Overview of Revised Ancillary Services (AS) Framework Proposal

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Future Ancillary Services (AS) Workshop
Advertisements

BAL-002-WECC-1 Contingency Reserves
IMPACT TO FREQUENCY CONTROL DURING STARTUP AND SHUT DOWN OF UNITS
January 9, 2013 BAL-001-TRE-1 Primary Frequency Response Update for Texas RE RSC.
Ancillary Services and SCED Jeff Gilbertson Market Analyst Congestion Management Working Group 9/4/2013.
Preliminary Impacts of Wind Power Integration in the Hydro-Qubec System.
Loads Acting as a Resource Relationships with QSEs and LSEs
ENERGY ONLY RESOURCES & THE RPS CALCULATOR. Deliverability Overview Most resources procured to date have been procured to be fully deliverable – CAISO.
1 New Resource Qualification Testing Sandip Sharma Supervisor, Operations Analysis New Generation Information Forum ERCOT Public November 4, 2014.
Ancillary Services Methodology Changes for 2015 Sandip Sharma Bill Blevins Dan Woodfin.
Joint Grid Code Review Panel POR Working Group Meeting 2 27 th March 2015 Chairperson : Michael Preston.
Governor Response Sequence Bob Green Garland Power and Light ERCOT Future AS Workshop January 20, 2014.
Frequency Control Turbine Governor Droop NERC Requirement
“Rethinking” Ancillary Services in ERCOT and Efforts to Incorporate “Loads In SCED” ERCOT Staff Operator Training Seminar Spring 2014.
Joel Koepke, P.E. ERCOT Operations Support Engineer ERCOT Experiences During Summer 2011.
Sixth Northwest Conservation & Electric Power Plan Adding Incremental Flexibility to the Pacific Northwest Power System? Maury Galbraith Northwest Power.
PDCWG Report to ROS August 12, 2010 Sydney Niemeyer.
Julia Matevosyan, Resource Adequacy January, 2014 Application of KERMIT in the DOE LTS process.
Sai Moorty ERCOT Integration Options into ERCOT systems.
1 Renewable Technology Working Group (RTWG) July 14, 2009 Henry Durrwachter.
1 Ancillary Services Requirements for Future Ancillary Services Cost Benefit Analysis FAS/SIRS Meeting September 21, 2015.
Demand Side Working Group Load Resource Performance Subgroup April 9, 2010 Mary Anne Brelinsky EDF Trading North America.
BAL-001-TRE-1 Primary Frequency Response in the ERCOT Region
Revising the Pacific Northwest Resource Adequacy Standard Resource Adequacy Technical Committee June 23, 2011.
1Texas Nodal Market Trials Update. 2Texas Nodal Full System Market and Reliability Test 24-Hour Test Observations Duration of Test for Week of 8/ Hour.
WGR Ramp Rate in Nodal: “As High as Possible” Mike Grimes for QMWG Meeting 10 August 2009.
Optimizing Deployment of CCGT Duct Firing Capacity in the Nodal Market Josh Clevenger Brazos Electric Cooperative.
1 1 Beacon Power Corporation Energy Storage – Regulation Issues Prepared for: Emerging Technologies Working Group January 5, 2011.
1 Reliability Deployment Task Force (RDTF Meeting) December 20 th 2011 December 20, 2011.
Future Ancillary Service Team (FAST) and Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) Workshop #2 ERCOT Staff August 25,
NPRR 571 ERS Weather Sensitive Loads Requirements Carl Raish, ERCOT QSE Managers Working Group November 5, 2013.
1 PDCWG Report to ROS October 13, 2011 Sydney Niemeyer.
Congestion Management and Ramp Rate for Delivering Ancillary Services Resmi Surendran.
October 29, Organizational role of Short-Term Planning and Hydro Duty Scheduling Relationship to other groups in BPA Planning and analysis job.
ISO Proposed Flexible Capacity Requirements Stephen Keehn Senior Advisor California ISO CPUC Workshop January 26, 2012.
October 02, 2009 Austin, Texas Quick Start Task Force Meeting 1.
Operational Issues & Risks ERCOT Operations Planning August 22, 2008.
PDCWG Report to ROS David Kee Chair CPS Energy Sydney Niemeyer Vice Chair NRG Energy.
ERCOT Pilot Project for Fast Responding Regulation Service (FRRS) August 8, 2012 PDCWG August 9, 2012 ETWG/QMWG.
Integrating Wind Energy Capabilities of Wind Power Plants Mark Ahlstrom Wind Energy: A Good Citizen of the Electric Grid Four Corners Wind Resource Center.
Floyd Trefny, P.E. Director of Wholesale Market Design Nodal Market Tools to Manage Wind Generation January 29, 2009 Presentation to the Renewables Technology.
PDCWG Report to ROS Sydney Niemeyer Chair NRG Energy Don Blackburn Vice Chair Luminant Energy.
Future Ancillary Services Team (FAST) Update April 24, 2014 TAC Meeting 1.
Responsive Reserve Service Deliverability Review September 15,
ERCOT Public 1 Project Panel 1 Dan Woodfin Director, System Operations August 15, 2014.
Frequency Control Task Force Presentation to the ERCOT Technical Advisory Committee June 1, 2006.
Document number Anticipated Impacts for FRRS Pilot Program ERCOT TAC Meeting September 7, 2012.
PDCWG Report to ROS January 13, 2011 Sydney Niemeyer.
Synchronous Inertial Response
ERCOT DYNAMICS WORKING GROUP Report to ROS August 16, 2007 Vance Beauregard, American Electric Power.
Real Time Balancing (RTB) & Resource Plan Statuses Change to the QSE practice of showing offline units as online and available ERCOT Presentation to ROS.
EEA Workshop 2 June 19, EEA Workshop 1 Recap Dan Woodfin.
Preliminary Report on ERCOT Pilot Project for Fast Responding Regulation Service (FRRS) June 12th, 2013.
ERCOT Pilot Project for Fast Responding Regulation Service (FRRS) June 13, 2012 WMS and June 14, 2012 ROS.
07/27/2006 Overview of Replacement Reserve Procurement ERCOT Staff PRS RPRS Task Force.
Future Ancillary Services Cost Benefit Analysis Overview Julia Matevosyan February 1, 2016 FAS Workshop.
1 EEA Workshop 3 April 2, /3/2015For the purpose of discussion only.
ERCOT Public 1 Future Ancillary Services Team (FAST) and Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) Workshop ERCOT Staff July 25, 2014.
NSRS in Nodal Proposal for Deployment & Recall Procedures ERCOT ROS 10/12-13/2006 By: S.Niemeyer R.Jones R.Wheeler B.Green J.Dumas P.Breitzman.
NERC: Essential Reliability Services
Appeal of PRS Rejection of NPRR 667
Current FRRS Language & Explanation of Posted Data
ERCOT Pilot Project for Fast Responding Regulation Service (FRRS)
Congestion Management and Ramp Rate for Delivering Ancillary Services
Market Notice Regarding Off-line Units
David Kee Chair CPS Energy Sydney Niemeyer Vice Chair NRG Energy
Overview of New Control Room Desk
30 Minute Reserves EPFSTF January 4,
Sandip Sharma ERCOT Manager, Operations Planning
Solar Energy Commercialization
Presentation transcript:

Overview of Revised Ancillary Services (AS) Framework Proposal Dan Woodfin, Julia Matevosyan, Sandip Sharma, Fred Huang ROS November 14, 2013

Drivers for new AS Framework Current AS Framework has performed well but has issues Resources could provide some services more efficiently if the requirements were decoupled (PFR/ FFR/ Contingency Reserve) New service needed to ensure technical requirements are met that used to be provided, inherently, by generators (e.g. inertia) Awkward to fit capabilities of new technologies (e.g. CCGTs with duct firing, wind turbines) that could provide services efficiently Changes in market design and control systems(e.g. 5 minute dispatch, HRUC) have reduced the need for other services New regulatory requirements (BAL-003) Need for changes has been highlighted in discussion of Fast Responding Regulation Service (FRRS), NPRR 524(Resource Limits in Providing Ancillary Service), etc. Slide #5

Goal Future AS Framework Technology neutral Market-based Based on fundamental needs of the system, not resource characteristics Unbundled services Flexible for new technologies Pay for performance, where practical Co-optimized procurement Will evolve over time Current AS Framework Based on capabilities of conventional steam generating units Unique services bundled together due to inherent capabilities of conventional units Mix of compensated and uncompensated services New technologies are cobbled on, with difficulty This is key slide Transition Plan TBD Now 5+ Years

Scope of Proposed AS Framework Long-term Ancillary Services (AS) framework intended to guide: Decisions on near-term changes to current AS Requirements for changes to ERCOT systems (EMMS, etc.) Investment in new resources and new resource types by the mkt. Framework will be developed in phases, due to complexity of issues Current Phase will only address frequency control services Future Phases may address Voltage Support and other services Framework should eventually include roadmap for transition from current AS to future framework Prioritization of services to be transitioned Inter-relationship of services that must transition concurrently High-level consideration of ERCOT systems and market impacts

ERCOT Proposal ERCOT proposes the transition to the following five AS products: Synchronous Inertial Response Service (SIR), Fast Frequency Response Service (FFR), Primary Frequency Response Service (PFR), Regulating Reserve Up (RRU) and Regulating Reserve Down (RRD) Service, and Contingency Reserve Service (CR). This revised AS set adds and/or redefines specific AS products currently used by the ERCOT System and Subsumes different elements within the current Responsive Reserve Service into several of the newly defined services. Recognizes during the transition period from today’s AS to the future AS set, there may be the need for a Supplemental Reserve Service that would be similar to today’s 30-minute Non-Spin Service.

Synchronous InertiaL Response(SIR) service

Synchronous Inertial Response (SIR) Service, Purpose SIR is stored kinetic energy that is extracted from the rotating mass of a synchronous machine following a disturbance in a power system Maintain minimum Rate of Change of Frequency (RoCoF) Provide sufficient time from Point A to Point C, for Fast Frequency Response and Primary Frequency Response No triggering RoCoF protection of synchronous generators (generally 0.5 Hz/s)

Synchronous Inertial Response Service, Need SIR has significant implications on the RoCoF during power imbalances; With increasing use of non-synchronous generation, changing load characteristics (less motor loads), increase in Combined Cycle units (lower inertia), the system SIR response is reduced: RoCoF increases, leaving insufficient time for PFR to deploy and arrest the system frequency excursion. High RoCoF may trigger generation RoCoF protection, tripping additional synchronous generators.

Synchronous Inertial Response Service, Need So far, the RoCoF during high wind/low load condition was less than 0.2 Hz/s and the average time to reach frequency nadir during frequency events is 4 to 6 seconds. The system inertia available in the real time operations under current conditions is still sufficient. Studies based on 2012 system conditions indicated RoCoF as high as 0.4 Hz/s for two largest unit trip (2750 MW as per recently approved NERC BAL-003 standard).

SIR, Future work Monitor and project the trend of ERCOT system inertial response and RoCoF Identify the minimum needs of system inertia and duration between points A and C Gather data to determine each generator’s RoCoF tolerance Investigate capability and value of synthetic inertial response from renewable energy resources to contribute to system’s SIR

Fast frequency response (ffr) service

Fast Frequency Response (FFR) Service Need To changing frequency to supplement the inherent inertial response from synchronous machines To provide sufficient time for PFR to deploy and arrest fast frequency excursion in the event of sudden power imbalance Deployment and Performance Self deployment Provide full response within 30 cycles (0.5 secs.) at a specified frequency thresholds and sustained for at least 10 minutes FFR service will require a high resolution measurement

Fast Frequency Response (FFR) Service Discussion Presently there is no separate FFR Service in ERCOT, however up to 1400 MW of Responsive Reserve Service (RRS) procured from Load Resources (LR) satisfy FFR characteristics In the proposed AS framework FFR and PFR are highly interdependent and the required quantity of each service can vary based on the system conditions FFR and PFR work together to produce the desired system response FFR service cannot completely replace the PFR service A performance requirement needs to developed

Primary frequency response (Pfr) service

Definition of PFR Service Primary Frequency Response (PFR) is defined as the instantaneous proportional increase or decrease in real power output provided by a Resource in response to system frequency deviations. This response is in the direction that stabilizes frequency. Primary Frequency Response is attained due to Governor or Governor-like action PFR is instantaneous response relative to the frequency deviation, PFR is generally delivered completely within 12 to 14 seconds.

Primary Frequency Response (PFR) Service- Need ERCOT as a single Balancing Authority Interconnection with only limited interconnection to the other Interconnects is solely responsible for maintaining frequency to maintain reliability and meet NERC standard requirements. All of ERCOT’s frequency response can only come from Resources within the ERCOT Interconnection. On July 18th, 2013 FERC issued a Notice of Proposed Rule Making (NOPR) approving the BAL-003 NERC Frequency Response Standard BAL-003 sets a Frequency Response Obligation (FRO) for each BA based on loss of two largest single units. The minimum FRO for ERCOT is 286 MW/0.1 Hz

Determination of the Amount of FFR and PFR Reserves The objective of Fast Frequency Response (FFR) and Primary Frequency Response (PFR) Reserves should be to ensure Frequency is arrested above UFLS threshold of 59.30 Hz and to meet NERC FRO Standard (BAL-003). Frequency Response Obligation (FRO) for ERCOT is determined based on instantaneous loss of two largest units (2750 MW). ERCOT must develop methodologies for the regular assessment of the needed concurrent amounts of both FFR and PFR.

Determination of the Amount of FFR and PFR Reserves How much PFR is needed will be based on minimum requirement for FFR while maintaining minimum PFR capability within Generators (for example, in the current RRS, Load Resources can provide up to 50% of 2800 MW RRS). System Load FFR PFR(5% Droop) <=35000 MW 840 MW(30% 0f 2800) 1960 MW 0 MW 4480 MW

Regulating Reserve (rr) service

Regulating Reserve (RR) Service – Up & Down An amount of reserve responsive to Load Frequency Control, which is sufficient to provide normal regulating margin. ERCOT generation is dispatched through Security Constrained Economic Dispatch (SCED) every five minutes to balance the generation and demand. The power imbalance between each SCED interval will cause frequency deviation that requires Regulating Reserve to compensate. This action will be provided by RR service.

Regulating Reserve (RR) Service – Up & Down While not substantially changing from todays Regulation Service ERCOT is proposing to implement the following: LFC signals will be delivered by ERCOT to the QSE specifically for the Resource providing this service The deployment instructions should be determined by taking into consideration ramp rates, HSLs etc. of each of the individual Resources. Resources providing RR should be limited to min(NURR,NDRR)*5*0.70, where NURR and NDRR are Normal-Up Ramp Rate and Normal-Down Ramp Rate The pay for performance approach should reward those Resources that closely follow the ERCOT LFC signal ERCOT will re-visit its LFC and RLC to avoid deploying RR for more than 10 continuous minutes in one direction during normal operation.

Contingency reserve (cr) service

Contingency Reserve (CR) Service – Need & Purpose CR is to ensure that the Balancing Authority is able to restore Interconnection frequency within defined limits following a DCS event or large net load forecast error within 15 minutes and restore its Primary Frequency and Regulating Reserve. According to NERC BAL-002-1 Disturbance Control Standard (DCS), The minimum amount of CR required is equivalent to “Most Severe Single Largest Contingency”, in ERCOT’s case this is currently 1375 MW. ERCOT may additionally procure CR reserve to cover for large net load forecast errors. To ensure ERCOT can meet the standard, the CR must be fully deliverable within 10 minutes so that frequency can be restored to the pre-disturbance level within 15 minutes

Qualification Deployment Performance Contingency Reserve Qualification Resources providing CR should be qualified up to the MW value to which they are able to ramp within 10 minutes from the time of deployment. Deployment ERCOT will deploy CR for a sizable generation trip. Resources providing CR must telemeter their ramp-rates such that SCED can dispatch the full Resource CR responsibility within 10 minutes. Performance Resources providing CR must be able to deliver and sustain the reserve deployments for the full hour it is carrying that obligation.

Supplemental reserve (Sr) service

Supplemental Reserve (CR) Service SR service is needed to compensate for net load forecast error and/or forecast uncertainty on days in which large amounts of reserve are not available online Generation Resources capable of being ramped to a specified output level within thirty (30) minutes or Load Resources that are capable of being interrupted within thirty (30) minutes and that are capable of running (or being interrupted) at a specified output level for at least one (1) hour Supplemental Reserve Service would be similar to today’s 30-minute Non-Spin Service

End

Synthetic IR Inverter based resources can have the capability to inject active power into the system initiated through control system action following a disturbance, e.g. generator trip. This capability, so called synthetic inertia, is already available from several WTG manufacturers. Synthetic inertia capability requires control action in response to falling system frequency and therefore is not equivalent to synchronous machine inertia However synthetic inertia will improve RoCoF and help to arrest system frequency decay. More discussion and evaluation of synthetic inertia performance is required.

Synthetic IR, example from Hydro-Quebec