicological Video for Instruction & Analysis Digital Archive Music Library Association, February.
Metadata “Data about data” Describes various aspects of a digital file or group of files Identifies the parts of a digital object and documents their content,
Implementing RDA: One Institution’s Evolving Experience, Two Years Later American Library Association Annual Conference ALCTS CaMMS Copy Cataloging Interest.
RDA Updates Since the Creation of LC RDA Training Material (May 2012) Annual Meeting of Council on East Asian Libraries March 19, 2013 Jessalyn Zoom Library.
OCLC Governance and the OCLC Asia Pacific Regional Council OCLC Asia Pacific Regional Council Meeting National Library of Australia 15 April 2010 Asia.
The Catalog of the Future: Integrating Electronic Resources By Dana M. Caudle Cataloging Librarian Auburn University Libraries
International Atomic Energy Agency Sources of National Literature INIS Training Seminar November 2011, Vienna, Austria Taghrid ATIEH Leader, Capacity.
OCLC CJK USERS GROUP FORUM Charlene Chou March 27th,
An Inquiry and Analysis of Metadata Utilization A Case Study of MARC 2005 ASIS&T Annual Meeting, November 1, 2005, Charlotte, North Carolina William E.
Differences and distinctions: metadata types and their uses Stephen Winch Information Architecture Officer, SLIC.
1 Overview of the U.S. RDA Test by Tina Shrader Cataloging Section Head and CONSER Coordinator National Agricultural Library June 28, 2010.
Library of Congress Authorities on the Web: Accessing Authority Records via the LC Online Catalog ALA Annual Conference 2002 Ann Della Porta Integrated.
A Complex Standard and Its Use Results from an empirical analysis of MARC 2004 Texas Library Association Annual Conference, March 18, 2004, San Antonio,
MICHAEL Culture Association WP4 Integration of existing data structure into Europeana ATHENA, WP4 Working group technical meeting Konstanz, 7th of May.
Rebecca L. Mugridge LFO Research Colloquium March 19, 2008.
AN ARCHETYPE FOR INFORMATION ORGANIZATION AND CLASSIFICATION OCLC WorldCat.
7th Annual Hong Kong Innovative Users Group Meeting
Two sides of perspectives:
Module 6: Preparing for RDA ...
FRAD: Functional Requirements for Authority Data
RDA in CJK NACO Workshop
Onboarding Webinar 13 April 2019 Presented by and.
OCLC, WorldCat and Connexion
OCLC CJK Users Group Annual Meeting
The Implementation Team 2019 CEAL Cataloging Workshop March 19th, 2019
Presentation transcript:

1 Task Force on Metadata and Electronic Resources Interim Report OCLC CJK Users Group 2003 Annual Meeting Friday, March 28, 2003 Flushing Branch Library Queens Borough Public Library

2 Background  April 2002: A voice for investigation  June 2002: Executive Board decided to establish the Task Force on Metadata and Electronic Resources  November 2002: Task Force members: –Mikyung Kang (UCLA) –Toshie Marra (UCLA) –Hideyuki Morimoto, Chair (Columbia Univ.) –Zhijia Shen (Univ. of Pittsburgh)

3 Task Force Charges  Survey OCLC CJK Users Group member institutions as to current cataloging practices for web access to CJK electronic resources through subscription or through free access  Study the current practices and training needs of OCLC CJK Users Group members in cataloging web access CJK electronic resources  Recommend a proposal to promote cooperative cataloging endeavors, in consultation with existing efforts such as Digital Asia Library, etc. among OCLC CJK Users Group member institutions

4 Survey  To identify current practices and training needs of East Asian studies librarians in preparing metadata for remotely-accessed East Asian vernacular electronic resources  February 12, 2003: Survey announcement  March 10: Received 13 responses from 12 institutions (23% response rate)

5 Question 1  Is your library preparing metadata for remotely-accessed East Asian vernacular electronic resources? –Yes: 7 institutions –No, but planning: 1 institution (Oct. 2003) –Not at all: 4 institutions

6 Question 2  Which metadata schema is your library using? –MARC21: 7 institutions –DC: 2 institutions –TEI: 1 institution By institutions: -MARC21 only: 6 institutions -DC only: 1 institution -MARC21, DC, TEI: 1 institution

