The latest results of verification over Poland Katarzyna Starosta Joanna Linkowska COSMO General Meeting, Cracow 15-19 September 2008 Institute of Meteorology.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Slide 1ECMWF forecast User Meeting -- Reading, June 2006 Verification of weather parameters Anna Ghelli, ECMWF.
Advertisements

Slide 1ECMWF forecast products users meeting – Reading, June 2005 Verification of weather parameters Anna Ghelli, ECMWF.
QPF verification of the 4 model versions at 7 km res. (COSMO-I7, COSMO-7, COSMO-EU, COSMO-ME) with the 2 model versions at 2.8 km res. (COSMO- I2, COSMO-IT)
VERIFICATION Highligths by WG5. 9° General MeetingAthens September Working package/Task on “standardization” The “core” Continuous parameters: T2m,
COSMO Workpackage No First Results on Verification of LMK Test Runs Basing on SYNOP Data Lenz, Claus-Jürgen; Damrath, Ulrich
Federal Department of Home Affairs FDHA Federal Office of Meteorology and Climatology MeteoSwiss WG5-Report from Switzerland: Verification of COSMO in.
Eidgenössisches Departement des Innern EDI Bundesamt für Meteorologie und Klimatologie MeteoSchweiz Institut für Physik der Atmosphäre On the Value of.
COSMO General Meeting – Roma Sept 2011 Some results from operational verification in Italy Angela Celozzi – Giovanni Favicchio Elena Oberto – Adriano.
The use of the NWCSAF High Resolution Wind product in the mesoscale AROME model at the Hungarian Meteorological Service Máté Mile, Mária Putsay and Márta.
Verification of DWD Ulrich Damrath & Ulrich Pflüger.
12th EMS Annual Meeting & 9th European Conference on Applied Climatology (ECAC), Łódź, September 2012 Rajmund Przybylak, Aleksandra Pospieszyńska.
COSMO General Meeting Zurich, 2005 Institute of Meteorology and Water Management Warsaw, Poland- 1 - Verification of the LM at IMGW Katarzyna Starosta,
On the impact of the SSO scheme in the COSMO model into the development of a deep cyclone in the Tirrenian sea Case study: April Antonella Morgillo.
COSMO General Meeting – Moscow Sept 2010 Some results from operational verification in Italy Angela Celozzi - Federico Grazzini Massimo Milelli -
A Statistical Comparison of Weather Stations in Carberry, Manitoba, Canada.
Characteristics of Extreme Events in Korea: Observations and Projections Won-Tae Kwon Hee-Jeong Baek, Hyo-Shin Lee and Yu-Kyung Hyun National Institute.
Federal Department of Home Affairs FDHA Federal Office of Meteorology and Climatology MeteoSwiss Report on Workshop « Stratified verification by weather.
The La Niña Influence on Central Alabama Rainfall Patterns.
Verification methods - towards a user oriented verification WG5.
9° General Meeting Adriano Raspanti - WG5. 9° General MeetingAthens September Future plans CV-VerSUS project future plans COSI “The Score” new package.
SEASONAL COMMON PLOT SCORES A DRIANO R ASPANTI P ERFORMANCE DIAGRAM BY M.S T ESINI Sibiu - Cosmo General Meeting 2-5 September 2013.
COSMO General Meeting, Offenbach, 7 – 11 Sept Dependance of bias on initial time of forecasts 1 WG1 Overview
We carried out the QPF verification of the three model versions (COSMO-I7, COSMO-7, COSMO-EU) with the following specifications: From January 2006 till.
Latest results in verification over Poland Katarzyna Starosta, Joanna Linkowska Institute of Meteorology and Water Management, Warsaw 9th COSMO General.
Long-term changes in frequencies of wind directions on the western coast of Estonia Jaak Jaagus Institute of Geography, University of Tartu Second International.
Dispersion conditions in complex terrain - a case study of the January 2010 air pollution episode in Norway Viel Ødegaard Norwegian Meteorological.
Regional Verification of CPC’s Seasonal Outlooks Michael Halpert & Kenneth Pelman Climate Prediction Center.
Federal Department of Home Affairs FDHA Federal Office of Meteorology and Climatology MeteoSwiss WG4 activities Pierre Eckert, MeteoSwiss, Geneva.
