Consolidation of Funds in Schoolwide Programs FY15 Oklahoma State Department of Education Office of Federal Programs.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Response to Intervention Funding Issues. The Question Is… Can RTI be an allowable part of a federally funded program? NOT Can federal funds pay for RTI?
Advertisements

Targeted Assistance & Schoolwide Programs NCLB Technical Assistance Audio April 18, :30 PM April 19, :30 AM Alaska Department of Education.
Schoolwide Programs vs. Targeted Assistance Programs
1 “Changing Performance” Nashville, Tennessee February 2, National Title I Conference Consolidating Funds S choolwide P rograms Sandy Brown &
Marina Taylor Title I Director Aberdeen School Dist. #58 November 10, 2011.
ESEA Title Programs Use of Funds: Consolidated School Wide Budget March 19, 2013 March 20, 2013 Presenters: GayeLeia King, Supervisory Education Specialist.
Campus Improvement Plans (CIP) Schoolwide Programs.
 The Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) requires equitable services to be provided to private schools.  Why? Federal programs are supported.
Implementing RTI Using Title I, Title III, and CEIS Funds Key Issues for Decision-makers.
Title I, Part A Flexibility: Addressing Barriers to Improving Student Achievement Anita Villarreal State Coordinator, Title I, Part A Division of Federal.
What is the Parent Involvement Plan (PIP)? Why do we have a Parent Involvement Plan (PIP)? (PIP) PARENT INVOLVEMENT PLAN 1.
BO MERRITT DIRECTOR OFFICE OF FEDERAL PROGRAMS Federal Grants Planning Titles I, II, & III.
Subrecipient Monitoring FY15 of Education Oklahoma State Department of Education Office of Federal Programs Federal Programs Office of Titles I, II, III,
Schoolwide Program Presentation New England Comprehensive Assistance Center Steve Hamilton.
Escondido Union School District Budget Update The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA)
Serving English Language Learners with ESEA Title III, Part A Funds.
School-wide Consolidation 2015 ESEA Directors Institute August 26, 2015.
1 MERA May 17, 2011 Mike Radke, Director, Office of Field Services, Michigan Department of Education.
Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) Maintenance of Effort Danna Sanders Phone:
Karen Seay PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT 101 – Writing a compliant policy and compact We’re all in this together:  State Department of Education 
Title I Schoolwide Ray Draghi and Rasha Hetata October 2014.
Title I Schoolwide Programs (SWP). Why Schoolwide? Flexibility Purpose : to provide schools with high percentages of at-risk children* the flexibility.
Virginia Department of Education Division Leadership Liaison Meeting January 7, 2013.
Federal Program Funding to Improve Student Outcomes Consolidated Application Spring Report District Learner Advisory Commitee (DAC) Meeting June.
Federal Flexibility Initiative and Schoolwide Programs.
Region Three Pilot “Virtual” Consolidation. Consolidation Legislation and Guidance Title I Schoolwide Fiscal Guidance issued February, 2008 [Section E]
MIS DATA CONFERENCE 2012 JULY 23, 2012 Mississippi Department of Education Office of Federal Programs.
Office of Federal Programs FY15 (SY ) ESEA Programs Applications and Due Dates October 31, 2014.
Federal Grant Training. I. Title I-A Fiscal Requirements  To ensure Title I-A funds are in addition to regular services normally provided, three fiscal.
Schoolwide Programs – New Guidance Karen Seay, Director Federal Policy and ESEA Research Division New Directors’ Training September 17-18, 2015
Schoolwide Funding Consolidation Panel Panelists: Nancy Konitzer, Arizona Department of Education, Rebecca Vogler, Cincinnati Public Schools and Jose Figueroa,
What to Expect When You Are Expecting Consolidated Monitoring: Every Step of the Way Office of Federal Programs Oklahoma State Department of Education.
Schoolwide Consolidation Consolidation Legislation and Guidance Title I Schoolwide Fiscal Guidance issued February, 2008 [Section E] Designing Schoolwide.
CAMPUS IMPROVEMENT PLANS (CIP) Schoolwide Programs.
Dr. John D. Barge, State School Superintendent “Making Education Work for All Georgians” Flexible Learning Program (FLP)
Oklahoma State Department of Education Janet Barresi State Superintendent of Public Instruction Consolidated Schoolwide Funds.
Title I Part A: Back to Basics ESEA Odyssey Fall 2010.
Federal Programs and the ESEA Flexibility Waiver Titles I, II, VI and X.
SUPPLEMENT, NOT SUPPLANT SUPPLEMENT, NOT SUPPLANT TESTS District Level: Maintenance of Effort School Level: Comparability of Services Child Level: Educational.
Contents: Module 7 Federal Requirements & Budget School Improvement Team Alabama Department of Education.
Title II, Part D Enhancing Education through Technology Equitable Services to Private Schools: Program Specifics.
Subrecipient Monitoring FY14 Oklahoma State Department of Education Federal Programs Office of Titles I, II, III, VI and X.
1 MARIA GARCIA Schoolwide Program Manager DIVISION OF FEDERAL PROGRAMS Title I Schoolwide Programs.
1 Schoolwide Accounting John Dunn Director of Financial Review Title II A Conference March 5, 2008 Georgia Department of Education Kathy Cox, Superintendent.
Federal Flexibility Initiative and Schoolwide Programs.
No Child Left Behind Application Title VI, Part B, Subpart 2 Virginia Department of Education March 2011.
Kay Townsend, Fiscal Consultant Title I, IIA, VI, & X Oklahoma State Department of Education (405)
Title I, Part A Schoolwide Programs Webinar #4 James Connolly Terry Reyes Office for Grants and Federal Fiscal Compliance March 18,
Title I Annual Meeting West Orange Elementary School Title I Program Overview for Schoolwide Program (SWP) Schools.
Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)
School-wide Consolidation: LEA Panel
A Principal’s Guide to Title I, Part A and LAP Requirements
Federal Program Funding to Improve Student Outcomes
Private School Consultation
Private School Consultation
Federal, State & Local Funds
Consolidation of Funds for Title I Schoolwide Schools Initiative
The Role a Charter School Plays in its Charter Authorizer’s Submission of the Consolidated Federal Programs Application Joey Willett, Unit of Federal Programs.
Administering Federal Programs-A Charter School Perspective
Cartersville City Schools
Title I Annual Meeting Title I Program Overview for Schoolwide Program (SWP) Schools Federal and State Education Programs Branch.
Office of Federal and State Accountability
ESEA Programs | December 2018
US Department of Education
Constructing High Performing Schoolwide Programs
ANNUAL TITLE I MEETING NOBLE ACADEMY COLUMBUS.
LAUSD Consolidated Application Part II
AUDITS----SINGLE AUDIT CONCEPT, COMPLIANCE
Title I, Part A Virginia Department of Education
ESSA Schoolwide 2017.
Presentation transcript:

Consolidation of Funds in Schoolwide Programs FY15 Oklahoma State Department of Education Office of Federal Programs

Title I Schoolwide Program The underlying purpose of the schoolwide approach is to enable sites with high numbers of at-risk children to integrate the services they provide to their children from Federal, State, and local resources.

Purpose of Consolidating Funds The purpose of consolidating funds is to help a schoolwide site effectively design and implement a comprehensive plan to upgrade the entire educational program based on the identified needs through its comprehensive needs assessment.

What Does Consolidating Funds Mean? Schoolwide sites treat the funds being consolidated as a single, conceptual “pool” of funds. Funds from the contributing programs lose their identity. The site uses funds from this “pool” to support any activity of the schoolwide plan without regard to which program contributed the specific funds.

Advantages of Consolidating Funds Eases the requirements for accounting for funds from each specific program separately. Releases most of the statutory and regulatory requirements of the specific federal programs consolidated. The schoolwide program must meet the intent and purpose of the Federal programs so students needs are met.

Types of Consolidation Consolidate only Federal funds Consolidate Federal, State, and local funds Note: LEAs are encouraged to consolidate as many eligible formula Federal program funds as possible. Competitive grants may not be used in consolidating funds.

Funds Available for Consolidation State aid and local tax revenue Title I, Part A Title I, Part C* Title I, Part D, Subpart 2 Title II, Part A Title III, Part A Title VI, Part B, Rural and Low Income Schools Title VII, Indian Ed* IDEA* * With restrictions

Meeting Intent and Purpose The site must be able to demonstrate that its schoolwide program contains sufficient resources and activities to reasonably address the intent and purposes of the included programs, particularly as they relate to the lowest-performing students. Sites may only use funds to support state/local activities if state/local funds are included in the consolidation.

Intent and Purpose of Programs State and Local Funds – Maintenance & Operations Title I, Part A – Help students achieve proficiency on State academic standards Title I, Part D, Subpart 2 – Collaboration with locally operated Neglected and Delinquent facilities

Intent and Purpose of Programs Title II, Part A – Improving Teacher and Principal Quality Title III – Ensure that limited English proficient children become proficient in English IDEA, Part B – All children with disabilities have an appropriate education designed to meet their individual needs

LEA Responsibilities The schoolwide site must identify which programs are included in the consolidation and the amount each program contributes to the consolidated schoolwide “pool”. Describe and maintain records that demonstrate how the intent and purposes of each of the Federal programs being consolidated will be met. The site-level basic educational program must be identified and continue to be offered.

LEA Responsibilities Continued An LEA does not literally need to combine funds in a single account or pool with its own accounting code. Each site operating a schoolwide program must receive all the State and local funds it would otherwise receive to operate its basic educational program in the absence of any Federal funds. It is the LEA’s responsibility, not the site’s, to be able to show that it distributes Federal, State, and local funds equitably to all sites.

LEA Responsibilities Continued Required District Set-Asides must still be budgeted at the District level. An LEA may be deemed ineligible to consolidate funds if it experiences any of the following: – Monitoring Findings – Lack of Internal Controls – Late and/or Inadequate Applications and Schoolwide Plans – Other deficiencies determined by federal programs office

Requirements Maintenance of Effort Comparability Equitable Services for Private Schools Carryover Limitations

Thank you for participating today.