Organizational Excellence Group UT Austin www.survey.utexas.edu The Real Value ($) in Employee Engagement Surveys Organizational Excellence Group UT –

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Attitudes Cognitive component The opinion or belief segment of an attitude. Attitudes Evaluative statements or judgments concerning objects, people, or.
Advertisements

Strategic Human Resource Management
The institute for employment studies Motivation and Reward: presentation to e.reward conference Peter Reilly.
CLEAR 2008 Annual Conference Anchorage, Alaska “Promoting Regulatory Excellence Through Surveying” Bob E. Hayes, Ph.D President Business Over Broadway.
The Power of Employee Engagement
© Copyright 2012 Avatar HR Solutions Employee Engagement: The Prescription for a Healthy Patient Journey Kevin Sheridan Senior Vice President – HR Optimization.
Organizational Behavior
John Supra & Nathan Strong October 2012 Using HR Metrics to Support Strategic Planning/Employee Development.
Your Speaker Today Mike Phillips Director of Feedback Strategy
Employee Engagement Sample Results. 2 Defining Employee Engagement Employee Engagement is a critical measure of person-organization alignment Engaged.
EMPLOYEE ENGAGEMENT Meet the HR Management Team New Faculty & Staff Event BRAVO! Employee Recognition First Faculty & Staff Night.
PCCYFS 2012 Annual Spring Conference Engaging, Motivating and Inspiring Top Performance Presented By: Robin Stricoff.
Hamtramck Employee Engagement Leadership Initiative.
1-1 Human Resource Management Gaining a Competitive Advantage Chapter 10 Employee Separation and Retention McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2008 by The McGraw-Hill.
UGA Libraries Compensation Satisfaction Consulting Project Carrie McCleese Starr Daniell.
Job Satisfaction.
Boosting Employee Morale While Maintaining Superior Customer Relations Chris Rossi.
© Development Dimensions Int’l, Inc., MMIII. All rights reserved. 1 Jim Thomas, Ph.D. Manager, Consulting Services January 17, 2003 Competency-based Selection.
Organizational Strategy & HRM Effectiveness Competitive strategies and HRM effectiveness Behavioral costing and HRM effectiveness High performance work.
THE BALANCED SCORECARD
Managing Human Resources Why Have Staff? Why Have Staff? - To advance the objectives and the mission of the organization - To advance the objectives and.
Calculating ROI: & Ensuring that OD Initiatives Provide Measurable Results… May, 2005.
Why Employee Engagement is Must?. What is Employee Engagement?  Employee engagement is a workplace approach designed to ensure that employees are committed.
501 Commons: A resource for nonprofits. A partner for philanthropy Offered by: Sherwood Trust & Nonprofit Learning Center Presented by: 501 Commons & BMHRA.
How to Find Out if Your Employees are Actively Engaged in Their Work
Customer Focus and Managing Customer Loyalty Chapter One M arket-Based Management, 4 th edition.
How to transform your company … and retain your best people.
Tulane University 1 Tulane University Employee Satisfaction Survey Results October 2012.
CREATING TRANSFERRABLE WEALTH THROUGH STRENGTHS AND ENGAGED MANAGEMENT Jim Downing, PhD Executive Leadership Resources, Inc. January 2, 2013.
Attracting appropriate user funding in the context of declining public funding.
© 2007 Towers Perrin Does being a Top Employer make a difference in employee engagement? How - And Why - Top Employers Are Building An Oasis for Talent.
The Adapted Balanced Scorecard. Kaplan’s Adaptation of the Balanced Scorecard Framework to Nonprofit Organizations Financial Perspective If we succeed,
Tiered Employment A Smart Recruitment, Retention and Self-Sufficiency Strategy.
