Estimated Impacts of Attaining 60 Billion Gallons of Ethanol by 2030 on Agriculture and the Nation’s Economy Governor’s Ethanol Coalition Kansas City,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Development of a Forest Module for POLYSYS Burton English, Daniel De La Torre Ugarte, Kim Jensen, Jamey Menard and Don Hodges USFS Forest Products.
Advertisements

Balancing Biomass for Bioenergy and Conserving the Soil Resource Jane Johnson USDA-ARS- North Central Soil Conservation Research Laboratory.
Socio-Economic Impacts of U.S. Ethanol Bruce A. Babcock Center for Agricultural and Rural Development Iowa State University.
Looking at the Economics of the Next Generation of Biofuels
Risk Assessment and Economics of Forest Biorefinery Concepts USDA Forest Service Forest Products Laboratory Madison, Wisconsin.
C. Robert Taylor Ronald D. Lacewell Emily Seawright.
Alternatives to Gasoline Possibilities and Capacities.
Emerging Biofuels: Outlook of Effects on U.S. Grain, Oilseed, and Livestock Markets Simla Tokgoz Center for Agricultural.
Opportunities and Challenges of Expanding Agriculture’s Contribution to the Energy Supply Daniel G. De La Torre Ugarte University of Tennessee.
Photos courtesy of USDA Jason Henderson Branch Executive Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City Omaha Branch May 14, 2008 U.S. AGRICULTURE: What Goes Up Must.
Alternatives to Gasoline Possibilities and Capacities.
Economic and Land Use Implications of Biofuels: Role of Policy Madhu Khanna With Xiaoguang Chen and Haixiao Huang Department of Agricultural and Consumer.
Alternatives to Gasoline Possibilities and Capacities.
Comparative Regional Economic Advantages for Cellulosic Feedstocks for Bioenergy Production. Burton C. English.
The Energy Bill, Biofuel Markets and the Implications for Agriculture Daniel G. De La Torre Ugarte Chesapeake College, Wye Mill, MD February 21, 2008 University.
The New World of Biofuels: Implications for Agriculture and Energy Keith Collins, Chief Economist, USDA EIA Energy Outlook, Modeling, and Data Conference.
The Potential Costs and Benefits of A Biomass-to-Ethanol Production Industry In California National Ethanol Conference National Ethanol Conference Las.
World Feed and Food Supply and Demand Governors’ Agriculture, Energy, and Sustainability Roundtable Governors’ Biofuels Coalition Washington, DC January.
COSTS AND BENEFITS OF A BIOMASS-TO-ETHANOL PRODUCTION INDUSTRY IN CALIFORNIA Pat Perez- Energy Commission May 8, rd Symposium on Biotechnology for.
The Long-Run Impact of Corn-Based Ethanol on the Grain, Oilseed, and Livestock Sectors: A Preliminary Assessment Bruce A. Babcock Center for Agricultural.
Presented to: CFR 521 Elliott Schmitt Photos from
Economics of Cellulosic Ethanol Production Marie Walsh, Burt English, Daniel de la Torre Ugarte, Kim Jensen, Richard Nelson SAEA Annual Meeting Mobile,
Renewable Fuels – The Basics What is the RFS? What is the VEETC / ethanol tax credit? What is the ethanol tariff? What are waivers?
Fertility Issues in Switchgrass Production Joint Meetings of SERA-ieg 6, NEC-17 and NCRA Nashville, Tennessee Donald Tyler University of Tennessee.
Liberalization of Trade in Biofuels: Implications for GHG Emissions and Social Welfare Xiaoguang Chen Madhu Khanna Hayri Önal University of Illinois at.
Minnesota Agriculture Profile Presented By:. Regional Patterns of Agriculture Production Forest Production/Mining Sugarbeets, wheat, diversified Dairy,
Putting the Hopes and Fears of Climate Change Legislation in Perspective _________________________________________ Sustainable Agriculture: The Key to.
1 Land in: Other Uses In Transition In Switchgrass Crop Lifetime Net SG Addition Of Acres Acres in Switchgrass Yield from Ag R&D Ave Yield in Established.
Energy and Products from Agricultural Biomass: Prospects and Issues F. Larry Leistritz Donald M. Senechal Nancy M. Hodur Presented at: IAIA 2007 Conference,
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT AND ENERGY PRODUCTION: EVALUATION OF BIOCHAR APPLICATION ON TAIWANESE SET-ASIDE LAND Chih-Chun Kung November 2012 Austin, Texas.
In the Northwest Martin Tobias CEO & Chairman, Imperium Renewables Biofuels.
Office of the Chief Economist Office of Energy Policy and New Uses National Agricultural Credit Committee Harry S. Baumes Associate Director Office of.
