SEDAR 42: US Gulf of Mexico Red grouper assessment Review Workshop Data inputs SEFSC July 14 - 16, 2015.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
History, Problems and Recommended Solutions Fisheries Data Collection in Puerto Rico and the US Virgin Islands Puerto Rico DNER USVI Department of Fish.
Advertisements

MANAGEMENT ALTERNATIVES 4.1 ACTION 1: Amend the Stock Complexes in the Reef Fish Fishery Management Units (FMU) Action 1(a) Grouper units Alternative.
Stock Assessment for Central Southern Management Area (CSMA) Striped Bass Stocks Marine Fisheries Commission Business Meeting February 11, 2011.
 Background › The SSC recommended OFL = average or median catch for most species/species groups and ABC = OFL. › The CFMC asked the SSC to consider withdrawing.
Amendment 5 to the 2006 Consolidated Atlantic Highly Migratory Species Fishery Management Plan: Issues and Options Highly Migratory Species Management.
Determining relative selectivity of the gulf menhaden commercial fishery and fishery independent gill net data Southeast Fisheries Science Center Amy M.
Urban Coast Institute Monmouth University June 15-16, 2009 Presented by DiLorenzo, Tiedemann, Danko.
A Standard Method to Apportion Sector Catch to Stock Area Michael Palmer Northeast Fisheries Science Center.
Black Sea Bass – Northern Stock Coastal-Pelagic/ASMFC Working Group Review June 15, 2010.
Key approaches that will inform the development of the research include Chai (1991), Casey (1996), Harley (2000), Dingsør (2001), Palsson (2003), McBride.
Fishery-Dependent Data Collection Presentation for Our Florida Reefs Community Working Groups Southeast Fisheries Science Center May 2014 James A. Bohnsack,
ACL Scoping Document CFMC3/24/09-3/26/09. Action 1: Amending the Stock Complexes in the Reef Fish Fishery Management Unit.
Data reporting Compliance workshop: Collection and reporting of Fisheries data to IOTC Mauritius, March 2014.
An overview of the 2014 Gulf of Maine cod stock assessment Michael Palmer Northeast Fisheries Science Center National Marine Fisheries Service 166 Water.
SSC Report to CFMC 148 th CFMC Meeting held December 11-12, 2013 SSC Meeting held November 12-14, 2013.
The (potential) value and use of empirical estimates of selectivity in integrated assessments John Walter, Brian Linton, Will Patterson and Clay Porch.
Time-Varying vs. Non-Time- Varying Growth in the Gulf of Mexico King Mackerel Stock Assessment: a Case Study Southeast Fisheries Science Center Jeff Isely,
NOAA Fisheries Dr. Jim Berkson, Dr. Yan Jiao Paige Barlow, Bonnie Coggins, Christopher Hayes, Melissa Hedges, Eliza Heery, James Thorson Biased length.
Development and Implementation of a Monitoring Program for Mark-selective Chinook Salmon Fisheries in Puget Sound, Washington Washington Department of.
Pacific Coast Groundfish Bycatch Management for Protected Species Implementing NOAA Fisheries’ Biological Opinion West Coast Region Alison Agness 1, Steve.
OPTIONS FOR AMENDMENT 2 TO THE FMP FOR THE QUEEN CONCH FISHERY OF PUERTO RICO AND THE U.S. VIRGIN ISLANDS AND AMENDMENT 5 TO THE REEF FISH FMP OF PUERTO.
History, Problems, and Recommended Solutions Fisheries Data Collection Improvements in Puerto Rico and the US Virgin Islands Puerto Rico DNER USVI Department.
SEFSC Research Progress and Objectives IAC Spring Meeting April 7-9, 2010.
Dr. John Dindo, Dauphin Island Sea Lab
Marine Recreational Information Program Update Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council April 9, 2013 Rob Andrews Office of Science and Technology.
Where does my data go? Preparation of files for the assessments of IOTC stocks and use of data for the assessments of IOTC species Mauritius, March.
West Coast Region September 12-14, 2015 Salmon Consultation on the Pacific Coast Groundfish Fishery: Salmon Consultation on the Pacific Coast Groundfish.
STFA/SCCFA/CFMC Spiny Lobster Project David Olsen, STFA Josh Nowlis, Bridge Environment Daryl Bryan, STFA Funded by Caribbean Fishery Management Council.
October 26, 2015 Cumulative effects of Amendment 31 regulations upon effective effort impacting sea turtle takes in the Gulf of Mexico reef fish bottom.
STANDARDIZATION OF CPUE FROM ALEUTIAN ISLANDS GOLDEN KING CRAB FISHERY OBSERVER DATA M.S.M. Siddeek 1, J. Zheng 1, Doug Pengilly 2, and Gretchen Bishop.
Summer Flounder Review of 2015 Management Measures August 13, 2014.
June 3, 2016 Research & Monitoring Activities. 2 Overview Research — Exempted Fishing Permits (EFPs)/Scientific Research Permits (SRPs) — Selected Research.
. Assessment of the Icelandic cod stock Björn Ævarr Steinarsson Marine Research Institute.
New Jersey Voluntary Angler Survey(s) Jeff Brust and Maryellen Gordon NJ Division of Fish and Wildlife Volunteer Angler Survey Workshop Baltimore, MD February.
ICES Advice for 2015 – Sea bass Carmen Fernández, ICES ACOM vice-chair For Inter AC Sea bass workshop (Paris, May 26, 2015)
MARFIN & Saltonstall-Kennedy, and SEFSC Projects in Puerto Rico and the Virgin Islands SEFSC Bonnie J. Ponwith, Ph.D. CFMC August, 2015.
SCRS Assessments of Western Atlantic Bluefin Tuna Clay E. Porch Southeast Fisheries Science Center U.S. National Marine Fisheries Service.
Overview of Restructured Observer Program and Observer Fees Alaska Region.
Amendment 5: Gulf of Mexico and Atlantic Shark Rebuilding Measures Proposed Rule December 19, 2012.
Jennifer M. Marsh M.S. Fisheries Student School of Fisheries and Ocean Sciences University of Alaska Fairbanks.
GIANNOULAKI M., SOMARAKIS S., MACHIAS A., SIAPATIS A., PAPACONSTANTINOU C. Hellenic Centre for Marine Research, PO Box 2214, Iraklion 71003, Greece Department.
Overview of Observer Fees Alaska Region. New Observer Program Full Coverage At least 100% coverage on every trip Vessels pays daily observer cost (“pay.
Fisheries 101: Modeling and assessments to achieve sustainability Training Module July 2013.
Steve Gaines Bren School of Environmental Science & Management Sustainable Fisheries Group UC Santa Barbara12 May 2011.
Is there a ‘cryptic biomass’ of relatively old and large red snapper in southeast US continental shelf-break waters?
Citizen Science as an Integral Component of Reef Fish Research and Monitoring Efforts Along Florida's Atlantic Coast Justin J. Solomon, Russell G. Brodie,
Northeast Cooperative Research Fishery Dependent Data: Observer and Study Fleet programs Presented by John J. Hoey, Ph.D. Director, Cooperative Research.
SEDAR 42: US Gulf of Mexico Red grouper assessment Review Workshop Introduction SEFSC July , 2015.
Use of dynamic factor analysis to estimate trends in abundance of upper trophic level species Michael Scott Sherburne Cassidy D Peterson Robert J Latour.
Scallop Dive (Port Phillip Bay) Fishery Cover photo - PMSS COMMERCIAL SCALLOP DIVE FISHERY - PORT PHILLIP BAY Results of the Fishery-Independent Dive Survey.
Economics of the West Coast Groundfish Trawl Catch Share Program Erin Steiner, Amanda Warlick, Marie Guldin, Lisa Pfeiffer, Jerry Leonard Economic and.
Yellowfin Tuna Major Changes Catch, effort, and length-frequency data for the surface fisheries have been updated to include new data for 2005.
Application of Data-Limited Methods (SEDAR 46) and Potential Use for Management Shannon L. Cass-Calay, Nancie Cummings, Skyler Sagarese, Tom Carruthers.
U.S. Department of Commerce National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration NOAA Fisheries A Priority in motion at NOAA Recreational Fisheries.
1 PIRO’s Pelagic Ecosystem Management Needs PIFSC External Science Review April 5, 2016.
Data requirement of stock assessment. Data used in stock assessments can be classified as fishery-dependent data or fishery-independent data. Fishery-dependent.
CPUE analysis methods, progress and plans for 2011 Simon Hoyle.
Caribbean Fishery Management Council 154 th Meeting December St. Thomas/St. John Fishery Management Plan – Draft Actions and Alternatives.
Goliath Grouper South Atlantic Fishery Management Council Scientific and Statistical Committee meeting April 6, 2011.
Exempted Fishing Permit (EFP) Application Applicant: Puerto Rico Department of Natural and Environmental Resources (PR DNER) 156 th Caribbean Fishery Management.
History of the Marine Recreational Fisheries Statistical Survey (MRFSS) in the United States Virgin Islands (USVI) U.S. Virgin Islands Marine Recreational.
Rebuilding Gulf of Mexico Red Snapper: Does the single-stock hypothesis provide sufficient protection against overfishing? South East Fisheries Science.
8.7 SAI Sailfish Few changes from 2006 Executive Summary because of the absence of new assessment.
General Framework and Specialized Approaches to Monitoring U. S
Modular Approach to logbook in the WECAFC Region
Longline CPUE standardization: IATTC 2006
ICES Advice for 2015 – Sea bass
Extract from the REPORT OF THE 6th MEETING OF THE CCSBT STOCK ASSESSMENT GROUP AND THE 10th MEETING OF THE SCIENTIFIC COMMITTEE Taipei, 28 Aug – 9 Sep.
Effects of Catch-at-Age Sample Size on Gulf of Mexico Gray Triggerfish Spawning Stock Biomass Estimates Jeff Isely SEFSC Miami.
ACL Scoping Document CFMC 3/24/09-3/26/09.
Presentation transcript:

SEDAR 42: US Gulf of Mexico Red grouper assessment Review Workshop Data inputs SEFSC July , 2015

SEDAR 42 Red Grouper Assessment Data inputs Assessment model configuration Model fit to data Model diagnostics Stock status determination Projections U.S. Department of Commerce | National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration | NOAA Fisheries | Page 2

Data inputs Landings Handline: Longline: Trap: Charter/Headboat/Private: Discards Handline: (observer program)* Longline: (observer program)* Trap: (self reported)* Charter/Headboat/Private: Length composition of discards Handline: (observer program) Longline: (observer program) Charter: (observer program) Headboat: , (observer program) Age composition of retained catch Handline: Longline: Charter/Headboat/Private: U.S. Department of Commerce | National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration | NOAA Fisheries | Page 3 Abundance indices Handline: ** Longline: ** Charter/Private: Headboat: Combined video survey: , 2002, *** SEAMAP summer groundfish survey: NMFS bottom longline survey: 2001, Length composition of fishery-independent indices Combined video survey: SEAMAP summer groundfish survey: NMFS bottom longline survey:

U.S. Department of Commerce | National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration | NOAA Fisheries | Page 4 Data inputs

Landings Commercial Fleets Handline ( ) Longline ( ) Trap ( ) Recreational Fleets Charter/Private: (1986 – 2013) Headboat: (1986 – 2013) U.S. Department of Commerce | National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration | NOAA Fisheries | Page 5

Commercial landings Data Sources Accumulated landings system (ALS) Florida trip ticket Florida landings Individual Fishing Quota (IFQ) Program Landings in IFQ years U.S. Department of Commerce | National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration | NOAA Fisheries | Page 6

Mean annual commercial trips by area U.S. Department of Commerce | National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration | NOAA Fisheries | Page

Mean annual commercial landings by area U.S. Department of Commerce | National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration | NOAA Fisheries | Page

Commercial landings Longline predominant fishery followed by handline and trap Longline and handline landings similar at start and end of time-series Longline landings ~2x greater than handline between 1993 and 2005 Trap landings drop to zero after 2006 Outlawed fishing practice U.S. Department of Commerce | National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration | NOAA Fisheries | Page 9

Recreational landings Data sources: Marine Recreational Fisheries Statistics Survey (MRFSS) and Marine Recreational Information Program (MRIP) Provides estimates for all recreational modes except headboat after 1986 Covers Florida to Louisiana Southeast Region Headboat Survey (SRHS) logbook program U.S. Department of Commerce | National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration | NOAA Fisheries | Page 10

Recreational landings Majority of recreational landings are from the Charter/Private fleet Charter/Private landings show high variability with periods of higher and lower average landings U.S. Department of Commerce | National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration | NOAA Fisheries | Page 11

Commercial and recreational landings Predominant fleets are commercial longline and handline, and recreational charter/private ~76% commercial ~24% recreational U.S. Department of Commerce | National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration | NOAA Fisheries | Page 12 Avg ~ 43% Avg ~ 26% Avg ~ 22.5% Avg ~ 0.9% Avg ~ 7.2%

Discards Commercial Trap Commercial HL & LL Recreational Charter/Private Recreational Headboat U.S. Department of Commerce | National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration | NOAA Fisheries | Page 13

Commercial Trap Discards ( ) Self-reported effort Self-reported discard rate Method from SEDAR12 update (2009) Discards = Self. Reported Rate * Annual Total Effort (by strata: targeting only significant factor/strata in GLM) : Average rate for : Annual rates U.S. Department of Commerce | National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration | NOAA Fisheries | Page 14

Preliminary estimates based on SEDAR update Commercial HL and LL Discards ( ) Self-reported total effort Observed discard rate Preliminary discard estimation method: Discards = Obs. Discards Rate * Annual Total Effort (by strata: gear, area, size limit, season, allocation, depth) : Average rates for (Pre-IFQ) : Annual rates U.S. Department of Commerce | National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration | NOAA Fisheries | Page 15

Preliminary estimates based on SEDAR update Commercial HL and LL Discards ( ) Discards = Obs. Discards Rate * Annual Total Effort DW recommended exploring total effort To do so, calculated observer landings were compared to official estimated landings for HL and LL (next slide): Obs. Calculated landings = Obs. Kept Rate * Total Effort Based on results, HL and LL estimates of total effort were deemed unreliable U.S. Department of Commerce | National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration | NOAA Fisheries | Page 16

Preliminary estimates based on SEDAR update Commercial HL and LL Discards ( ) Official landings compared to calculated landings Obs. Calculated landings = Obs. Kept Rate * Total Effort U.S. Department of Commerce | National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration | NOAA Fisheries | Page 17 ~ 5x ~ 2/3 most years

Commercial HL and LL Discards ( ) Official landings by strata Observer discard and kept rates Current discard estimation method: (by strata: year, subregion, season, fishery, allocation) : Average rates for (Pre-IFQ) : Annual rates U.S. Department of Commerce | National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration | NOAA Fisheries | Page 18

Commercial HL and LL Discards ( ) Strata : subregion, season, fishery : year, subregion, season, fishery, allocation U.S. Department of Commerce | National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration | NOAA Fisheries | Page 19 Subregion East, West Season Open season, Closed Season IFQ allocation None, 1+ Pounds, applicable to only Fishery shark or reef fish, applicable to bottom longline only Commercial discards for present assessment were substantially higher than commercial discards in previous assessments.

Commercial HL and LL Discards ( ) Compared to 2009 SEDAR Estimates ( ) New method leads to larger estimated of discards High discards are supported by high discard fractions on observed trips U.S. Department of Commerce | National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration | NOAA Fisheries | Page 20

Commercial discards Longline over 50% of annual discards Except 2009 and 2010 At its highest in 1996, trap 22% of annual discards U.S. Department of Commerce | National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration | NOAA Fisheries | Page 21

Recreational Charter/Private Discards ( ) Self-reported discards : estimated/adjusted in the same manner as self-reported landings U.S. Department of Commerce | National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration | NOAA Fisheries | Page 22

Recreational Headboat Discards ( ) Self-reported landings/discards CB proxy Self-reported HB discards and landings Observed data : Self-reported discards validated by obs. data : Charterboat proxy: U.S. Department of Commerce | National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration | NOAA Fisheries | Page

Recreational Discards U.S. Department of Commerce | National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration | NOAA Fisheries | Page 24

Discards U.S. Department of Commerce | National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration | NOAA Fisheries | Page 25 49%53% 12%18% 33%26% 1.5%0% 4%2.5% ‘93-’06‘07-13

Discard Mortality FleetData SourceDiscard RateSensitivity Rates Recreational FleetsFWC Obs. Program11.6% 5.8%, 14.5% Commercial HLFWC Obs. Program (41-50m only)19%10.0%, 31.0% Commercial LL Pre-IFQNMFS Obs. Program41.4%34.3%, 48.7% Commercial LL Post-IFQNMFS Obs. Program43.6%36.7%, 50.8% Commercial Trap*SEDAR update 2009*10% U.S. Department of Commerce | National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration | NOAA Fisheries | Page 26 *No new data on discard mortality rates available. 10% used in past assessments (2002, 2006, and 2009) FWC Observer Program NMFS Observer Program

Indices of abundance Indices working group recommended four fishery- dependent indices and three fishery-independent indices for use in the assessment model U.S. Department of Commerce | National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration | NOAA Fisheries | Page 27

Indices of abundance U.S. Department of Commerce | National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration | NOAA Fisheries | Page 28 Fishery-dependent Commercial handline ( ) Commercial longline ( ) Charter/Private ( ) Headboat ( ) Fishery-independent SEAMAP summer groundfish survey: NMFS bottom longline survey: 2001, Combined video survey: , 2002, SEAMAP video: , 2002, PC Lab video: FWRI video: PC lab video FWRI video SEAMAP video Fishery-dependent indices, SEAMAP summer groundfish, & NMFS bottom longline

Fishery-dependent indices U.S. Department of Commerce | National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration | NOAA Fisheries | Page 29

Indices Fishery-dependent U.S. Department of Commerce | National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration | NOAA Fisheries | Page 30

Fishery-independent indices U.S. Department of Commerce | National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration | NOAA Fisheries | Page 31

Indices Fishery-independent U.S. Department of Commerce | National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration | NOAA Fisheries | Page 32

Age composition Data sources Commercial fleets ( ) Trip Interview Program (TIP) Recreational fleets ( ) MRFSS/MRIP SRHS GulfFIN TIP U.S. Department of Commerce | National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration | NOAA Fisheries | Page 33

Age composition U.S. Department of Commerce | National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration | NOAA Fisheries | Page 34 Commercial HandlineCommercial LonglineCommercial Trap Charter/PrivateHeadboat

U.S. Department of Commerce | National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration | NOAA Fisheries | Page 35 Age composition Cohort Commercial HandlineCommercial LonglineCommercial Trap Charter/PrivateHeadboat 1988, 1995, 1998, 2001, , 2001, , 1995, 1998, , 1998, 2005

Length composition Data Sources Discards NMFS Observer Program Commercial handline ( ) Commercial longline ( ) FWRI At-Sea Observer Survey Charter ( ) Headboat ( , ) Fishery-independent surveys Video surveys (2008 – 2013) SEAMAP summer groundifsh survey ( ) NMFS bottom longline survey ( ) U.S. Department of Commerce | National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration | NOAA Fisheries | Page 36

Length composition - discards U.S. Department of Commerce | National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration | NOAA Fisheries | Page inch TL size limit 18 inch TL size limit Commercial HandlineCommercial Longline IFQ program CharterHeadboat

Length composition – Fishery independent surveys U.S. Department of Commerce | National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration | NOAA Fisheries | Page 38 Combined video 20 – 100 cm FL SEAMAP summer groundfish 0 – 80 cm FL NMFS bottom longline 30 – 90 cm FL

EXTRA SLIDES U.S. Department of Commerce | National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration | NOAA Fisheries | Page 39

Combined video index Standardization method Poisson sub-model for nonzero data Binomial sub-model for presence-absence data U.S. Department of Commerce | National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration | NOAA Fisheries | Page 40 PC Lab FWRI SEAMAP

Standardization methods Delta-lognormal model (Lo et al., 1992 ) Commercial handline Charter/Private Headboat SEAMAP summer groundfish survey NMFS bottom longline survey Lognormal model Commercial longline (high proportion of positive trips) Delta-Poisson model Combined video survey U.S. Department of Commerce | National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration | NOAA Fisheries | Page 41

Indices U.S. Department of Commerce | National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration | NOAA Fisheries | Page 42 commHLcommLLMRFSSHBVideoNMFS_BLLSEAMAP_GF commHL 1 commLL CBT_PR HB Video NMFS-BLL SEAMAP- GF

Discard Fractions Discard fractions from commercial observer data: LL: depending on strata HL: depending on strata Discard fractions calculated from annual recreational landings and discards estimates HB: 0.88 mean annual fraction discarded CBT/PRI: 0.31 mean annual fraction discarded U.S. Department of Commerce | National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration | NOAA Fisheries | Page 43