How to Prepare for a Federal Monitoring Visit (SASA/OSEP) Jennifer S. Mauskapf, Esq. Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC Fall Forum 2012.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
How to Prepare for a Federal Monitoring Visit (SASA/OSEP) Jennifer S. Mauskapf, Esq. Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC Spring.
Advertisements

MONITORING OF SUBGRANTEES
Threshold System Presented by Jan Stanley, State Title I Director Office of Assessment and Accountability Fall Title I Directors Conference October 23-25,
Compliance Monitoring Orientation. Monitoring Components Focus Site Review/Fiscal Monitoring SPAM.
(Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act) and
Massachusetts Department of Elementary & Secondary Education
THE SUPER CIRCULAR – “OMNI CIRCULAR” THE ONE-STOP SHOP FOR FEDERAL ASSISTANCE OMB Revised Administrative, Cost, Audit Rules Governing All Federal Grants.
ESEA Program Review Russ Sweet Preparing for ESEA Program Reviews of Titles I-A, II-A, VI-B (REAP), and X Summer 2014.
Carl D. Perkins Career & Technical Education Act of 2006 The Law, The Myths, The Legends February 2015.
1 INTERNAL CONTROLS Thomas Chin October 5, Presentation Topics Requirements – Internal Control Time and Effort Reporting Statistics on Single.
Final Determinations. Secretary’s Determinations Secretary annually reviews the APR and, based on the information provided in the report, information.
MODULE 8 MONITORING INDIANA HPRP Training 1. Role of Independent Financial Monitors 2 IHCDA is retaining an independent accounting firm to monitor its.
Fiscal Updates Presented by: Janice Hay, Finance Coordinator and Jan Stanley, State Title I Director Title I Directors’ Conference March 2009.
On Site Review Process Office of Field Services.
1 Monitoring Review: What Every New Coordinator Should Know Victoria Rankin and Greta Colombi, NDTAC.
Drafting Compliant (and Some Newly Required) Policies and Procedures Tiffany Winters, Esq. Brustein & Mansevit, PLLC
Office of Field Services Fiscal Review Process Becky Pennington Susan Szymas February 7, 2013.
Verification Visit by the Office of Special Education Programs (OSEP) September 27-29, 2010.
TIME AND EFFORT REPORTING: THE BASICS Steven Spillan, Esq. Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC Fall Forum 2013.
Title I Technical Assistance Training Federal and State Programs.
Grants Management Test for Institutions of Higher Education and Nonprofit Organizations Tiffany R. Winters, Esq. Erin Auerbach, Esq.
Subrecipient Monitoring FY15 of Education Oklahoma State Department of Education Office of Federal Programs Federal Programs Office of Titles I, II, III,
Presented by Michael Brustein, Esq. Bonnie L. Graham, Esq. Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC Fall Forum 2013.
Grant Requirement Reminders Michigan State Police Emergency Management and Homeland Security Division Ms. Jackie Reese, Audit Unit Manager Mr. Richard.
Fiscal Compliance for Title III Keisha Davis Monitoring & Compliance Section School Business Division
1 INTERNAL CONTROLS Matthew Pakos School Improvement Grant Programs May 23, 2011.
PREPARING FOR SUPPLEMENTAL MONITORING PERKINS COMPLIANCE Monieca West ADHE Federal Program Manager October 19, 2012.
Internal Controls New Title I Directors Title I Technical Assistance Session May 15, 2013.
Monitoring & Oversight Adult Education and Literacy (AEL) Programs Brenda B. Williams Project Manager Texas Workforce Commission Regulatory Integrity Division.
Omni Circular Key Area #7: New Responsibilities of the Pass- Through Agency By Michael Brustein, Esq. Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC Spring.
The Elizabeth Audit A Case Study in Audit Resolution The Elizabeth Audit A Case Study in Audit Resolution Bonnie Little, Esq. Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC.
How to Prepare for a Federal Monitoring Visit (SASA/OSEP) Jennifer S. Mauskapf, Esq. Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC Fall Forum 2013.
