 Interest in enhancing student learning with technology  Interest in how students and faculty prefer to learn a new technology  Interest in beliefs.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Robin L. Donaldson May 5, 2010 Prospectus Defense Florida State University College of Communication and Information.
Advertisements

Academic Advising Cathy Sanders Director of Assessment and Faculty Governance UNC Charlotte Office of Academic Affairs.
LIBRARY AND INFORMATION USE PATTERNS BY ENGINEERING FACULTY AND STUDENTS Lisha Li William Baer June 2009.
Preliminary Analysis of the 2013 Canadian Graduate and Professional Student Survey (CGPSS) - York University Results Richard Smith Acting Director Office.
Changing the expected format of a test on the day of the test Giving a very difficult exam during the third week of school in attempt to encourage.
THE JOINT COMMITTEE ON ONLINE AND DISTANCE LEARNING Report to the Faculty Senate May 9, 2013.
Results of the Faculty Survey on Internationalization at Villanova: A Preliminary Report Prepared for the International Leadership Committee Prepared by.
The Faculty Said… (pt.3) Community College Faculty Survey of Student Engagement 2005 Findings Presenter: LaSylvia Pugh – September 14, 2006.
Student perceptions of source credibility and health-related behavior: a case study Grace Collura, Carlie Hagerman, Jordan Kitch, Claire Szpara, and Sheng.
E-learning in LIS education: satisfaction of part-time LIS students with Omega Marko Tot, young researcher Faculty of Humanities and Social Sceiences,
WASHBURNWASHBURN Friends of Mabee Library October 28, 2004 Standardized Assessment of Information Literacy Skills Presented by Judy Druse Martha Imparato.
Faculty Survey of Student Engagement Using What Faculty Say about Improving Their Teaching Thomas F. Nelson Laird, IUB Jennifer Buckley, IUB Megan Palmer,
Diversity Demographics United States and University of Washington Compiled by UW Department of Anthropology Diversity Committee.
Fostering “Habits of Mind” for Student Learning in the First Year of College: Results from a National Study Linda DeAngelo, CIRP Assistant Director for.
ECAR/MSU STUDY OF FACULTY AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY Explorations in Instructional Technology November 21, 2014.
A Coach’s Communication Strategy and its Relationship to a Collegiate Player’s Motivation to Perform as an Athlete Dana Neil, Andrea Pendergast, Amy Schmidt,
2007 Noel-Levitz Student Satisfaction Survey Bruce Schultz, Dean of Students and Associate Vice Chancellor for Student Development Michael Votava, Associate.
2008 – 2014 Results Chris Willis East Stroudsburg University Office of Assessment and Accreditation Spring 2015
The Design and Use of a Career Portfolio to Promote Student Career Development Jill Lumsden Katie Meyer Robert Reardon James P. Sampson, Jr. Florida State.
IE GOALS IE GOALS Our Mission Provide the first two years of a baccalaureate degree Support all curriculum programs by providing.
Alice’s Adventures in LibQual-Land Kitty Tynan Assistant Director for Public Services CUA Libraries All illustrations from The Victorian Web: A Tenniel.
The Students Said… (pt.2) Community College Survey of Student Engagement 2005 Findings Presenter: LaSylvia Pugh – August 29, 2006.
American Institute of Higher Education Presentation09/10/08 Accounting Faculty Utilization of Web-Based Resources to Enhance In-Class Instruction By Thomas.
Faculty Said/Student Said 2008 Update (First Look) Community College Survey of Student Engagement 2008 Findings LaSylvia Pugh – February 16, 2009.
Academic Transformation/Course Redesign Vincent J. Granito, Ph.D. Chair, Center for Teaching Excellence Assistant Professor, Psychology.
1 Spartan Experience Questionnaire Selected Results Spring 1999 Office of Institutional Research September 1999 UNCG Planning Council September 22, 1999.
A Comprehensive Analysis of a PrOF Instructional Data Packet To illustrate the data analysis process CRC Research Office 2009.
Gregory P. Valentine University of Southern Indiana Department of Economics and Finance 8600 University Boulevard Evansville, IN Katherine M. Sauer.
Maximizing Learning Using Online Assessment 2011 SLATE Conference October 14, /12/ P. Boyles, Assistant Professor, Chicago State University,
The Impact of Greek Life: Findings from a National Study Ramsey G. Jabaji Coordinator for Student Involvement & Leadership Development Programs University.
TULSA COMMUNITY COLLEGE Julie Woodruff, Associate Professor of English Mary Millikin, Director of Institutional Research representing the AtD Data Team.
Achieving the Dream Baseline Data – What does it tell us? Presented by the ATD Data Team February 24, 2015.
WSU SAMPLE  All full-time tenured and tenure-track faculty  All campuses  Response rate: 57.6 % (N=603)  At least 50 % response rate in all colleges.
Bringing Together Survey Results of the UNLV Student Experience
St. Thomas University ALUMNI SURVEY Executive Summary Undergraduate and Graduate alumni in university database from 2001 to 1991 were mailed a copy of.
Mapping the Changing Technological Landscape: Faculty and Student Surveys on Educational Technology Cara Lane, Research Scientist Catalyst Research and.
10/17/2015 State Board of Education 1 ANNUAL REPORT ON GIFTED AND TALENTED EDUCATION Academic Year
Academic Integrity Survey Summary of Results Committee on Intellectual Integrity September 11, 2007.
ITESM Virtual University Forum Monterrey May 30, 2003 Dr. Robert W. Jerome Assistant Provost for Faculty and International Programs.
UNF E&G and Phased Retired Faculty: Fall Terms.
Results from the 2005 Educational Technology Surveys Cara Lane Research Scientist Catalyst Research and Development Office of Learning Technologies.
ACUHO-IEBI Resident Study 2009 Highlights from the Executive Summary.
An e-Portfolio for Kelvin Bentley, Ph.D.. Overview of Qualifications Educational Background  Ph.D. in Psychology from the University of Delaware Teaching.
1 The Multicultural Climate at MSU- Mankato William E. Sedlacek University of Maryland
Differences between Genders And Age groups. Hypothesis: Male students believe they perform better in traditional classes over online classes while female.
Practices and Predictors of the Use of Accommodations by University Faculty to Support College Students with Disabilities Leena Jo Landmark, M.Ed., and.
Diversity at Stetson: Perspectives of Students and Faculty John Tichenor Associate Professor of Decision and Information Science.
ACUHO-IEBI Resident Study 2010 Highlights from the Executive Summary.
Instructors’ General Perceptions on Students’ Self-Awareness Frances Feng-Mei Choi HUNGKUANG UNIVERSITY DEPARTMENT OF ENGLISH.
An Assessment of the Readiness of a Tertiary Healthcare Organization in Saudi Arabia, in Adopting Effective Online Staff Development Programs Adnan D.
LibQUAL+ ® Survey Administration LibQUAL+® Exchange Northumbria Florence, Italy August 17, 2009 Presented by: Martha Kyrillidou Senior Director, Statistics.
Who Are We? Some Facts About the Faculty. Number% Full-time Tenured and Tenure Eligible % Full-time Non-Tenure Eligible % Research and Public.
ACES: Developing a Valid and Reliable Survey to Assess Faculty Support of Diversity Goals.
CCSSE 2015 Findings for Merced College Spring 2016 Flex Thursday, 14 January 2016 Presented by the Office of Student Services, Office of Student Equity.
UAA Fall 2002 Leadership Retreat “ Focusing on Student Success ” Noel-Levitz Student Satisfaction Survey Fall 2001 Results Anchorage Campus.
 The older a person is, the less inclined they will be to file their income tax electronically.
Designing Innovative Instruction using Faculty Feedback on Technology Use and Faculty Attitudes toward Library Research Instruction Maria Perez-Stable,
Hospitality and Tourism Students Use of Technology Cary C. Countryman Michael Sciarini Matthew Roberts.
Noel-Levitz Student Satisfaction Survey University of Louisville Fall of 2002.
WKU Campus-wide Leadership Awareness Survey. Faculty Numbers Position Adjunct = 7 Instructor = 25 Asst. Professor = 38 Assoc. Professor = 28 Full Professor.
LibQUAL+ TM Library Survey LIBQUAL+ “ Only customers judge quality – all other measures are irrelevant”
The University of Texas-Pan American S. J. Sethi, Ph.D. Assistant Director Office of Institutional Research & Effectiveness Faculty Survey of Student Engagement.
Director of Institutional Accreditation and Assessment
Accommodations at UNO; What You Don’t See
Student Experience Survey Spring 2009 Report
Alfredo G. Torres, MS, PhD Director of Faculty Diversity Professor
Percentage of Faculty Members by Rank,
IPEDS COMPARISON FALL 2010 – FALL 2014
Underrepresentation of Underrepresented Minorities in Academic Medicine: The Need to Enhance the Pipeline and the Pipe  Juanita L. Merchant, M. Bishr.
