Zlatko Mihaljević, Ana Previšić, Igor Stanković Dept. of Biology, Faculty of Science, Univ. of Zagreb Development of biological assessment systems for.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Framework for the Ecological Assessment of Impacted Sediments at Mining Sites in Region 7 By Jason Gunter (R7 Life Scientist) and.
Advertisements

The European Eutrophication Activity and the UWWT and Nitrate Directives Ana Cristina Cardoso.
Ecological Evaluation Index (EEI) A biotic index for the implementation of WFD in rocky coastal and sedimentary transitional Mediterranean waters by Sotiris.
Intercalibration of assessment systems for the WFD: Aims, achievements and further challenges Presented by Sandra Poikane Joint Research Centre Institute.
Lec 12: Rapid Bioassessment Protocols (RBP’s)
Implementation of WFD in Hungary - rivers Zoltán Simonffy Hungarian Academy of Sciences Research Group for Water Management Zoltán Simonffy Hungarian Academy.
Final stuff: n Lab practical –Coleoptera, Hemiptera n Final exam: Fri May 2:15 –Assessment with Invertebrates n Lecture material (IDEM protocol) n.
Ecological Evaluation Index (EEI) A biotic index for the implementation of WFD by Sotiris Orfanidis (February 2008)
Invertebrate Standards in Rivers Paul Logan. Existing CEN standards relating to the ecological assessment of freshwaters - TG1 - invertebrates Quality.
Ecoregion typing Ecological classification or typing will allow the grouping of rivers according to similarities based on a top-down nested hierarchical.
PROJECT :EVK PROGRAMME:EESD-ESD-3 THEMATIC PRIORITY:EESD WATER FRAMEWORK DIRECTIVE.
An overview of water quality monitoring schemes for compliance with the WFD An Overview An overview of water quality monitoring schemes for compliance.
ARROW: system for the evaluation of the status of waters in the Czech Republic Jiří Jarkovský 1) Institute of Biostatistics and Analyses, Masaryk University,
NC Division of Water Quality Water Quality Assessments and Local Watershed Plans.
P. Mustafić, M. Mrakovčić Faculty of Science, Univ. of Zagreb European Union Twinning Project European Union Twinning Project of the WFD in Croatia Implementation.
Rudy Vannevel Canada, Montreal FLEMISH ENVIRONMENT AGENCY A. Van de Maelestraat 96 B-9320 Erembodegem BELGIUM Methods and guidelines for the.
Final stuff: n Lab practical: Apr 29 n Final exam: due Fri May 2:15.
CEN TC 230 WG2 “Biological Methods” Work Programme October 2008.
National Aquatic Resource Surveys Wadeable Streams Assessment Overview November, 2007.
Aquatic Macroinvertebrates
Fish migration from a Water Framework Directive perspective
Rapid Bioassessment Protocols for low gradient streams) for species richness, composition and pollution tolerance, as well as a composite benthic macroinvertebrate.
ECOSTAT meeting – Ispra (IT), July of 14 CBriv GIG Macrophyte Intercalibration.
Resolution 147 (Vienna-2) WG 2 welcomes the proposal for future standardisation activities and collaboration between CEN, DG Environment and ECOSTAT and.
MODULE 1 Water Framework Directive, Relation of WFD with Daughter Directives, River Basin Management Planning, Water Bodies, Typology, Classification River.
Seite Foto Pulkau Foto Gebirgsbach General chemical and physico- chemical elements – Type-specific assessment of rivers in Austria Karin Deutsch.
Presented by Sandra Poikane EC Joint Research Centre Institute for Environment and Sustainability Biological indicators of lakes and rivers and the Intercalibration.
Case Study Development of an Index of Biotic Integrity for the Mid-Atlantic Highland Region McCormick et al
WG 2A ECOSTAT 4-5 MARCH 2004 Task on Harmonisation of Freshwater Biological Methods Progress Report Presented by Ana Cristina Cardoso Joint Research Centre.
