Power Standards & Common Assessments at McGavock Elementary Stacey Elkins, Literacy Coach T ogether E veryone A chieves M ore.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Assessment Adapted from text Effective Teaching Methods Research-Based Practices by Gary D. Borich and How to Differentiate Instruction in Mixed Ability.
Advertisements

Instructional Planning Documentation
JUSD Common Core Priority Standards for ELA. SEE THE “BIG PICTURE” FIRST.
Common Formative Assessments
Value Added Assessment RAD Reading Assessment Teacher Moderation Greg Miller Supervisor of Assessment Lynda Gellner Literacy Consultant Juanita Redekopp.
Scoring Writing Grades 3-5 Scoring Writing Grades 3-5 (Session 2) Created by Pat Collins, Everett Public Schools.
Common Formative Assessments
Student Growth Developing Quality Growth Goals II
Preparing for the Data Team Process 1.  Know the rationale for “Step A” with respect to the data team process.  Experience Step A as a tool to help.
Welcome CTE Professional Development Day! We are so glad you are with us! Agenda for today: Intro by Micheal Thompson Intro by Micheal Thompson Perkins.
Common Formative Assessment Inquiry & Action RESEARCH & EVALUATION BAKERSFIELD CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT SEPTEMBER, 2013.
We accept learning as the fundamental purpose of our school and therefore are willing to examine all practices in light of the impact on learning.. - DuFour,
How it all connects with Step 1: Computational Skills (Math Review and Mental Math) Step 2: Problem Solving (Elementary does Step 4: Math Facts)
Classroom Assessment FOUN 3100 Fall Assessment is an integral part of teaching.
Common Core 2 Miles Ahead!. ACTIVITY As a team, create an graphic representation that shows the relationship between standards, assessments, results and.
Student Growth Developing Quality Growth Goals STEPS 3-4-5
EVIDENCE BASED WRITING LEARN HOW TO WRITE A DETAILED RESPONSE TO A CONSTRUCTIVE RESPONSE QUESTION!! 5 th Grade ReadingMs. Nelson EDU 643Instructional.
Professional Learning Communities Data Teams
Assessment Cadre #3: “Assess How? Designing Assessments to Do What You Want”
Power Standards: An Overview
©Joan Sedita, The Key Three Routine: Comprehension Strategies Joan Sedita, M.Ed. TM.
1 Let’s Meet! October 13,  All four people have to run.  The baton has to be held and passed by all participants.  You can have world class speed.
Unwrapping Standards.
Important to know and do Worth being familiar with Essential Learning.
Professional Learning Communities. Today’s Learning Targets ✓ I can explain common formative assessments. ✓ I can unwrap a standard. ✓ I can identify.
Pre-Conference Workshop – June 2007 BUILDING A NATIONAL TEAM: Theatre Education Assessment Models Robert A. Southworth, Jr., Ed.D. TCG Assessment Models.
Chapter 6 Leading the Data Teams Process: Standards, Assessment, and Instruction.
Reading Comprehension Strategies Rubrics Standards-based Assessment of and for Learning.
CFA Seminar Common Formative Assessments: The Power of Assessments For Learning Somers Public Schools Session #2 Somers Public Schools Session #2.
Data for Student Success Using Classroom Data to Monitor Student Progress “It is about focusing on building a culture of quality data through professional.
Regional Interim Assessment Project (DCA) Session #1 TRICIA PROFIC, ANDREA TAMARAZIO, KIM LOUTTIT & STEVE GRASER.
Overview to Common Formative Assessments (CFAs) Adapted from The Leadership and Learning Center Presented by Jane Cook & Madeline Negron For Windham Public.
English Language Acquisition Professional Learning Community WIDA Standards Organizational Meeting March 8, 2011.
