INTRODUCTION TO THE SYSTEM Kansas Department of Health and Environment Facility Profiler System.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Integrated Justice Models Integrated Justice Models.

Advertisements

Network Innovations Lets Share Code: Site Profiler Popping Up Everywhere Thursday, May 31, 2012.

Node Lessons Learned James Hudson Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources.

AQS Futures (Where is AQS Heading?) AQS Conference August 22, 2012 Robert Coats.

Clean Water Act Integrated Planning Framework Sewer Smart Summit October 23, 2012.

EPA Plans for Moving Forward with Electronic Reporting David Hindin, US EPA May 31, 2012 General Session for the Exchange Network National Meeting Philadelphia,

Developing Enterprise GIS Infrastructure for the Florida Department of Health Chris DuClos, M.S. Florida Department of Health Division of Environmental.

1 The Facility Registry System 2006 GIS Workgroup Meeting Cincinnati Mainstreaming Locational Improvement In Our Work Status Update of Locational Data.

Electronic Reporting Breakout Discussion David Hindin, US EPA May 31, 2012 Break Out Session 7 Exchange Network National Meeting May 29 – June 1, 2012.

U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY The Web Service Catalog Presentation to the SOA-COI Meeting Lico Galindo, OIC April 14, 2010.

Facility Profiler North Dakota Department of Health- Environmental Health Section Gary Haberstroh

Mni Sose Intertribal Water Rights Coalition, Inc. Exchange network Project Presented by Rhonda Azure Mni Sose Treasurer.

1 Using CDX and the Exchange Network Services Roy Chaudet US Environmental Protection Agency Office of Environmental Information 2007 STORET/WQX Conference.

Integrating Historical and Realtime Monitoring Data into an Internet Based Watershed Information System for the Bear River Basin Jeff Horsburgh David Stevens,

1 State/EPA Environmental Information Exchange Network December 2004 Molly O’Neill State Director, Network Steering Board Environmental Council of the.

GIS at SDSC Domains: –From geology, environmental science, hydrology, ocean biodiversity, regional development, Katrina response, archaeology, to neuroscience.

Charlie Crocker Vice President Farallon Geographics, Inc. An Overview of Internet Mapping Technology.

Introduction to the Interstate Chemicals Clearinghouse

Electronic Reporting: ICIS Data Publishing Presented by: Alison Kittle, U.S. EPA Elisa Willard, Colorado Department of Public Health & Environment Roy.

State of Wyoming Department of Environmental Quality To the cloud my friend! Steve Alison – Georgia EPD Simon Watson – Windsor Why Georgia has its node.

National STORET Users Conference Environmental Information Exchange Network Andrew T. Battin, Director Information Exchange & Services Division Office.

National Institute of Statistics, Geography and Informatics of Mexico Website of Mexico for Information Exchange With OECD Towards Implementation of SDMX.

Mobile Inspections Rebecca Wenner Kansas DHE Guy Outred Windsor Solutions.

TRI National Conference February 13, 2008 Implementing the State Data Exchange in Kentucky.

©2009 Cadcorp Compass 09 25th June 2009 O’Callaghan Alexander Hotel, Dublin 2.

Exchange Network Grant Information: Stephen Goranson Office of Information Services USEPA Region 5.

1 The Exchange Network: A Tool for Better Environmental Management Jonathan Jacobson US Environmental Protection Agency.

ISMT E-200: Trends in Enterprise Information Systems Project: GLOCO – Integrated Corporate Portal Part 1 Business Requirement Team Members: Joyce Torres.

U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY For Conference Use Only Data Exchanges Using Machine-to- Machine Transfer Technologies System of Registries Conference.

Geospatial Systems Architecture Todd Bacastow. GIS Evolution

Danish State Railways goes Mobile Background Carries 156 million passengers annually which is 95 % of traffic in Denmark Employees :8,400. Business Drivers.

1 Systems Development Cheryl Itkin SIMCorB Meeting RTP, NC June 29-30, 2000 SIMCorB Organization Policy Systems Outreach.

Node Mentoring Workshop “Sharing What We Node” Middleware Breakout Session.NET New Orleans, Louisiana February 9-10, 2004.

Planning for Arctic GIS and Geographic Information Infrastructure Sponsored by the Arctic Research Support and Logistics Program 30 October 2003 Seattle,

1 The Exchange Network: A Tool for Better Environmental Management Doreen Sterling, Director Information Exchange & Services Division Office of Environmental.

Environmental & Health Data Integration for Homeland Security Support Exchange Network Users Meeting Hilton San Francisco Hotel, Continental Ballroom April.

Serving society Stimulating innovation Supporting legislation Workshop on the INSPIRE registry and registers Martin Tuchyňa, Tomáš.

National Environmental Information Exchange Network Potential for Regional LAEs By: Dave Tetta and Andrew Battin US EPA.

OEI’s Services Portfolio December 13, 2007 Draft / Working Concepts.

The City of Los Angeles Implements Its New Web Presented By: SARAH EL-SHOUBARY By: Madeleine Rackley Web Address: Topic.

Introduction to the Exchange Network May 30th, 2012.

Geospatial Systems Architecture Todd Bacastow. Views of a System Architecture Enterprise Information Computational Engineering Technology.