CUPA HR “Embracing Change: Staying Ahead of the Curve” Keeping Employees Engaged in a Changing Workplace Noel Landuyt
H uman A ssets Transcending Horizons…. Saarthi Driving Performance… Transcending Horizons Human Assets.
Presented by: Karen Gauthier
H uman A ssets Transcending Horizons… HR Consulting.
Managerial Case Study 1 By Amy Albaugh, Michael Bolin, Yonathan Garnelo, Jason Contino.
3. What business ? Most Compelling Investment? One Effective Way to Lead in the Mid Market.
C ALCULATING ROI. Why do we Calculate ROI? TO ENURE THAT OD INITIAVES PROVIDE MEASUREABLE RESULTS!
1 ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR STEPHEN P. ROBBINS Chapter 3 Attitudes and Job Satisfaction Reporter: Yen-Jen Angela Chen 2007/09/20.
Interactive Training Skills: Evaluation Study Executive Summary Presentation Service Merchandise Company Date: Wednesday, April 6, 2011 CONFIDENTIAL Consultants:
10/23/2015 Human Resources A Comprehensive Approach.
T HE G ALLUP O RGANIZATION 1 Managing Employee Engagement in this Crisis Copyright © 2009 The Gallup Organization, Princeton, NJ. All rights reserved.
Connecting Employee Engagement to Business Performance.
Engagement and the Generations HEABC Annual Conference 25 June 2007.
ORBChapter 31 ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR Chapter 3 Attitudes & Job Satisfaction.
Cost Neutral Incentives For Human Service Employees by David Keegan.
International Conference “ АDDRESSING QUALITY OF WORK IN EUROPE”, October 2012 Employees` engagement – effects on business performance and main drivers.
Human Resource Management
Copyright 2004 ROI Institute, Inc. how me the money! Moving from Impact to ROI Patti Phillips, Ph.D.
Employee Engagement: The Key to Organizational Success
Workshop on the adaption of a Strategic Human Resource Plan for the Tourism Industry 12 Sep 2011 On the Job Training Efforts – Training Investment for.
THE BUSINESS BENEFITS OF MANAGEMENT AND LEADERSHIP DEVELOPMENT. THE BUSINESS BENEFITS OF MANAGEMENT & LEADERSHIP DEVELOPMENT, CMI, FEB 2012.
How to Be a Great Partner! Steve Erickson National Consultant to CPA Firms.
1. Development Planning and Administration MPA – 403 Lecture 15 FACILITATOR Prof. Dr. Mohammad Majid Mahmood Bagram.
Key Fact 1: Relevancy and Frequency Microsoft Office Applications are relevant to IW jobs and used frequently. U.S. Workforce Analysis 1 Total Employment:
Workplace Flexibility: An Opportunity. 61% 81% 20% +
1 P-CMM ® INITIATIVE Overview. 2 B A D C Improving Organisation Organisational Capability Technology ProcessPeople.
Welcome.  A workforce that understands, supports and embraces mission, vision, goals, values and focus  Employees driven to contribute to the success.
© 2007 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved. Attitudes and Job Satisfaction Chapter Four.
D. Randall Brandt, Ph.D. Vice President Customer Experience & Loyalty The Customer Experience Trust Factor Do You Know How Well Your Employees Are Delivering.
0 Response to Request For Information Bergen Brunswig Corporation W W W. W A T S O N W Y A T T. C O M Financial Executives International Linking HR Practices.
Balanced Scorecard The University of Texas at El Paso Division of the Vice President for Business Affairs.
Brian Patrick EDLS Theory X?Theory Y?  Public Service Motivation: 1. Targets those best suited for public service 2. Increases employee retention.
The Denison Organizational Culture Model & Link to Performance
Engagement Matters: How Engaged Is Your Team & Why Knowing is Critical to Your Success? OSIYO GROUP: LEIGH A. MCGEE, CO-FOUNDER & PRINCIPAL 2016 NATIONAL.
Employee Engagement Sample Results
HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT
WORKFORCE PLANNING AT CHISHOLM INSTITUTE
Presentation transcript:

Organizational Excellence Group UT Austin The Real Value ($) in Employee Engagement Surveys Organizational Excellence Group UT – Austin Noel Landuyt, PhD

Organizational Excellence Group UT Austin About Us Organizational Excellence Group Group of researchers, consultants, data management and organizational specialist at the Univ. of Tx at Austin Working with Government, Industry, and non-profit sector for over 40 years. Dr. Noel Landuyt Actively work with state and local governmental entities in across all sectors. Teach and consult in areas of non-profit management, human resources, organizational theory, and survey research.

Organizational Excellence Group UT Austin 3 Key Engagement Strategies

Organizational Excellence Group UT Austin What is Engagement? Fully Engaged Passively Engaged Disengaged Actively Disengaged

Organizational Excellence Group UT Austin Why Employee Engagement? Industry Standard Service Standard

Organizational Excellence Group UT Austin LOW Engagement Costs Financial Reasons Why?

Organizational Excellence Group UT Austin How Do We Know This? Customer Public Service Value Chain Employees Leadership Organization

Organizational Excellence Group UT Austin Profit & Growth Loyalty Value People Where Did it Come From? Service Value Chain

Organizational Excellence Group UT Austin Public Service Value Chain Benefits Customer Employees Leadership Organization Clarity of Mission/Purpose Stronger Leadership Retention of Key Personnel Organizational Wide Focus {

Organizational Excellence Group UT Austin Public Service Value Chain Benefits Customer Employees Leadership Organization Clarity of Mission/Purpose Higher Rates of Satisfaction Retention/Effectiveness Better Customer Service {

Organizational Excellence Group UT Austin Public Service Value Chain Benefits Customer Employees Leadership Organization Public Confidence Trust Fewer Complaints No Negative Story {

Organizational Excellence Group UT Austin Employee Engagement Customer Employees Leadership Organization

Organizational Excellence Group UT Austin Why This Area? Customer Employees Leadership Organization Retention Absenteeism Performance Linkage Customer Linkage {

Organizational Excellence Group UT Austin What We Measured

Organizational Excellence Group UT Austin What We Look At

Organizational Excellence Group UT Austin Case Study Profile Governmental Organization Approximately 1000 FTE Coordinating and Regulatory Highly Educated Workforce

Organizational Excellence Group UT Austin Case Study Con’t Utilization of Sick Leave Turnover Survey of Organizational Excellence Items Strongly Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Disagree Agree Divided into 2 Groups

Organizational Excellence Group UT Austin Findings: Pride In Work No Real Difference (5 hours) Group Average # of Hours of Sick Leave Utilization Dissatisfied63 Satisfied58

Organizational Excellence Group UT Austin Findings: Benefits No Real Difference (5 hours) Group Average # of Hours of Sick Leave Utilization Dissatisfied64 Satisfied59

Organizational Excellence Group UT Austin Findings: Supervision Difference of 22 hours Group Average # of Hours of Sick Leave Utilization Dissatisfied80 Satisfied58

Organizational Excellence Group UT Austin Findings: Organizational Mission Difference of 24 hours Group Average # of Hours of Sick Leave Utilization Dissatisfied81 Satisfied57

Organizational Excellence Group UT Austin Findings: Pay Difference of 24 hours Group Average # of Hours of Sick Leave Utilization Dissatisfied74 Satisfied50

Organizational Excellence Group UT Austin Findings: Job Satisfaction Difference of 28 hours Group Average # of Hours of Sick Leave Utilization Dissatisfied84 Satisfied56

Organizational Excellence Group UT Austin Findings: Valued Employee Group Average # of Hours of Sick Leave Utilization Dissatisfied88 Satisfied54 Difference of 34 hours (approaching a work week)

Organizational Excellence Group UT Austin Findings: Ethical Behavior Group Average # of Hours of Sick Leave Utilization Dissatisfied93 Satisfied59 Difference of 34 hours (approaching a work week)

Organizational Excellence Group UT Austin Findings: Harassment Group Average # of Hours of Sick Leave Utilization Dissatisfied110 Satisfied59 Difference of 51 hours

Organizational Excellence Group UT Austin What’s that Cost? Average Salary $52,000 ($25/hour) Harassment 51hrs * $25/hr * 30 employees= -$38,250 Supervisor 22hrs * $25/hr *140 employees = -$77,000

Organizational Excellence Group UT Austin Findings: Turnover Group Average # of Hours of Sick Leave Utilization Left107 Stayed57 Difference of 50 hours

Organizational Excellence Group UT Austin All the Cost Calculated Cost Turnover Cost Lost Productivity cost Cost to the workgroup Cost to the customer Attitudinal cost

Organizational Excellence Group UT Austin Making It Real Soft Measures to Hard Numbers Data Matters Engagement Matters

Organizational Excellence Group UT Austin Customer Employees Leadership Organization

Organizational Excellence Group UT Austin Thank You! Organizational Excellence Group The University of Texas at Austin Noel Landuyt