Beyond Corn and Soybeans: Cellulose Feedstocks Marie E. Walsh, Burt English, Daniel de la Torre Ugarte, Chad Hellwinckel, Jamey Menard, Kim Jensen, and.
The Role of Biofuels in the Transformation of Agriculture Daniel G. De La Torre Ugarte and Chad M. Hellwinckel The Economics of Alternative Energy Sources.
Perspectives on Impacts of the 2002 U.S. Farm Act Paul C. Westcott Agricultural Economist U.S. Department of Agriculture Economic Research Service April.
APCA A Market Directed Inventory System (MDIS) National Farmers Union Annual Convention Omaha, Nebraska March 5, 2012 Daryll E. Ray and Harwood D. Schaffer.
Can Biofuels be Sustainable in an Unsustainable Agriculture? Daniel G. De La Torre Ugarte Chad M. Hellwinckel Chad M. Hellwinckel American Chemical Society.
Kurt M. Guidry Gilbert Durbin Professor LSU AgCenter Department of Agricultural Economics and Agribusiness 2010 LSU AgCenter’s Outlook Conference Outlook.
Agricultural Biomass Resources, Opportunities, and Constraints Presentation to the Western Governors’ Association Clean and Diversified Energy Advisory.
Energy and Agriculture I.Energy types, sources, and uses II.Ag use of energy III.Ag production of energy IV.Outlook.
Future Of Agricultural Machinery in the United States UNACOMA General Assembly 21 June 2007 Charlie O’Brien Vice President – Agricultural Services.
1 Bioenergy Development at West Virginia University West Virginia is the third most forested state in the US West Virginia is the third most forested state.
America’s 21st Century Transportation Fuel Ethanol From Biomass.
APCA Agricultural Policy Options for Improving Energy Crop Economics Daniel G. De La Torre Ugarte Agricultural Policy Analysis Center University of Tennessee.
An Evaluation of the Economic and Environmental Impacts of the Corn Grain Ethanol Industry on the Agricultural Sector Western Agricultural Economics Association.
American Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007 (EIS) and the global agriculture Yong Liu Department of Agriculture.
Biofuel Policy Effects on Soil Erosion C. Robert Taylor, Auburn University Ronald D. Lacewell Texas A&M.
Bioenergy: Where We Are and Where We Should Be Daniel G. De La Torre Ugarte Chad M. Hellwinckel.
Department of Economics Crop Outlook Ames, Iowa August 22, 2008 Chad Hart Assistant Professor/Grain Markets Specialist
April 8, 2009Forestry and Agriculture GHG Modeling Forum Land Use Change in Agriculture: Yield Growth as a Potential Driver Scott Malcolm USDA/ERS.
APCA Economic Synergism Between Agricultural and Energy Policies Daniel G. De La Torre Ugarte Agricultural Policy Analysis Center University of Tennessee.
APCA A Market Directed Inventory System (MDIS) National Farmers Union February 29, 2012 Daryll E. Ray and Harwood D. Schaffer Agricultural Policy Analysis.
Bio-Fuels: Opportunities and Challenges 9 th Annual Farmer Cooperative Conference T. Randall Fortenbery Renk Agribusiness Institute Dept. of Ag and Applied.
Bottlenecks, Drought, and Oil Price Spikes: Impact on U.S. Ethanol and Agriculture Chad Hart Center for Agricultural and Rural Development Iowa State University.
Corn and Wheat Market Overview and Outlook by Cory G. Walters Southern Regional Outlook Conference Agricultural Economics.
Department of Economics Biofuel Economics Intensive Program in Biorenewables Ames, Iowa June 9, 2009 Chad Hart Assistant Professor/Grain Markets Specialist.
Sustainable Aviation Biofuels Workshop Georgia Tech: H. Milton Stewart School of Industrial Systems & Engineering, December 3, 2015.
Biofuels CENV 110. Topics The Technology Current status around the world – Supply and trends in production Impact Benefits Costs – Carbon balance – Net.
Biofuel and the Environment: Opportunities and Risks Joe Fargione The Nature Conservancy.
Policies to Accelerate the Bioeconomy: Unintended Effects and Effectiveness Madhu Khanna University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign.
Economic Sustainability
Biorenewable Policy Analysis Center for Agricultural and Rural Development
Biofuel Demand Projections In the Annual Energy Outlook
The Farm Security and Rural Investment Act of 2002
The Outlook for Crop Agriculture and the New Farm Bill
Chad Hart & Bruce Babcock
Crop Outlook and Farm Bill
The 2008 Farm Bill Chad Hart Center for Agricultural and Rural Development Iowa State University October 1, 2007 ISU Farm Management.
Assistant Professor/Grain Markets Specialist
Presentation transcript:

Estimated Impacts of Attaining 60 Billion Gallons of Ethanol by 2030 on Agriculture and the Nation’s Economy Governor’s Ethanol Coalition Kansas City, Kansas October 3, 2006 Burton C. English Daniel G. De La Torre Ugarte Kim Jensen Agricultural Policy Analysis Center

The Story  Agriculture can have a significant role in meeting America’s energy needs.  Providing feedstocks for ethanol production could be a new multi-billion dollar industry measured in net returns.  Savings in government payments of $9 to $100 billion.  Create a 360 billion $ industry within the U.S. creating 2.4 million more jobs. Many of which will be located in RURAL AMERICA  Could reduce imports of gasoline by more than 1.0 billion barrels, valued at more than $160 billion dollars.

The Modeling Process  Modeling is both a science and an art In this type of modeling effort we attempt to project numerous variables into the future. To reduce the number of variables we predict, we use a baseline developed by USDA and extend it to the year 2030 (USDAext2030). We change the baseline to accommodate the scenario we wish to study and compare the results to that baseline to determine the changes in the agricultural sector that might occur.

The Goal  10, 30, and 60 million gallons ethanol from renewable feedstocks by 2010, 2020, and 2030, respectively. (GEC)  60 million gallons ethanol from renewable feedstocks by 2030 with corn adjusted (GECCornadj)  60 million gallons ethanol from renewable feedstocks by 2030 with corn adjusted and cellulosic ethanol delayed until 2015 (GEC with Corn Adj & CED)

The GEC Goal

Biodiesel Goal

Objectives  This progress report summarizes the impacts to the agricultural sector and economic impacts on the nation of providing and converting biomass to 60 million gallons of ethanol from renewable sources.  The impacts of two assumptions are examined:  Corn adjustment, and  Corn adjustment and cellulosic ethanol delayed to 2015.

Renewable Energy Feedstocks From Agriculture

Cellulosic Materials Corn Stover and Wheat Straw  Readily available.  Some view as a waste; however, some currently is marketed, it provides nutrients and serves as cover for erosion control.  Should not be removed on highly erodible lands.  While I am not an agronomist, I have read recommendations to leave 2000 pounds on the ground on non-erosive lands.  These are incorporated into our modeling activities.  We are not assuming anything about carbon as of yet, but the carbon issue could reduce the quantity available even further.