Assessment Literacy Interim Assessment Kansas State Department of Education ASSESSMENT LITERACY PROJECT1.
Cornell Notes Please print this slide show, follow the directions, and staple it to your reading response. Reading Informational Text Standard :
Unwrapping the Standards. The power standards are the fence posts. They provide the curricular focus and teachers need to dig deeper to assure student.
Common Formative Assessments for Science Monica Burgio Daigler, Erie 1 BOCES.
A Balanced Assessment Plan For Petoskey Public Schools.
Assessment. Levels of Learning Bloom Argue Anderson and Krathwohl (2001)
PLC Team Leader Meeting
KNOW THY IMPACT: The Power of Common Formative Assessments
Determining Student Mastery: Achieving learning potential using assessment Drew Maerz Asheboro City Schools July 8, 2014.
Gathering Evidence to Achieve Results.  ALL CSD students and educators are part of ONE proactive educational system.  Evidence-based instruction and.
Teacher’s English Proficiency Test (TEPT) and Process Skills Test (PST) in Science and Mathematics TEPT-PST: Overview 2015.
FINDING THE PATH AND STAYING ON IT Sue Howell August 12 & 13, 2010.
An Integral Part of Professional Learning Communities.
Fidelity of Implementation A tool designed to provide descriptions of facets of a coherent whole school literacy initiative. A tool designed to provide.
Gathering Evidence to Achieve Results. A Culture of Collaboration - PLC Norms - Systems Support A Focus on Results -Pre-assessments -Common Formative.
Connecticut Accountability for Learning Initiative District and School Capacity Building Leadership No Child Left Behind Partnerships & Professional Learning.
Common Formative Assessments (CFAs) Adapted from The Leadership and Learning Center Presented by Jane Cook for Plainfield Public Schools
Prioritizing Standards How do we decide what matters most?
C&I 222: Understanding Goals and Purposes: Assessment OF Learning and Assessment FOR Learning.
Innovate. Engage. Empower THE ONECLAY WRITES SCORING EXPERIENCE WELCOME! FIND A SEAT TALK TO OTHERS AT YOUR TABLE AND DISCUSS SUCCESSES SO FAR THIS YEAR.
Scoring Writing Kindergarten Scoring Writing Kindergarten (Session two) Created by Pat Collins, Everett Public Schools.
Zimmerly Response NMIA Audit. Faculty Response Teacher input on Master Schedule. Instructional Coaches Collaborative work. Design and implement common.
Critical Vocabulary for Every Student Words that make or break student understanding 1.
Academic Excellence Framework How can we meet the complex learning needs of students in a standards based environment? In brief, how can we achieve.
Math Study Group Meeting #1 November 3, 2014 Facilitator: Simi Minhas Math Achievement Coach, Network 204.
Examining Student Work Middle School Math Teachers District SIP Day January 27, 2016.
GOING DEEPER INTO STEP 1: UNWRAPPING STANDARDS Welcome!
Professional Learning Communities Really Clarifying Learning Targets Module 8.
Instruction & Learning Plan PROFESSIONAL LEARNING COMMUNITIES PROFESSIONAL LEARNING COMMUNITIES: INSTRUCTION & ASSESSMENT PLAN PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT.
Chapter 6 Assessing Science Learning Updated Spring 2012 – D. Fulton.
Student Growth Developing Quality Growth Goals STEPS Teacher Professional Growth & Effectiveness System (TPGES)
Depew Science 5-8 Data Rollout. Reviewing Current Assessment Data Initial reactions Where do you believe your students were MOST successful when compared.
Unpacking This Week’s ELA Standards
Assessment Information
Office of Education Improvement and Innovation
Increasing Rigor to Develop Critical Thinking Skills
OCS: Putting the Assessment Pieces Together
Presentation transcript:

Power Standards & Common Assessments at McGavock Elementary Stacey Elkins, Literacy Coach T ogether E veryone A chieves M ore

Basic Facts Consider These Facts: 5.6 instructional hours per day x 180 days x 13 years = 13,104 total hours of K-12 instruction. McREL identified 200 standards and 3,093 benchmarks in national and state level documents. Classroom teachers estimated a need for 15,465 hours to teach them all.

What is a Power Standard? Prioritized standards Essential for student success In each grade level In life On all high-stakes assessments

How Powerful Practices Work Together Power Standards “Unwrap” Standards, Big Ideas, Essential Questions Performance Assessments Rubrics Common Formative Assessments Data-Drive Decision Making Effective Teaching Strategies By: Robert Smelser

Priority Standards Steps Step 1: Make initial selections based on professional judgment. Step 2: Analyze state test requirements and school and district test data. Step 3: Modify selections as needed. Step 4: Vertically align standards PK-12. Step 5: Acquire feedback from all sites. Step 6: Revise, publish, distribute By: Larry Ainsworth

How to Select Power Standards 1. Determine to start – reading or math 2. Count the number of standards 3. Decide on a reduction target (from 60 to 30 or 20) Criteria: Endurance Leverage Readiness for Next Level

Take 10 minutes to determine subject, count standards, and decide reduction number

Preliminary Determination By yourself quietly (not group work): Select your favorite standards – number determined by the number you just decided You will have 10 minutes to do this.

Preliminary Determination As a group: By dot-voting – determine which standards get the highest number of individual votes. Take 15 minutes to do this. Type or write them on a separate piece of paper so that only your top votes are seen. This is still preliminary!

Discussion As a group, advocate to add or delete some. **If you add one, then remove another! Try to stay in your target number area!

4 nine-weeks Divide the Power Standards into the nine- weeks. Estimate the amount of time devoted to each. Make adjustments to standards – add and delete if necessary ***Allow for time in the 9-weeks for assessments!

Chart Paper Put Power Standards on Chart Paper by nine- weeks. Are they aligned across the grade levels? Do they match the TCAP standards? Now, start back at the beginning with the other subject!

COMMON ASSESSMENTS

Power of COMMON Assessments “Schools with the greatest improvements in student achievement consistently used common assessments.” – Douglas Reeves

Formative vs. Summative Assessments Formative: Immediate feedback Current level of student understanding Administered several times Summative: Final measure to determine if learning goals are met

Common Assessments They are formative & summative Important point Developed COLLABORATIVELY Incorporate each team’s collective wisdom

What are Common Formative Assessments? Items designed to match the level of rigor indicated in the targeted Priority Standards. A blend of item types, including selected- response (multiple choice, true/false, matching) AND constructed-response (short- or extended) Student results analyzed in grade-level or course-specific Data Teams to guide instructional planning and delivery Ainsworth & Viegut

10 STEPS TO CREATING A QUALITY COMMON FORMATIVE ASSESSMENT!

Laying the Foundation: Steps 1-6 Step 1: Select Important Instructional Topic Step 2: Identify Matching Priority Standards Step 3: “Unwrap” Selected Priority Standards Step 4: Create Graphic Organizer Step 5: Determine the Big Ideas Step 6: Write the Essential Questions

Creating the Assessment: Steps 7-10 Step 7: Write Selected-Response Items Step 8: Write Constructed-Response Items (extended or short) Step 9: Create Scoring Guide for Constructed- Response Items Step 10: Write Essential Questions – Big Idea Directions

Step 1: Pick One Topic Pick one topic from 1 st nine-weeks One reading One math Ainsworth suggests important topic for about a month of instruction. For example: Reading Comprehension (Main Idea, Supporting Details, Inferences, and Generalizations)

Step 2: Identify Matching Priority Standards Find the standards that go with that topic Example: Recognize main ideas presented in texts and provide evidence that supports those ideas Draw inferences, conclusions, or generalizations about text and support them with textual evidence and prior knowledge Contrast facts, supported inferences, and opinions in text.

Step 3: “Unwrap” Priority Standards Underline key concepts (important nouns and noun phrases) Circle the skills (the verbs) in each one Example: RECOGNIZE main ideas presented in texts and PROVIDE evidence that supports those ideas.

