The Algebraic Approach 1.Introduction 2.The building blocks 3.Dynamical symmetries 4.Single nucleon description 5.Critical point symmetries 6.Symmetry.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Some (more) Nuclear Structure
Advertisements

Collective properties of even- even nuclei Vibrators and rotors With three Appendices.
Valence shell excitations in even-even spherical nuclei within microscopic model Ch. Stoyanov Institute for Nuclear Research and Nuclear Energy Sofia,
Isomer Spectroscopy in Near-Spherical Nuclei Lecture at the ‘School cum Workshop on Yrast and Near-Yrast Spectroscopy’ IIT Roorkee, October 2009 Paddy.
Generalized pairing models, Saclay, June 2005 Generalized models of pairing in non-degenerate orbits J. Dukelsky, IEM, Madrid, Spain D.D. Warner, Daresbury,
Nuclear Collective Dynamics II, Istanbul, July 2004 Symmetry Approach to Nuclear Collective Motion II P. Van Isacker, GANIL, France Symmetry and dynamical.
Development of collective behavior in nuclei Results primarily from correlations among valence nucleons. Instead of pure “shell model” configurations,
IBA – An Introduction and Overview Basic Ideas, underpinnings, Group Theory, basic predictions.
II. Spontaneous symmetry breaking. II.1 Weinberg’s chair Hamiltonian rotational invariant Why do we see the chair shape? States of different IM are so.
Review Short range force, Pauli Principle  Shell structure, magic numbers, concept of valence nucleons Residual interactions  favoring of 0 + coupling:
Structure of odd-odd nuclei in the interacting boson fermion-fermion model 3.
Nucleon-pair transfer-intensities nuclear shape-phase transitions
Single Particle Energies
Single particle properties of heavy and superheavy nuclei. Aleksander Parkhomenko.
Nuclear Low-lying Spectrum and Quantum Phase Transition Zhipan Li School of Physical Science and Technology Southwest University 17th Nuclear Physics Workshop,
Symmetries Galore “Not all is lost inside the triangle” (A. Leviatan, Seville, March, 2014) R. F. Casten Yale CERN, August, 2014.
The IBA The Interacting Boson Approximation Model Preliminary review of collective behavior in nuclei Collective models, and why the IBA Basic ideas about.
IBA Lecture part 2. Most general IBA Hamiltonian in terms with up to four boson operators (given N) IBA Hamiltonian Mixes d and s components of the wave.
Assume valence fermions couple in pairs to bosons of spins 0+ and 2+
Nuclei with more than one valence nucleon Multi-particle systems.
Outline  Simple comments on regularities of many-body systems under random interactions  Number of spin I states for single-j configuration  J-pairing.
NSDD Workshop, Trieste, February 2006 Nuclear Structure (II) Collective models P. Van Isacker, GANIL, France.
Even-even nuclei odd-even nuclei odd-odd nuclei 3.1 The interacting boson-fermion model.
Symmetries in Nuclei, Tokyo, 2008 Symmetries in Nuclei Symmetry and its mathematical description The role of symmetry in physics Symmetries of the nuclear.
fermions c j N bosons A nucleons valence nucleonsN nucleon pairs L = 0 and 2 pairs s,d  even-even nuclei 2.2 The Interacting Boson Approximation A.
5. Exotic modes of nuclear rotation Tilted Axis Cranking -TAC.
More on Collective models Microscopic drivers: Valence p-n interactions Simply estimating the properties of nuclei Exotic nuclei.
1 New formulation of the Interacting Boson Model and the structure of exotic nuclei 10 th International Spring Seminar on Nuclear Physics Vietri sul Mare,
Themes and challenges of Modern Science Complexity out of simplicity -- Microscopic How the world, with all its apparent complexity and diversity can be.
Lecture 4 Quantum Phase Transitions and the microscopic drivers of structural evolution.
Symmetries in Nuclei, Tokyo, 2008 Symmetries in Nuclei Symmetry and its mathematical description The role of symmetry in physics Symmetries of the nuclear.
Collective Model. Nuclei Z N Character j Q obs. Q sp. Qobs/Qsp 17 O 8 9 doubly magic+1n 5/ K doubly magic -1p 3/
Shape phase transition in neutron-rich even-even light nuclei with Z=20-28 H.B.Bai X.W.Li H.F.Dong W.C.Cao Department of Physics, Chifeng University, Chifeng.