FISCAL MONITORING OBJECTIVES:  To provide a clearer understanding of the monitoring process;  To provide further guidance for documentation needed for.
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC OMNI CIRCULAR KEY AREA #1: TIME AND EFFORT STEVEN SPILLAN, ESQ. MIKE BENDER, ESQ. BRUSTEIN.
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC The Effort Required for Compensating Employees Tiffany R Winters, Esq. Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC
Subrecipient Monitoring and Common Findings By USDE Kristen Tosh Cowan, EsquireTiffany R. Winters, Esquire
Time and Effort Reporting: Documenting Employees’ Personnel Costs Kristen Tosh Cowan, Esq. Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC Fall Forum.
Fiscal Compliance for Title III Keisha Davis Monitoring & Compliance Section School Business Division
HOW TO DRAFT COMPLIANT POLICIES AND PROCEDURES BRETTE KAPLAN WURZBURG, ESQ. ERIN AUERBACH, ESQ. BRUSTEIN & MANASEVIT,
Brette Kaplan, Esq. Erin Auerbach, Esq. Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC Spring Forum 2013
Title I, Part A Preparing for Federal Program Monitoring Chris McLaughlin Virginia Department of Education Office of Program Administration and Accountability.
Fiscal Responsibility Webinar Title III Stephanie English, Chief Monitoring & Compliance Section School Business Division
What Laws Apply to Federal Grants: A Historical Perspective Leigh M. Manasevit, Esq. Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC Fall Forum 2011.
Timeliness, Indirect Costs and Other Requirements Under Part 75 Leigh Manasevit, Esq. Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC Spring Forum 2015.
Continuous Improvement and Focused Monitoring System US Department of Education Office of Special Education Programs Overview of the OSEP Continuous Improvement.
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC Effort Takes Time and Documentation MIKE BENDER, ESQ. BRUSTEIN & MANASEVIT, PLLC SPRING FORUM 2015.
On Site Review Process Office of Field Services.
On Site Review Process Office of Field Services Last Revised 8/15/2011.
Obligations, Tydings and Complying with Cash Management Requirements Michael Brustein, Esq. Brustein & Manasevit,
IDEA EQUITABLE SERVICES: SERVING PARENTALLY PLACED PRIVATE SCHOOL STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES Jennifer S. Mauskapf, Esq. Brustein &
DEVELOPING POLICIES AND PROCEDURES Brette Kaplan, Esq. Erin Auerbach, Esq. Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC Fall Forum.
Presented by: Jan Stanley, State Title I Director Office of Assessment and Accountability June 10, 2008 Monitoring For Results.
Kristen Tosh Cowan, Esq. Brustein & Manasevit PAFPC Conference April 5, 2011.
WELCOME - As you enter the room… Walk around, Read the posted questions, and Use the colored dots provided to select the four questions that are most important.
PUBLIC SCHOOLS OF NORTH CAROLINA STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION Fiscal Components of Monitoring Stephanie English, Chief Monitoring.
Leigh Manasevit, Esq. Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC Fall Forum
1 OSEP Verification Visits Fiscal Component FFY Office of Special Education Programs.
Child Support Director’s Association 2007 Training Conference Administrative Audits Presentation #107 September 18, 2007.
U.S. Department of Education Office of Special Education Programs Building the Legacy: IDEA General Supervision.
Grants Management Test for State and Local Educational Agencies
Allowability, Time & Effort Under the New EDGAR
Time and Effort Documentation Flexibility
The Importance of Subrecipient Monitoring
EDGAR OVERVIEW Michael L. Brustein, Esq.
Policies & Procedures A How-To Guide Bonnie Graham, Esq.
To Accountability…and Beyond
Managing Perkins Funds
Managing Federal grants
EDGAR 201 Steven A. Spillan, Esq.
Fiscal Compliance for Title III
Presentation transcript:

How to Prepare for a Federal Monitoring Visit (SASA/OSEP) Jennifer S. Mauskapf, Esq. Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC Fall Forum 2012

AGENDA Overview of the Monitoring Process SASA OSEP Preparing for a Monitoring Visit Common Findings Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC 2

OVERVIEW OF THE MONITORING PROCESS Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC 3

SASA Monitoring Covers… Title I, Part A Title I, Part D (Neglected, Delinquent, or At-Risk) Title X, Part C (McKinney-Vento Act/Homeless Program) Section 1003(g) School Improvement Grants (SIG) Title III, Part A Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC 4

OSEP ‘Monitoring’ Covers… Continuous Improvement Visits ame=OSEP+Continuous+Improvement+Visits ame=OSEP+Continuous+Improvement+Visits Results Component Stakeholder Input Process Verification Component r_name=CrEAGs-+Part+B r_name=CrEAGs-+Part+B Determinations. State Performance Plan (SPP) / Annual Performance Report (APR) Review Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC 5

Prior to Visit Desk monitoring of each State State contact gathers and analyzes data and information Information collected primarily through Web-based searches and document analysis Specific documentation requested from SEA Selection of LEAs Receipt of Agenda and List of ED Participants Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC 6

The Visit Itself HOW LONG? Typically one full week WHAT WILL ED BE DOING DURING THE VISIT? Review documentation not available prior to the trip Interview SEA and LEA staff, principals, teachers, parents, and other stakeholders Exit Conference Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC 7

Post-Visit – SASA-specific  DRAFT comprehensive monitoring report issued  To be issued within 35 business days of the on-site visit  SEA has 5 business days to review and provide technical edits and corrections  FINAL report issued  SEA Response  SEA has 30 business days to respond to any required actions  SASA sends a letter approving proposed actions or requiring revision/further action  May require close collaboration (e.g., CAPs) and/or follow-up visits  Significant compliance findings can lead to special conditions Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC 8

TOP 10 WAYS TO PREPARE FOR A MONITORING VISIT Preparation is the Key! Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC 9

1. Organizational Meeting Meet with Key Personnel All about Communication! Discuss program and areas that will be reviewed Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC 10

2. Select Main Visit Contact 1 Main Visit Contact Schedule meetings Ensure lead personnel schedules clear Organize travel requests / information (as requested by SASA) Schedule visits to schools (as requested by SASA) Schedule conference calls with SASA prior to visit Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC 11

3. Select Main Interview Contacts A representative should be appointed as lead interviewer for each program (and topic) as appropriate Title I, Part A Title I, Part D – Neglected, Delinquent or At-Risk Title X, C - McKinney-Vento Title III, Part A SIG IDEA Results These representatives must know who should be present for each indicator and where all documentation is located! Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC 12

4. Select Meeting Place Want meeting place separate from main offices so that all parties can remain focused Don’t completely isolate All personnel should have cleared scheduled and be ready to participate as necessary Organized by the applicable lead contact Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC 13

5. Complete Monitoring Documents Complete the Actual Monitoring Document the Monitors will be using! Put your best foot forward Narrative Form How? Answer the Question Being Asked! Respond to correct fiscal year! Include Specific Citations as appropriate. Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC 14

5. Complete Monitoring Documents (cont.) OSEP: Critical Elements Analysis Guide (CrEAG) Part B Gen. Supervision Fiscal Systems SASA Monitoring Plan for Formula Grant Programs SIG: Application Process, Implementation, Fiscal, Technical Assistance, Monitoring, Data Collection Title I Team Title I-A Fiduciary Title I-D McKinney-Vento Title III-A: Monitoring of Subgrantees; Standards, Assessments & Accountability, Instructional Support, Fiduciary Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC 15

5. Complete Monitoring Documents (cont.) OSEP’s CrEAG Format Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC 16

5. Complete Monitoring Documents (cont.) SIG Format Title I & Title III Team Format Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC 17

6. Organize Documentation Corresponding Binders Tabbed! Organized! Complete Examples! Connect-the-Dots! Copies for yourself Include any additional documents given to SASA during the visit Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC 18

7. Mock SASA Visit Practice Makes Perfect! (sort of) Take the monitoring instrument and review the current system in place Interview selected personnel (“test”) CONDUCT PRIOR TO VISIT Chance to change systems as needed! Chance to create corrective action plans and begin implementation as needed! Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC 19

8. Be Prepared to Address Noncompliance Be prepared to address any corrective action plan already created or implemented. If no corrective action plan then attempt to create a plan prior to SASA’s arrival. Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC 20

9. Review Findings From Your State Review old monitoring reports Special Conditions State Plans Did you complete everything you said you would? Review audits Including A-133 Single Audit Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC 21

10. Review Monitoring Findings In Other States Title I & Title III Reports ( ): s12/index.html s12/index.html SIG Reports: OSEP Continuous Improvement Letters: date.html date.html Review reports to identify focus areas, trends in findings. Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC 22

