Heating and Current Drive Systems for ARIES-AT T.K. Mau University of California, San Diego ARIES Project Meeting September 18-20, 2000 Princeton Plasma.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ARIES-Advanced Tokamak Power Plant Study Physics Analysis and Issues Charles Kessel, for the ARIES Physics Team Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory U.S.-Japan.
Advertisements

First Wall Heat Loads Mike Ulrickson November 15, 2014.
ELECTRON CYCLOTRON SYSTEM FOR KSTAR US-Korea Workshop Opportunities for Expanded Fusion Science and Technology Collaborations with the KSTAR Project Presented.
1 Heating and Current Drive Studies In the ARIES Program T.K. Mau University of California, San Diego Peer Review of the ARIES Program August 17, 2000.
Physics Analysis for Equilibrium, Stability, and Divertors ARIES Power Plant Studies Charles Kessel, PPPL DOE Peer Review, UCSD August 17, 2000.
Proposals for Next Year’s MFE Activities C. Kessel, PPPL ARIES Project Meeting, Sept. 24, 2000.
Impact of Liquid Wall on Fusion Systems Farrokh Najmabadi University of California, San Diego NRC Fusion Science Assessment Committee November 17, 1999.
Status of Advanced Design Studies and Overview of ARIES-AT Study Farrokh Najmabadi US/Japan Workshop on Fusion Power Plant Studies & Advanced Technologies.
Characteristics of Commercial Fusion Power Plants Results from ARIES-AT Study Farrokh Najmabadi Fusion Power Associates Annual Meeting & Symposium July.
Optimization of a Steady-State Tokamak-Based Power Plant Farrokh Najmabadi University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA IEA Workshop 59 “Shape and.
ARIES-ACT1 preliminary plasma description C. Kessel, PPPL ARIES Project Meeting, October 13, 2011.
IPP Stellarator Reactor perspective T. Andreeva, C.D. Beidler, E. Harmeyer, F. Herrnegger, Yu. Igitkhanov J. Kisslinger, H. Wobig O U T L I N E Helias.
Highlights of ARIES-AT Study Farrokh Najmabadi For the ARIES Team VLT Conference call July 12, 2000 ARIES Web Site:
June19-21, 2000Finalizing the ARIES-AT Blanket and Divertor Designs, ARIES Project Meeting/ARR ARIES-AT Blanket and Divertor Design (The Final Stretch)
March 20-21, 2000ARIES-AT Blanket and Divertor Design, ARIES Project Meeting/ARR Status ARIES-AT Blanket and Divertor Design The ARIES Team Presented.
D. Borba 1 21 st IAEA Fusion Energy Conference, Chengdu China 21 st October 2006 Excitation of Alfvén eigenmodes with sub-Alfvénic neutral beam ions in.
1 Electron Bernstein Wave Research and Plans Gary Taylor Presentation to the 16th NSTX Program Advisory Committee September 9, 2004.
1 ST workshop 2008 Conception of LHCD Experiments on the Spherical Tokamak Globus-M O.N. Shcherbinin, V.V. Dyachenko, M.A. Irzak, S.A. Khitrov A.F.Ioffe.
C. Kessel Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory For the NSTX National Team DOE Review of NSTX Five-Year Research Program Proposal June 30 – July 2, 2003.
1 ST workshop 2005 Numerical modeling and experimental study of ICR heating in the spherical tokamak Globus-M O.N.Shcherbinin, F.V.Chernyshev, V.V.Dyachenko,
Advanced Tokamak Plasmas and the Fusion Ignition Research Experiment Charles Kessel Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory Spring APS, Philadelphia, 4/5/2003.
ECRF Heating on CS Reactors T.K. Mau UC-San Diego With input from L.P. Ku (PPPL), J.F. Lyon (ORNL), X.R. Wang (UCSD) ARIES Project Meeting May 6-7, 2003.
1 Association Euratom-Cea TORE SUPRA Tore Supra “Fast Particles” Experiments LH SOL Generated Fast Particles Meeting Association Euratom IPP.CR, Prague.
J A Snipes, 6 th ITPA MHD Topical Group Meeting, Tarragona, Spain 4 – 6 July 2005 TAE Damping Rates on Alcator C-Mod Compared with Nova-K J A Snipes *,
Analysis and Simulations of the ITER Hybrid Scenario C. Kessel, R. Budny, K. Indireshkumar Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory, USA ITPA Topical Group.
Progress in ARIES-ACT Study Farrokh Najmabadi UC San Diego Japan/US Workshop on Power Plant Studies and Related Advanced Technologies 8-9 March 2012 US.
Exploring ECRF Heating on CS Reactors T.K. Mau UC-San Diego ARIES Project Meeting January 8-10, 2003 University of California-San Diego.
Systems Analysis Development for ARIES Next Step C. E. Kessel 1, Z. Dragojlovic 2, and R. Raffrey 2 1 Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory 2 University.
Initial Exploration of HHFW Current Drive on NSTX J. Hosea, M. Bell, S. Bernabei, S. Kaye, B. LeBlanc, J. Menard, M. Ono C.K. Phillips, A. Rosenberg, J.R.
Integrated Modeling and Simulations of ITER Burning Plasma Scenarios C. E. Kessel, R. V. Budny, K. Indireshkumar, D. Meade Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory.
ITER Standard H-mode, Hybrid and Steady State WDB Submissions R. Budny, C. Kessel PPPL ITPA Modeling Topical Working Group Session on ITER Simulations.
Current Drive for FIRE AT-Mode T.K. Mau University of California, San Diego Workshop on Physics Issues for FIRE May 1-3, 2000 Princeton Plasma Physics.
Fyzika tokamaků1: Úvod, opakování1 Tokamak Physics Jan Mlynář 8. Heating and current drive Neutral beam heating and current drive,... to be continued.
ARIES-AT Physics Overview presented by S.C. Jardin with input from C. Kessel, T. K. Mau, R. Miller, and the ARIES team US/Japan Workshop on Fusion Power.
RF simulation at ASIPP Bojiang DING Institute of Plasma Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences Workshop on ITER Simulation, Beijing, May 15-19, 2006 ASIPP.
1 Instabilities in the Long Pulse Discharges on the HT-7 X.Gao and HT-7 Team Institute of Plasma Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, P.O.Box 1126, Hefei,
Advances In High Harmonic Fast Wave Heating of NSTX H-mode Plasmas P. M. Ryan, J-W Ahn, G. Chen, D. L. Green, E. F. Jaeger, R. Maingi, J. B. Wilgen - Oak.
Simulation and Analysis of the Hybrid Operating Mode in ITER C. Kessel, R. Budny, and K. Indireshkumar Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory Symposium On.
NSTX EXPERIMENTAL PROPOSAL - OP-XP-825 Title: HHFW Heating/CD phase scans in D L-mode plasmas P. Ryan, J. Hosea, R. Bell, L. Delgado-Aparicio, S. Kubota,
1) Disruption heat loading 2) Progress on time-dependent modeling C. Kessel, PPPL ARIES Project Meeting, Bethesda, MD, 4/4/2011.
Stabilizing Shells in ARIES C. E. Kessel Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory ARIES Project Meeting, 5/28-29/2008.
Emanuele Poli, 17 th Joint Workshop on ECE and ECRH Deurne, May 7-10, 2012 Assessment of ECCD-Assisted Operation in DEMO Emanuele Poli 1, Emiliano Fable.
Compact Stellarator Approach to DEMO J.F. Lyon for the US stellarator community FESAC Subcommittee Aug. 7, 2007.
ITER STEADY-STATE OPERATIONAL SCENARIOS A.R. Polevoi for ITER IT and HT contributors ITER-SS 1.
NSTX HIGH HARMONIC FAST WAVE CALCULATIONS
European Fusion Power Plant Conceptual Study - Parameters For Near-term and Advanced Models David Ward Culham Science Centre (Presented by Ian Cook) This.
D. Tskhakaya, LH SOL Generated Fast Particles Meeting IPP.CR, Prague December 16-17, 2004 Quasi-PIC modelling of electron acceleration in front of the.
Exploration of High Harmonic Fast Wave Heating on NSTX J. R. Wilson 2002 APS Division of Plasma Physics Meeting November 11-15, 2002 Orlando, Florida.
Systems Analysis Development for ARIES Next Step C. E. Kessel 1, Z. Dragojlovic 2, and R. Raffrey 2 1 Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory 2 University.
1 EBW & HHFW Research - G. Taylor PAC-19 2/23/06 EBW & HHFW Research (Including EBW Collaborations with MAST & P EGASUS ) Gary Taylor presented on behalf.
1 LHCD Properties with a New Lower Hybrid Wave Antenna on HT-7 Tokamak Wei Wei,Guangli Kuang,Bojiang Ding,Weici Shen and HT-7 Team Institute of Plasma.
Summary of RF-Related Presentations at the 2011 EPS Meeting G. Taylor NSTX Physics Meeting July 25, 2011 NSTX Supported by 1.
045-05/rs PERSISTENT SURVEILLANCE FOR PIPELINE PROTECTION AND THREAT INTERDICTION Taming The Physics For Commercial Fusion Power Plants ARIES Team Meeting.
MHD Issues and Control in FIRE C. Kessel Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory Workshop on Active Control of MHD Stability Austin, TX 11/3-5/2003.
FIRE Advanced Tokamak Progress C. Kessel Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory NSO PAC 2/27-28/2003, General Atomics 1.0D Operating Space 2.PF Coils 3.Equilibrium/Stability.
Advanced Tokamak Modeling for FIRE C. Kessel, PPPL NSO/PAC Meeting, University of Wisconsin, July 10-11, 2001.
HHFW heating experiments in NSTX S. Bernabei, J. Hosea, B. LeBlanc, C. K. Phillips, P. Ryan, D. Swain, J. R. Wilson and the whole NSTX crew. ORNL.
1 NSTX EXPERIMENTAL PROPOSAL - OP-XP-712 Title: HHFW Power Balance Optimization at High B Field J. Hosea, R. Bell, S. Bernabei, L. Delgado-Aparicio, S.
Simulation of Non-Solenoidal Current Rampup in NSTX C. E. Kessel and NSTX Team Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory APS-DPP Annual Meeting, Savannah, Georgia,
AES, ANL, Boeing, Columbia U., CTD, GA, GIT, LLNL, INEEL, MIT, ORNL, PPPL, SNL, SRS, UCLA, UCSD, UIIC, UWisc FIRE Collaboration FIRE.
Presented by Gary Taylor In collaboration with Cynthia Phillips, Phil Ryan, Randy Wilson and The NSTX RF Research Team NSTX Wave-Particle Physics, Heating.
Long Pulse High Performance Plasma Scenario Development for NSTX C. Kessel and S. Kaye - providing TRANSP runs of specific discharges S.
Compact Stellarators as Reactors J. F. Lyon, ORNL NCSX PAC meeting June 4, 1999.
A.D. Turnbull, R. Buttery, M. Choi, L.L Lao, S. Smith, H. St John
First Experiments Testing the Working Hypothesis in HSX:
Farrokh Najmabadi Professor of Electrical & Computer Engineering
J.R. Wilson, R.J. Goldston, J.C. Hosea ReNew Theme III Workshop
Current Drive and Plasma Rotation Considerations for ARIES-AT
New Results for Plasma and Coil Configuration Studies
No ELM, Small ELM and Large ELM Strawman Scenarios
Presentation transcript:

Heating and Current Drive Systems for ARIES-AT T.K. Mau University of California, San Diego ARIES Project Meeting September 18-20, 2000 Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory Princeton, NJ

OUTLINE CD Analysis for ARIES-AT equilibria at  = 9.1% (90% of limit) and with R = 5.2 m, I p ~ 13 MA, and B o = 5.9 T Power requirement, profile alignment and number of CD systems Normalized CD efficiency scaling vs T e and Z eff. RFCD launcher system definitions Conclusions and Discussions

Seed CD Requirements for Latest ARIES-AT Equilibria Latest series of ARIES-AT equilibria have profiles optimized to give high  N ( 90% of  limit ), and maximum bootstrap alignment ( I bs /I p > 0.9 ) at Z eff = 1.7, T e0 = 24, 26, 28 and 30 keV. Seed current is defined as: J sd = j eq - j bs - j dia - j ps in  - direction. Bootstrap alignment: 2 regions of seed CD : (1) On axis; (2) Off axis CD power and system requirements determined by driving seed current profile using RF techniques. n, T profiles RS core, L-mode edge TeTe nene T e0 = 26 keV  N = 5.4 f bs = EQ BS Dia+PS On-axis Seed: 0.04 MA Off-axis Seed: 1.05 MA

Seed CD Requirements at Z eff = 1.8 Modified n, T profiles RS core, L-mode edge TeTe nene T e0 = 26 keV  N = 5.4 f bs = BS EQ On-axis Seed: 0.03 MA edge +mid-radius Seed: 1.32 MA Dia Bootstrap current is sensitive to changes in Z eff. To extrapolate from Z eff = 1.7, adjust n and T profiles to obtain bootstrap alignment without overdrive. Three regions of seed current: (1) on-axis seed :  < 0.2, (2) mid-radius seed : 0.5 <  < 0.8 (3) edge seed :  > 0.8.

Current Drive at Z eff = 1.7 Needs two CD systems: 1.ICRF/FW for on-axis drive :  < 0.2; P fw ~ 1-2 MW 2.LHW for off-axis drive :  > 0.8; P lh ~ MW Very good current alignment can be obtained. T eo = 26 keV f bs = P fw = 1.4 MW P lh = 32 MW FW LH BS EQ RF Dia T eo = 30 keV f bs = P fw = 2.2 MW P lh = 36 MW EQ BS RF FWDia LH

Current Drive at Z eff = 1.8 Three CD systems are required: 1.ICRF/FW for on-axis drive :  < 0.2;P fw ~ 1 MW 2. LHW for off-axis drive :  > 0.8; P lh ~ MW 3.HHFW for mid-radius drive : 0.5 <  < 0.8 ; P hh ~ MW Fair current profile alignment T eo = 24 keV f bs = P fw = 1.1 MW P lh = 40 MW P hh = 16 MW T eo = 28 keV f bs = P fw = 0.8 MW P lh = 32 MW P hh = 16 MW FW Dia HH LH BS EQRF FW Dia HH LH BS EQRF

CD Efficiency Scaling vs T e0 and Z eff  B = I p R o /P CD Based on four equilibria optimized at Z eff = 1.7 and T e0 = 24, 26, 28, 30 keV. Thus, Z eff = 1.7 case has the highest CD efficiency. For Z eff = 1.7 and 1.6, only 2 RF systems are required (FW+LH). For Z eff = 1.8, 3 RF systems are required (ICRF/FW+LH+HHFW). Alignment not as good: results are less reliable.

T D 2T 2D,3T 4T 3D 5T4D,6T 96 MHz 68 MHz 135 MHz 22 MHz Frequency Options for Fast Wave On-Axis CD Criteria : Avoid ion and  absorption no resonance on OB side Reasonable antenna size higher frequency 68 MHz, 96 MHz, and 135 MHz appear feasible; similar power requirements 68 MHz is used in most calculations. R-a R+a Axis

ICRF Fast Wave Drives On-axis Seed Current Wave frequency is chosen to place 4f cT resonance at R > R o +a, and 2f cD resonance at R << R axis, to minimize ion and alpha absorption. Launcher is located on outboard midplane with N || = 2 spectrum for best current profile alignment. Plasma & wave parameters : R = 5. 2 m, A = 4,  = 2.2,  =0.8, B o = 5.9 T, I p = 13 MA,  N = 5.4, T eo = 26.8 keV, n eo,20 = 2.83, Z eff = 1.8 f = 96 MHz, N || = Z (m) R (m) X (m) Y (m) Axis  ARIES-AT P e /P = 0.90 P T /P = 0.02 P  /P = 0.08 I / P = A/W Driven Current

Off-Axis/Edge Seed CD with LH Waves Frequency = 3.6 GHz [ > 2 * f LH (  =0.8) ] - Less than 1% alpha absorption Usually five waveguide modules, each launching a different N ||, are required. - Located ~2 m. below OB midplane to give maximum penetration. Penetration to  < 0.8 is not possible for this class of AT equilibria. Low N || rays encounter mode conversion to fast wave at  >0.8 and propagates back to edge; higher N || rays get totally damped before reaching  = 0.8. start end N || = -1.6 e-damping limit MC limit Inaccessible Accessible

Mid-Radius CD Using High Harmonic Fast Waves (HHFW) At f ~ 20f ci, HHFW can penetrate deeper than LH waves. CD efficiency is found to be acceptable. Issues: - Strong absorption by energetic  ’s - Experimental database being developed on NSTX at 30 MHz. - No credible FW launcher design at f ~ 0.9 GHz. F = 0.9 GHz N || = -2 T e0 = 26 keV Z eff = 1.8 P  /P = 0.41 Absorption Current Drive T e0 = 26 keV Z eff = 1.8 I/P = A/W e 

Current Drive System Definition for ARIES-AT Reference Option : ICRF/FW + LHW - Requires two RF systems and highly compatible with core configuration - Requires lowest CD power (30-40 MW) - Likely narrow range of operation - Issues : (1) LH wave penetration limited to  > 0.8. Second Option : ICRF/FW + HHFW + LHW - Requires three RF systems; should be compatible with core design - Requires more CD power (40-60 MW) - Broader range of operation - Issues:(1) alpha absorption of HHFW power (2) HHFW antenna concept remains to be developed. Comments: - Because of small on-axis seed current, ECCD can be a viable alternative to ICRF/FW. - Should extra ICRF power be set aside for auxiliary heating? Can existing CD systems heat plasma to design point?

Definition of the ICRF Fast Wave Launcher System Assumed requirements for Z eff = 1.8, T e0 = 26 keV (strawman): - 1 MW of 96 MHz and N || = 1.5 for on-axis CD. At 96 MHz, similar j fw profile and I/P are obtained. Higher frequency is used to reduce size of launcher. Base launcher module is similar to ARIES-RS folded waveguide design : - Has 8 waveguides in a toroidal array, with 45 o phase shift - Each waveguide has 10 folds - Located at outboard midplane - Radial thickness with diaphragm = 0.97 m - Module dimensions are : 2.08 m (width) x 0.51m (height) with total aperture area = 0.99 m 2 Taking a maximum power density of ~40 MW/m 2, prudence requires us to set the power limit at ~20 MW. Extra power can be used for auxiliary heating and/or rotation drive. Structural material is SiC with W coating (as in divertors); high surface resistive dissipation [TBD]; structures (Faraday shields, straps and support) to be cooled with LiPb. Other choices will be explored.

Isometric View of Folded Waveguide Unit Design and dimensions are similar to ARIES-RS (f = 95 MHz)

Definition of the LH Wave Launcher System Calculated lower hybrid system requirements for Z eff = 1.8, T e0 = 26 keV: - 5 waveguide modules delivering a total power of 35 MW. Modulefrequency (GHz)N || Power (MW) Base unit is the passive/active multijunction grille, modeled after ITER-EDA design, and used in ARIES-RS. The grilles are located at ~2 m from the outboard midplane. Using ITER guideline for power flux capability: P (MW/m 2 ) < 20 f 2/3 (GHz), total required port area = 1.34 m 2.

Front View of LH Launcher Modules Shown are the designs for ARIES-RS, for illustration purpose only.

Consideration of HHFW Launcher System Calculated HHFW system requirements for Z eff = 1.8, T e0 = 26 keV: - Launched wave spectrum at 0.9 GHz and N || = Launch location : outboard midplane. - Power = 16 MW. At present, there is no proven design of FW launcher in 0.9 GHz range. Possibilities include: - Combline structure : data at 200 MHz (GA/JFT-2M) - Folded waveguide : no data close to 0.9 GHz Assume similar power scaling as ITER guideline for LH waves: - At 0.9 GHz, power density limit = 18.6 MW/m 2 (conservative!) - First wall penetration area = 1.16 m 2.

ICRF/FW LHW HHFW Blanket Sector Special Blanket Sector with RF Launchers There are 16 blanket sectors. One sector has a width of ~2.6 m at midplane. Sketch of locations of RF launchers in the sector is based on Z eff = 1.8, T e0 = 26 keV (strawman). Aperture area for the launchers: - ICRF/FW :0.99 m 2 - LHW :1.34 m 2 - HHFW :1.16 m 2 Total aperture area = 3.49 m 2 = 1% of first-wall area.

Conclusions and Discussions A series of ARIES-AT equilibria with  N = 5.4 and f BS = 0.91 at Z eff = 1.7 and T e0 = 24, 26, 28 and 30 keV have been analyzed for CD power and launch requirements. Extrapolations to Z eff = 1.6 and 1.8 are made. CD efficiency scalings were calculated vs T e0 and Z eff ; 2 RF systems are required for Z eff = 1.6, 1.7, while 3 systems are required for Z eff = 1.8, resulting in lower fBS and higher CD power requirements. Based on the present strawman with Z eff =1.8 and T e0 = 26 keV, 3 RF systems are required: LHW for edge CD, ICRF/FW for on-axis CD and HHFW for mid-radius CD. Power requirement is reasonable at ~ 52 MW level. Extra ICRF power for auxiliary heating and/or rotation drive should be provided. Launcher designs for both LH and ICRF systems have been on-going. Initial design results in launcher penetration equal to 1% of first wall area. It appears feasible to place all RF modules in one blanket sector.

Suggested Remaining Tasks CD power may be lowered, and number of RF systems may be reduced to two by looking at equilibria optimized at Z eff = 1.8 or higher, and with no mid-radius seed current drive ( 0.5 <  < 0.8 ). Complete detailed design of ICRF/FW and LHW launchers. - Dimensions of various modules - Wall dissipation with W coating on structures, and compare to Cu. Address the issue of auxiliary heating during start-up with existing CD systems: - How much extra ICRF power is required? At what frequency? - What are the implications for using LHW to heat the plasma?

Issues and Areas for Future Research Heating and Current Drive: - LHW penetration is limited in high-  plasma; HHFW is a possibility, but needs innovative antenna concept; - Investigate the dynamics of RF current profile control --- modeling, and physics and technological constraints - Refine modeling capability to self-consistently determine MHD stable equilibrium with bootstrap and externally driven currents; - Use wave spectrum calculated for RF launcher in ray tracing analysis; - Study roles of RF in rotation generation and transport barrier control RF Launcher: - EM field analysis inside folded waveguide in realistic geometry, and experiments in a tokamak environment - Detailed launcher cooling and thermal stress analysis - Structural material choice in SiC environment : SiC with metal coating - Wave coupling and loading during plasma transients