College of Education Scorecard
Presentation transcript:

 Interest in enhancing student learning with technology  Interest in how students and faculty prefer to learn a new technology  Interest in beliefs about learning  Intent to use results in professional development Research Question To what extent do students and faculty differ in preferences and beliefs about teaching and learning with technology? Respondents Rationale Materials  EDUCAUSE-developed survey  5 preference questions  13 belief questions  11 student demographic items  5 faculty demographic items Procedures  Electronic format  distribution of survey link  All students, faculty, staff – Fall 07  3 week availability  3 reminder messages Significant Preferences for Learning a New Technology Significant Beliefs About Learning Pearson Chi-Square =11.83, df = 2, Cramer’s V =.08, p <.01Pearson Chi-Square =16.36, df = 2, Cramer’s V =.09, p <.01Pearson Chi-Square =6.82, df = 2, Cramer’s V =.06, p <.05 Table 2 Faculty Demographics (N=223) % CollegeCourses/Semester  A&S 65   CoB 8   CoEHS 18   CoNHS 6Years Teaching  Other 3  Rank   Professor 24   Associate 25   Assistant 22   IAS 16  Adjunct 13 Table 1 Student Demographics (N=1726) % CollegeEnrollment  A&S 54  Full-time 91  CoB 21  Part-time 9  CoEHS 20Age in years  CoNHS 5   Undeclared 1  Gender   Female 71Race  Male 29  White 94 Class  Asian-Pac Islander 3  Freshmen 20  Hispanic/Latino 1  Sophomores 18  American Indian 1  Juniors 22  African-American.23  Seniors 33  Multi-racial.23  Grads 7  Other 1 Figure 4 To be of interest, course material must be relevant to real life. Figure 5 Students learn best when a variety of visual materials are presented in class. Figure 6 Students prefer to learn independently, not by working with others. Figure 7 Interacting with fellow students in class improves learning. Figure 8 Interacting with an instructor in class does not improve learning. Figure 9 Online discussion boards and forums are not useful for learning. Figure 10 Resource on the Internet do not make a good replacement for faculty. Figure 11 Resources on the Internet have greatly reduced the need to go to the library. Figure 1 Read a paper instruction manual Figure 2 Take a class/attend a demonstration Figure 3 Just do it and see what works Pearson Chi-Square = , df = 2, Cramer’s V =.24, p <.01Pearson Chi-Square = 11,41, df = 2, Cramer’s V =.08, p <.01 Pearson Chi-Square = 39.98, df = 2, Cramer’s V =.14, p <.01 Pearson Chi-Square = 47.68, df = 2, Cramer’s V =.16, p <.01 Pearson Chi-Square = 28.61, df = 2, Cramer’s V =.12, p <.01 Pearson Chi-Square = 92.20, df = 2, Cramer’s V =.22, p <.01 Pearson Chi-Square = 9.41, df = 2, Cramer’s V =.07, p <.01Pearson Chi-Square = 7.47, df = 2, Cramer’s V =.06, p <.05  Pat Karlen and Andy Nelson, Office of Institutional Research: assistance with demographic data  Gene Leisz, Network for Excellence in Teaching: assistance with poster design  UW – Eau Claire Office of Academic Affairs: assistance in survey deployment  EDUCAUSE: survey instrument availability  Survey not locally designed or piloted  Relatively low percentage of student respondents Professional development efforts need to help faculty:  Account for learning preferences when designing learning activities with technology  Use a variety of visual materials effectively  Use group-/team-based learning effectively  Examine effective use of online discussion boards/forum  Explore how students use learning resources electronically versus going to the library Preferences 3 of 5 items differ significantly  Students prefer reading paper instructions less than faculty  Both prefer taking a class/attending a demonstration; students more so than faculty  Both prefer using a technology to see what works; faculty more so than students Beliefs 8 of 13 items differ significantly  Both believe content must be relevant; students more so than faculty  Both believe variety of visual materials increases learning, students more so than faculty  Faculty believe more strongly that students do not prefer to learn independently  Faculty believe more strongly that interacting with fellow students in class improves learning  Faculty believe more strongly that interacting with instructors in class improves learning  Students believe more strongly that online discussion boards improve learning  Faculty believe more strongly that resources on the Internet are not good replacements for instructors  Students believe more strongly that resources on the Internet have reduced the need to go to the library Linda J. Carpenter, Ph.DJenna Komarek Network for Excellence in Teaching