Dedicated Energy Crops  Are produced primarily for use as feedstocks in energy generation processes and include hybrid poplar, hybrid willow, and switchgrass.  Switchgrass is our model crop. Perennial Low input Native to US Wildlife enhancing Low erosion Low chemical use

Other Cellulosic Materials  Forestry Residues are the biomass material remaining in forests that have been harvested for timber and are composed of logging residues, rough rotten salvageable dead wood, and excess small pole trees.  Mill Residues are unused waste woods from manufacturing operations that would otherwise be landfilled, including primary mill residues, pallets, etc.  Fuel Reduction Materials consist of small diameter wood removed from managed forests in order to reduce wildfires.

Current Land Use Agricultural Census

Assumptions for a Potential Outlook Yield by 2030: Crops: corn (195 bu/ac), soybeans (51 bu/ac), wheat (53.2 bu/ac), cotton (981 pounds), energy crop (6 to12 dt/acre). Management Practices: Increase crop residues by shifting corn and wheat acreage to 50% no-till, 30% reduced till and 20% conventional till by 2030.

Rate of Growth Increase in Yields Assumed Beyond 2015 USDAextGEC Corn (bushels)1.13%1.69% Sorghum (bushels)0.76%1.13% Oats (bushels)0.61%0.91% Barley (bushels)0.88%1.31% Wheat (bushels)0.88%1.32% Soybeans (bushels)0.93%1.39% Cotton (pounds)0.43%0.64% Rice (pounds)0.79%1.19%

Assumptions for a Potential Outlook Commodity Programs: R emain as specified in Conversion Efficiency: Improved cellulosic ethanol to an average of 89 gallons/ton by 2030 and corn ethanol conversion to 3 gallons/bushel (97 gallons/ton) by Other means to produce ethanol from food wastes remained at the current conversion rate.

Ethanol Production: By Feedstock, 2006 – 2030 GEC Scenario Billion Gallons

Ethanol Production: By Feedstock, 2006 – 2030 GEC Cornadj Scenario Billion Gallons

Ethanol Production: By Feedstock, 2006 – 2030 GEC Cornadj CED Scenario Billion Gallons

Land Use: 2007, 2010, 2015, 2020, 2025, and 2030 (GEC) Million acres

Land Use: 2007, 2010, 2015, 2020, 2025, and 2030, GEC Cornadj Scenario Million acres

Land Use: 2007, 2010, 2015, 2020, 2025, and 2030, GEC Cornadj CED to 2015 Million acres

Estimated Prices by Scenario for Corn USDAext2030$2.20$2.60 $2.51$2.46$2.41 GEC$2.44$3.49$3.29$2.87$2.42$3.03 GEC corn adj allowed$2.44$3.46$2.98$2.45$2.32$2.93 GEC corn adj allowed, CED$2.44$3.46$4.65$2.70$2.31$3.00

Estimated Prices by Scenario for Soybeans USDAext2030$5.40$5.95$6.10$5.85$5.69$5.53 GEC$5.83$6.77$7.59$6.82$6.67$6.76 GEC corn adj allowed$5.79$6.70$6.75$6.66$6.24$6.44 GEC corn adj allowed, CED$5.79$6.70$7.52$6.60$6.23$6.42

Estimated Prices by Scenario for Wheat USDAext2030$3.10$3.25$3.55$3.50$3.47$3.43 GEC$3.12$3.36$3.87$3.57$3.48$3.96 GEC corn adj allowed$3.12$3.36$3.74$3.50$3.41$3.79 GEC corn adj allowed, CED$3.12$3.36$4.01$3.50$3.40$3.79

Estimated Non Land Costs of Producing Switchgrass ($/dry ton) USDAext2030$0.00 GEC$0.00 $26.18$22.78$27.13$27.58 GEC corn adj allowed$0.00 $27.89$25.96$27.59$28.81 GEC corn adj allowed, CED$0.00 $21.58$25.98$27.06$29.73

