New Haven, A City of Great Schools COLLABORATION AND SCHOOL REFORM IN NEW HAVEN NEW HAVEN PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
WEST HEMPSTEAD UNION FREE SCHOOL DISTRICT Three Year Strategic Plan
Advertisements

Audience: Parents, families, local community members
Characteristics of Improving School Districts Themes from Research October 2004 G. Sue Shannon and Pete Bylsma Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction.
Updated Training for DPAS II for Administrators
1 Establishing Performance Indicators in Support of The Illinois Commitment Presented to the Illinois Board of Higher Education December 11, 2001.
In August, the historic CORE district waiver was approved allowing these districts to pursue a new robust and holistic accountability model for schools.
How Can Using Data Lead to School Improvement?
PRIORITY AND FOCUS SCHOOLS: INCREASING CAPACITY FOR IMPROVEMENT USING THE INDISTAR ® ACTION-PLANNING TOOL June 11, 2014 OSPI’s Office of Student and School.
PUSD Teacher Evaluation SY12/13 Governing Board Presentation May 10, 2012.
STRATEGIC PLAN Community Unit School District 300 7/29/
A relentless commitment to academic achievement and personal growth for every student. Redmond School District Graduates are fully prepared for the demands.
TRANSFORMATIONAL LEADERSHIP The Philadelphia Story The School District of Philadelphia’s CEO Region Gregory Shannon, Regional Superintendent Malika A.
Knows and performs Illinois Professional Teaching Standards including working with diverse learners Demonstrates basic competency in planning, instruction,
New haven School Change AND Evaluation and development program
Woodland Park School District Educator Effectiveness 101 August 2014.
Evaluating principal effectiveness Focal Point 2012.
Estándares claves para líderes educativos publicados por
Webinar #1 The Webinar will begin shortly. Please make sure your phone is muted. (*6 to Mute, #6 to Unmute) 7/3/20151.
Teachers for a New Era Arts Design Team Report ( )
Leadership for Student Achievement National School Boards Association.
Essential Concepts for School for Prevention First Patricia Berry, M.A. CSAP Essential Concepts for School m 1 BUILDING THE 5 ESSENTIAL.
Principal Evaluation in Massachusetts: Where we are now National Summit on Educator Effectiveness Principal Evaluation Breakout Session #2 Claudia Bach,
Shared Decision Making: Moving Forward Together
Administrative Evaluation Committee – Orientation Meeting Dr. Christine Carver, Associate Superintendent of Human Capital Development Mr. Stephen Foresi,
Teachers Lead, Students Learn A landmark teacher contract that takes the transformation of Baltimore City Public Schools to the next level September 29,
1 Orientation to Teacher Evaluation /15/2015.
Leadership: Connecting Vision With Action Presented by: Jan Stanley Spring 2010 Title I Directors’ Meeting.
Guidance from the CSDE on SRBI Implementation May 14, 2010 CAPSS Assistant Superintendents’ Meeting Mary Anne Butler, Education Consultant Iris White,
July 2011 Apr Dec May-June Aug. 2011June Winter 2010 Mar Board Study Session on Equity that included student panel, Q&A and.
PARENT COORDINATOR INFORMATION SESSION PARENT ACCOUNTABILITY Wednesday, July 20, 2011 Madelene Chan, Supt. D24 Danielle DiMango, Supt. D25.
Scott Lowrey, Ed.D. (OISE/University of Toronto) CCEAM/CASEA 2014.
Setting purposeful goals Douglas County Schools July 2011.
Inspiring Oregonians… to do what it takes to make our schools among the nation’s best.
Effective Instructional Feedback Mike Miles July 2009.
OVERVIEW 1. WHAT IS FIP YOUR SCHOOL? 2 What is a FIP School? Our goal is to make every school in Ohio a FIP School – a school committed to embracing.
Organizational Conditions for Effective School Mental Health