Step 4: Create a Graphic Organizer “Unwrapped” Concepts From Targeted Power (Priority) Standards THIS IS WHAT STUDENTS NEED TO KNOW! Main ideas Facts Supporting evidence Supported inferences Inferences Opinions Generalizations Text evidence Prior knowledge Conclusions

Step 4: Create a Graphic Organizer “Unwrapped” Skills with Approximate Bloom’s Taxonomy Levels WHAT STUDENTS NEED TO BE ABLE TO DO (2) RECOGNIZE (main idea) (2) PROVIDE (supporting evidence) (4) CONTRAST (facts, supported inferences, opinions) (4) DRAW (inferences, conclusions, generalizations) (5) SUPPORT (inferences/conclusions w/text evidence, prior knowledge)

Step 5: Determine Topical Big Ideas Main ideas must be supported with evidence from text and supporting details. We draw conclusions and make generalizations from what we read and from our own experiences. Knowing the differences between facts, opinions, and inferences helps you make your own decisions about what you read.

Step 6: Write Essential Questions Must correspond with Big Ideas 1. How do you know if your main idea is really the main idea? (Main ideas must be supported with evidence from text and supporting details.) 2. What are conclusions and generalizations? How do we arrive at them? (We draw conclusions and make generalizations from what we read and from our own experiences.)

Step 6: continued 3. Facts, opinions, inferences! What’s the difference, and why should we know? (Knowing the differences between facts, opinions, and inferences helps you make your own decisions about what you read.)

Step 7: Selected-Response Multiple-Choice Question is directly correlated to “unwrapped” concept, skill, and level of Bloom’s Taxonomy (Level 2) RECOGNIZE (main idea) Student Directions: Choose the best answer from the answer choices. 1.What is the main idea of this tale? (level 2) a)Two frogs accidentally jumped into a pail of milk. b)The little frog lived because he didn’t give up. c)Milk can be churned into butter with enough effort.

Step 7: Selected-Response True/False Question is directly correlated to “unwrapped” concept, skill, and level of Bloom’s Taxonomy. (Level 4) DRAW (inferences, conclusions, generalizations) Student Directions: Write T or F in the space provided. (Level 4) ______ The little frog knew the milk would turn into butter if he kept paddling. ______ The little frog hoped that if he kept paddling, he would live.

Step 8: Extended-Response Question is directly correlated to “unwrapped” concepts, skills, and levels of Bloom’s Taxonomy. (Level 4) – DRAW (inferences, conclusions, generalizations) (Level 5) – SUPPORT (inferences, conclusions with text evidence, prior knowledge) This tale best illustrates which one of the following generalizations: (Level 4) a)Danger can show up in the most ordinary places. b)Events sometimes take a surprising turn if you refuse to quit. c)Everyone fails some of the time.

Step 8: Extended-Response Item Student Directions: Write one or more paragraphs defending your answer choice for the multiple-choice question above. State your choice and three reasons to support it, using examples from the tale, “A Bucket of Trouble.” Write a concluding sentence to summarize or support your choice. Your writing will be scored using the criteria listed on the Constructed-Response Scoring Guide. (Level 5)

Step 9: Create Scoring Guide Proficient States answer choice Supports answer choice with three examples from tale Writes one or more paragraphs Writes concluding sentence that summarizes or supports answer choice **Then create the remaining levels of the scoring guide: Advanced, Progressing, and Beginning

Strive for Objective Language Language that is specific (Avoid words like “some, few, good, many, most, little, creative,” etc.) Language that is measurable Language that is observable Language that is understandable Language that is matched to task directions

Step 10: Evaluate Student Understanding of Big Ideas Students will respond to the teacher’s Essential Questions with the Big Ideas stated in their own words. Responses can be quickly evaluated using the provided generic scoring guide (in your supporting documents).

Step 10: Evaluate Student Understanding of Big Ideas Conversation: What are our roadblocks? What do you see as easy to implement? What will we need more PD on?