9.2 – Deciding whether or not to take civil action.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ALTERNATIVE METHODS OF DISPUTE RESOLUTION (ADR)
Advertisements

Unit 4 Area of Study 1 Booklet 1.2 Answers. What is the Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal (VCAT) The Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal.
D ISPUTE R ESOLUTION - A COMPARISON. The legal system presents individuals with a range of ways in which they can resolve disputes. Taking a case to court.
© 2007 Prentice Hall, Business Law, sixth edition, Henry R. Cheeseman Chapter 3 Litigation and Alternative Dispute Resolution Chapter 3 Litigation and.
Law 12 MUNDY Civil Trials – Introduction Civil lawsuit involves disputes between two individuals, groups or corporations/organizations called =
Litigation and Alternatives for Settling Civil Disputes CHAPTER FIVE.
16.1 Civil Cases.
Chapter 16 Lesson 1 Civil and Criminal Law.
EVALUATION OF DISPUTE RESOLUTION METHODS. Strengths of Mediation  Strengths 1) Mediation is often less expensive. Mediation avoids the costs of a trial,
Intro to the courts & Magistrates’ Court Jurisdiction
Slides developed by Les Wiletzky Wiletzky and Associates Copyright © 2006 by Pearson Prentice-Hall. All rights reserved. Traditional, Alternative, and.
Mediation and the Trial Civil Procedure Reforms practice direction Law Society of the Northern Territory Steve Walsh QC Alistair Wyvill SC.
Business and Its Legal Environment (Mgmt 246) Alternative Dispute Resolution (Chapter 3) Professor Charles H. Smith Fall 2010.
N ORTHERN M ARIANA I SLANDS R ULES FOR M ANDATORY A LTERNATIVE D ISPUTE R ESOLUTION.
Victorian Court Hierarchy
AS LAW: The English Legal System
DISPUTE RESOLUTION METHODS
Dispute Resolution Methods
 County Courts  High Court of Justice  The Court of Appeal (Civil Division)  The Supreme Court.
The U.S. Legal System and Alternative Dispute Resolution
The court hierarchy: civil disputes. The Hierarchy Just like in criminal matters, the court hierarchy assists in resolving civil disputes. Disputes should.
DISCOVERY AND DIRECTIONS HEARINGS. Discovery Is a stage of the civil pre-trial process where each party has the opportunity to request documents and additional.
Civil Law in Action Wednesday 17 August Court hierarchy Review: What are the advantages of having a court hierarchy?
It’s our last one YAY!.  Remember FAT ElementMeaningWays it is achieved (F) Entitlement to a fair and unbiased hearing Based on natural justice, a fair.
LAW for Business and Personal Use © 2012 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible.
Copyright © 2005 Pearson Education Canada Inc. Business Law in Canada, 7/e, Chapter 2 Business Law in Canada, 7/e Chapter 2 The Resolution of Disputes.
The purpose and operation of civil pre-trial procedures Chapter 9.3.
Chapter is based on two parties battling to win the case, each acting as the adversary of the other. ROLE: to provide a procedure for the parties.
1.  osts_Yourrighttoknow.aspx osts_Yourrighttoknow.aspx.
Practice Direction 6 Revisited Damian Gordon Barrister at Law.
Access to the courts is vital for an effective legal system.
The Adversary System.  To provide a procedure for disputing parties to present and resolve their cases in as fair a manner as possible  Controlled by.
Unit 4 Area of Study 1 Booklet 1.3 Answers. Advantages of ADR ADR (mediation, conciliation, arbitration) is a MUCH LESS FORMAL compared to the adversarial.
Legal Studies 3C.  People must be treated fairly  Right to be heard by an unbiased decision-maker  Know allegations made against you  Given a chance.
Extended response “Courts can use mediation, conciliation and arbitration to resolve disputes. Indeed, they are relying on them to free up the court system.
 We use the Adversary system of trial.  HOWEVER, the Coroner’s Court, Family Court, Children’s Cases Program, some tribunals and some alternative methods.
Chapter 16.1 Civil Cases. Types of Civil Lawsuits In civil cases the plaintiff – the party bringing the lawsuit – claims to have suffered a loss and usually.
Civil Trial Procedure By: Anthony Franco, Luis Bonaparte, Eric Mathiau, & Josue Lecodet.
Civil Tort Law Trial Procedure Civil Remedies (Tort Action)
VCE Legal Studies: Evaluating the role of the court as a law-maker
Mediation with the Information Commissioner’s Office Cory Martinson Appeals and Policy Analyst 25 November 2009.
Copyright © 2006 by Pearson Prentice-Hall. All rights reserved Slides developed by Les Wiletzky PowerPoint Slides to Accompany ESSENTIALS OF BUSINESS AND.
Trials and Resolving Disputes
Civil Cases. Civil Lawsuits Why do some people file civil suits? – Plaintiff claims to have suffered a loss or injury to themselves and usually seeks.
Solving a civil dispute Methods of dispute resolution Chapter 9.1.
© 2006 Pearson Education, Upper Saddle River, NJ, All Rights Reserved.Hames/Ekern: Introduction to Law, 3 rd edition Chapter Thirteen Alternative.
By Group D The Law of Arbitration by Group D The Law of Arbitration.
Civil Courts & ADR Advantages and Disadvantages. Learning Objectives I will be able to state the advantages and disadvantages of each form of civil dispute.
By Paramita Khisa.  VCAT and court use a range of methods to resolve criminal and civil disputes.  Criminal cases are solved by the judge in courts.
Understanding Business and Personal Law The Court System Chapter 4 The Court System What You’ll Learn How disputes can be settled without the courts.
© 2005 West Legal Studies in Business, a division of Thompson Learning. All Rights Reserved.1 PowerPoint Slides to Accompany The Legal, Ethical, and International.
Purpose and Operation.   Pre-trial procedures – procedures taken before a trial and may result in the dispute being settled  If the dispute is not.
Resolving Civil Disputes
History, Structure and Function of the American Legal System 1 Court Systems and Practices.
Supreme court pre-trial procedures
CONCILIATION  Third party assists in the process of enabling parties to reach a decision between themselves.  Third party does not make a decision 
Victorian Court Hierarchy
Topic 4: Evaluating Methods of Dispute Resolution
Civics & Economics – Goals 5 & 6 Civil Cases
Dispute resolution methods used by the courts and VCAT:
How Civil Procedure allows for FAT
Civil Pre-Trial Procedures
Court Procedures for Negligence Cases
Civil Pre-Trial Procedures
Strengths of ADR Much less formal- is not bound by strict rules of evidence and procedure. This makes it less intimidating and cheaper (do not have to.
Civil Trial Procedures
The role of VCAT.
Civil Pretrial Practice
Key Knowledge The purposes and appropriateness of consumer affairs Victoria in resolving civil disputes Key Skills Discuss and justify the appropriateness.
Chapter 16.1 Civil Cases.
Presentation transcript:

9.2 – Deciding whether or not to take civil action

Considerations regarding taking action or not!

Factors to consider when initiating civil proceedings Costs involved. The costs involved in employing legal representatives can be expensive and, in some cases, the damages a plaintiff receives will not cover the costs of legal fees. Probability of winning. Obviously plaintiffs must consider whether they are likely to win or lose the case and whether or not they are prepared to take the risk of losing valuable time and money if they are unsuccessful. Defendant's ability to pay. Another matter to consider if the plaintiff wishes to sue the defendant for damages is whether or not the defendant will be able to pay the damages. If the defendant has no money, then taking him or her to court would be more a matter of principle rather than seeking monetary compensation. Complexity of the case. Along with the complexity of the case, another consideration is whether or not there have been any similar cases in court that have been successful. Sometimes a particular type of case might not have been heard by the court before, which means that the court will be making a decision for the first time. These types of cases are sometimes called ‘test cases’, and mean a greater risk to a plaintiff because the likelihood of success is not known. Publicity. Another matter to consider is the publicity the case may generate. If a plaintiff is well known, it might be better not to proceed because other matters about his or her personal life may be aired in court, providing further content for the media. Personal circumstances. Parties taking civil action should take into consideration the effects a trial may have on their health and their family life.

Methods that can be used to resolve a civil dispute It is often most efficient for parties to aim to resolve a civil dispute between themselves in an informal manner before taking their action to court, which can be very costly, time-consuming and stressful. Parties might aim to resolve their dispute using ADR It is often more efficient and effective to resolve civil disputes using dispute resolution methods. These methods are less formal and less costly than court proceedings because no strict rules of evidence and procedure are followed and there is less need for legal representatives, and matters can generally be resolved in a more timely manner. Parties may also feel more satisfaction with the outcome because they have directly participated in the decision-making process.

Avenues of civil dispute settlement CourtOriginal civil jurisdictionAppellate civil jurisdiction Magistrates'Cases up to $ None County Cases involving unlimited amounts None Supreme (Trial Division) Cases involving unlimited amounts Appeals from the Magistrates' Court (and VCAT) on an error in law only Supreme Court of AppealNone All civil appeals from the county and supreme (trial division) courts (and VCAT if presided over by president or vice-presidents)

Aiming to reach an out-of-court settlement One of the main aims of the parties to a civil dispute must be to reach an out-of- court settlement or resolve their dispute without the need to go to court. This might be achieved if the defendant offers an acceptable amount of money to compensate the plaintiff for the breach of rights, or if the plaintiff decides to abandon the civil action. In many cases, parties are able to reach an agreement and resolve the dispute using negotiation or other methods of dispute settlement including mediation, conciliation and arbitration. The parties to a civil action must also follow various pre-trial procedures in an attempt to resolve their case prior to attending court. For example, prior to attending court both parties must exchange various written documents and information to ensure each party is fully aware of the details and facts of the case. It is hoped that this knowledge may assist the parties to reach an early settlement. If this is not possible, at the least, the exchange of this information should help minimise the length of the trial as the details and facts of the case are clarified before the trial.

Your turn Complete questions 1 – 6. Page 335 of text.