Verification Verification with SYNOP, TEMP, and GPS data P. Kaufmann, M. Arpagaus, MeteoSwiss P. Emiliani., E. Veccia., A. Galliani., UGM U. Pflüger, DWD.
Evaluation of 2002 Annual 12km MM5 Surface Parameters for OTC Modeling Shan He and Gary Kleiman NESCAUM And Winston Hao NYDEC Review of Application and.
NWP Activities at INM José A. García-Moya SMNT – INM 27th EWGLAM & 12th SRNWP Meetings Ljubljana, October 2005.
The months of the year January February. The months of the year March April.
U. Damrath, COSMO GM, Athens 2007 Verification of numerical QPF in DWD using radar data - and some traditional verification results for surface weather.
Short Range Ensemble Prediction System Verification over Greece Petroula Louka, Flora Gofa Hellenic National Meteorological Service.
INSTITUTE OF METEOROLOGY AND WATER MANAGEMENT Hydrological applications of COSMO model Andrzej Mazur Institute of Meteorology and Water Management Centre.
General Meeting Moscow, 6-10 September 2010 High-Resolution verification for Temperature ( in northern Italy) Maria Stefania Tesini COSMO General Meeting.
COSMO General Meeting Zurich, 2005 Institute of Meteorology and Water Management Warsaw, Poland- 1 - Simple Kalman filter – a “smoking gun” of shortages.
NCAR April 1 st 2003 Mesoscale and Microscale Meteorology Data Assimilation in AMPS Dale Barker S. Rizvi, and M. Duda MMM Division, NCAR
Overview of WG5 activities and Conditional Verification Project Adriano Raspanti - WG5 Bucharest, September 2006.
VERIFICATION Highligths by WG5. 2 Outlook Some focus on Temperature with common plots and Conditional Verification Some Fuzzy verification Long trends.
10th COSMO General Meeting, Cracow, Poland Verification of COSMOGR Over Greece 10 th COSMO General Meeting Cracow, Poland.
Comparison of LM Verification against Multi Level Aircraft Measurements (MLAs) with LM Verification against Temps Ulrich Pflüger, Deutscher Wetterdienst.
Latest results in the precipitation verification over Northern Italy Elena Oberto, Marco Turco, Paolo Bertolotto (*) ARPA Piemonte, Torino, Italy.
Verification methods - towards a user oriented verification The verification group.
Federal Department of Home Affairs FDHA Federal Office of Meteorology and Climatology MeteoSwiss Experiments at MeteoSwiss : TERRA / aerosols Flake Jean-Marie.
VERIFICATION Highligths by WG5. 2 Outlook The COSMO-Index COSI at DWD Time series of the index and its DWD 2003.
VALIDATION OF HIGH RESOLUTION SATELLITE-DERIVED RAINFALL ESTIMATES AND OPERATIONAL MESOSCALE MODELS FORECASTS OF PRECIPITATION OVER SOUTHERN EUROPE 1st.
Deutscher Wetterdienst Long-term trends of precipitation verification results for GME, COSMO-EU and COSMO-DE Ulrich Damrath.
WG5 COSMO General Meeting, Rome 2011 Authors: ALL Presented by Adriano Raspanti.
New results in COSMO about fuzzy verification activities and preliminary results with VERSUS Conditional Verification 31th EWGLAM &16th SRNWP meeting,
Operational Verification at HNMS
Weather Data Summary.
COSMO-RU operational verification in Russia using VERSUS2
Current verification results for COSMO-EU and COSMO-DE at DWD
Tuning the horizontal diffusion in the COSMO model
COSMO Priority Project ”Quantitative Precipitation Forecasts”
Country Presentation SASCOF September 2016 Maldives
Daniel Leuenberger1, Christian Keil2 and George Craig2
COSMO General Meeting 2009 WG5 Parallel Session 7 September 2009
Verification Overview
Conditional verification of all COSMO countries: first results
INSTITUTE OF METEOROLOGY AND WATER MANAGEMENT
Christoph Gebhardt, Zied Ben Bouallègue, Michael Buchhold
2007 Mei-yu season Chien and Kuo (2009), GPS Solutions
Some Verification Highlights and Issues in Precipitation Verification
Verification Overview
Ulrich Pflüger & Ulrich Damrath
Seasonal common scores plots
Short Range Ensemble Prediction System Verification over Greece
Verification using VERSUS at RHM
Presentation transcript:

The latest results of verification over Poland Katarzyna Starosta Joanna Linkowska COSMO General Meeting, Cracow September 2008 Institute of Meteorology and Water Management

PLAN Introduction Data and method Verification of continuous parameters Verification of precipitation Common plot Versus Future plans

Work Report in WG 5 in Poland Verification of surface parameters and precipitation using 56 SYNOP stations Verification of precipitation using 308 rain gauges Common plots Data: June May 2008 Case study VERSUS – compilation package

METHODS Run 00 UTC – model 14 km ME and RMSE for continuous parameters: T2m,TD2m, MSLP, Wspeed Period monthly and seasonally (JJA, SON, DJF, MAM) Precipitation 6h and 12h (thresholds 0.2, 2, 5,10), 24h (thresholds 0.2, 2,10, 20 mm), scores: FBI, POD, FAR, ETS Precipitation 24h (06-06) – thresholds 0.5, 1, 2.5, 5, 10, 25, 30, scores: FBI, POD, PON, FAR, TSS, HSS, ETS

Domain used at IMGW

RMSE, ME, June 2007-May 2008 Temperature, Dew point temperature 2m Temperature - ME Winter DJF below zero Summer JJA, Spring MAM above zero Autumn SON round about zero  2m Temperature – RMSE Summer and Spring diurnal cycle, max at noon (FCT 12,36h) minimum at night (FCT 6,30h) Winter, Autumn no explicit diurnal cycle 2m Dew point temperature – ME Summer, Spring below zero Winter, Autumn round about zero 2m Dew point temperature – RMSE Summer and Spring diurnal cycle, max at noon (FCT 12,36h) minimum at night (FCT 6,30h) Winter, Autumn no explicit diurnal cycle

RMSE, ME, June 2007-May 2008 Sea level pressure, Wind speed  Sea level pressure – ME Increase with forecast time. Positive in winter, near zero or negative in summer, spring and autumn  Sea level pressure – RMSE Increase with forecast time. The highest at winter (above 3) and smallest at summer.  Wind speed – ME Winter below zero at noon, above zero at night. Summer and autumn above zero.  Wind speed – RMSE Increase with forecast time. Similar for all seasons.

12h forecast, April 2008, Warsaw RMSE=2.57 ME=0.16 RMSE=3.17 ME=2.33 RMSE=1.83 ME=0.15 RMSE=1.82 ME=-0.73

FBI, 6,12, 24h precipitation July 2007-May 2008

POD-FAR, 6h precipitation, seasonal

POD-FAR, 12h precipitation, seasonal

POD-FAR, 24h precipitation, seasonal

POD-FAR, FBI, 24h precipitation, threshold 0.5, year 2007

Indices for 24h precipitation,April 2008

Monthly precipitation, model, stations, April 2008 Minimum: 0 25%-tile: 36.2 Median: %-tile: 66 Maximum: Minimum: %-tile: Median: %-tile: Maximum:

Monthly precipitation, model, stations, January 2008 Minimum: 0 25%-tile: 36 Median: %-tile: 61.3 Maximum: 157 Minimum: %-tile: Median: %-tile: Maximum:

Conclusions The seasonal variation for the scores is observed. The diurnal cycle for 2m temperature and 2m dew point temperature is observed. The RMSE and ME increase with the forecast time for sea level pressure and 10 m wind speed. The verification of 6h accumulated precipitation is not satisfactory. Overprediction is observed for 12h and 24h accumulated precipitation for threshold 0.2 mm and underprediction for higher thresholds of precipitations.

THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION