Cavity support scheme options Thomas Jones 25/06/15 to 06/07/15 1.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
RF Cavity Module G. Gosling Dept. of Mechanical Engineering Imperial College London.
Advertisements

MICE RF and Coupling Coil Module Outstanding Issues Steve Virostek Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory MICE Collaboration Meeting October 26, 2004.
SPL Intercavity support Conceptual design review 04/11/ A. Vande Craen TE/MSC-CMI.
N. Dhanaraj, Y. Orlov, R. Wands Thermal-Stress Analysis of CC1 Space Frame.
Vacuum Vessel Production Readiness Review
Slide HALLD TAGGER MAGNET STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS Presented by William Crahen 6/10/09 Pole Plate analysis Vacuum chamber analysis Vacuum chamber tie rods and.
Integration of Cavities and Coupling Coil Modules Steve Virostek Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory MICE Collaboration Meeting March 28 – April 1, 2004.
Progress on the MICE 201 MHz Cavity Design Steve Virostek Lawrence Berkeley National Lab RF Working Group Fermilab August 22, 2007  automatic.
Background to the current problem 1. As a result of the high stresses in the bobbin due to the magnet load, the bobbin end plate needs to be increased.
MICE RFCC Module Update Allan DeMello Lawrence Berkeley National Lab MICE CM26 at Riverside California March 26, 2010.
1 RF-Structures Mock-Up FEA Assembly Tooling V. Soldatov, F. Rossi, R. Raatikainen
3.9GHz Coupler Cold End Robustness Study Will Couplers survive on-site and overseas shipping? D. Olis, G. Galasso, M. McGee.
Chapter 5 Vibration Analysis
The HiLumi LHC Design Study (a sub-system of HL-LHC) is co-funded by the European Commission within the Framework Programme 7 Capacities Specific Programme,
DQW Cryogenic Magnetic Shield Internal Review Niklas Templeton 06/05/15.
Cryomodule Concept for the ODU RF Dipole Crab Cavity Tom Nicol* - Fermilab December 10, 2013 * With lots of help from HyeKyoung, Tom J, Shrikant, Ofelia,
Alignment and assembling of the cryomodule Yun He, James Sears, Matthias Liepe MLC external review October 03, 2012.
Ofelia Capatina on behalf of the CERN specification team
The HiLumi LHC Design Study (a sub-system of HL-LHC) is co-funded by the European Commission within the Framework Programme 7 Capacities Specific Programme,
TDR Part 2: 3.3 Cavity Integration (10 pages) H. Hayano Baseline Design based on the meeting discussion.
ZTF Cryostat Finite Element Analysis Andrew Lambert ZTF Technical Meeting 1.
R&D Status and Plan on The Cryostat N. Ohuchi, K. Tsuchiya, A. Terashima, H. Hisamatsu, M. Masuzawa, T. Okamura, H. Hayano 1.STF-Cryostat Design 2.Construction.
RFQ Thermal Analysis Scott Lawrie. Vacuum Pump Flange Vacuum Flange Coolant Manifold Cooling Pockets Milled Into Vanes Potentially Bolted Together Tuner.
RFCC Module Design Update  automatic tuners  cavity suspension  cavity installation Steve Virostek Lawrence Berkeley National Lab MICE Collaboration.
Stress and cool-down analysis of the cryomodule Yun He MLC external review October 03, 2012.
Cavity support scheme options Thomas Jones 25/06/15.
Chapter Five Vibration Analysis.
05/04/05 FEM Analysis of PA 44 Engine Mount PIPER SEMINOLE –PA-44 TWIN ENGINE AIRCRAFT.
Stress and Cool-down Analysis Yun HE MLC Internal Review 9/5/2012Yun HE, MLC Internal Review1.
CRYOGENICS FOR MLC Cryogenic Piping in the Module Eric Smith External Review of MLC October 03, October 2012Cryogenics for MLC1.
Status of Activities at CERN
Cold Magnetic Shield Update
Cavity support scheme options Thomas Jones 1. Introduction Both cavities will be supported by the fundamental power coupler and a number of blade flexures.
56 MHz SRF Cavity Cryostat support system and Shielding C. Pai
56 MHz SRF Cavity Thermal Analysis and Vacuum Chamber Strength C. Pai
56 MHz SRF Cavity and Helium vessel Design
LMQXFA Cold Mass Assembly Antonios Vouris Fermilab February 3, 2016.
Carlo Pagani University of Milano INFN Milano-LASA & GDE ILC and XFEL Cryomodules Preliminary thoughts for convergence ILC EDR Kick-off Meeting DESY,
Cavity support scheme options Thomas Jones 25/06/15 1.
Alignment and assembling of the cryomodule Yun He, James Sears, Matthias Liepe.
HiLumi-LHC/LARP Crab Cavity System External Review – May Work partly supported by the EU FP7 HiLumi LHC grant agreement No and by the.
MICE RFCC Module Update Steve Virostek Allan DeMello Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory MICE CM27 at RAL, UK July 8, 2010.
S1 global: thermal analysis TILC09, April 19th, 2009 Serena Barbanotti Paolo Pierini.
The HiLumi LHC Design Study is included in the High Luminosity LHC project and is partly funded by the European Commission within the Framework Programme.
Date 2007/Sept./12-14 EDR kick-off-meeting Global Design Effort 1 Cryomodule Interface definition N. Ohuchi.
Gravity load on SAS – comparison between real and mock-up April 13 th, 2016.
Adam Carreon July 19, 2012 Technical Division SRF Department Dressed SSR1 Cavities.
Thermal Shield Update Niklas Templeton 15/02/16 (final update of placement  )
CW Cryomodules for Project X Yuriy Orlov, Tom Nicol, and Tom Peterson Cryomodules for Project X, 14 June 2013Page 1.
Comments from the SNS Cryostat Design Review February 2010 Tom Peterson, Fermilab 15 February 2010.
HL-LHC-UK Thermal Shield Update Niklas Templeton 07/03/2016.
Integration and Cold Testing of the CW ERL Cryomodule at Daresbury Shrikant Pattalwar ASTeC, STFC, Daresbury Laboratory (UK) On behalf of ERL Cryomodule.
Engineering of the power prototype of the ESRF HOM damped cavity* V. Serrière, J. Jacob, A. Triantafyllou, A.K. Bandyopadhyay, L. Goirand, B. Ogier * This.
Cavity Supporting Scheme Paulo Azevedo, CERN – TE/MSC SPL Conceptual Review, 04/11/2010.
ILC : Type IV Cryomodule Design Meeting Main cryogenic issues, L. Tavian, AT-ACR C ryostat issues, V.Parma, AT-CRI CERN, January 2006.
Coupled thermal-structural FEA of AS tooling for brazing of manifolds to disk stack R. Raatikainen, F. Rossi
SPL RF coupler: integration aspects
CERN – Zanon discussions
Stress and cool-down analysis of the cryomodule
at STFC Daresbury laboratory
HFM Test Station Main Cryostat
Crab Cavity HOM Coupler Specification Drawings & Tolerances
Status of design and production of LEP connection cryostat
A. Vande Craen, C. Eymin, M. Moretti, D. Ramos CERN
Update on HL-LHC triplet fingers
Niklas Templeton – STFC – UK Collaboration
Crab Cavity support system update
Vertical-flexure CCD module: Thermal and Dynamic FEA
Magnetic shielding and thermal shielding
Dove-Tail Tack Block Design
Presentation transcript:

Cavity support scheme options Thomas Jones 25/06/15 to 06/07/15 1

Cavity support The cavities will be rigidly supported by the input coupler. Additional supports are required that will be attached to a common adjustable alignment plate. The current design utilises rods, however, the following analysis proposes the use of ‘blade’ type flexures to increase stiffness in the required directions and therefore reduce low order vibrations. 2

Analysis models 1. Only coupler2. Ø4mm Ti Rods 3. Stainless Steel flexures (2mm thick)4. Additional flexure Thickness to give similar thermal conduction and therefore similar temperature profile and contraction as the input coupler 3

Analysis setup RFD cavity represents the ‘worst case’ as it is the most cantilevered support. The mass is approximate, but is valid for these comparative purposes. Standard earth gravity applied. Coupler, rods and flexures fixed at common support plate. Static total deformation, Max von-Mises Stress and first 4 modes were found. No mesh convergence check performed, but same meshing used for each analysis (see next). Material properties measured by FermiLab from 300K to 2K used. 4

Meshing 3mm 10mm 5

Analysis Result Analysis Max Deformation (mm) Max von- Mises stress (MPa) Mode 1 Frequency (Hz) Mode 2 Frequency (Hz) Mode 3 Frequency (Hz) Mode 4 Frequency (Hz) Performance is significantly improved using blade type flexures. The 3 flexure design is best, however, need to consider increased heat load. Analysis 3, i.e. with only 2 blades was then analysed for thermal deformation/stress. 6

Thermal analysis K 80K 2K K 80K 2K Flexures will ideally be thermalised the same as the coupler to minimise heat leak, however, optimisation to be completed. 7

Thermal results 8

9

10

Thermal results 11

Result comment Stresses are well within acceptable limits. There are no detrimental stresses in the helium vessel and therefore there will be no additional deformation of the cavity due to the flexures. The elevated stressed are found in the interface between materials and are highly localised (see previous). The method of mounting can be optimised to reduce stress even further if required. This could be for example a Grade 2 Ti block, which the Stainless blade is then clamped into. The high stresses will be ofound anyway in the coupler were we have 316LN to Grade 2 Ti connections. It has been observed through experience with these joints that the stresses are below allowable for the material properties at 2K. i.e. CERN have brazed 316LN flanges to Nb and they do not fail. 12

