A Study of the Professional Development Needs of Teachers in Grand Blanc Sheryl Boegner – Grand Blanc Community Schools Lisa Kunkleman – Swartz Creek Community.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Definitions Innovation Reform Improvement Change.
Advertisements

SUCCESSION PLANNING ~ DELAWARE STYLE Appoquinimink, Capital and Indian River
PAYS FOR: Literacy Coach, Power Hour Aides, LTM's, Literacy Trainings, Kindergarten Teacher Training, Materials.
STANISLAUS COUNTY OFFICE OF EDUCATION/ CENTRAL CALIFORNIA MIGRANT HEAD START CHILD OUTCOMES SYSTEM CHILD OUTCOMES SYSTEMS Training Plan * Outcomes Awareness.
Teacher Evaluation Model
Delta Sierra Middle School Napa/Solano County Office of Education School Assistance and Intervention Team Monitoring Report #8 – July 2008 Mary Camezon,
1 Presented by Media Services Media Specialists Connections and Issues Training: November – December Zone Based Meetings.
Connecticut Comprehensive System of Monitoring the use of Accommodations in Testing Connecticut Comprehensive System of Monitoring the use of Accommodations.
A Study of Teacher Competencies and Involvement in Transition Services for Middle and High School Students with Disabilities Conducted by: John Mattos.
A three-year project focused on supporting high quality learning and teaching (HQLT) in secondary mathematics and science Supported by funds from the.
INSTRUCTIONAL LEADERSHIP FOR DIVERSE LEARNERS Susan Brody Hasazi Katharine S. Furney National Institute of Leadership, Disability, and Students Placed.
+ Hybrid Roles in Your School If not now, then when?
Instructional Materials for English Language Learners in Urban Public Schools, Council of the Great City Schools.
ABC Elementary School EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: IMPLEMENTATION OF SAXON PHONICS AND SPELLING K.
Sharon Walpole University of Delaware Michael C. McKenna University of Virginia Literacy Coaches in Action: Strategies for Crafting Building- Level Support.
Career Kaleidoscope: What Do You See? Chances, Changes, and Challenges.
Building Teacher Effectiveness A Lab School Protocol.
Avery’s Creek Elementary School. What is Title I? United States Federal Government’s largest education program to support public schools. The Purpose:
 K-12 Principal Internship and Competency Summary Aaron Freed K-12 Principal Licensure Candidate Bethel University.
5-Step Process Clarification The 5-Step Process is for a unit, topic, or “chunk” of information. One form should be used for the unit, topic, etc. The.
Accelerated Reader Usage and Reading Proficiency Scores During Second Grade Presented to R. D. Head Elementary Staff and Administration November 30, 2002.
The Effects of Professional Learning Communities on Student Achivement Erin N. Fyffe School of Teacher Education, Western Kentucky University Methods and.
Why principal evaluation? Because Leadership Matters!
Orientation and Induction of Traditionally and Alternatively Educated New Teachers Jennifer Conkin October, 2012.
Maryland’s Journey— Focus Schools Where We’ve Been, Where We Are, and Where We’re Going Presented by: Maria E. Lamb, Director Nola Cromer, Specialist Program.
Segment 5: Sample Activities Federal Accountability Requirements School Leadership Instructional Supervision 1.
Strategic Technology Plan Lincoln High School Sarah Simmons ETEC 6223 University of Arkansas.
Technology Use Plan Bighorn County School District #4 Basin / Manderson, Wyoming “Life-long learning through attitude, academics, and accountability.”
Social Studies Classroom Based Assessments (CBAs ) Tacoma Public School K – 5 Implementation Plan
South Western School District Differentiated Supervision Plan DRAFT 2010.
Teresa K. Todd EDAD 684 School Finance/Ethics March 23, 2011.
Cultural Competency and the Inclusive Classroom Professional Development Session Kalyn Estep.
Lubbock Independent School District Technology Plan By Stacey Price.
Hastings Public Schools PLC Staff Development Planning & Reporting Guide.
Professional Development Forum (FY13). Professional Development Forum (FY13) Welcome & Introductions District Departments ONLY.
The New York State School Improvement Grant Initiative Five Years On Office of Professional Research & Development, Syracuse University, NY.
CHARLOTTESVILLE CITY SCHOOLS Number and Number Sense Professional Development Plan.
English Language Learners Modifications Needs Assessment Presenter Yanira Alfonso, EDS ESOL Teacher Hopkins Elementary.
Readiness for AdvancED District Accreditation Tuscaloosa County School System.
Project 3 Supporting Technology. Project Proposal.
Lead Teach Learn PLC Fundamental IV: Multi-Tiered System of Supports.
TOSA Content Fundamental II. TOSA AGENDA Content for TOSAs Pink Wednesday Material Planning time.
Kimberly B. Lis, M.Ed. University of St. Thomas Administrative Internship II Dr. Virginia Leiker.
Key messages related to quality assurance management Trust Tools Time
By Billye Darlene Jones EDLD 5362 Section ET8004-1B February, 2010.
ESEA FOR LEAs Cycle 6 Monitoring Arizona Department of Education Revised October 2015.
Instructional Technology Survey: Highlands School District Shawn Cressler, Summer 2013.
Enter System Name AdvancED TM External Review Exit Report Maxey Elementary December 9 and 10, 2013.
Flexible Scheduling Mrs. Smith's class leaves Mr. Brown's class enters Improving Student Learning Through Expanded Use of the Library Media Center Library.
THEN NOW  Historic approach had been to pull groups of teachers together for whole group/single topic discussions. ◦ District level determination.
Lead Teach Learn PLC Fundamental II: Inclusive Practice.
D90 Administrative Recommendation: Full-Day Kindergarten Board of Education Meeting 1/23/12.
Lead Teach Learn PLC Fundamental III: Climate and Engagement.
Researching Technology in South Dakota Classrooms Dr. Debra Schwietert TIE Presentation April 2010 Research Findings.
Harvest Ridge School Improvement Plan Update January 17, 2014.
MEYER ELEMENTARY SPRING ISD LORETTA DAVENPORT Campus Improvement Project III Teacher Mentoring Program.
Lead Teach Learn PLC Fundamental II: Inclusive Practice.
DEVELOPING INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY LITERACY AMONG TECHNOLOGY EDUCATION PRE-SERVICE TEACHERS IN PARAGUAY Hong Kong, January 2006 Aichi University of Education.
Take One! ™ Jumpstarting Your National Board Teaching Certification Process.
School Development External Review “Building a Learning Community”
Marlene M. Dodyk Director of Student Services Wayland Public Schools.
PENFIELD CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT: K-5 LITERACY CURRICULUM AUDIT Presented by: Dr. Marijo Pearson Assistant Superintendent for Curriculum, Instruction,
Indicator 5.4 Create and implement a documented continuous improvement process that describes the gathering, analysis, and use of student achievement.
Oregon Statewide System of Support for School & District Improvement Tryna Luton & Denny Nkemontoh Odyssey – August 2010.
UNISON ELEMENTARY Three-Year Action Plan. FOCUS AREA #1 To increase student achievement on standardized assessment measures by 5% each year over the three.
December 2015 NEW STANDARDS FOR PRINCIPAL SUPERVISORS.
Note: In 2009, this survey replaced the NCA/Baldrige Quality Standards Assessment that was administered from Also, 2010 was the first time.
Fenton Area Public Schools International Baccalaureate Program Evaluation May 11, 2015.
Advancing Student and Educator Growth through Peer Feedback
Dr. Robert Perry, Dr. Mick Arnold,
Presentation transcript:

A Study of the Professional Development Needs of Teachers in Grand Blanc Sheryl Boegner – Grand Blanc Community Schools Lisa Kunkleman – Swartz Creek Community Schools Jamie Ureche – Lake Fenton Community Schools Melissa White – Mt. Morris Consolidated Schools

Professional Development Needs of Teachers Background and Rationale  Professional development is required by state  Professional development is often designed without taking into account teacher needs  Lack of follow-up after professional development  Effective professional development can increase student achievement

Professional Development Needs of Teachers Assumptions  The respondents surveyed will understand the language of the instrument, will be competent in self–reporting, and will respond objectively and honestly.  Interpretation of the data collected accurately reflects the intent of the respondent.  The teachers involved in our research project will feel the same as we do.

Professional Development Needs of Teachers Limitations  This study is limited to the information acquired from the literature review and survey instruments.  The majority of the responders were kindergarten through fifth grade teachers.  The software used did not facilitate the disaggregation of the survey without additional costs (esurveypro.com)  The survey was long and could have led to test fatigue.  If a respondent needed to stop and complete the survey at another time, they may have been counted more than once.

Professional Development Needs of Teachers Research Question #1  What are the perceptions, attitudes, and beliefs about the district’s professional development offerings?

Professional Development Needs of Teachers Research Question #2  What are the staff and administrator’s recommendations for future staff development?

Professional Development Needs of Teachers Review of the Literature  Types of Professional Development Professional Learning Communities (PLC) Walk-throughs Action Research Mentoring of new teachers  Professional Development based on teacher need  Sustainability

Professional Development Needs of Teachers Method of Study  Instruments Electronic survey for certified staff Electronic survey for administrators Personal interviews with Central Office  Data Analysis

Professional Development Needs of Teachers Selection of Respondents K-12 certified staff K-12 administrators Central Office staff

Certified Staff Responses Who decides Professional Development? Principal/ Assistant Principal responses 26% District Level Administrators 23% 31% Building/School-Level Administrators 24% 16% Grade Level or Department Chairs 18% 10% Professional Development Committee 15% 13% Teachers 16% 3% I’m not sure 0% <1% Other 4% Professional Development Needs of Teachers Survey-Section I

 Questions related to participants’ perception, attitude, and beliefs about the district’s professional development. Professional Development Needs of Teachers Survey-Section II

Professional Development Needs of Teachers Survey- Section III Questions asked respondents to indicate interest for future professional development

Professional Development Needs of Teachers Results of the Study  Many factors determine professional development offerings Initiatives related to Strategic Plan New programs Teacher IDPs  Perceptions, attitudes, and beliefs varied throughout the district  Future professional development areas Classroom management Instructional skills Classroom diversity skills Technology skills

Professional Development Needs of Teachers Conclusions and Recommendations  Certified staff should be allowed to choose their own professional development  Certified staff should be recognized for their efforts  Further follow-up actions need to be taken to ensure that all staff are utilizing their training

Professional Development Needs of Teachers Implications for Future Research Rather than allow respondents to select as many topics of professional development that they would like to receive, it is suggested that the respondents be limited to their top three choices each year. This would more easily allow the data to be used to determine the district’s needs as a whole. The survey should be redesigned to meet the needs of staff at various levels (elementary, middle, high and special areas). With the implementation of Professional Learning Communities in the district, the effectiveness of these groups should be examined.