7 Question 3  Which name authority control is your library using?  Which name authority control guidelines is your library using? –AACR2: 8 institutions –Other: 1 institution By institutions: –AACR2 only: 7 institutions –AACR2, other: 1 institution

8 Question 4  Which name authority file is your library using? –NAF(LC/NACO): 7 institutions –No name authority file used: 1 institution

9 Question 5  Which subject authority file and/or thesaurus is your library using? –LCSH: 7 institutions –In-house file: 1 institution –No subject authority file/thesaurus used: 1 institution –Other: 1 institution

10 Question 5 (continued) By institutions: –LCSH only: 6 institutions –LCSH and In-house file: 1 institution –No subject file/thesaurus used, other: 1 institution

11 Question 6  Which job categories of employees prepare metadata? –CJK catalogers not specifically appointed for processing of electronic resources: 6 institutions –Electronic resources catalogers not specifically appointed for CJK languages: 1 institution –CJK digital library projects employees: 1 institution –Digital library projects employees not specifically appointed for CJK languages: 1 institution –Other (CJK general all purpose staff): 1 institution

12 Question 6 (continued) By institutions: –CJK catalogers not specifically appointed for processing of electronic resources only: 4 institutions –CJK catalogers not specifically appointed for processing of electronic resources and electronic resources catalogers not specifically appointed for CJK languages: 1 institution –CJK catalogers not specifically appointed for processing of electronic resources and digital library projects employees not specifically appointed for CJK languages: 1 institution –CJK digital library projects employees only: 1 institution –CJK general all purpose staff only: 1 institution

13 Question 7  Which professional/administrative levels of employees prepare metadata? –Professional-level managers: 6 institutions –Professional-level librarians: 4 institutions –Para-professional-level staff members: 4 institutions –Library school student: 1 institution

14 Question 7 (continued)  By institutions: –Professional-level managers and para- professional-level staff members: 3 institutions –Professional-level managers only: 1 institution –Professional-level librarians only: 1 institution –Professional-level manager and professional- level librarians: 1 institution –Professional-level managers, professional-level librarians, and para-professional-level staff members: 1 institution –Professional-level librarians and library school students: 1 institution

15 Question 8  Which cataloging system does your library use ? –OCLC CJK: 6 institutions –Local systems: 2 institutions –Connexion: 1 institution –RLIN terminal for Windows: 1 institution By institutions: –OCLC CJK only: 6 institutions –Local systems only: 1 institution –Connexion, local systems, and RLIN: 1 institution

16 Question 9  Have your library employees attended any training programs for preparing metadata? –No: 7 institutions –Yes: 5 institutions  ALA/ALCTS Metadata and AACR2 Institute  SCCTP workshops  Workshops organized by local professional organizations  In-house training sessions by resident specialists  OCLC Institute’s Online Library Learning series, Cataloging Internet Resources Using MARC21 and AACR2

17 Question 10  Is your library planning to create new or additional positions of specifically- designated CJK metadata specialists? –No, it is unnecessary and/or unrealistic: 10 institutions –No, but we will start planning: 2 institutions

18 Question 11  Do you have any concern about your library’s preparation of metadata? –Yes: 12 individuals  Employee training: 9 individuals  Name authority control: 5 individuals  Subject authority control: 5 individuals  Staffing: 5 individuals  Metadata availability through shared bibliographic utility: 5 individuals  Standards as to metadata schemata: 4 individuals  Standards as to metadata content designation: 3 individuals  Other: 4 individuals –No: 1 individual

19 Question 12  Do you have any comment on preparation of metadata? –Good move –Number of subscribed electronic resources is small/cataloging work is manageable –More reliable records should be contributed to shared bibliographic utility databases –CJK capabilities desirable in Connexion –Different types of metadata should be explored, e.g. for text, visual materials, arts, EAD –Concern on archiving/maintenance of access

20 Please send comments to Task Force members: –Mikyung Kang –Toshie Marra –Hideyuki Morimoto –Zhijia Shen

21 Thank you very much! Task Force on Metadata and Electronic Resources