OUTLINE Current state of Ensemble MOS

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Chapter 13 – Weather Analysis and Forecasting
Advertisements

Mei Xu, Jamie Wolff and Michelle Harrold National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR) Research Applications Laboratory (RAL) and Developmental Testbed.
Ensembling Mesoscale Model Data National Weather Service, Cleveland, OH Christopher Mello.
Gridded MOS – A Prototype System
Panel Discussion on Corporate Volunteerism Closing Plenary, June 25, 2003 Nick Keener, CCM Director, Meteorology 2009 Summer AMS Community Meeting Aug.
Jess Charba Fred Samplatsky Phil Shafer Meteorological Development Laboratory National Weather Service, NOAA Updated September 06, 2013 LAMP Convection.
“Where America’s Climate, Weather and Ocean Services Begin” NCEP CONDUIT UPDATE Brent A Gordon NCEP Central Operations January 31, 2006.
Part 5. Human Activities Chapter 13 Weather Forecasting and Analysis.
Comparison of Several Methods for Probabilistic Forecasting of Locally-Heavy Rainfall in the 0-3 Hour Timeframe Z. Sokol 1, D. Kitzmiller 2, S. Guan 2.
A short term rainfall prediction algorithm Nazario D. Ramirez and Joan Manuel Castro University of Puerto Rico NOAA Collaborator: Robert J. Kuligowski.
Paul Fajman NOAA/NWS/MDL September 7,  NDFD ugly string  NDFD Forecasts and encoding  Observations  Assumptions  Output, Scores and Display.
NATS 101 Lecture 3 Climate and Weather. Climate and Weather “Climate is what you expect. Weather is what you get.” -Robert A. Heinlein.
MOS Developed by and Run at the NWS Meteorological Development Lab (MDL) Full range of products available at:
Hydrometeorological Prediction Center HPC Medium Range Grid Improvements Mike Schichtel, Chris Bailey, Keith Brill, and David Novak.
MOS What does acronym stand for ? –MODEL OUTPUT STATISTICS What is the difference between the GFS and GFS MOS ?
1 NATS 101 Lecture 3 Climate and Weather. 2 Review and Missed Items Pressure and Height-Exponential Relationship Temperature Profiles and Atmospheric.
Univ of AZ WRF Model Verification. Method NCEP Stage IV data used for precipitation verification – Stage IV is composite of rain fall observations and.
Improving Gridded Localized Aviation MOS Program (LAMP) Guidance by Using Emerging Forecast and Observation Systems Judy E. Ghirardelli, Jerome P. Charba,
MOS Performance MOS significantly improves on the skill of model output. National Weather Service verification statistics have shown a narrowing gap between.
Exploitation of Ensemble Output (and other operationally cool stuff) at NCEP HPC Peter C. Manousos NCEP HPC Science & Operations Officer
Robert LaPlante NOAA/NWS Cleveland, OH David Schwab Jia Wang NOAA/GLERL Ann Arbor, MI 22 March 2011.
Chapter 13 – Weather Analysis and Forecasting. The National Weather Service The National Weather Service (NWS) is responsible for forecasts several times.
1 Localized Aviation Model Output Statistics Program (LAMP): Improvements to convective forecasts in response to user feedback Judy E. Ghirardelli National.
Using Short Range Ensemble Model Data in National Fire Weather Outlooks Sarah J. Taylor David Bright, Greg Carbin, Phillip Bothwell NWS/Storm Prediction.
Probabilistic forecasts of (severe) thunderstorms for the purpose of issuing a weather alarm Maurice Schmeits, Kees Kok, Daan Vogelezang and Rudolf van.
Phillip Bothwell Senior Development Meteorologist-Storm Prediction Center 3 rd Annual GOES-R GLM Science Meeting Dec. 1, 2010 Applying the Perfect Prog.
1 GOES-R AWG Hydrology Algorithm Team: Rainfall Probability June 14, 2011 Presented By: Bob Kuligowski NOAA/NESDIS/STAR.
Compiled by Load Profiling ERCOT Energy Analysis & Aggregation
NOAA’s National Weather Service National Digital Forecast Database: Status Update LeRoy Spayd Chief, Meteorological Services Division Unidata Policy Committee.
Utilizing Localized Aviation MOS Program (LAMP) for Improved Forecasting Judy E. Ghirardelli National Weather Service Meteorological Development Laboratory.
June 19, 2007 GRIDDED MOS STARTS WITH POINT (STATION) MOS STARTS WITH POINT (STATION) MOS –Essentially the same MOS that is in text bulletins –Number and.
VERIFICATION OF NDFD GRIDDED FORECASTS IN THE WESTERN UNITED STATES John Horel 1, David Myrick 1, Bradley Colman 2, Mark Jackson 3 1 NOAA Cooperative Institute.
By John Metz Warning Coordination Meteorologist WFO Corpus Christi.
