Professional Learning and Development: Best Evidence Synthesis Helen Timperley, Aaron Wilson and Heather Barrar Learning Languages March 2008.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Leading Learning in the Social Sciences MARGARET LEAMY National Coordinator Social Sciences Te Tapuae o Rehua Consortium
Advertisements

When Students Can’t Read…
Creating the Map To Set the Direction. Educational Positioning System (EPS – a play on GPS)
E.g Act as a positive role model for innovation Question the status quo Keep the focus of contribution on delivering and improving.
School Leaders Shaping Professional and Student Learning AIS Executive Conference October 2011 Professor Helen Timperley The University of Auckland.
PORTFOLIO.
Using Evidence in the Classroom for Professional Learning Ontario Education Research Symposium February 2010 Helen Timperley University of Auckland.
Teacher Professional Growth & Effectiveness System (TPGES) Laying the Groundwork ISLN September 2012.
Moving forward with Curriculum for Excellence Phil Denning HMI.
Using Assessment Data for Improving Teaching Practice ACER Conference August 2009 Professor Helen Timperley Faculty of Education University of.
Schooling Improvement: What do we know?
DISTRICT IMPROVEMENT PLAN Student Achievement Annual Progress Report Lakewood School District # 306.
The Leaders-Are-Teachers Revolution Geoff Petty 2015.
The Power of Professional Learning: School Leaders and First Teachers
Leadership for Learning
1 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations – for all students – for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through the.
The role of the mathematics subject leader in leading sustainable improvements Thursday 23 rd September 2010 Jo Lakey School Improvement Officer.
The contribution of research to teachers’ professional learning and development Philippa Cordingley Centre for the Use of Research and Evidence in Education.
From the gym window most Sundays – I observe?. Deliberate Practice Colvin (2008) noted that exceptional performers, were not necessarily the most talented.
Professional Learning Communities in Schools Online Workshop.
Ensuring Quality and Effective Staff Professional Development to Increase Learning for ALL Students.
Agenda Overview Problems of Practice – (same triads) – Break School Visits – Personal reflection – Partner share Research overview On PLCs and the connection.
Sharon Walpole University of Delaware Michael C. McKenna University of Virginia Literacy Coaches in Action: Strategies for Crafting Building- Level Support.
MATHEMATICS KLA Years 1 to 10 Understanding the syllabus MATHEMATICS.
Developing School-Based Systems of Support: Ohio’s Integrated Systems Model Y.S.U. March 30, 2006.
INTEGRATED LEARNING: STAGE 4 (SECONDARY COGS) Principles and process.
Principal Evaluation in Massachusetts: Where we are now National Summit on Educator Effectiveness Principal Evaluation Breakout Session #2 Claudia Bach,
Meeting of the Staff and Curriculum Development Network December 2, 2010 Implementing Race to the Top Delivering the Regents Reform Agenda with Measured.
Northampton – Development Opportunities a framework for enabling positive change.
Learning with Digital Technologies MRI Professional Learning 2015.
1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.
Overall Teacher Judgements
Portfolio based assessment - options for the new CGEA.
Hertfordshire in Action Working in Partnership to secure effective Transition and Progression.
Quality teaching and the implications for teaching and learning Based on the Quality Teaching for Diverse.
Workshop 3 Early career teacher induction: Literacy middle years Workshop 3 Literacy teaching and NSW syllabus 1.
ELA: Focus on Collaborative Conversations & Writing FCUSD Instructional Focus Meeting Sara Parenzin September 20, 2012 Welcome! Please sign in and start.
Assessment Practices That Lead to Student Learning Core Academy, Summer 2012.
What is HQPD?. Ohio Standards for PD HQPD is a purposeful, structured and continuous process that occurs over time. HQPD is a purposeful, structured and.
Integrating Knowledge Translation and Exchange into a grant Maureen Dobbins, RN, PhD SON, January 14, 2013.
1. Housekeeping Items June 8 th and 9 th put on calendar for 2 nd round of Iowa Core ***Shenandoah participants*** Module 6 training on March 24 th will.
LEAP Conference July 2015 Helen Timperley. Professional development to build capability is fundamental to whole school improvement processes BUT...
Expeditionary Learning Queens Middle School Meeting May 29,2013 Presenters: Maryanne Campagna & Antoinette DiPietro 1.
Raising standards, improving lives The use of assessment to improve learning: the evidence 15 September Jacqueline White HMI National Adviser for Assessment.
3219 Yonge St., Suite # 240, Toronto, ON, M4N 3S1 | tel | fax | toll free APORIA Leading Learning.
Strengthening Student Outcomes in Small Schools There’s been enough research done to know what to do – now we have to start doing it! Douglas Reeves.
School Improvement Partnership Programme: Summary of interim findings March 2014.
1. Administrators will gain a deeper understanding of the connection between arts, engagement, student success, and college and career readiness. 2. Administrators.
Student Name Student Number ePortfolio Demonstrating my achievement of the NSW Institute of Teachers Graduate Teacher Stage of the Professional Teacher.
The Conceptual Framework: What It Is and How It Works Linda Bradley, James Madison University Monica Minor, NCATE April 2008.
March E-Learning or E-Teaching? What’s the Difference in Practice? Linda Price and Adrian Kirkwood Programme on Learner Use of Media The Open University.
Australian Teacher Performance and Development Framework Consultation proposal.
National Standards in Reading & Writing Sources : NZ Ministry of Education websites. G Thomas, J Turner.
The Literacy and Numeracy Secretariat Le Secrétariat de la littératie et de la numératie October – octobre 2007 The School Effectiveness Framework A Collegial.
Staff All Surveys Questions 1-27 n=45 surveys Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree The relative sizes of the colored bars in the chart.
The School Effectiveness Framework
1 CECV Intervention Framework Module 5A Learning & Teaching EFFECTIVE INTERVENTION.
Helping Teachers Help All Students: The Imperative for High-Quality Professional Development Report of the Maryland Teacher Professional Development Advisory.
National Science Education Standards. Outline what students need to know, understand, and be able to do to be scientifically literate at different grade.
The Literacy and Numeracy Secretariat Le Secrétariat de la littératie et de la numératie October – octobre 2007 The School Effectiveness Framework A Collegial.
National Professional Standards for Teachers. Focus Role of the Australian Institute for Teaching and School Leadership Background on the National Professional.
Raising standards improving lives The revised Learning and Skills Common Inspection Framework: AELP 2011.
English Extension 1 Preliminary Course. A Word From BOS  2 English (Extension) 12.1 Structure  The Preliminary English (Extension) course consists of.
Measuring Progress and Planning Learning William E. Dugger, Jr. Shelli D. Meade.
Partnership for Practice
Consistency of Teacher Judgement
Implementing Race to the Top
Standard for Teachers’ Professional Development July 2016
February 21-22, 2018.
Presentation transcript:

Professional Learning and Development: Best Evidence Synthesis Helen Timperley, Aaron Wilson and Heather Barrar Learning Languages March 2008

Introduction

Professional learning opportunities Teacher interpretation and utilization of targeted understandings and skills Teacher outcomes:  change in practice  no change in practice Student learning outcomes:  improved  not improved Student interpretation and utilization of targeted understandings and skills Student learning opportunities The Black Boxes of Teacher and Student Learning

Main Research Question What kinds of professional learning opportunities for teachers result in an impact on student outcomes?

Why limit the synthesis to studies with student outcomes? A professional development provider walks into a school ……. Delivers a workshop Supports teachers with ongoing observations and feedback Teachers successfully implement Student achievement DROPS

Leadership BES (Robinson, Hohepa & Lloyd) Leadership DimensionEffect size Establishing goals and expectationsAverage ES = 0.35 Strategic resourcingAverage ES =0.34 Planning, coordinating and evaluating teaching Average ES =0.42 Promoting and participating in teacher learning & development Average ES =0.84 Ensuring an orderly & supportive environment Average ES =0.27

Methodology and Theoretical Framing

The Process of Selecting Core Studies Analysis of Student Outcomes Adequacy of methodology Significance of impact Core Studies Medium to high methodology Substantive quantitative and/or qualitative outcomes Medium to broad range Supplementary Studies Medium to high methodology but low or no impact on student outcomes Lower methodological adequacy but with substantive outcomes Mapped onto theoretical frameworkUsed to inform synthesis Characteristics of Professional Learning Associated with Medium/High Impact For Particular Contexts

▪ Formal educational policies/curriculum ▪ Prevailing discourses ▪ School organisation Wider social context The professional learning context ▪ People and practicalities ▪ Professional learning goals Responses of diverse teacher learners/communities Impact on diverse student learners Content of the professional development/learning opportunities Activities constructed to promote the learning Learning processes

Mapping the Studies 97 studies analysed against 84 characteristics - 90%+ inter-rater reliability Treated theoretical framework as neutral Short description for each characteristic entered onto an Excel spreadsheet Lots of blanks

Synthesis Structure Summary of findings Separate syntheses for: Mathematics Science Literacy Reframing social constructions of students Specific topics: Multiple roles of assessment Leadership Professional learning communities Secondary schools The role of personal teacher theories Case studies

Reflection activity In small groups, discuss one example of effective or ineffective professional development you had as a teacher (or similar),using the questions as a guide.

Overview of Findings

The Context of Professional Learning and Development

Voluntary or Compulsory? Neither who initiated the professional learning opportunities nor whether they were voluntary or compulsory was associated with particular outcomes for students What was more important was that teachers engaged in the learning process at some point.

Effective Contexts Extended time and frequent contact was necessary but not sufficient External expertise was typically necessary but not sufficient Prevailing discourses challenged Not necessarily school-based Opportunities to participate in a professional community of practice Active school leadership in school-based cases.

Active School Leadership Effective leaders: –Organised a supportive learning environment –Participated in the learning with teachers –Provided alternative visions, targets and goals for student outcomes and monitored them –Developed the leadership of others.

The Content of Professional Learning Reflected a view of teaching as a complex activity Different aspects of teaching & learning integrated in a coherent manner Aligned theory with practice Established clear links between teaching and learning outcomes Assessment used to focus teaching and enhance self-regulation Sustainability rarely reported.

Integrating different aspects of content

Teacher Learning Activities All core studies employed a variety of activities Apart from listening to those with expertise, no single type of activity was common to all studies No individual activity stood out as more effective than others across studies or within particular categories Every type of activity that was associated with positive outcomes, was also associated with low or no impact.

Alignment of Activities to Content There was a clear alignment between the intended learning goals and the activities Individual activities often served multiple purposes Activities served to develop teachers’ understanding of the relationship between their teaching and student learning Providers engaged with teachers’ own theories of practice.

Typical Sequence of Professional Learning Opportunities

Teacher learning processes Changing practice in substantive ways is difficult Specific teacher learning processes were usually implied rather than specified Teachers’ responses were also more often implied than specified.

New Understandings All core studies involved teachers developing new understandings and extending their skills through becoming aware of new information Some new understandings were consistent with current positioning Others created dissonance with current positioning A few developed enhanced regulation of own and others’ learning.

What knowledge and skills do our students need? What knowledge and skills do we as professionals need? What has been the impact of our changed actions? Deepen professional knowledge and refine skills Engage students in new learning experiences Teacher inquiry and knowledge-building cycle to promote valued student outcomes

Conclusions If we are to be more sophisticated in how we approach teacher professional learning then the theoretical and empirical literatures need to be brought more closely together Alongside this we need more sophisticated theories of how to promote the professional learning of teachers.