Results of Survey on Level Organization June 2012.
HEE Hui For Excellence in Education June 6, 2012
Lynwood Park Public School Cyclical Review Report Date: 9-13 March 2012.
1. Housekeeping Items June 8 th and 9 th put on calendar for 2 nd round of Iowa Core ***Shenandoah participants*** Module 6 training on March 24 th will.
Woodland Park School District Educator Effectiveness 101 September 2015.
Delaware’s Performance Appraisal System for Administrators DPAS 2.5 Jacquelyn O. Wilson, Ed.D. University of Delaware Director Delaware Academy for School.
Reform Model for Change Board of Education presentation by Superintendent: Dr. Kimberly Tooley.
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation Program Introduction to Principal Evaluation in Washington 1 June 2015.
National Staff Development Council Standards Cindy Brown Jill Erickson Vera Weber Jerad Voglewede Crysta Wagner ED635 Personnel, Supervision, and Staff.
Transforming the Learning, Teaching, and Leadership Environment Summer Institutes 2001 Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction/Association of Washington.
ANNOOR ISLAMIC SCHOOL AdvancEd Survey PURPOSE AND DIRECTION.
1 Less Testing, More Learning November MASS/MASC Conference.
THEN NOW  Historic approach had been to pull groups of teachers together for whole group/single topic discussions. ◦ District level determination.
Our Theory of Action and Multi-Tiered Framework are anchored in the Vision and Mission for the Superintendent of Public Instruction. Office of Student.
Presented by: Barbara A. Deane–Williams, Superintendent Christopher Marino, Teacher Leader Susan Streicher, Principal Strengthening Teacher & Leader Effectiveness.
Staff All Surveys Questions 1-27 n=45 surveys Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree The relative sizes of the colored bars in the chart.
Turning Around Chronically Low- Performing Schools Nelson Colbert, Science Instructional Specialist Richmond Public Schools Richmond, VA.
Helping Teachers Help All Students: The Imperative for High-Quality Professional Development Report of the Maryland Teacher Professional Development Advisory.
1 School Board and Superintendent Continuous Improvement and Evaluation Quality New Mexico June 9, 2011.
Action Research Purpose and Benefits Technology as a Learning Tool to Improve Student Achievement.
Developed by: July 15,  Mission: To connect family strengthening networks across California to promote quality practice, peer learning and mutual.
Coffee County School System Sept A Vision for Public Education in Georgia.
Superintendent Formative Evaluation April 26, 2015.
SEA Strategies for Promoting Equity: SEA/IHE Collaboration on Teacher Preparation Lynn Holdheide, Center on Great Teachers and Leaders & Collaboration.
School Improvement Needs Assessment – © Iowa Association of School Boards Assessment Conducted by the Iowa Association of School Boards.
New Haven, A City of Great Schools MOVING FROM COMPLIANCE TO COHERENCE IN EVALUATION AND DEVELOPMENT: THE IMPACT OF THE E3 PROGRAM NEW HAVEN PUBLIC SCHOOLS.
A lens to ensure each student successfully completes their educational program in Prince Rupert with a sense of hope, purpose, and control.
TELL Survey 2015 Trigg County Public Schools Board Report December 10, 2015.
Kansas Association of School Boards ESEA Flexibility Waiver KASB Briefing August 10, 2012.
Tell Survey May 12, To encourage large response rates, the Kentucky Education Association, Kentucky Association of School Administrators, Kentucky.
Clinical Practice evaluations and Performance Review
New haven School Change AND Evaluation and development program
Instructional Personnel Performance Appraisal System
Characteristics of Improving School Districts Themes from Research
Presentation transcript:

New Haven, A City of Great Schools COLLABORATION AND SCHOOL REFORM IN NEW HAVEN NEW HAVEN PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1

New Haven, A City of Great Schools Progress Driven by Cross-Group Input and Discussion 2 Reset of reform with joint reform discussions - Contract negotiations overlapping and in parallel Summer 2009 NHFT reform contract agreement (Approved by 842 to 39) Sept 2009 Multi-party committees created by contract agreement (Reform, Teacher Evaluation and Development or TEVAL, and Survey – also PEVAL), with Teacher Committees in parallel Fall/Winter 2009 First Tiering of Schools, identifying 7 pilot schools with significant flexibilityMar 2010 First Climate survey of schools, including 360 feedback Spring 2010 Launch of new school year with revised NHPS evaluation and development systems Sept 2010 Launch of New Haven reform, and conflict in State Capital over Charter SchoolsWinter/Spring 2009 District survey on Central Office Effectiveness & The New Teacher Project (TNTP) survey on evaluation and coaching Recommendations on TEVAL and PEVAL approved by NHPS Board of Education Dec 2009 On-going multiparty dialogue and strengthening of reform programToday

New Haven, A City of Great Schools NHPS School Change Campaign Each school will be organized and supported on its own unique path to success (Tiering of schools, School Turnaround, Flexibility in School Work Rules, School Climate Surveys, Central Office Effectiveness and Feedback Survey) Portfolio of SchoolsTalentCommunity & Parents Adults in the system will be managed as professionals to encourage collaboration, empowerment, and responsibility for outcomes (Teacher and Principal Evaluation and Development Systems, including measures of student learning; Pipeline for Teacher Leadership and Leadership Development) The work of the school system will be as aligned as possible with the other adults who work on behalf of students, including parents and community organizations (Increasing Parent Involvement, Boost! Collaboration with the United Way, New Haven Promise) 3 Issues We have Worked On Evidence of Progress Academic progress in planning year: gains in CMT double that of state as a whole, and 1/3 of system making AYP or safe harbor Smoothness and focus of school opening and ongoing school year…even in the face of historic snow Anecdotal feedback on positive climate in schools, including both collaboration and instructional practice. Identification of XX potential needs improvement staff without significant backlash. Positive anecdotal feedback on TEVAL and instructional manager conversations Evidence We Expect to See Soon Positive climate survey feedback, on school climate and TEVAL process (in field now) Strong academic results in turnaround schools, other tiered schools, and all schools (DRA tests provide leading indicator) Actual progress from a substantial number of potential “Needs Improvement” staff, and overall increases in teacher ratings over time

New Haven, A City of Great Schools Start with Common Goals What has “Collaboration” Meant in NHPS? Reform discussions began with a Joint Statement of Beliefs Similarly, at the start of the TEVAL process, the TNTP survey established a common frustration with existing evaluation and development, and aligned ambitions for a new system Connect Relevant Issues Validate Concerns Administrators need the time and focus to be effective coaches and evaluators – which means other issues need a lower priority Similarly, teachers and administrators need high-quality and timely student assessments There are administrators who are not good judges of teacher quality, and teachers need mechanisms of both protection (3 rd party validation) and feedback (climate surveys) Avoid a Broad Brush The vast majority of both teachers and administrators are capable, competent people, capable of and eager for professional coaching relationships Put the Time In Collaboration means time, commitment, and patience – in order to demonstrate a commitment both to teamwork and to common objectives Examples and Implications 4

New Haven, A City of Great Schools Primary Concerns and their Response 5 Primary Concerns Teacher tenure, or protection of basic due process Use of test scores in a teachers evaluation Top to Bottom Accountability, including principals Translation from teacher input to actual action in the district Response Clear contract language to delineate reform measures Creation of Citywide committees, with parallel teacher working groups Top to Bottom Accountability, including aligned processes/materials, all the way to superintendent In TEVAL, 3 rd Party Validation, multiple measures of student performance, and weight of student performance depending on consistency of result Emphasis on Comer principles of “No Fault” discussion Emphasis on methods of broad input (survey, committees, etc) to identify consensus rather than extreme positions TEACHERS Practical and actionable process for school change: teacher evaluation, school-level flexibility, etc Avoiding the “blame-game”, of parents, teachers, principals, or central office ADMINISTRATION

New Haven, A City of Great Schools Moving Forward 6 We are conscious that both our reform and our relationship must continue to evolve. Areas of focus include: Strengthening professional community among teachers, to emphasize collective professionalism in balance to individual rights Expanding capacity (i.e. time) and capability (i.e. expertise) of school leaders to collaborate with and develop teachers Ensuring tone of respect and professionalism, even in difficult conversations