Soft X-ray Self-Seeding in LCLS-II J. Wu Jan. 13, 2010.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Schemes for generation of attosecond pulses in X-ray FELs E.L. Saldin, E.A. Schneidmiller, M.V. Yurkov The potential for the development of XFEL beyond.
Advertisements

Soft X-ray Self-Seeding
05/03/2004 Measurement of Bunch Length Using Spectral Analysis of Incoherent Fluctuations Vadim Sajaev Advanced Photon Source Argonne National Laboratory.
Sub-femtosecond bunch length diagnostic ATF Users Meeting April 26, 2012 Gerard Andonian, A. Murokh, J. Rosenzweig, P. Musumeci, E. Hemsing, D. Xiang,
Approaches for the generation of femtosecond x-ray pulses Zhirong Huang (SLAC)
E. Schneidmiller and M. Yurkov (SASE & MCP) C. Behrens, W. Decking, H. Delsim, T. Limberg, R. Kammering (rf & LOLA) N. Guerassimova and R. Treusch (PGM.
Hard X-ray FELs (Overview) Zhirong Huang March 6, 2012 FLS2012 Workshop, Jefferson Lab.
P. Emma LCLS FAC 12 Oct Comments from LCLS FAC Meeting (April 2004): J. Roßbach:“How do you detect weak FEL power when the.
Performance Analysis Using Genesis 1.3 Sven Reiche LCLS Undulator Parameter Workshop Argonne National Laboratory 10/24/03.
1 A Grating Spectrograph for the LCLS Philip Heimann Advanced Light Source Observe the spontaneous radiation spectrum of the individual undulators Observe.
Spontaneous Radiation at LCLS Sven Reiche UCLA - 09/22/04 Sven Reiche UCLA - 09/22/04.
LCLS Transition to Science DOE Status Review of the LUSI MIE Project Near term opportunities for LCLS 'upgrades' J. Hastings for the LCLS Experimental.
FEL Beam Dynami cs FEL Beam Dynamics T. Limberg FEL driver linac operation with very short electron bunches.
FEL simulation code FAST Free-Electron Laser at the TESLA Test Facility Generic name FAST stands for a set of codes for ``full physics'' analysis of FEL.
07/27/2004XFEL 2004 Measurement of Incoherent Radiation Fluctuations and Bunch Profile Recovery Vadim Sajaev Advanced Photon Source Argonne National Laboratory.
The impact of undulators in an ERL Jim Clarke ASTeC, STFC Daresbury Laboratory FLS 2012, March 2012.
W.S. Graves1 Seeding for Fully Coherent Beams William S. Graves MIT-Bates Presented at MIT x-ray laser user program review July 1, 2003.
Low Emittance RF Gun Developments for PAL-XFEL
A. Doyuran, L. DiMauro, W. Graves, R. Heese, E. D. Johnson, S. Krinsky, H. Loos, J.B. Murphy, G. Rakowsky, J. Rose, T. Shaftan, B. Sheehy, Y. Shen, J.
R&D Towards X-ray Free Electron Laser Li Hua Yu Brookhaven National Laboratory 1/23/2004.
Free Electron Lasers (I)
S. Spampinati, J.Wu, T.Raubenhaimer Future light source March, 2012 Simulations for the HXRSS experiment with the 40 pC beam.
Two Longitudinal Space Charge Amplifiers and a Poisson Solver for Periodic Micro Structures Longitudinal Space Charge Amplifier 1: Longitudinal Space Charge.
Max Cornacchia, Paul Emma Stanford Linear Accelerator Center Max Cornacchia, Paul Emma Stanford Linear Accelerator Center  Proposed by M. Cornacchia (Nov.
Beam Dynamics and FEL Simulations for FLASH Igor Zagorodnov and Martin Dohlus Beam Dynamics Meeting, DESY.
SFLASH  SASE interference setup & optics rough estimation 1d estimation 3d estimation summary.
Optimization of Compact X-ray Free-electron Lasers Sven Reiche May 27 th 2011.
A bunch compressor design and several X-band FELs Yipeng Sun, ARD/SLAC , LCLS-II meeting.
J. Wu In collaboration with Y. Jiao, W.M. Fawley, J. Frisch, Z. Huang, H.-D. Nuhn, C. Pellegrini, S. Reiche (PSI), Y. Cai, A.W. Chao, Y. Ding, X. Huang,
Max Cornacchia, SLAC LCLS Project Overview BESAC, Feb , 2001 LCLS Project Overview What is the LCLS ? Transition from 3 rd generation light sources.
External Seeding Approaches: S2E studies for LCLS-II Gregg Penn, LBNL CBP Erik Hemsing, SLAC August 7, 2014.