1 Intercalibration in the Eastern Continental Region 1 Dr. Ursula Schmedtje International Commission for the Protection of the Danube River.
WG 2A ECOSTAT 7-8 July 2004 Task on Harmonisation of Freshwater Biological Methods Status Report AC Cardoso and A Solimini Harmonisation Task Team: JRC.
Austrian Approach for Identification of Water Bodies Workshop on Identification of Surface Water Bodies Brussels, 25/26 September 2003 Birgit Vogel Austrian.
Management of the coastal and marine environment: The legal framework of the European Union from the first EEC Directives to the Water Framework Directive.
Middle Fork Project AQ 3 – Macroinvertebrate and Aquatic Mollusk Technical Study Report Overview May 5, 2008.
DETERMINATION AND MANAGEMENT OF SENSITIVE AREAS ON THE BASIS OF WATERSHED IN TURKEY MINISTRY OF FORESTRY AND WATER AFFAIRS.
A Tool to Evaluate the Health of Streams and Rivers within the Chesapeake Bay Watershed Katie Foreman 1, Claire Buchanan 2, Adam Griggs 2, Andrea Nagel.
IC Guidance Annex III: Reference conditions and alternative benchmarks Sandra Poikane Joint Research Centre Institute for Environment and Sustainability.
Böhmer, J. Birk, S., Schöll, F. Intercalibration of large river assessment methods.
1 Collaboration on EMAP Stream Condition Assessments in EPA Region 8 Thomas R. Johnson and Karl A. Hermann EPA Region 8.
Invertebrate Standards and Lakes Paul Logan. Existing CEN standards relating to the ecological assessment of freshwaters - TG1 - invertebrates Quality.
Meeting of the Working Group 2A on Ecological Status (ECOSTAT) – 3+4 July 2006, Stresa (IT) Eastern Continental GIG Draft final report on the results of.
CEN TC 230 WG2 “Biological Methods” Work Programme April 2010.
River Basin Management Plan Steps, Status and Objectives.
The German way of sampling, standardisation, storing, evaluation and assessment of waterbodies Armin Lorenz, Daniel Hering, Christian Feld Faculty of Biology,
Centre for Economic Development, Transport and the Environment in Lapland1 Classification and monitoring of the surface waters of Finland National.
CIS Working Group 2A ECOSTAT Overall Approach to the Ecological Classification 01 July 2003 D/UK WGL CIS 2A.
Disentangling the effects of multiple stressors in lakes; should we use littoral benthic invertebrates? Rebeka ŠILING, Gorazd URBANIČ Institute for Water.
Hümeyra BAHÇECİ (Expert)
Agenda item 5: Discussion of next steps
Task on Harmonisation of Freshwater Biological Methods
WATER QUALITY Vol 3: Biological Characteristics
REFCOND EU Water Framework Directive project funded by the European Commission DG Environment Included in the EU Water Directors “Common Strategy on.
Intercalibration progress: Central - Baltic GIG Rivers
SoE Guidance – Biological reporting sheets
Carolin Meier & Daniel Hering (University of Duisburg-Essen)
Intercalibration : a “WFD compliant” boundary comparing procedure
Biological assessment on rivers and reservoirs in Spain
The normal balance of ingredients
REFCOND Workshop Uppsala, May 2001
CBriv GIG Macrophyte Intercalibration Status Overview
on a protocol for Intercalibration of Surface Water
ECOSTAT, JRC April 2007 MEDiterranean RIVers GIG Report
CIS Working Group 2A ECOSTAT SCG Meeting in Brussels
IBI’s: An Introduction
3rd meeting, 8 March 2006 EEA Copenhagen
FITTING THE ITALIAN METHOD FOR EVALUATING LAKE ECOLOGICAL QUALITY FROM BENTHIC DIATOMS (EPI-L) IN THE “PHYTOBENTHOS CROSS-GIG” INTERCALIBRATION EXERCISE.
WFD CIS 4th Intercalibration Workshop
Presented by Ana Cristina Cardoso
ASSIGNING WATER BODY TYPES IN THE WATER FRAMEWORK DIRECTIVE IMPLEMENTATION Wouter van de Bund EC Joint Research Centre, Institute for Environment and sustainability,
Joint REFCOND and Intercalibration Meeting
Presentation transcript:

Zlatko Mihaljević, Ana Previšić, Igor Stanković Dept. of Biology, Faculty of Science, Univ. of Zagreb Development of biological assessment systems for rivers and lakes – benthic macroinvertebrates European Union Twinning Project Implementation of the WFD in Croatia

Surface water quality monitoring in Croatia continuous monitoring in Republic of Croatia started in the 1950’ Water quality monitoring is mainly based on physico-chemical parameters since 2000 water quality assessment is significantly improved sampling and assessment of water quality is done in accordance with Croatian (HRN) or international norms (ISO-EN) in authorized laboratories.

Biological surface water quality determinants being monitored according to Water Classification Act (“National Gazette”, NN 77/98) are:  Saprobic index (Pantle – Buck),  Extended Biotic Index and  Trophy status (lakes) Bioindicator system that is currently in use in Croatia:  Wegl (1983) Analysed communities:  Benthic macroinvertebrates  Periphyton  Bioseston HRIS - national bioindicator system (2005)

Classification in five water quality classes according to limit values of the parameters. Limit values of S.I., EBI and Trophic status Biological determinands Saprobic index Biotic index Trophy status Water Quality class 1,0-1,8>10oligotrophicI 1,8-2,38-9mezotrophicII 2,3-2,76-7 moderately eutrophic III 2,7-3,24-5eutrophicIV 3,2-4,0<4hypertrophicV

Comparison of water quality indices Mountain streamLarge lowland river - middle reach

Comparison of water quality indices Crenal sectionMountain river - middle reach

Need for revision of the water monitoring system According to WFD water bodies as primary water management units must be nominated; According to WFD water bodies as primary water management units must be nominated; Prevent deterioration, reduce pollution and achieve good status of aquatic ecosystems; Prevent deterioration, reduce pollution and achieve good status of aquatic ecosystems; Information on ecological quality status must be obtained; Information on ecological quality status must be obtained; BQE – Aquatic flora: Phytoplankton, Macrophytes, Phytobenthos BQE – Aquatic flora: Phytoplankton, Macrophytes, Phytobenthos Benhic macroinvertebrates Benhic macroinvertebrates Fishes Fishes Information on water bodies` ecological quality are prerequisite for establishment of management plans. Information on water bodies` ecological quality are prerequisite for establishment of management plans. For WFD implementation a multimetric method for assessing the ecological status of rivers is in preparation. For WFD implementation a multimetric method for assessing the ecological status of rivers is in preparation.

Application of AQEM sampling protocols Implementation of AQEM methodology in Croatia Implementation of AQEM methodology in Croatia –Project: “Ecological Research of freshwater in Croatia regarding criteria of the Water Framework Directive of EU” Its application is under development Its application is under development Definition of type specific reference conditions Definition of type specific reference conditions Required modification; Required modification; –Integration of HRIS –Characteristic type-specific species (Dinaric area)

Ecoregions (Illies, 1978)

Preliminary revised typology for Croatia Ecoregions (2): Pannonian Dinaric - subecoregions; Continental Mediterranean

3 type specific watercourses for each eco/subecoregion; 3 type specific watercourses for each eco/subecoregion; –Mountain streams –Mountain rivers –Lowland rivers Problems: selection of referent sites (conditions) for the lowland rivers in the Pannonian region Problems: selection of referent sites (conditions) for the lowland rivers in the Pannonian region –all rivers highly influenced (general degradation) –historical data insufficient Preliminary revised typology for Croatia

Application of AQEM methodology Mutihabitat sampling – 80 sampling sites All habitat types according to previous typology of freshwater ecotypes were sampled

Multi-habitat Sampling (MHS) 20 sample units each sample unit represents 5 % of stream bottom 20 x 5 % = 100 %

Megalithal (> 40 cm), Blocks, bedrock Macrolithal ( cm), Blocks Mesolithal ( cm), Cobbles Microlithal (2 - 6 cm), PebblesAkal (0,2 - 2 cm), GravelPsammal (6 µm - 2 mm), Sand Application of AQEM methodology Mineral microhabitats Mineral microhabitats

Community composition of pooled data P MD CD ecoregions

Type-specific Saprobic Index HighGood Mode- rate PoorBad Lowland rivers (Pannonian ecoregion; < 200 m a.s.l.) Lowland rivers (Pannonian ecoregion; < 200 m a.s.l.) < 1.9 – 2.4 – 3.0 – 3.6 – 4.0 Lowland rivers (Dinaric ecoregion; Lowland rivers (Dinaric ecoregion; < 200 m a.s.l.) < 1.7 – 2.2 – 2.8 – 3.4 – 4.0 Mountain streams (200 – 800 m a.s.l.) Mountain streams (200 – 800 m a.s.l.) < 1.3 – 1.9 – 2.5 – 3.2 – 4.0 Mountain rivers (200 – 800 m a.s.l.) Mountain rivers (200 – 800 m a.s.l.) < 1.4 – 2.0 – 2.6 – 3.3 – 4.0 (...) (...) Preliminary quality criteria

Main stressors Organic pollution Morphological degradation Metrics: - Saprobic Index (Pantle-Buck) - Shannon-Wiener - EBI Metrics: - number of EPT taxa - abundance of Trichoptera - number of taxa - total abundance - Index of Biocenotic Region - [%] EPT-Taxa - [%] Oligochaeta & Diptera - [%] Gatherers/Collectors - [%] littoral preferences - …