Mean-Field Description of Heavy Neutron-Rich Nuclei P. D. Stevenson University of Surrey NUSTAR Neutron-Rich Minischool Surrey, 2005.
原子核配对壳模型的相关研究 Yanan Luo( 罗延安 ), Lei Li( 李磊 ) School of Physics, Nankai University, Tianjin Yu Zhang( 张宇 ), Feng Pan( 潘峰 ) Department of Physics, Liaoning.
Isospin and mixed symmetry structure in 26 Mg DONG Hong-Fei, BAI Hong-Bo LÜ Li-Jun, Department of Physics, Chifeng university.
Nuclear Models Nuclear force is not yet fully understood.
How do nuclei rotate? 1. The molecular picture.
Spontaneous symmetry breaking and rotational bands S. Frauendorf Department of Physics University of Notre Dame.
Discovery of a Quasi Dynamical Symmetry and Study of a possible Giant Pairing Vibration R.F. Casten WNSL, Yale May 11,2011 Evidence for a Quasi Dynamical.
Surrey Mini-School Lecture 2 R. F. Casten. Outline Introduction, survey of data – what nuclei do Independent particle model and residual interactions.
IAEA Workshop on NSDD, Trieste, November 2003 The interacting boson model P. Van Isacker, GANIL, France Dynamical symmetries of the IBM Neutrons, protons.
Partial dynamical symmetries in Bose-Fermi systems* Jan Jolie, Institute for Nuclear Physics, University of Cologne What are dynamical symmetries? Illustration.
Symmetries and collective Nuclear excitations PRESENT AND FUTURE EXOTICS IN NUCLEAR PHYSICS In honor of Geirr Sletten at his 70 th birthday Stefan Frauendorf,
Lecture 23: Applications of the Shell Model 27/11/ Generic pattern of single particle states solved in a Woods-Saxon (rounded square well)
Quantum Phase Transitions (QPT) in Finite Nuclei R. F. Casten June 21, 2010, CERN/ISOLDE.
Petrică Buganu, and Radu Budaca IFIN-HH, Bucharest – Magurele, Romania International Workshop “Shapes and Dynamics of Atomic Nuclei: Contemporary Aspects”
Nuclear and Radiation Physics, BAU, 1 st Semester, (Saed Dababneh). 1 Shell model Notes: 1. The shell model is most useful when applied to closed-shell.
Some (more) High(ish)-Spin Nuclear Structure Paddy Regan Department of Physics Univesity of Surrey Guildford, UK Lecture 2 Low-energy.
Variational approach to isospin symmetry breaking in medium mass nuclei A. PETROVICI Institute for Physics and Nuclear Engineering, Bucharest, Romania.
Interacting boson model s-bosons (l=0) d-bosons (l=2) Interpretation: “nucleon pairs with l = 0, 2” “quanta of collective excitations” Dynamical algebra:
Left-handed Nuclei S. Frauendorf Department of Physics University of Notre Dame, USA IKH, Forschungszentrum Rossendorf Dresden, Germany.
The i 13/2 Proton and j 15/2 Neutron Orbital and the SD Band in A~190 Region Xiao-tao He En-guang Zhao En-guang Zhao Institute of Theoretical Physics,
„The uncertainty in the calculated nuclear matrix elements for neutrinoless double beta decay will constitute the principle obstacle to answering some.
Quantum phase transitions and structural evolution in nuclei.
Quantum Phase Transitions in Nuclei
Algebraic collective model and its applications Gabriela Thiamová Laboratoire de Physique Subatomique et de Cosmologie Institut National Polytechnique.
Quantum Phase Transition from Spherical to γ-unstable for Bose-Fermi System Mahmut Böyükata Kırıkkale University Turkey collabration with Padova–Sevilla.
Nuclear Low-lying Spectrum and Quantum Phase Transition 李志攀 西南大学物理科学与技术学院.
Rotational energy term in the empirical formula for the yrast energies in even-even nuclei Eunja Ha and S. W. Hong Department of Physics, Sungkyunkwan.
超重原子核的结构 孙 扬 上海交通大学 合作者:清华大学 龙桂鲁, F. Al-Khudair 中国原子能研究院 陈永寿,高早春 济南,山东大学, 2008 年 9 月 20 日.
Quantum shape transitions in the shapes of atomic nuclei. J. Jolie, Universität zu Köln.
Determining Reduced Transition Probabilities for 152 ≤ A ≤ 248 Nuclei using Interacting Boson Approximation (IBA-1) Model By Dr. Sardool Singh Ghumman.
The role of isospin symmetry in medium-mass N ~ Z nuclei
IV. Nuclear Structure Topics to be covered include:
Yu Zhang(张宇), Feng Pan(潘峰)
Structure and dynamics from the time-dependent Hartree-Fock model
Surrey Mini-School Lecture 2 R. F. Casten
a non-adiabatic microscopic description
Nuclear shapes for the critical point
Presentation transcript:

The Algebraic Approach 1.Introduction 2.The building blocks 3.Dynamical symmetries 4.Single nucleon description 5.Critical point symmetries 6.Symmetry in n-p systems 7.Symmetry near the drip lines Lecture 1Lecture 2

NUCLEAR MEAN FIELD Three ways to simplify Shell Model Single particle motion Describes properties in which a limited number of nucleons near the Fermi surface are involved. Algebraic Truncation of configuration space Dynamical symmetry Geometrical Model Collective motion (in phase) Vibrations, rotations, deformations Describes bulk properties depending in a smooth way on nucleon number  R I j Interacting Boson Approximation

Basic, attractive SD Interaction (2J+1) and 2 + lowest; separated from the rest.

Bosons counted from nearest closed shell (i.e. particles or holes). [Eg 130 Ba Z = 56 N = 74 N  = 3 N = 4 ; N=7] WHY???  7/2  5/2  3/2  1/2 Pauli Principle Consider f 7/2 “shell” with 6 neutrons M Maximum seniority = 2 Maximum (d)-boson number =1

DYNAMICAL SYMMETRY Describes basic states of motion available to a system - including relative motion of different constituents G 1  G 2  G 3  ………. H= aC 1 [G 1 ] † bC 2 [G 2 ] † cC 3 [G 3 ] † …… i ii i Dynamical symmetry breaking splits but does not mix the eigenstates

Some ‘Working Definitions’ Have states s and d  with  = - 2, - 1,0,1, dim. vector space. Unitary transformations involving the operators s, s †, d , d  † => ‘rotations that form the group U(6). Can form 36 bilinear combinations which close on commutation, s † s, s † d , d  † s, (d  † d  ) (L) (eg: [d † s,s † s] = d † s) - these are the generators [Analogy: Angular momentum: J x,J y,J z generate rotations and form group 0(3)] [For 0(3), use J z,J  ; J  = J x ± i J y Then [J +,J - ] = 2J z ; [J z,J  ] = ± J  ]

A Casimir operator commutes with all the generators of a group. –Eg:C 1U(6) = N;C 2U(6) = N(N+5) Now look for subsets of generators which form a subgroup. Eg: (d † d) (L) - 25-U(5) (d † d) (1), (d † d) (3) (5) (d † d)  (1) -3-0(3) ie: U(6)  U(5)  0(5)  0(3) - group chain decomposition Now form a Hamiltonian from the Casimir operators of the groups. H =  C 1U(6) +  C 2U(6)  C 2U(5) +  C 2O(5) +  C 2O(3) All C’s commute and H is diagonal DYNAMICAL SYMMETRY