Estimated Level of Government Payments by Government Program Government Program and Scenario Projected for the Year:Total Million dollars Loan Deficiency : GEC ,098 USDAExt ,069 Contract: GEC 4,2495, ,833 USDAExt2030 4,2495, ,833 Counter Cyclical: GEC 2,1261, ,833 USDAExt2030 3,4581, ,616 Other: GEC 3,9504,4903,610 98,470 USDAExt2030 3,9504,4903,610 98,470 Total Payments: GEC 11,10511,1089,2489,3499,3529,463255,234 USDAExt ,47311,7329,6469,6109,5979,535263,988

Projected Volume of Exports for Selected Years and Scenario

Projected Value of Agricultural Exports for Corn, Wheat, Soybeans, and Cotton by Selected Year and Scenario Crop and Scenario Projected for the year: Corn: GEC 4,733 6,158 5,565 6,112 6,204 6,864 USDAExt2030 4,455 5,525 6,175 6,474 6,854 7,259 Wheat: GEC 2,982 3,391 4,240 4,183 4,418 4,699 USDAExt2030 2,945 3,250 3,994 4,174 4,410 4,657 Soybeans: GEC 5,903 5,122 3,714 4,420 4,991 4,300 USDAExt2030 5,832 6,128 5,947 6,055 6,253 6,468 Cotton: GEC 3,731 3,835 4,115 4,380 4,510 4,659 USDAExt2030 3,731 3,868 4,460 4,798 5,067 5,358 Total: GEC 18,65619,94819,38620,76722,00222,202 USDAExt ,27120,16222,17923,220 4,42025,681

Change in Soybean Acreage, GEC, 2015

Change in Soybean Acreage, GEC, 2030

Distribution of the Production of Cellulosic Materials, GEC, 2010

Distribution of the Production of Cellulosic Materials, GEC, 2015

Distribution of the Production of Cellulosic Materials, GEC, 2020

Distribution of the Production of Cellulosic Materials, GEC, 2030

Changes in Farm Income and Government Payments (million $)

Change in Net Returns GEC

Change in Net Returns GEC

Change in Net Returns GEC

Estimated Annual National Impacts under the 30, and 60 gallon ethanol goal for 2020 and 2030; Respectively. Year and Sector Change in Industry Output Impact in Employment Direct ImpactTotal ImpactDirect ImpactTotal Impact Millionnumber of jobs 2020: Agricultural Production Sector $13,906$21, ,146242,487 Renewable Energy Sector $37,466$76,378 23,296398,864 Interstate Commerce a $0$73, ,986 Total $51,373$171, ,4421,200, : Agricultural Production Sector $24,869$37, ,709359,674 Renewable Energy Sector $85,093$171,096 57,597898,192 Interstate Commerce a $0$159,730 01,229,325 Total $109,962$368, ,3062,487,191 a Since ethanol is a relatively new industry in many of the states, the estimated state level impacts did not capture the impacts of interstate commerce.

Agricultural Economic Activity, GEC, 2030

Change in Employment as a Result of Changes in Agricultural Economic Activity, GEC, 2030

Economic Activity as a Result of Conversion, GEC, 2030

Change in Employment as a Result of Changes in Agricultural Economic Activity, GEC, 2030

Conclusions Preliminary results indicate that: There is sufficient potential from America’s agricultural and forest lands to produce energy without impacting food security Currently, we have substantial capacity for production from underutilized lands

Conclusions (Continued) Marketing additional energy from agriculture sector could result in:  Increased Farm Income,  Reduced Government Payments,  Increased Rural Economic Development,  Enhanced Environmental Benefits, and  Reduction in Foreign Oil Dependency.

Agricultural Policy Analysis Center Bio-based Energy Analysis Group Department of Agricultural Economics, Institute of Agriculture University of Tennessee Project analysis team includes Chad Hellwinckel, Jamey Menard, Roland Roberts, Marie Walsh, and Brad Wilson in addition to Burton English, Daniel G. de la Torre Ugarte, and Kim Jensen