Recommendations STFC recommend that first order frequencies in the system be above 25Hz to avoid unwanted high amplitude vibration. Blade flexures have been shown to increase stiffness, reduce deformation, reduce stress and raise the first order vibration mode above 25Hz. The current flexure geometry can be optimised to give minimised heat leak and/or increased stiffness. Flexure design currently used is a first order approximation. The use of the common adjustable support flange is compatible with the flexure system. The flexures require no penetration through the Outer Vacuum Chamber, simplifying the design and reducing the risk of leaks. They also take up no space externally on the module where space is at a premium. Flexures will require no adjustment after cooldown and can be thermalised using copper shunts to ensure the heat leak is minimal. 13

Inter-cavity supports A thermally neutral support system was developed for the UK4ROD. This relied on differences in thermal contraction of materials to maintain the same length after cooled down to 2K. It was shown to increase the stiffness and low frequency modes of the system. However, this was compared to a ‘coupler only’ type support. Also the UK4ROD had much more balanced forces, i.e. the coupler was in the centre of the cavity. This was by design, to improve the support system of the cavity. 14

Inter-cavity supports Invar integrated contraction from room temperature to 2K is L i x (0.037/100) 304 Stainless steel contraction from room temperature to 2K is L ss x (0.306/100) Therefore; 2L i x (0.037/100) = L ss x (0.306/100) AND 2L i – L ss = 1032mm (distance between fixed points) So, 2Li x (0.037/100) = (2Li – 1032) x (0.306/100) Solving the simultaneous equation gives L i = 587mm and Lss = 142mm 15

Analysis Models 1. 2 independent cavities on rods 2. Rods with inter-cavity in vertical 3. Blades with inter-cavity in vertical 4. Blades with inter-cavity in horizontal 16

Result summary Analysis Max Deformation (mm) Max von- Mises stress (MPa) Mode 1 Frequency (Hz) Mode 2 Frequency (Hz) Mode 3 Frequency (Hz) Mode 4 Frequency (Hz) * * *deformation of the inter-cavity supports mm Cavity deflection 17

Recommendations The use of the inter-cavity support in conjunction with the blade flexure supports offers no significant improvement. Some modes are actually lowered, due to the increased mass. Despite the inter-cavity supports adding rigidity the cold mass still ‘sways’ as one unit. The inter-cavity supports use invar which is a strongly magnetic material. Simulations have shown this not to be an issue, however, it seems in this instance that it is not worth the increased risk in using them for little to no gain. Using blades only also gives the ability to move the cavities freely independent of each other. If a ‘Plan B’ is required I suggest we investigate other options. 18

Support distance sweep Supports moved closer to input coupler in steps of 50mm from 700mm to 400mm. Note this is different to previous analysis as both flexures set at 700mm from coupler to begin with. They were previously slightly different distances. 19

Results Distance from coupler (mm) Max Deformation (mm) Max von- Mises stress (MPa) Mode 1 Frequency (Hz) Mode 2 Frequency (Hz) Mode 3 Frequency (Hz) Mode 4 Frequency (Hz)

Result comment Deformation and stress reduce the further the blades are from the coupler. Due to the increased stiffness of the system, the modes of vibration increase the further the blades are positioned from the coupler. It is recommended that the blades be as far into the corners of the vessel as practicable. 21

Blade width sweep Width ‘w’ varied from 20mm to 60mm. There is a limit of 0.2W per flexure heat load at 2 Kelvin. Width of thicker part was kept 5mm wider. Thickness remained constant at 2mm. 650mm ‘w’ ‘w’+5mm 22

Results Blade width (mm) Max Deformation (mm) Max von- Mises stress (MPa) Heat load to 80K (W) Heat Load to 2K (W) Mode 1 Frequency (Hz) Mode 2 Frequency (Hz) Note that in the SPS area, and in fact most facilities around the world, there is a large amplitude of vibration around 50Hz, this is due to reciprocating pumps etc. Care should be taken in the design to avoid having a mode exactly on 50Hz. 23

Result comment As expected maximum deformation and stress is reduced by increasing blade width. The frequency of vibration modes increases with increasing blade width. However, increasing the blades does bring an increased risk of coupling to 50Hz vibration. A more detailed model should be analysed including HOM absorber geometry and masses to accurately predict the vibration frequencies. This should take place after integration of the blades as the exact space available is unknown. 24

Conclusion The RFD cavity has been used as this is the most cantilevered and therefore represents the worst case. Blade type flexures will perform significantly better than supporting rods. Maximum deformation is reduced by 10x. Stress reduced by 4x. The fundamental vibration mode with thin rods and coupler for this cavity may be as low as 8.5Hz, this would certainly be a risk. The blades increase the fundamental mode above 25Hz. With the blades there would be no need for any inter-cavity support therefore allowing independent movement of the cavities. Ways to optimise the blade structure have been analysed and can be used as tools in the integration of the structures into the overall cryomodule. In general the blades should be spaced as far as possible from the coupler. A more detailed analysis of the overall dress cavity, including HOM absorbers and tuner will be required to assess the final modes and to tune the blade width to avoid 50Hz coupling whilst optimising stiffness. 25