Example of angular momentum For O(3), generators are J z, J + and J - Then [J 2, J z ] = [J 2, J + ] = [J 2, J - ] = 0 C 2O(3) = J 2 Subgroup O(2) simply J z = C 1O(2) So H =  C 2O(3) +  C 1O(2) E=  J(J+1) +  M O(2) J1J1 J2J2 M= +J z M= -J z O(3) 

I. “U(5)” - Anharmonic Vibrator II. “SU(3)” - Axially symmetric rotor III. “O(6)” - Gamma - unstable rotor Only 3 chains from U(6)

U(5) R 4/2 = 2.0

SU(3) R 4/2 = 3.33

O(6) R 4/2 = 2.5

The first O(6) nucleus ……….. Cizewski et al, Phys Rev Lett. 40, 167 (1978)

and then many more….

Transition Regions and Realistic Calculations Most nuclei do not satisfy the strict criteria of any of the 3 Dyn. Symm. Need numerical calculations by diagonalizing H IBA in s – d boson basis Can use a very simple form of the most general H

Z= < R 4/2 < 3.15  =0.03 MeV N.V. Zamfir, R.F. Casten, Physics Letters B 341 (1994) 1-5

Summary Algebraic approach contains aspects of both geometrical and single particle descriptions. Dynamical symmetries describe states of motion of system Analytic Hamiltonian is a sum of Casimir operators of the subgroups in the chain. Casimir operators commute with generators of the group; conserve a quantum number Each Casimir lifts the degeneracy of the states without mixing them. Three and only three chains possible; O(6) was the surprise. Very simple CQF Hamiltonian describes large ranges of low-lying structure

VibrationalTransitionalRotational Evolution of nuclear shape E = nħωE = J(J+1) ? Previously, no analytic solution to describe nuclei at the “transitional point”

Critical Point Symmetries F. Iachello, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 3580 (2000); 87, (2001). V(β) β Approximate potential at phase transition with infinite square well Solve Bohr Hamiltonian with square well potential Result is analytic solution in terms of zeros of special Bessel functions Predictions for energies and electromagnetic transition probabilities Spherical Vibrator Symmetric Rotor γ -soft X(5) E(5) Two solutions depending on γ degree of freedom

ξ = 1 ξ = 2 τ = 0 τ = 1 R 4/2 = 2.20 E(0 2 )/E(2 1 ) = 3.03 E(0 3 )/E(2 1 ) = 3.59 Key Signatures E(4 1 )/E(2 1 ) = 2.91 E(0 2 )/E(2 1 ) = 5.67 X(5) and E(5)

Searching for X(5)-like Nuclei P= N p N n N p +N n Good starting point: R 4/2 or P factor β-decay studies at Yale 156 Dy M.A. Caprio et al., Phys. Rev. C 66, (2002). 162 Yb E.A.McCutchan et al., Phys. Rev. C 69, (2004). 166 Hf 152 Sm R.F. Casten and N.V. Zamfir, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, (2001). N.V. Zamfir et al., Phys. Rev. C 60, (1999).. E.A.McCutchan. et al., Phys. Rev. C- submitted. Other Yale studies: 150 Nd - R.Krücken et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, (2002).

Searching for E(5)-like Nuclei Good starting point: R 4/2 or P factor 134 Ba R.F. Casten and N.V. Zamfir, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 3584 (2000). 102 Pd N.V. Zamfir et al., Phys. Rev. C 65, (2002). 130 Xe Ba Mo Sr Zr Te Xe Ce Cd Pd Ru Sn Z/N P~2.5

Symmetries and phases transitions in the IBM Challenges for neutron-rich: –New collective modes in three fluid systems (n-skin). –New regions of phase transition –New examples of critical point nuclei? –Rigid triaxiality? D.D. Warner, Nature 420 (2002) 614