Basic Energy Sciences Advisory Committee MeetingLCLS February 26, 2001 J. Hastings Brookhaven National Laboratory LCLS Scientific Program X-Ray Laser Physics:
External Seeding Approaches for Next Generation Free Electron Lasers
Harmonic lasing in the LCLS-II (a work in progress…) G. Marcus, et al. 03/11/2014.
Fluctuations Study Update A. Lutman. Model description Undulator section I 1D FEL code Bunch shape: flat top Short Bunch Long Bunch length20 fs50 fs current2.
The Next Generation Light Source Test Facility at Daresbury Jim Clarke ASTeC, STFC Daresbury Laboratory Ultra Bright Electron Sources Workshop, Daresbury,
UCLA Claudio Pellegrini UCLA Department of Physics and Astronomy X-ray Free-electron Lasers Ultra-fast Dynamic Imaging of Matter II Ischia, Italy, 4/30-5/3/
Transverse Gradient Undulator and its applications to Plasma-Accelerator Based FELs Zhirong Huang (SLAC) Introduction TGU concept, theory, technology Soft.
LCLS-II: Accelerator Systems LCLS SAC Meeting P. Emma et al. April 23, 2010.
J. Wu March 06, 2012 ICFA-FLS 2012 Workshop Jefferson Lab, Newport News, VA Tolerances for Seeded Free Electron Lasers FEL and Beam Phys. Dept. (ARD/SLAC),
Awake electron beam requirements ParameterBaseline Phase 2Range to check Beam Energy16 MeV MeV Energy spread (  ) 0.5 %< 0.5 % ? Bunch Length (
J. Corlett. June 16, 2006 A Future Light Source for LBNL Facility Vision and R&D plan John Corlett ALS Scientific Advisory Committee Meeting June 16, 2006.
Neil Thompson ASTeC, Daresbury Laboratory STFC and IoP PAB Group Workshop, 16 th February 2016: Towards a UK X-FEL Existing and Future X-FEL Facilities.
What did we learn from TTF1 FEL? P. Castro (DESY).
E. Schneidmiller and M. Yurkov FEL Seminar, DESY April 26, 2016 Reverse undulator tapering for polarization control at X-ray FELs.
WIR SCHAFFEN WISSEN – HEUTE FÜR MORGEN Enhanced X-ray FEL performance from tilted electron beams Eduard Prat, Simona Bettoni and Sven Reiche :: Paul Scherrer.
Applications of transverse deflecting cavities in x-ray free-electron lasers Yuantao Ding SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory7/18/2012.
Production of coherent X-rays with a free electron laser based on optical wiggler A.Bacci, M.Ferrario*, C. Maroli, V.Petrillo, L.Serafini Università e.
Some Simulations for the Proposed Hard X-Ray Self- Seeding on LCLS J. Wu J. Wu et al. Feb. 25, 2011.
E. Schneidmiller and M. Yurkov Harmonic Lasing Self-Seeded FEL FEL seminar, DESY Hamburg June 21, 2016.
Harmonic Generation in a Self-Seeded Soft X-Ray LCLS-II J. Wu Feb. 24, 2010.
SIMULATION FOR TW LCLS-II Tor’s question on the undulator length in the TW FEL senario SASE FEL undulator length 9, 10, and 11:  9 – m, 10.
Free Electron Laser Studies
Seeding in the presence of microbunching
Eduard Prat / Sven Reiche :: Paul Scherrer Institute
LCLS-II: An upgrade for the LINAC Coherent Light Source
LCLS efforts: Self-seeding -- status report
Paul Scherrer Institut
LCLS Instrument Development
Review of Application to SASE-FELs
F. Villa Laboratori Nazionali di Frascati - LNF On behalf of Sparc_lab
Self-seeding for the soft x-ray line in LCLS upgrade
Soft X-Ray pulse length measurement
Z. Huang LCLS Lehman Review May 14, 2009
Two-bunch self-seeding for narrow-bandwidth hard x-ray FELs
SASE FEL PULSE DURATION ANALYSIS FROM SPECTRAL CORRELATION FUNCTION
Status of FEL Physics Research Worldwide  Claudio Pellegrini, UCLA April 23, 2002 Review of Basic FEL physical properties and definition of important.
Achieving Required Peak Spectral Brightness Relative Performance for Four Undulator Technologies Neil Thompson WP5 – 20/03/19.
Introduction to Free Electron Lasers Zhirong Huang
Enhanced Self-Amplified Spontaneous Emission
Presentation transcript:

Soft X-ray Self-Seeding in LCLS-II J. Wu Jan. 13, 2010

2 Originally proposed at DESY [ J. Feldhaus, E.L. Saldin, J.R. Schneider, E.A. Schneidmiller, M.V. Yurkov, Optics Communications, V.140, p.341 (1997). ] –Chicane and gratings in two orthogonal planes x and y Schematics of Self-Seeded FEL chicane electron 1 st undulator2 nd undulator SASE FEL grating Seeded FEL grazing mirrors slit electron dump FEL

3 For a Gaussian photon beam –Gaussian pulse, at 1.5 Å, if I pk = 3 kA, Q = 250 pC,  z  10  m, then transform limit is:   /  0  10  –LCLS normal operation bandwidth on order of 10  3 –LCLS electron bunch, double-horn but central part effectively flat top, for flat top Improve longitudinal coherence, and reduce the bandwidth  improve the spectral brightness Transform Limited Pulses

4 Reaching a single coherent spike? –L G = 1 m, 20L G = 20 m, for u = 2 cm, there is ~1000 periods –Take 1 nm as example, single spike  1 micron –Low charge might reach this, but bandwidth will be broad Narrow band, “relatively long” pulse  Self-Seeding. In the following, we focus on 250-pC case with a “relatively” long bunch, and look for “narrower” bandwidth and “good” temporal coherence For shorter wavelength (< 1 nm), single spike is not easy to reach, but self-seeding still possible Single Spike vs Self-Seeding

5 Seeding the second undulator (vs. single undulator followed by x-ray optics) –Power loss in monochromator is recovered in the second undulator (FEL amplifier) –Shot-to-shot FEL intensity fluctuation is reduced due to nonlinear regime of FEL amplifier –Peak power after first undulator is less than saturation power  damage to optics is reduced Two-Stage FEL with Monochromator With the same saturated peak power, but with two-orders of magnitude bandwidth reduction, the peak brightness is increased by two-orders of magnitude

6 J. Hastings suggested varied line spacing gratings (to provide focusing) as the monochromator for the soft x-ray self-seeding scheme –Yiping Feng, Michael Rowen, Philip Heimann (LBL), and et al. are designing –Yiping Feng, Michael Rowen, Philip Heimann (LBL), and Jacek Krzywinski et al. are designing John Arthur, Uwe Bergmann, Paul Emma, John Galayda, Claudio Pellegrini, and Jochen Schneider et al. are giving general advices Monochromator

Performances Parametersymbolvalueunit Energy range  200 – 2000eV Pulse length (rms)  34 – 12fs Pulse energyE JJ Peak PowerP input MW E-beam size (rms) s mm Resolving powerR> Throughput  total 0.2 – 0.005% Output peak Power P output kW Time delay TT 10.8 – 9.6ps Optics Specs Feng-Rowen-Heimann-Krzywinski-Hastings-Wu-et al.

