1. Advances In High Harmonic Fast Wave Heating of NSTX H-mode Plasmas P. M. Ryan, J-W Ahn, G. Chen, D. L. Green, E. F. Jaeger, R. Maingi, J. B. Wilgen - Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN, USA R. E. Bell, J. C. Hosea, S. M. Kaye, B. P. LeBlanc, C. K. Phillips, M. Podestá, G. Taylor, J. R. Wilson - Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory, Princeton, NJ, USA P. T. Bonoli - MIT Plasma Science and Fusion Center, Cambridge, MA, USA R. W. Harvey - CompX, Del Mar, CA, USA Goal was to bring system voltage limit with plasma (~15 kV) up to its vacuum limit (~25 kV), thus increasing the power limit by a factor of ~2.8. For a given strap current –Peak strap voltage would be halved. –Peak voltage on vacuum side of feedthrough would be reduced by ~30%. –Peak system voltage in transmission line would remain unchanged. Tests whether electric fields in strap/Faraday shield region or the strap/antenna frame currents set the limit for plasma operation 12 Antenna Straps 30 MHz RF Power Sources 5 Port Cubes Decoupler Elements HHFW antenna extends toroidally 90º 12 straps are connected to form two adjacent 6-element arrays, 180º out of phase with each other. For phase shifts of 30º, 90º, and 150º, it operates as a 12-element array with a single highly directional peak. Original RF Feeds Previous Ground New Ground New Feeds Antenna Upgraded To Reduce Peak Voltages on the Straps Extensive Antenna Conditioning Needed For Li Operation Dual Liquid Lithium Evaporators ~ Dual Lithium Powder Droppers Liquid Lithium Divertor Observation of Arcs During Plasma Conditioning Li deposited on antenna contributed to arcing and had to be cleaned by plasma conditioning Three visible light cameras (1000, 2000, and >30,000 fps) observing antenna during plasma condtioning in He, L-mode plasma. Shot 135242 had three transmitter trips during a 200 ms, 2.6 MW pulse at -90º phasing. 0.188s0.418s RF Power (MW) Transmitter 1 (straps 1 & 7) trips off at 188.1 ms 8 9 10 11 12 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 189.755 ms191.755 ms193.755 ms195.755 ms 189.749 ms191.751 ms193.753 ms 195.755 ms 189.742 ms191.742 ms193.742 ms 195.742 ms 2000 fps 38,460 fps 1000 fps Standard camera sees straps 6-12 Fast camera sees straps 8-12 Additional camera sees straps 1-9 Transmitter 5 (straps 5 & 11) trips off at 418.1 ms 414.655 ms416.655 ms419.655 ms 414.649 ms416.651 ms419.615 ms Ohmically-Heated Helium Target Plasma Transitions to H-Mode During 2.6 MW HHFW Pulse k  = -8 m -1 GENRAY ray tracing simulation predicts HHFW power deposited on electrons inside  ~ 0.5. Broader power deposition during H-mode. Negligible damping on He predicted, some H minority heating (1 MW, k   = -8 m -1, He with 3% H minority) H-mode Initiated & Maintained Through ELMs with P RF ~ 2.7 MW During ~ 2 MW D 2 NBI (Shot 135340) Transition to H-mode occurs after RF turn on and without RF arc. With reflection coefficient trip level set to 0.7, RF stays on during ELMing plasma. k  = - 13 m -1 Li Operation Improves Power Coupling to the Core RECORD T e

2. CQL3D simulation predicts ~ 40% of RF antenna power coupled to plasma for k  = -13 m -1 (-150º) Heating P rf used in CQL3D modeling reduced to match simulated and measured neutron rate In NBI-driven H-mode, Power Coupling to Core Decreases ~20% Compared to L-mode Electron Pressure Coupling Characteristics  W e ~ 13 kJ  W tot ~ 25 kJ  W e ~ 7 kJ  W tot ~ 14 kJ (0.353 sec) (P NB = 2 MW, I P = 1 MA,B T = 0.55 T) R. Harvey CompX Shot 130608 k  = -13 m -1 TRANSP/TORIC modeling predicts RF absorption by NBI fast-ions lasts well after NBI turn off All rf power absorbed by electrons prior to NBI pulse After NBI turn-on, the fast-ion population absorbs HHFW power at the expense of the electrons Trend confirmed by single time point calculations with AORSA, GENRAY and TORIC TRANSP/TORIC RF Power Absorption by Fast-Ions Decreases as Fast-Ions Thermalize During RF-Heated NBI H- Mode Electron  increases with time as density rises, increasing RF heating on electrons k  = -13 m -1 B T (0) = 5.5 kG Results for HHFW Heating of NBI-driven H-modes k  = -8 m -1 RF-acceleration of fast ions from NBI Fast IR camera for studying ELM- resolved heat flux ORNL Three bolometer views for studying divertor radiation Fast IR camera view "Hot" region in outboard divertor more pronounced at k  = –8 m -1 than –13 m -1 Linked along field lines to scrape-off plasma in front of antenna 3 MW/m 2 measured by IR camera during 2.6 MW of k  = –8 m -1 RF heating Time for “hot” spot to decay away is ~ 20 ms at –8 m -1 and ~ 8 ms at –13 m -1 Visible & IR Images Show Significant RF Power Flows to Divertor, Particularly for Lower k   Heating P nbi = 2 MW P rf = 1.8 MW k  = - 8 m -1 P nbi = 2 MW IR View P rf = 1.8 MW k  = -13 m -1 P nbi = 2 MW Visible Camera (with NBI-only light subtracted) IR Camera Heat Flux (MW/m 2 ) 3 Bay I IR view Bay G IR view 439.64 – 439.31 ms RF -90° 452 ms455 ms RF heated pattern on lower divertor plate follows the change in magnetic field pitch Large increase in neutron rate when HHFW is applied to NBI plasmas (as predicted originally by CQL3D/GENRAY) Measured significant enhancement & broadening of NBI fast-ions profile over a range of ion cyclotron harmonics and   Wtot ~ 20 ms gives  eff ~ 66%, 40% for -150°, -90° antenna phasings P RF losses coupled to edge are ~ 0.7MW, 1.1 MW for - 150°, -90°, out of 1.8 MW launched by antenna Summary Antenna grounds were moved and power feeds added to reduce voltage on the straps. Li wall conditioning, needed for improved power coupling through SOL, imposes additional antenna conditioning requirements. Achieved record T e (>6 keV) in He. H-modes accessed with HHFW alone. Heating of core electrons in NBI-driven H-modes for k  of 3, 8, 13 m -1. Significant damping on the fast ions from neutral beams. Increased edge plasma power losses in NBI-driven H-modes. Increased heating of outer divertor with HHFW. Summary Antenna grounds were moved and power feeds added to reduce voltage on the straps. Li wall conditioning, needed for improved power coupling through SOL, imposes additional antenna conditioning requirements. Achieved record T e (>6 keV) in He. H-modes accessed with HHFW alone. Heating of core electrons in NBI-driven H-modes for k  of 3, 8, 13 m -1. Significant damping on the fast ions from neutral beams. Increased edge plasma power losses in NBI-driven H-modes. Increased heating of outer divertor with HHFW.