The use of market mechanisms to bolster forest carbon: A critical analysis Faculty of Law, University of Sydney, Australia Celeste M Black, Senior Lecturer.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
On-line resource materials for policy making Ex-Ante Carbon-balance Tool Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, FAO Learning how using.
Advertisements

Dr. Tony Richardson Director, TreeSmart Australia & TreePower Australia Your Farm Your Future Forum, Dookie, 6 May 2009.
Economic Analysis of Carbon Sequestration. Hypothesis: By adopting more sustainable practices, farmers can sequester C in soil at a cost competitive with.
S E R V I N G C A N A D I A N S A U S E R V I C E D E S C A N A D I E N S This may not necessarily represent the view of the Government CBA/Justice Annual.
Ensuring Effective Monitoring, Certification and Verification of Emissions by Jed Jones Lloyd’s Register.
A practical overview from planning to practice on of the capture and combustion of methane from landfill. Source: Clean Energy Regulator (CER) July 2013.
A Layman’s View of Carbon Reduction Policies. Overview History of climate change policy debate Projected impacts Australian Government’s response Opposition.
Canada’s Offset System for Greenhouse Gases Dean Stinson O’Gorman New Brunswick Climate Change Hub meeting October 7, 2009.
A practical overview from planning to practice on the destruction of methane generated from manure in piggeries. Source: Clean Energy Regulator (CER) July.
Australian Government Emissions Reduction Fund. Central component of the Government's Direct Action Plan Funding of $2.55 billion Additional funding to.
2 Ms Gwen Andrews Chief Executive Some practical approaches to implementing the Kyoto Protocol ISO Sydney - September 2001.
 November 12 - forest carbon 1, Tutorial 4  November 14 – carbon (cont)  Brief due  November 18 (Monday) – EBM simulation  November 19 (Lecture)
USING CONSERVATION COVENANTS TO PROTECT PRIVATE LAND Judy Atkins Hillyer Atkins.
KYOTO PROTOCOL MECHANISMS EURASIA 歐亞 Solicitors and Advocates.
Carbon Price and the Energy Sector June 2011 Kane Thornton Director of Strategy & Operations.
JULY 2009 AFIA What, when and how will agriculture be affected by the CPRS.
AGEC/FNR 406 LECTURE 22 Carbon Emissions,
Stakeholder consultation on discussion document on GHG mitigation potential within the agriculture and forest sector Portlaoise 15 May 2015 Eugene Hendrick.
Carbon Trading: The Challenges and Risks John Drexhage Director, Climate Change and Energy International Institute for Sustainable Development Agriculture.
Presented by Dean Current, PhD Center for Integrated Natural Resources and Agricultural Management (CINRAM) Department of Forest Resources University of.
A. N. Gichu Kenya Forest Service REDD+ and REDD Readiness.
Baker & McKenzie International is a Swiss Verein with member law firms around the world. In accordance with the common terminology used in professional.
European State Forest Association ‘Sinks’ in the EU Emissions Trading Scheme 26/06/08 Erik Kosenkranius – EUSTAFOR Executive Director Marianne Rubio -
Carbon Emissions from Harvesting Wood Products and Bioenergy Justin Ford-Robertson.
Emissions Trading: Dairy industry response Allan Burgess President Australian Dairy Farmers.
Carbon Offset Projects and the FIA Neil Sampson March 3, 2009.
Relationship between the EU ETS and the Kyoto Protocol Flexible Mechanisms, from the Perspective of Bioenergy and C Sequestration Relationship between.
LULUCF – Post 2012 Bryan Smith Manager, Forest Policy Co-ordination Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry.
FAO 2005 Seminar, O. Cacho 1 Transaction Costs of Carbon Sink Projects Oscar Cacho School of Economics University of New.
AGEC/FNR 406 LECTURE 21 Atmospheric Concentrations of Carbon Dioxide,
FINANCING REDD – A CRITICAL EVALUATION OF THE REDD MECHANISM Patricia Blazey and Hope Ashiabor Patricia Blazey and Hope Ashiabor 1.
Latest on Bioenergy in the EU Emissions Trading System and in the CDM Latest on Bioenergy in the EU Emissions Trading System and in the CDM B. Schlamadinger.
A Review of Forest Carbon Sequestration Cost Studies Q: What is Carbon Sequestration? A: Capture and Storage of Carbon in Sinks Terrestrial (forest, agriculture)