Cylindrical horizontal focusing M 1 –Focus at reentrant point Planar pre-mirror M 2 –Vary incident angle to grating G Planar variable-line-spacing grating G –Focus at exit slit Exit slit S Spherical vertical focusing mirror M3 –Re-focus at reentrant point M1M1 M3M3 G   M2M2 electron-beam Optics Components source point re-entrant point Feng-Rowen-Heimann-Krzywinski-Hastings-Wu-et al.

Optical components –Deflecting mirror; Pre-mirror; VLS Grating; Collimation mirror w0’w0’ w0w0 w 0 ’’ M1M1 GvGv M3M3 L1L1 r’Gr’G r M3  L Re-entrant ZRZR r total L M1M2 M2M2 r M2G r’ M3 Geometry (Dispersion Plane) Feng-Rowen-Heimann-Krzywinski-Hastings-Wu-et al. L1L1 L M1M2 r M2G r’Gr’G r M3 r’ M3  L Re-entrant r total 200 eV eV

10 Might need more than one monochromators Efficiency: –Monochromator efficiency –Phase space conservation: bandwidth reduced by one to two-order of magnitudes –Overall efficiency will be on order of a percent to a few 10  5 (about 0.2 – %) –Still looking for design to have higher efficiency Use blazed profile -- efficiency increases by x10Use blazed profile -- efficiency increases by x10 Use coating to improve reflectivityUse coating to improve reflectivity Monochromator

11 S-2-E electron distribution: slice emittance entering the undulator S-2-E electron distribution: slice emittance entering the undulator LCLS SASE FEL Parameters Slice Emittance small  Gain Length Short

12 Peak current ~1 kA Undulator period 5 cm, Betatron function 4 m For 250 pC case, assuming a step function current profile,  z ~ 22  m Gain length ~ 1.4 m SASE spikes ~ 70 6-nm Case: Electron Bunch

13 S-2-E electron distribution: electron current profile entering the undulator S-2-E electron distribution: electron current profile entering the undulator LCLS high-brightness electron beam head tail

14 6-nm FEL power along first undulator 6-nm FEL power along first undulator 6-nm SASE FEL Parameters saturation around 28 m with ~5 GW Present LCLS-II plan uses 40 meter long undulators

15 Effective SASE start up power is 200 W. –In a bandwidth of 2.2  10  5, there is only 0.5 W Use small start up seed power 10 kW… –Monochromator efficiency  10% (at 6 nm) –Phase space conservation: bandwidth decreases 1 to 2-orders of magnitude (about 70 spikes) –Take total efficiency 1.0  10  3  Need 10 MW on monochromator to seed with 10 kW in 2 nd und. 6-nm Case - Requirement on Seed Power 10 MW 10 kW

16 FEL power along 2 nd undulator for seed power of: 10 MW (black), 100 kW (red), 10 kW (cyan) 6-nm Seeded FEL Parameters Saturation around 18, 25 and 29 m with power ~5 GW

17 Temporal profile at ~26 m in 2 nd undulator for seed of 100 kW (black) and 10 kW (red) 6-nm Seeded FEL Parameters ~35  m

18 FEL spectrum at ~26 m in 2 nd undulator for seed of 100 kW (black) and 10 kW (red) 6-nm Seeded FEL Parameters FWHM 3.1  10  4

19 Effective pulse duration 35  m (  z  10  m) Transform limited Gaussian pulse  bandwidth is 1.1  10  4 FWHM (For uniform pulse  1.5  10  4 FWHM) Here the seeded FEL bandwidth is about twice the transform limited bandwidth 6-nm Case - Transform Limit

20 The second undulator can be APPLE type –Linear (black), circular (red), or elliptical polarization –Pol. ~ 100% Polarization

