Overview of Longitudinal Evaluation Research PBS TeacherLine Station Meeting October 27, 2008.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Title I Directors Conference Sept 2007 Carol Diedrichsen Gwen Pollock Surveys of the Enacted Curriculum for English.
Advertisements

PERSONAL LITERACY PLANS AT THE SECONDARY LEVEL December 12, 2003.
Continuous Improvement in the Classroom -Professional Learning Communities.
PAYS FOR: Literacy Coach, Power Hour Aides, LTM's, Literacy Trainings, Kindergarten Teacher Training, Materials.
Math Content Network Update The Power of Mistakes Student Engagement Culture of Learning Growth Mindset Congruent Tasks.
LINDSAY CLARE MATSUMURA HELEN GARNIER BRIAN JUNKER LAUREN RESNICK DONNA DIPRIMA BICKEL June 30, 2010 Institute of Educational Sciences Conference Evidence.
1 Oregon Reading First: Three-Year Report Preliminary Impact Evidence Oregon Reading First Center LLSSC Meeting, November 29, 2006.
Collaborative Evaluation Communities in Urban Schools.
POSTER TEMPLATE BY: Increasing Student Growth and Achievement A Systems Approach: Improving Our Teacher Evaluation System Dawn.
October 9 th, 2013 Curriculum Presentation: State Assessments Grades 3-8.
The Florida Reading Initiative (FRI) is a research-based school wide reform effort committed to providing the professional development and follow up support.
Needs Assessment for Title II-A Teresa A. Burgess Coordinator Title II-A Idaho State Department of Education
1 Oregon K-12 Literacy Framework and K-3 Statewide Outreach.
project DATA. Agenda Entry task Welcome and introductions project DATA –Background –Purpose and.
Eugene Field Elementary School “Inspiring and empowering each other to positively impact our community and our world.” Our Journey to Responsive Intervention.
PLT Professional Learning Teams Weaver Elementary School January, 2013.
Coaching Framework Improving Teaching and Learning Literacy District More than Literacy.
Evaluation of Math-Science Partnership Projects (or how to find out if you’re really getting your money’s worth)
Program Effectiveness in GARF: Where Have We Been and Where Do You Need to Go?
Enhancing Education Through Technology Competitive Grants PBS TeacherLine.
Project Connect 2 Teach Rebecca J. Speelman, Ed.D. York College of Pennsylvania Shared at the National Education Computing Conference 2009.
Evaluating a Literacy Curriculum for Adolescents: Results from Three Sites of the First Year of Striving Readers Eastern Evaluation Research Society Conference.
Lenoir STEM Learning Community. Just the facts, ma’am… 0 What? Half million dollar MSP grant with additional financial support from industry partners.
Striving to Link Teacher and Student Outcomes: Results from an Analysis of Whole-school Interventions Kelly Feighan, Elena Kirtcheva, and Eric Kucharik.
What is Title I and How Can I be Involved? Annual Parent Meeting Sequoyah Elementary School August 7, 2014.
Metropolitan School District of Metropolitan School District of Pike Township Indianapolis, Indiana Pike Township Indianapolis, Indiana A K-12 Coaching.
Voices From the Field Name: Vince Campolongo Board: Wellington Catholic DSB Learning Team Facilitator (Professional Learning Cycle) 1.
No Child Left Behind Act (NCLBA) Title IID Enhancing Education through Technology Initiative 2 American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) Competitive.
Implementing Formative Assessment Online Professional Development What Principals Need to know.
System Implementation and Monitoring Regional Session Spring, 2014 Resources are available at sim.abel.yorku.ca.
Southern Regional Education Board Florida Leadership Academy for Innovation and Improvement US DOE Communication Hub Meeting Albuquerque, NM September.
Teresa K. Todd EDAD 684 School Finance/Ethics March 23, 2011.
A state-wide effort to improve teaching and learning to ensure that all Iowa students engage in a rigorous & relevant curriculum. The Core Curriculum.
Lancaster County School District. Student Learning Objectives are the product of an interest in extending the available data for educators throughout.
Making DATA Actionable… School Improvement and Student Success Timberlane Regional School District Christi Michaud Director of Data, Assessment, and Accountability.
Hastings Public Schools PLC Staff Development Planning & Reporting Guide.
1 The Oregon Reading First Model: A Blueprint for Success Scott K. Baker Eugene Research Institute/ University of Oregon Orientation Session Portland,
Marjorie Hall Haley, PhD - GMU1 NO CHILD LEFT BEHIND The reauthorized elementary and secondary education act.
Reform Model for Change Board of Education presentation by Superintendent: Dr. Kimberly Tooley.
Governor’s Teacher Network Action Research Project Dr. Debra Harwell-Braun
TEAM Coordinating Committee Training (TCC).  Introductions  Mission of the TEAM Program  Design of the TEAM Program  Overview of the Module Process.
Teacher Growth and Assessment: The SERVE Approach to Teacher Evaluation The Summative or Assessment Phase.
Mentoring School Name Date Mentor’s Name. OVERVIEW What is Mentoring? The Mentoring Menu The Coaching Process.
Data Report July Collect and analyze RtI data Determine effectiveness of RtI in South Dakota in Guide.
School Accreditation School Improvement Planning.
Solving the Equation for Urban Student Achievement in STEM Council of Great City Schools Theresa Morris, Director of Mathematics, Indianapolis Public Schools.
Building Collaborative Teams Susan Rasicot. Examine: The Statistics  Number of students on grade level  Number of students by grade below grade level.
Scaling Up: Responding to Financial Constraints Through the Lens of Implementation North Santiam School District Fall Conference 2010.
Lenoir STEM Learning Community. Just the facts, ma’am… 0 What is Lenoir STEM? A program funded by MSP grant with additional financial support from industry.
An Evaluation of Professional Development for One-to-One Instruction at Pantego Christian Academy Steven R. Newby Kristi Fairbanks Marilyn Dardenne.
Statewide Evaluation Cohort 7 Overview of Evaluation March 23, 2010 Mikala L. Rahn, Ph.D.
Office of Service Quality
Ipod Project Initial Overview Training February 15, :30-5:30 PM (SEA #11 – 309 – Academic) Lenoir County Public Schools.
1 NO CHILD LEFT BEHIND The reauthorized elementary and secondary education act.
“ Let us not be content to wait and see what will happen, but give us the determination to make the right things happen”- Horace Mann 2014 MCAS Overview.
Supporting online instructors and assessing their instruction Barb Storandt ALTA Solutions Group, LLC Lia Dossin PBS TeacherLine LaRay Mason PBS TeacherLine.
Consortium for Educational Research and Evaluation– North Carolina Building LEA and Regional Professional Development Capacity First Annual Evaluation.
Using PLCs to Build Expertise Community of Practice October 9, 2013 Tammy Bresnahan & Tammy Ferguson.
Understanding Growth Targets and Target Adjustment Guidance for Student Learning Objectives Cleveland Metropolitan School District Copyright © 2014 American.
MINT MENTORING AND INDUCTION FOR NEW TEACHERS Miami Dade County Public Schools Office of Professional Development and Evaluation.
TAP Math: Teachers and Administrators Partnering for Mathematics Learning Mathematics and Science Partnership Grant Department of Education funded through.
Professional Learning Initiatives Overview
By: Alice Tackett and Jill Maynard
December 11, 2015 Varnville Elementary School, Varnville, SC
Literacy Development Plan
Literacy Across Disciplines (LAD)
Strategic Planning Summary.
The Literacy Model and Intervention: Bridging the Gap
STUDENT GROWTH OBJECTIVES
Resources are available at sim.abel.yorku.ca
Presentation transcript:

Overview of Longitudinal Evaluation Research PBS TeacherLine Station Meeting October 27, 2008

Context  Two two-year studies: Peer Connection use among coaches and their coachees Online course – Teaching Reading Fluency  Experimental designs  Nationwide reach  and  Mixed methods

Coaching Study Research Questions 1. What impact does PBS TL Peer Connection have on instructional coaching programs and teacher attitudes, knowledge and instructional practices? 2. To what extent do the effects of PBS TL Peer Connection depend on mediating factors? 3. How do the effects of the PBS TL Peer Connection change over time? 4. To what extent do the effects of PBS TL Peer Connection vary according to mediating factors? 5. To what extent does the implementation of PBS TL Peer Connection correlate with improved student achievement?

Coaching Study Design  Matched-pair random assignment to: a) “business as usual” b) Unlimited access to PBS TL Peer Connection, and professional development

Coaching Study Participants 1 24 coaches are in the process of joining the study 2 36 teachers are in the process of joining the study  Located in SC, AR, and throughout the Northeast  Focus on Title I schools  Recruitment is ongoing  Stipend for participation GoalCurrent Coaches Teachers

Coaching Study Measures  Electronic tracking of PC use  Content analysis of coach-teacher dialogue  Surveys  Field studies  Document analysis

Coaching Study Part II  Research question: To what extent are the effects of PC on student literacy or math achievement mediated by Peer Connection’s effects on teacher instructional practice?  Study within a study  Focused intervention  Literacy, then math  Subsample of 30 coaches for each content area  Same methods as Part I, plus student benchmark testing data

Online Course Research Questions 1. What impact does the PBS TL course have on teacher outcomes? 2. What impact does the PBS TL course have on student reading fluency and engagement in reading? 3. To what extent do the effects that the PBS TL course has on teaching depend on mediating factors? 4. How do the effects of the PBS TL course on teaching change over the course of the school year?

Online Course Study Design  Switching replications design Timeline Teachers Fall 2008 Spring 2009 May 2009Sept 2009Late Fall 2009 January 2010May 2010 Group A Baseline teacher surveys Online course Teacher surveys Teacher surveys and baseline student assessments Teacher surveys and student assessments Group B Baseline teacher surveys Teacher surveys Teacher surveys and baseline student assessments Online course Teacher surveys and student assessments

Online Course Study Participants  150 teachers 75 Group A 75 Group B  Located in NV, CO, VA, and MD  Grades 2-3; ELA or general ed  Title I schools  Stipend for participation  IRB approval

Online Course Study Measures  Teacher surveys: background, beliefs, efficacy, knowledge, practices. Collected at 5 points between October 2008 and May 2010  Student measures: reading fluency and attitudes; DIBELS. Collected at 3 points during school year

Why does this matter?  Research provides PBS stations with information on the effectiveness of PBS TeacherLine courses and products  The quality of PBS TeacherLine products improves based on research results

Ways you can help  Support efforts to recruit and/or maintain study participants  Make contacts between Hezel and the district’s research approval team  Maintain lists of interested teachers, principals, and school districts that can be tapped for future research projects

Barb Storandt Senior Project Manager, PK East Fayette Street Syracuse, NY Hezel Associates