Suggested type specific sites Dinaric ecoregion Dinaric ecoregion –Continental subecoregion; mountain streams: mountain streams: Crna rijeka Pollution Saprobic Index (Pantle-Buck)1,00 IBE11 Shannon-Wiener2,32 Degradation in stream morphology number of EPT taxa16 abundance of Trichoptera140 number of taxa40 total abundance12789 Index of Biocenotic Region3,444 [%] EPT-Taxa18 [%] Oligochaeta & Diptera27,54 [%] Gatherers/Collectors16,00 [%] littoral preferences5,971

Suggested type specific sites Dinaric ecoregion Dinaric ecoregion –Continental subecoregion; mountain rivers: Mrežnica upper reach (Zvečaj) mountain rivers: Mrežnica upper reach (Zvečaj) Pollution Saprobic Index (Pantle-Buck)2,24 IBE12 Shannon-Wiener2,72 Degradation in stream morphology number of EPT taxa18 abundance of Trichoptera637 number of taxa74 total abundance13315 Index of Biocenotic Region6,404 [%] EPT-Taxa18,919 [%] Oligochaeta & Diptera59,73 [%] Gatherers/Collectors30,69 [%] littoral preferences13,808

Suggested type specific sites Dinaric ecoregion Dinaric ecoregion –Mediterranean subecoregion; mountain streams: Ljuta mountain streams: Ljuta Pollution Saprobic Index (Pantle-Buck)1,74 IBE10 Shannon-Wiener1,87 Degradation in stream morphology number of EPT taxa13 abundance of Trichoptera20 number of taxa27 total abundance2754 Index of Biocenotic Region4,658 [%] EPT-Taxa56,935 [%] Oligochaeta & Diptera36,71 [%] Gatherers/Collectors38,68 [%] littoral preferences23,922

Suggested type specific sites Dinaric ecoregion Dinaric ecoregion –Mediterranean subecoregion; mountain river: Zrmanja upper reach mountain river: Zrmanja upper reach Pollution Saprobic Index (Pantle-Buck)1,16 IBE10,4 Shannon-Wiener2,04 Degradation in stream morphology number of EPT taxa18 abundance of Trichoptera243 number of taxa34 total abundance10341 Index of Biocenotic Region4,416 [%] EPT-Taxa19,853 [%] Oligochaeta & Diptera24,10 [%] Gatherers/Collectors14,62 [%] littoral preferences6,108

Suggested type specific sites Dinaric ecoregion Dinaric ecoregion –Mediterranean subecoregion; Lowland rivers: Lowland rivers: Zrmanja lower reach Pollution Saprobic Index (Pantle-Buck)1,53 IBE11 Shannon-Wiener2,90 Degradation in stream morphology number of EPT taxa18 abundance of Trichoptera85 number of taxa59 total abundance4420 Index of Biocenotic Region5,408 [%] EPT-Taxa31,946 [%] Oligochaeta & Diptera23,80 [%] Gatherers/Collectors32,22 [%] littoral preferences5,848

Croatian lakes and reservoirs

Definition of ecological status of lakes according to benthic macroinvertebrates The most relevant pressure in Croatian lakes and reservoirs are eutrophication (nutrient loading). Metrics: 1) the taxonomical composition and abundance 2) the ratio of disturbance, sensitive to insensitive taxa 3) the level of diversity 4) Saprobic index Problems: 1) Dominance of chironomids and oligochaetes in benthic communities 2) Identification to species and genus level (costly and time-consuming) 3) Lack of experts

Specific water bodies; travertine barrage lakes Brljan Lake Visovac Lake Roški slap Skradinski buk

L. hoffmeisteriP. hammoniensis/Chironomus P. hammoniensis/ P. heuscheriheuscheriP. barbatus heuscheri SphaeriumP. barbatusTanytarsus Chironomus Chironomus P. barbatus Procladius Tanytarsus

Specific water bodies; travertine barrage lakes Plitvice Lakes

Acknowledgements Dr Mladen Kerovec Dr Ivančica Ternjej Dr Sanja Gottstein Dr Aleksandar Popijač Dr Jasna Lajtner Krešimir Žganec Marija Ivković Mirjana Jelenčić Vladimir Bartovsky Dr Marko Miliša Mirela Sertić Ana Slavikovski Nino Mihoković Martina Temunović