Dred Scott v Sandford Facts of the Case: Dred Scott was a slave in Missouri. From 1833 to 1843, he resided in Illinois (a free state) and in an area of.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Lincoln-Douglas Debates: Video (2:13)
Advertisements

A DIVIDED NATION Chapter 20.
CHAPTER 16.3: THE DREDD SCOTT DECISION. FACTS 1.Dred Scott was a slave from Missouri. (MO) 2. Scott and his owner moved to Wisconsin for four years. 3.
Chapter 21 A Dividing Nation.
Kansas-Nebraska Act Divide unorganized territory into two territories: Kansas and Nebraska Settlers living in territories decide slavery by popular sovereignty.
SSUSH9 The student will identify key events, issues, and individuals relating to the causes, course, and consequences of the Civil War. a. Explain the.
Chapter 1, Lesson 3 EQ: What were the events that led up to the Civil War?
Continued Increase in Tension Over Slavery. Do Now: Read the brief background info below on Dred Scott. Then read Chief Justice Taney’s Court Decision.
UNIT 10: Road to the Civil War
Dual federalism 1 tyler larson christian gibbons morgan powell josh wendell branden mackinnon kayla delahoussaye.
Road to Civil War Challenges to Slavery p
Dred Scott Decision, March 1857 Dred Scott was a slave who moved from a Missouri a slave state to free states Illinois and Wisconsin In 1846 Scott sues.
PRE-CIVIL WAR NOTES. Missouri Compromise (1820) 1. Missouri Compromise (1820) a. Maine enters as a Free State b. Missouri enters as a Slave State c. No.
 Dred Scott v. J. A. Sanford (1857).   Who was Dred Scott?  Events Affecting Dred Scott’s fate  Timeline of Events  The Two Sides of the Issue 
Objectives:. Bellringer: What was the Missouri Compromise?
Slavery & the West Sectionalism: An exaggerated loyalty to a particular region of the country.
Chapter 14 – Lesson 3 Pages  In 1819, the US was made up of 11 free states and 11 slave states  They had equal places on the US Senate  In.
Griffin Honeycutt Block 2 October 29,  Official Name- Dred Scott v. John F. A. Sandford  The defendant’s name was actually Sanford, but was misspelled.
Chapter 15: Pp Allowed Maine to join the Union as a free state and Missouri to join as a slave state Banned slavery north of 36 30’ N latitude.
Dred Scott Case. Dred Scott Decision - FACTS: Dred Scott was a slave from Missouri. (MO) Dred Scott.
Chapter 15, Section 3 Challenges to Slavery.
Prelude to the Civil War Three Events that led America into Conflict.
Chapter 5: Causes of the Civil War Core Lesson 3: Compromise and Conflict.
Legality of Slavery Prior to the Civil War.
The Path to the Civil War Pre-constitution law Prohibited slavery in the new territories Founding Fathers’ plans for the eventual end of slavery? #1: The.
APUSH – Spiconardi.   In the 1830s, Dred Scott, a slave, accompanied his owner from Missouri to Illinois and later the territory of Wisconsin  Scott.
Chapter 10 Section 4: The System Fails. Violence Erupts Antislavery groups in the northeast set up Emigrant Aid Societies in to send 1,200 New.
Objective: To examine the importance of the Lincoln – Douglas debates and the Dred Scott decision.
APUSH Review: Dred Scott v. Sanford Everything You Need to Know About Dred Scott v. Sanford To Succeed In APUSH
Ch. 15, Section 3: Challenges to Slavery pg. 445  Main Idea: Social, economic, and political differences divided the North and South.  Key Terms:  Arsenal.
EVENTS LEADING TO THE CIVIL WAR Missouri Compromise, 1820 Missouri became a slave state. Missouri became a slave state. Maine became a free state. Maine.
Peyton Waters and John McArthur 2A DRED SCOTT V. SANDFORD(1857)
Events Contributing to Sectionalism Sectionalism is loyalty to local interest or region.
Lesson 3: Compromise and Conflict. Would Slavery Spread? The United States grew-the Louisiana Purchase and the Mexican War opened new lands to settlers.
Events Leading to the Civil War Chapter 6
DRED SCOTT DECISION  Dred Scott was a slave  Owner had taken him north of Missouri Compromise Line  Sued for freedom  Court Ruled  Slaves did not.
By: Mireina Barrios. Dred Scott and Roger B. Taney Dred Scott, a slave who had his freedom at Illinois and the free territory of Wisconsin before moving.
The Coming of the Civil War Chapter Two Nations? A. North & South divided: each saw the other as a threat to their way of life. B. Northern.
REPUBLICAN PARTY – a political party formed in the mid 1850’s, majority supported the end to slavery.
The years leading up to the Civil War…. Life in the North Cities Canals Factories Railroads Lots of People (including immigrants)
The Last Strides to War. More New Political Parties  Millard Fillmore served as the last Whig president due to his lack of support over the issue of.
Dred Scott v. Sandford A Supreme Court Decision in 1857.
Slavery and Secession. The Birth of the Republican Party.
The Crisis Deepens: Civil War is Inevitable Dred Scott Decision (1857) Lincoln-Douglas Debates (1858) John Brown’s Raid on Harpers Ferry (1859) Election.
Dred Scott.  I can explain how the Dred Scott Court decision impacted African Americans during the time before the Civil War.
Factors Leading to Sectional Division. Compromise of 1850 Proposed by Senator Henry Clay of Kentucky California admitted to the Union as a free state.
Causes of the Civil War. New Political Divisions Republican Party –Formed in 1854 –Formed by Whigs, Democrats, Free- Soilers, & abolitionists –Opposed.
 Dred Scott was a slave.  He had lived in a free territory with his owner.  His owner moved back into a slave state.  While there, the.
The Election of 1860 The election of Abraham Lincoln prompted the
Chapter 14 The Nation Divided Section 3: The Crisis Deepens
Dred Scott Decision 1857.
Causes of the Civil War.
Chapter 5, Lesson 3 Compromise and Conflict
Compromise of 1850 Compromise that made California a free state. Allowed for popular sovereignty in Utah and New Mexico Territories. Also added the fugitive.
Politics of Slavery
Fugitive Slave Law The law was very controversial.
Events leading to the civil war
Opener – Copy into Notebook pp. 84
Background: Who was Dred Scott?
Dred Scott v. Sanford.
Chapter 15: A Divided Nation
To do this, Congress repealed (ended) the Missouri Compromise line at 36˚30’ in the western territories.
Mario Lopez Eric Mendez
Causes of the Civil War.
Pre-Civil War compromises and events
Chapter 15: A Divided Nation
Dred Scott Decision Scott was not a citizen, could not sue
Causes of the civil war.
Politics of Slavery
Politics of Slavery
Presentation transcript:

Dred Scott v Sandford Facts of the Case: Dred Scott was a slave in Missouri. From 1833 to 1843, he resided in Illinois (a free state) and in an area of the Louisiana Territory, where slavery was forbidden by the Missouri Compromise of After returning to Missouri, Scott sued unsuccessfully in the Missouri courts for his freedom, claiming that his residence in free territory made him a free man. Scott then brought a new suit in federal court. Scott's master maintained that no pure- blooded Negro of African descent and the descendant of slaves could be a citizen in the sense of Article III of the Constitution.

Dred Scott v Sandford Question: Was Dred Scott free or slave?

Dred Scott v Sandford Conclusion: (Majority Opinion) –Under Articles III and IV No one but a citizen of the US could be a citizen of a state, and only Congress could confer national citizenship No person descended from an American slave had ever been a citizen for Article III purposes Hoped to end the slavery question once and for all continued....

Dred Scott v Sandford Decision: – He is and can be taken anywhere

John Brown’s Raid on Harper’s Ferry, 1859 Brown a radical abolitionistBrown a radical abolitionist He plans to rob the arsenal at to start a slave revolutionHe plans to rob the arsenal at to start a slave revolution Southerners believe NORTHERNERS support BROWN!Southerners believe NORTHERNERS support BROWN! John Brown’s Raid on Harper’s Ferry, 1859 Brown a radical abolitionistBrown a radical abolitionist He plans to rob the arsenal at to start a slave revolutionHe plans to rob the arsenal at to start a slave revolution Southerners believe NORTHERNERS support BROWN!Southerners believe NORTHERNERS support BROWN! “John Brown’s Fort”

John Brown: Madman, Hero or Martyr?