Critical Thinking (do quiz on page 21). Characteristics of a Good Critical Thinker (p. 23, 27) Truth Seeking Open Minded Analytic Systematic Persistent.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

-- in other words, logic is

Advertisements

Basic Terms in Logic Michael Jhon M. Tamayao.

Teaching for CT. What is CT? Athearn slides 1, 2,3.

Module 3 Objectives Gain knowledge in the variables that comprise critical thinking Identify when clinical reasoning is being used Evaluate the effectiveness.

Philosophy as a set of skills

Unlocking the mind to critical thinking. “Thinking about Thinking”

Deduction and Induction

LogicandEvidence Scientific argument. Logic Reasoning –Deductive –Inductive.

Inductive and Deductive Reasoning Geometry 1.0 – Students demonstrate understanding by identifying and giving examples of inductive and deductive reasoning.

Building Logical Arguments. Critical Thinking Skills Understand and use principles of scientific investigation Apply rules of formal and informal logic.

Slide 1 1 Critical Thinking and Nursing Judgment NPN 105 Joyce Smith RN, BSN.

Critical Thinking and Nursing Practice

2.5 Verifying Arguments Write arguments symbolically. Determine when arguments are valid or invalid. Recognize form of standard arguments. Recognize common.

Persuasion Deductive reasoning works from the more general to the more specific. Sometimes this is informally called a "top-down" approach. Inductive reasoning.

Section 1.1 Inductive Reasoning 1/16. DEDUCTIVE REASONING Two Types of Reasoning INDUCTIVE REASONING 2/16.

Today’s Quote Use soft words and hard arguments English Proverb.

1. Is Critical Thinking Enough to Decide Questions Such as Those Posed in Enough? Applying a Schema of Critical Wisdom For Deciding the “Big Questions”

Logic and Reason. Deductive Reasoning Reasoning that moves from the general to the particular Watchdogs bark at strangers. The watchdog did not bark at.

Thinking Mathematically

Deductive Reasoning What can you D…D….D…. DEDUCE ?

Logic in Everyday Life.

Applying Deductive Reasoning Section 2.3. Essential Question How do you construct a logical argument?

Reasoning and Critical Thinking Validity and Soundness 1.

Deductive Reasoning Chapter 2 Lesson 4.

Question of the Day!  We shared a lot of examples of illogical arguments!  But how do you make a LOGICAL argument? What does your argument need? What.

Section 2-2: Conditional Statements. Conditional A statement that can be written in If-then form symbol: If p —>, then q.

Chapter 2 Section 2-1: Conditional Statements

Theory of Knowledge Ms. Bauer

Section 2-5: Deductive Reasoning Goal: Be able to use the Law of Detachment and the Law of Syllogism. Inductive Reasoning uses _________ to make conclusions.

Philosophical Method  Logic: A Calculus For Good Reason  Clarification, Not Obfuscation  Distinctions and Disambiguation  Examples and Counterexamples.

The construction of a formal argument

Critical Thinking, Reading and Writing Part 2 Ed McCorduck CPN 101—Academic Writing II on Computer SUNY Cortland

Fun with Deductive Reasoning

Propositions and Arguments. What is a proposition? A proposition is a predicative sentence that only contains a subject and a predicate S is P.

Logic and Reasoning.

Section 2.2 Inductive and Deductive Reasoning. Definition: Conjecture an unproven statement that is based on observations or given information.

Deductive and Inductive Reasoning

Higher / Int.2 Philosophy 12. Our Learning  Fallacy Reminder  Summary following Homework NAB  Class NAB.

Dr. Andreas Yumarma First Meeting. Study of the methods and principles used to distinguish correct from incorrect reasoning (Irving M. Copy & Carl Cohen,

METHODS IN ANTHROPOLOGY SCIENCE AND INTERPRETATION.

© 2016 by Pearson Education, Inc.. THINK CRITICALLY, FACIONE & GITTENS Chapter 14 Empirical Reasoning.

Critical Thinking in the Nursing Process

Meaning, Definition and Concept of RESEARCH

Deductive reasoning.

Chapter 1 Lessons 1-4 to 1-8.

CHANGE THEORY AND EDUCATION INNOVATION

Chapter 3: Reality Assumptions

Earlier we learned about inductive reasoning. • Earlier we learned about inductive reasoning. • Look at specific examples. • Recognize patterns, which.

2.4 Deductive Reasoning.

2-3 Deductive Reasoning Objectives:

Reasoning, Logic, and Position Statements

DEDUCTIVE vs. INDUCTIVE REASONING

Deductive Reasoning: The process of thought through which a conclusion is reached through a set of premises (assumptions that something is true).

Inductive and Deductive Logic

2-1 Inductive Reasoning.

Induction and deduction are used together in research reasoning

Notes 2.3 Deductive Reasoning.

Premise: If it’s a school day, then I have Geometry class.

Reasoning and Proofs Deductive Reasoning Conditional Statement

Logical Fallacies.

Chapter 5: Inductive Generalizations

The Persuasive Speech Ch. 24.

Tenets to Argumentation

Angles, Angle Pairs, Conditionals, Inductive and Deductive Reasoning

If there is any case in which true premises lead to a false conclusion, the argument is invalid. Therefore this argument is INVALID.

If there is any case in which true premises lead to a false conclusion, the argument is invalid. Therefore this argument is INVALID.

Skilled and Eager to Think

1-5 Conditional statements 1-6 deductive reasoning

Presentation transcript:

Critical Thinking (do quiz on page 21)

Characteristics of a Good Critical Thinker (p. 23, 27) Truth Seeking Open Minded Analytic Systematic Persistent Inquisitive Judicious

Critical Thinking Skills (p. 31) Interpretation Analysis Inference Evaluation Explanation Self-Regulation

Inductive Reasoning (34) Bottom-up reasoning From several specific instances To a general conclusion about other like instances in the future

Deductive Reasoning (35) Top-down reasoning From a general hypothesis To a specific conclusion

Correct Syllogism (True Premise)  All mammals are warm-blooded  No lizards are warm-blooded  No lizards are mammals

False Syllogism (False Premise)  Blondes have more fun.  Mary is blonde; Jane is not.  Mary has more fun than Jane.