Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Achieving Required Peak Spectral Brightness Relative Performance for Four Undulator Technologies Neil Thompson WP5 – 20/03/19.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Achieving Required Peak Spectral Brightness Relative Performance for Four Undulator Technologies Neil Thompson WP5 – 20/03/19."— Presentation transcript:

1 Achieving Required Peak Spectral Brightness Relative Performance for Four Undulator Technologies
Neil Thompson WP5 – 20/03/19

2 FEL Brightness Have spec: B ≥ 1e33 ph/s/mm2/marad2/0.1%bw at 16keV
δ is the normalised degeneracy parameter - a correction factor to account for longitudinal and transverse coherence. The most dominant parameters are the peak current, the beam energy and the wavelength.

3 FEL Brightness Required peak current to achieve FEL peak brightness 1033 Normalised emittance (mm-mrad) E 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 5GeV 4.6kA 5.2kA 5.6kA 5.8A 6.0kA 6GeV 3.7kA 4.2kA 4.5kA 4.7kA 4.9kA 7GeV 3.2kA 3.5kA 3.8kA 4.0kA 4.1kA

4 Relative Performance for Four Undulator Technologies

5 Undulator Comparison Quick comparison of different undulator technologies to motivate discussions Have determined, for beam energies from 4 – 9 GeV, for different undulators: the period for the FEL to tune from 8keV at minimum gap (or max field) to 16keV the aw parameter at 16keV Have calculated, using simple 1D model (no corrections for emittance, energy spread, diffraction) The 1D saturation length and saturation power at 16keV for a constant peak current Not intended to provide absolute answers to the performance but to illustrate the relative differences we could expect between the different undulator types and how the technology would affect our choice of beam energy, for example Achievable field: c1 c2 c3 REF Cryogenic PMU 3.896 -4.022 0.529 EuPraxia Report D6.1, 2016 DELTA helical 1.45 -1.28 -2.24 A. B. Temnykh, PR-STAB 11, , 2008 Hybrid Planar 3.67 -5.08 1.54 P. Ellaume et al, NIM A455, 2000,

6 Undulator Comparison Helical SCU data from 3D modelling at STFC (Vicky Bayliss + Mike Courthold) 4m SCU with 4mm gap and 11.5m period was built at STFC as prototype for the ILC positron source.

7 Undulator Comparison – 3mm gap
Period required for 8keV at minimum gap of 3mm Corresponding aw at 16keV 1D saturation length for peak current 4kA, beam radius 25um 1D saturation power for peak current 4kA, beam radius 25um

8 Undulator Comparison – 4mm gap
Period required for 8keV at minimum gap of 4mm Corresponding aw at 16keV 1D saturation length for peak current 4kA, beam radius 25um 1D saturation power for peak current 4kA, beam radius 25um

9 Parameter Set Adopted parameters at FEL: Parameter Value Comments
Energy 5.5GeV Allows options for undulator technology Lower than SwissFEL Consistent with Peak Brightness 1033 ph/s/mm2/mrad2/0.1%bw Peak Current 5kA Achievable from LiTrack results Normalised Emittance 0.2 mm-mrad Consistent with Q < 100pC Bunch charge < 100pC RMS Slice energy spread 1e-4 Slice length = one SASE spike length (2πlc ~ 0.3fs) Max Photon Energy 16keV FEL tuning range at fixed energy X 2 Peak Spectral 16keV 1033 ph/s/mm2/mrad2/0.1%bw

10 Genesis Steady-State (single slice) @ 16keV (3mm gap)
Undulator Type Period aw CPMU Planar 12.87 mm 0.628 Delta Helical 13.78 mm 0.550 Hybrid Planar 14.12 mm 0.521 SCU Helical 9.85 mm 0.907 Beam radius optimised to 13um (β = 9m) Module length = 2m Intermodule gap = 0.25m

11 Genesis Time Dependent @ 16keV (3mm gap)
Flat-top bunch with full width = 5.45fs Charge = 27pC Same shot noise seed for each case.

12 Genesis Time Dependent @ 16keV (3mm gap) – Summary of results
CPMU Delta Hybrid SCU Saturation Power (mean over pulse) (GW) 9.1 8.9 7.6 9.8 Saturation Length (m) 24.5 26.5 29.1 15.6 Saturation Pulse Energy (µJ) 49 48 29 54 FWHM Bandwidth 9.87e-4 9.75e-4 9.96e-4 1.16e-3 Peak Brightness (mean over pulse) #ph/s/mm2/mrad2/0.1%bw 2.39e33 2.37e33 1.98e33 2.18e33 Notes FWHM bandwidth is of a single spiky spectrum – needs averaging over many pulses Brightness assumes full transverse coherence, so probably an over-estimate by factor ~2 No wakes included - Likely to reduce peak power and increase bandwidth.

13


Download ppt "Achieving Required Peak Spectral Brightness Relative Performance for Four Undulator Technologies Neil Thompson WP5 – 20/03/19."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google