COMMON FINDINGS ACROSS THE BOARD Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC 23

Written Policies and Procedures Conflicting policies Out-of-date policies Non-existent policies  If you have to explain how something is done without being able to point to a clear and current written policy or procedure, you probably have some work to do!!! Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC 24

Notification Requirements Timeliness Required Items Public Reporting Examples: Title I-A: Annual LEA Report Card, HQT Status Letter, School Improvement Status, SES and Choice Notice Title III: Student Identification, AMAO Determination IDEA: Procedural Safeguards, Stakeholder Input for SPP/APR Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC 25

Fiduciary Timely review and approval of LEA applications Timely allocation of subgrants Period of availability of funds to LEAs Process for Reallocating Funds Timely Obligation and Liquidation Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC 26

Fiduciary Ensuring Funds are Used for Allowable Uses Consistent with Federal Cost Principles? Consistent with EDGAR? Consistent with program-specific rules? How does SEA/LEA ensure and document allowability? Program-specific Fiscal Rules MOE Supplement not Supplant Caps Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC 27

Fiduciary – High Dollar Areas of Concern Procurement Property / Inventory Management Time Distribution Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC 28

EDGAR Procurement Rules Section of EDGAR All procurement transactions must be conducted with full and open competition Conflict of Interest: Must have written code of conduct for all employees engaged in contract award and administration Must have protest procedures to handle disputes Follow Procurement Rules!!! Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC 29

Inventory Management: Common Problems Determining between “equipment” and “supply” Determining level of control over item Tracking non-equipment items Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC 30

Equipment Rules Section of EDGAR Must have adequate controls in place to account for: Location of equipment Custody of equipment Security of equipment Property records Description, serial number or other ID, title information, acquisition date, cost, percent of federal participation, location, use and condition, and disposition (if applicable) Physical inventory Must be performed at least every 2 years Control system to prevent loss, damage and theft All incidents must be investigated Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC 31

Equipment Rules (cont.) Must protect against unauthorized use May use for other projects as long as use is incidental and does not interfere with authorized use When property is no longer needed, must follow disposition rules: Transfer to another federal program Over $5,000 – Keep or sell, but must pay a share based on the percentage of federal ED participation at initial acquisition Under $5,000 – May keep, sell, or dispose of it with no obligation to ED Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC 32

Supplies Section of EDGAR Supplies are everything else Do not cost much money Used fairly quickly Examples: pens, paper, toner, laptops EDGAR does not set out any specific tracking requirements As a practical matter, ED expects subgrantees to track all property purchased with federal funds, in order to prove there has been an allocable benefit to the federal program Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC 33

Time Distribution Selected Items of Cost: Salaries and Wages Allowable if proper time distribution records Time Distribution Records must be maintained for all employees whose salaries are: Paid in whole or in part with federal funds Used to meet a match/cost share requirement Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC 34

Time Distribution – Common Problems Proper Identification of “Cost Objective(s)” Completion of Required Documentation PAR vs. Semi-annual Certification Correct Signatory? Correct Time Period? Time reported add up to 100% time worked? Signed after-the-fact? Quarterly Reconciliations Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC 35

Equitable Services Timely and Meaningful Consultation LEA Maintaining Control Program Funds—no reimbursement! Property—tags, inventory Evaluation of Services Identification of Eligible Students Administration Costs NOT Charged Against Equitable Services Set-Aside Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC 36

Subrecipient Monitoring Comprehensive Monitoring Protocol Follow-up procedures to ensure corrective actions taken to address compliance issues Linking Monitoring Findings with Technical Assistance Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC 37

RESOURCES  SASA Monitoring Protocol  Title I & Title III Reports ( ):  SIG Reports:  Continuous Improvement Visit Page _name=OSEP+Continuous+Improvement+Visits _name=OSEP+Continuous+Improvement+Visits  OSEP Continuous Improvement Letters:  Part B SPP and APR Determination Letters: Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC 38

Questions? Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC 39

This presentation is intended solely to provide general information and does not constitute legal advice. Attendance at the presentation or later review of these printed materials does not create an attorney-client relationship with Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC. You should not take any action based upon any information in this presentation without first consulting legal counsel familiar with your particular circumstances. Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC 40 Disclaimer