Challenge Grant Update: Linking the Network of Natural Heritage Biodiversity Data to the Environmental Information Exchange Network.

TRI OUTREACH: Finding Opportunities Barbara Conklin EPA Region 8.

Electronic Exchange of Drinking Water Lab Data Presented by: Mike Matsko NJDEP Exchange Network Users Meeting April 18, 2006.

A State Perspective Mentoring Conference New Orleans, LA 2/28/2005 RCRAInfo Network Exchange.

SDC JE What is a Data Registry? v A place to keep facts about characteristics of data that are necessary to clearly describe, inventory,

L. David Glatt North Dakota Department of Health Environmental Health Section.

RCRAInfo May 6, RCRAInfo: What is it? The national (mission critical) information system that supports the RCRA Subtitle C program. A national.

H eartland E mergency R esponse E xchange.  Effectively manage and proactively exchange information  Enhance decision-making and risk assessment.

EPA Plans for Moving Forward with Electronic Reporting David Hindin, US EPA May 31, 2012 General Session for the Exchange Network National Meeting May.

Geospatial Systems Architecture

Intranet Steve Andy Michael. Intranet A network based on TCP/IP protocols (an internet) belonging to an organization, usually a corporation, accessible.

AFS Modernization NACAA Meeting – May 5, AFS Modernization Status  Long agreed upon need to modernize  Efficiencies and cost savings from modernization.

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Central Data Exchange Pilot Project Promoting Geospatial Data Exchange Between EPA and State Partners. April 25, 2007.

1 Stockholm Convention on Persistent Organic Pollutants Clearing-house Mechanism for Information on POPs. Role of Regional Centres.

NGA Center for Best Practices January 10, 2001 Charleston, South Carolina National Environmental Information Exchange Network Kim Nelson Pennsylvania Department.

Using the Exchange Network One State’s Perspective Deb Soule New Hampshire Department of Environmental Services NERACOOS/NECOSP Data Management Workshop,

The Earth Information Exchange. Portal Structure Portal Functions/Capabilities Portal Content ESIP Portal and Geospatial One-Stop ESIP Portal and NOAA.

Introduction to Metadata March 2016 What is Metadata?

What is Stormwater? Direct result of rainfall Recharges groundwater by infiltration Produces “runoff” (excess rainfall after infiltration) May be concentrated.

6/13/2016 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 1 Starting a Facilities Flow Lee David

Status Report to the President under EO EPA ACTIONS 1 Executive Order: Improving Chemical Facility Safety & Security.

REGIONAL RESPONSE TEAM NOVEMBER 5, Executive Order: Improving Chemical Facility Safety & Security.

Information Collection and Presentation Enriched by Remote Sensor Data

New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection

K-Plex, Inc. We Develop Technology for… Personalization Integration

MICHIGAN’S Electronic Discharge Monitoring Reporting System (e-DMR)

Challenge Grant Update

New Mexico Environment Department ICIS-Air Dataflow Project

Presentation transcript:

INTRODUCTION TO THE SYSTEM Kansas Department of Health and Environment Facility Profiler System

Exchange Network Grant History One Stop Grant $500,000 (’02) Readiness Grant $297,000 (’03) Implementation Grant $300,000 (’04) Challenge Grant (HERE) $750,000 (’05) Infrastructure Grant (CME) $223,000 (’06) Implementation II $245,000

Exchange Network Flow Goals State to EPA & EPA to State  FRS, NEI, SDWIS, AQS, RCRA, FEA, RMP  RCRAInfo, WQX, UIC, ICIS-NPDES (Proposed) State to State  KS to {MO,NE,IA} (HERE Project Presentation Tomorrow) Intrastate  KDA to KDHE (Ag Chemicals) Regulated Community  TRI

Facility Profiler Data Content Affiliated Parties 45 32’ N ’W Facility name, Industry Classification Environmental Interests Geographic Location

Facility Profiler Goals Establish an agency-wide data sharing environment Support FOIA requests (e.g., ‘Who’s doing what nearby?’) thus reducing agency burden Support drivers for integrated environmental data from EPA, the legislature, and the regulated community Assist with internal bureau coordination (e.g., during permit reviews or enforcement actions) Participate in the National Exchange Network

Facility Profiler Overview

Additional Benefits Browser based GIS mapping capabilities on agency desktops Facility location address cleaning Derivation of facility location coordinates Identification of facility duplication in existing systems Facility name data standardization Allows users to query and download data Can provide a ‘portal’ to bureaus’ inquiry systems

Multiple Source Systems

Multiple External Connections KDHE Intranet Internet Applications

Monarch Cement

Wichita Area of Interest

Sharing Facility Profiler Reuse  Michigan (.Net, SQL Server)  Kansas (.Net, Oracle)  North Dakota (.Net, SQL Server)  Nevada (.Net, Oracle)  Connecticut - variant (.Net, SQL Server)  Missouri (Java, DB2)

Conclusions Integration doesn’t have to be all or nothing  Integrated data access doesn’t require integrated data management – a warehouse can be a highly effective, lower cost alternative Integration is not just an agency thing anymore  Data about your state is probably disparate;  The EN allows for comprehensive data integration States can collaborate effectively  Share data – e.g., HERE  Share investments – e.g., Node, Plugins, Applications (FP)