Implementation of the Kyoto Protocol: what does it mean for bioenergy and C sequestration? Implementation of the Kyoto Protocol: what does it mean for.
Agriculture’s Role in Climate Change Mitigation July 18, 2007 (revised) Daniel A. Lashof, Ph.D. Science Director Climate Center Natural Resources Defense.
Avoided Deforestation as an IPES Opportunity Annah Peterson, Duke University Louise Gallagher, UNEP ETB David Huberman, IUCN Ivo Mulder, The Dutch Fund.
GIS bioenergy Options for GIS bioenergy projects Andreas Türk 25. April 2008.
CDM and Forestry Sector in India Carbon Pool of Forestry Sector in India The growing stock of the country has been estimated to be 4,740 million m³.
Sustainable Land Management and Climate Change Details of Pillar 2 Public consultation meetings February-March 2007.
Australia’s Independent Farm Policy Research Institute Greenhouse emissions trading and agriculture: Opportunities and threats.
FOREST SECTOR MITIGATION IN INDIA Ravindranath, Sudha & Sandhya Indian Institute of Science Bangalore.
“STEWARDSHIP IN FORESTRY” Forestry Projects for Terrestrial Sequestration -- Regulatory and Public Acceptance Issues -- Jim Cathcart, Ph.D. Oregon Department.
Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative RGGI John Marschilok, P.E. Environmental Engineer Department New York State Department of Environmental Conservation.
Cacho (2008) 1 THE ROLE OF TRANSACTION COSTS IN LUCF PROJECTS Research funded by ACIAR Oscar Cacho School of Business, Economics and Public Policy University.
1 Consideration of Forestry Assets in Climate Change Legislation Cologne, 8 May 2007 Charlotte Streck
U.S. Office: 1877 Garden Avenue Eugene, Oregon USA.
Large Industrial Emitters Emissions Trading Natural Resources Canada March 14, 2003.
Gordon Smith April 6-9, th Forestry and Agriculture Greenhouse Gas Modeling Forum Shepardstown, West Virginia Leakage Accounting in Forestry and.
If carbon stocks are up, who gets the credit ? A practical method of distinguishing between human and natural factors. Miko Kirschbaum 1 & Annette Cowie.
Climate mitigation and avoided deforestation Martina Jung Quest Workshop on Forestry and Climate Mitigation, July 2005.
Michigan Commission of Agriculture September 16, 2009 Climate Change and the Farm.
Seite 1 Stand: Article 3.4 and CDM outcomes: implications for wood based industries / bioenergy Bernhard Schlamadinger IEA Bioenergy Task 38,
Introduction to Domestic Emissions Trading Warren Bell Associate, IIISD Kyoto Mechanisms Seminar for the Manitoba Business Sector March 14, 2003.
Land Use, Land Use Change and Forestry (LULUCF) European Commission expert group on forest fires Antalya, 26 April 2012 Ernst Schulte, DG ENV on behalf.
Consultation on Proposed Changes – The Emissions Trading scheme.
Kicking the Carbon Habit Jeanette Fitzsimons, Co-leader March 2007 Green Party of Aotearoa New Zealand.
Insert Your Image Here © Insert Image Credit Josh Parrish – Director, TNC Working Woodlands Program Gay Thistle – Private Forest Owner Bill Kunze – Executive.
Climate Change and Forestry —Possible Legal and Policy Instruments to Address Potential Effects of Forest Carbon Offsets Ding Zhi (Department of Law of.
Dr Sean Weaver, Principal, Carbon Partnership Pilot Project Case Study: Improved Forest Management.
Climate Change Mitigation and Complexity Agus P Sari Country Director, Indonesia EcoSecurities.
New Zealand’s ETS: All Gases, All Sectors Basil Sharp Department of Economics Energy Centre The University of Auckland New Zealand.
American Forest Foundation Forest Climate Opportunities for Family Forest Owners Robert S. Simpson Senior Vice President Center for Family Forests October.
Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Targets
Land use, land-use change and forestry projects under JI in theory and practice B. Schlamadinger and N. Bird Joanneum Research, Austria C. Streck and.
IMPLEMENTATION ISSUES FOR THE CREATION OF OFFSETS IN THE AGRICULTURE AND FORESTRY SECTORS FOR USE IN A POTENTIAL CANADIAN DOMESTIC EMISSION TRADING.
Current Status of Carbon Market in Thailand
Climate Change Legislation & Agriculture
Carbon Offset Markets and Utah’s Opportunity
Canada’s Regulatory Framework for Greenhouse Gas Emissions
The global implications of water and carbon management
Presentation transcript:

The use of market mechanisms to bolster forest carbon: A critical analysis Faculty of Law, University of Sydney, Australia Celeste M Black, Senior Lecturer

Forest Carbon ›Role of forestry in reducing levels of atmospheric carbon The bathtub analogy ›Emissions: deforestation and forest degradation ›Removals: forest carbon – afforestation and reforestation ›Sustainability Institute and Schlumberger Ltd ›Climate Bathtub 2 Introduction

Forest Carbon Reducing deforestation ›REDD ›Domestic measures: emissions liability upon deforestation Establishing new forests ›CDM ›Domestic forest offsets ›Voluntary/regulatory markets 3 Role of Market Incentives

Forest Carbon ›Natural sequestration of carbon -Soil Carbon -Forest Carbon -Ocean uptake ›Growth of forest: net carbon sink ›Carbon saturation point at forest maturity? ›Monitoring and measurement ›Permanence – natural risks ›Small scale harvesting 4 Forests as a Carbon Sink

Forest Carbon ›Creating a commercially viable alternative to other land use options ›Direct incentives -Grants programs -Concessional tax treatment of expenses ›Indirect incentives -Issuing carbon offsets ›Including both large and small land-holders 5 Creating positive incentives for forestry

Forest Carbon: Australia ›Several regimes to encourage forestry at state and federal levels ›Federal level -Tax concessions -Generation of units under deferred ETS (the Carbon Pollution Reduction Scheme) ›NSW State level: Generation of units under emissions trading scheme – the NSW Greenhouse Gas Abatement Scheme (GGAS) ›New initiatives: Victorian Carbon Exchange for carbon offsets 6 Forest incentives in Australia

Forest Carbon: Australia ›Establishment costs deductible -Until June 2012, fully deductible in year incurred -After June 2012, deductible at 7% pa (over 14 yrs, 105 days) ›Must notify relevant authority and satisfy criteria ›Commissioner of Taxation may deny deduction for non-compliance ›Suggestion of annual monitoring? ›Compare favourable tax treatment of forestry managed investment schemes (plantation forestry) 7 Federal tax incentives for carbon sink forests

Forest Carbon: Australia ›Indefinite deferral of CPRS ›For reforestation ›Qualification requirements similar to regime for carbon sink forests ›Approach to crediting units ›5 year reporting cycle ›Treatment of harvested forest stands ›Risk of reversal buffer ›Projects to be revoked and units relinquished if non-compliant ›Liability capped 8 Federal incentive: Generation of units under CPRS

Forest Carbon: Australia 9 CPRS Discussion Paper: short rotation harvest – unit limit in red

Forest Carbon: Australia ›GGAS covers NSW electricity sector ›For project-based increase in carbon stocks in an eligible forest, generate NSW Greenhouse Abatement Certificates (“NGACs”) ›Accreditation and project registration ›Approach to issuing abatement certificates -Sequestration pools -Permanent carbon storage plus rotational harvesting ›100 year requirement ›Non-compliance produces emissions liability 10 Generating NGACs under NSW GGAS

11 NSW GGAS sequestration pool management

Forest Carbon: New Zealand ›3 main regimes to encourage forestry ›National level: generation of units under 2 regimes: -Permanent Forest Sink Initiative (PFSI) -NZ Emissions Trading Scheme (NZ ETS) ›Local/Federal level -Cash grants under Afforestation Grant Scheme (AGS) 12 Forestry incentives in New Zealand

Forest Carbon: New Zealand ›Provides for generation of Assigned Amount Units ›For carbon sequestered in a permanent forest on previously unforested land (1989/90 rule) ›99 year covenant with NZ Government ›Limited harvesting allowed ›Landowners required to return AAUs and pay penalty in the event of non- compliance 13 National Incentives: Permanent Forest Sink Initiative

Forest Carbon: New Zealand ›NZ units issues for increases in carbon stock from afforestation and reforestation ›Delineation between pre-1990 and post Pre-1990 forests must participate upon deforestation -Post-1989 forests: voluntary participation -One-off allocation for pre-1990 forests & limited exemptions ›Approach to issuing NZUs ›Units must be surrendered if carbon stocks decrease ›Measurement -Look-up tables: forest age and type -New measurement-based approach (proposed) based on field data 14 National Incentives: NZ ETS

Forest Carbon: New Zealand ›Competitive cash grant scheme jointly funded by NZ Govt and regional councils ›Complements PFSI and NZ ETS ›Simpler option to obtain benefits from establishing a new Kyoto-compliant forest ›Grant agreement with Minister for Agriculture ›Term of 10 years ›Crown owns any units generated 15 Afforestation Grants Scheme

Forest Carbon: A comparison ›Shortcomings of Australian approach -Lack of coherence between current measures -Issues around design of tax concession and monitoring -NSW GGAS a useful model - pooling ›NZ approach -More thorough/detailed -Inclusive of both holders of small parcels of land and larger scale forestry operators -Inclusion of deforestation 16 Comparison of approaches in Australia and NZ