21 Temporal profile in 2 nd undulator with seed of 100 kW for planar (black) and circular (red) 6-nm Seeded FEL: Polarization ~35  m Planar at 26 m; Circular at 18 m

22 FEL spectrum in 2 nd undulator with seed of for planar (black) and circular (red) 6-nm Seeded FEL : Polarization FWHM 3.1  10  4 Planar at 26 m; Circular at 18 m

23 Peak current ~3 kA Betatron function 4 m Undulator period 5 cm, Betatron function 4 m For 250 pC case, assuming a step function current profile,  z  7  m. Gain length ~ 2.1 m SASE spikes ~ Å Case: Electron Bunch

24 S-2-E electron distribution: electron current profile entering the undulator: compress more S-2-E electron distribution: electron current profile entering the undulator: compress more LCLS high-brightness electron beam head tail

25 6-Å FEL power along the first undulator 6-Å FEL power along the first undulator 6-Å SASE FEL Parameters saturation around 32 m with power ~10 GW Present LCLS-II plan uses 40 meter long undulators

26 6 Å FEL temporal profile at 30 m in the first undulator: challenge 6 Å FEL temporal profile at 30 m in the first undulator: challenge 6 Å SASE FEL Properties

27 6 Å FEL spectrum at 30 m in the first undulator 6 Å FEL spectrum at 30 m in the first undulator –Spiky spectrum: challenge 6 Å SASE FEL Properties

28 Effective SASE start up power is 1.3 kW. In a bandwidth of 6.6  10 -6, there is only 1.6 W Use small start up seed power 20 kW… –Monochromator efficiency ~ 0.2 % (at 6 Å) –Phase space conservation: bandwidth decreases 1 to 2-orders of magnitude (~ 160 spikes) –Take total efficiency 5.0  10  5  Need 400 MW on monochromator to seed with 20 kW in 2 nd und. 6-ÅCase - Requirement on Seed Power 6-Å Case - Requirement on Seed Power 400 MW 20 kW

29 Power along 2 nd undulator for seed power of 20 kW (black) and 10 kW (red) 6-ÅSeeded FEL Parameters 6-Å Seeded FEL Parameters Saturation around 35 m with power on order of 10 GW

30 Temporal profile at ~35 m in the 2 nd undulator for seed of 20 kW (black) and 10 kW (red) 6-ÅSeeded FEL Parameters 6-Å Seeded FEL Parameters ~12  m

31 FEL spectrum at ~35 m in the 2 nd undulator for seed of 20 kW (black) and 10 kW (red) FEL spectrum at ~35 m in the 2 nd undulator for seed of 20 kW (black) and 10 kW (red) 6-ÅSeeded FEL Parameters 6-Å Seeded FEL Parameters FWHM 6.2  10  5

32 Effective pulse duration 12  m,  z ~ 3.5  m Transform limited Gaussian pulse  bandwidth is 3.2  10  5 FWHM. (For uniform pulse  4.4  10  5 FWHM) The seeded FEL bandwidth (6.2  10  5 FWHM) is less than twice the transform limited bandwidth 6-Åcase — transform limited 6-Å case — transform limited

Parameter 6 nm 6 Å unit Emittance mmmm Peak Current 13kA Pulse length rms 3512fs Bandwidth FWHM  5 Limited Bandwidth  5 Seed Power 1020kW Power on Mono 10400MW Mono Efficiency 100.2% Sat. Power 510GW Sat. Length 3035m Brightness Increment Self-Seeding Summary at 6 nm and 6 Å

34 VLS gratings are being studied in more details looking for larger overall efficiency Three dimensional overlap of the electron pulse and the photon pulse Electron chicane will be studied in more detail Statistics of the self-seeded FEL performance Full simulation with monochromator wavefront propagation More detailed study on APPLE undulator possibility as the second undulator to generate narrow bandwidth FEL with variable polarization Ongoing work