Radar in aLMo Assimilation of Radar Information in the Alpine Model of MeteoSwiss Daniel Leuenberger and Andrea Rossa MeteoSwiss.
Henry Fuelberg Pete Saunders Pendleton, Oregon Research Region Map Types and Lightning Frequencies.
1 NWS Forecast Grids Served by an NNEW Web Coverage Service AIXM/WXXM Conference Steve Olson Meteorological Development Laboratory Office of Science and.
Meteorological Data Analysis Urban, Regional Modeling and Analysis Section Division of Air Resources New York State Department of Environmental Conservation.
1 An overview of the use of reforecasts for improving probabilistic weather forecasts Tom Hamill NOAA / ESRL, Physical Sciences Div.
MDL Lightning-Based Products Kathryn Hughes NOAA/NWS/OST December 3, 2003
The Rapid Evolution of Convection Approaching the New York City Metropolitan Region Brian A. Colle and Michael Charles Institute for Terrestrial and Planetary.
Model Post Processing. Model Output Can Usually Be Improved with Post Processing Can remove systematic bias Can produce probabilistic information from.
Meteorology 415 October Numerical Guidance Skill dependent on: Skill dependent on: Initial Conditions Initial Conditions Resolution Resolution Model.
Robert LaPlante NOAA/NWS Cleveland, OH David Schwab Jia Wang NOAA/GLERL Ann Arbor, MI 15 March 2012.
Phillip Bothwell Southern Thunder 2011 Workshop July 13, 2011 Multi-Model Lightning Prediction.
Meteorology 415 October Numerical Guidance Skill dependent on: Skill dependent on: Initial Conditions Initial Conditions Resolution Resolution Model.
An Improved Global Snow Classification Dataset for Hydrologic Applications (Photo by Kenneth G. Libbrecht and Patricia Rasmussen) Glen E. Liston, CSU Matthew.
NOAA/NWS Digital Services 1 National Weather Service Forecast Evolution and Delivery in a Digital Era Glenn Austin / Mark Tew Office of Climate, Water,
NOAA/NWS Digital Services 1 National Weather Service Forecast Evolution and Delivery in a Digital Era Glenn Austin Office of Climate, Water, and Weather.
Digital Aviation Services Paving the way for aviation forecasts of the future Cammye Sims Cammye Sims.
1 Gridded Localized Aviation MOS Program (LAMP) Guidance for Aviation Forecasting Judy E. Ghirardelli and Bob Glahn National Weather Service Meteorological.
SPC National Fire Weather Outlooks March 4, 2005 Dr. Phillip Bothwell.
OPERATIONAL 2-H THUNDERSTORM GUIDANCE FCSTS TO 24 HRS ON 20-KM GRID JESS CHARBA FRED SAMPLATSKY METEOROLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT LABORATORY OST / NWS / NOAA.
The LAMP/HRRR MELD FOR AVIATION FORECASTING Bob Glahn, Judy Ghirardelli, Jung-Sun Im, Adam Schnapp, Gordana Rancic, and Chenjie Huang Meteorological Development.
MOS AVN = Dynamical Model –Seven fundamental equations ! AVN MOS = Statistical Model –No seven fundamental equations ! –Equations are statistical, not.
An Examination Of Interesting Properties Regarding A Physics Ensemble 2012 WRF Users’ Workshop Nick P. Bassill June 28 th, 2012.
NOAA/NWS Digital Services 1 NWS Forecast Evolution and Delivery in a Digital Era Glenn Austin Office of Climate, Water, and Weather Services David Ruth.
NDFDClimate: A Computer Application for the National Digital Forecast Database Christopher Mello WFO Cleveland.
Localized Aviation MOS Program (LAMP) Judy E. Ghirardelli National Weather Service Meteorological Development Laboratory February 05, 2009.
Improved Gridded Localized Aviation MOS Program (LAMP) Ceiling and Visibility Guidance using HRRR model output Presenting: Judy E. Ghirardelli/Adam Schnapp.
MDL Requirements for RUA Judy Ghirardelli, David Myrick, and Bruce Veenhuis Contributions from: David Ruth and Matt Peroutka 1.
NWS / SPoRT Coordination Call 24 March, 2011 March 2011, Coordination Call.
1 NWS Digital Services American Meteorological Society Annual Partners Meeting San Diego, CA January 13, 2005 LeRoy Spayd National Weather Service Office.
Aviation Products from the Localized Aviation MOS Program (LAMP) Judy E. Ghirardelli National Weather Service Meteorological Development Laboratory Presented.
Developing GFS-based MOS Thunderstorm Guidance for Alaska Phillip E. Shafer* and Kathryn Gilbert Meteorological Development Laboratory, NWS, NOAA
Model Post Processing.
Post Processing.
NATS 101 Lecture 3 Climate and Weather
NATS 101 Lecture 3 Climate and Weather
MOS What does acronym stand for ?
NATS 101 Lecture 3 Climate and Weather
Presentation transcript:

Updated Thunderstorm Probability Forecast Guidance in Support of Gridded Model Output Statistics OUTLINE Current state of Ensemble MOS Thunderstorm probability guidance for gridded MOS Initial release of gridded MOS NWA Annual Meeting, Cleveland, OH October 16, 2006 E-mail: Kathryn.Gilbert@noaa.gov

Current State of Ensemble MOS MOS equations are applied to all 15 members of the GFS ensemble and the operational run to create 16 text messages Local applications like getENS generate summary values The current gridded MOS is an example of a lagged ensemble. Temperature, dew point, max and min temperature grids are created from two runs, weighted 2:1 Future ensemble MOS requirements are vague Tool for making probabilistic forecasts, based on older equations, perform testing on lagged ensemble to play with the weights, possibly include more cycles, redevelop to match temporal resolution. Image from Penn state site Image from PSU web site

Enhanced-Resolution MOS Support for the operational forecasters Two Approaches “True” Gridded MOS Observations and forecasts valid on fine grid Uses remotely-sensed predictand data cloud-to-ground lightning data “MOS at any point” Emphasis on high-density surface networks Uses high-resolution geophysical data Another example of remotely sensed data would be the Pop/QPF demonstration system, using 4-km hydrologic grid (HRAP); WSR-88-D, Image high temperature valid Monday, from the National Digital Forecast Database

Remotely-Sensed Lightning Data NLDN cloud-to-ground lightning observations define a thunderstorm event Observations are the predictand Monthly lightning climatologies were developed from ten years of data for 3-, 6-, 12-, and 24-h time periods, to be used as predictors Observed lightning data are used to verify the thunderstorm guidance Predictand, the event we want to forecast

Creating the Gridded Lightning Datasets from Observations Strikes are summed over the appropriate time period and assigned to the center of the grid boxes ×××× × ××× ×× 3-, 6-, 12-, and 24-h time periods, any grid resolution. Used 40-km in this development. = thunderstorm = no thunderstorm

Probabilities for Different Grid Resolutions Probabilities for 40-km vs 20-km grid resolutions, both 3-h time periods. Pattern is similar, but the magnitude of the probabilities are reduced almost in half, when the resolution is doubled. Documented in AMS preprint Seattle 2004. 40-km 21-24h period 10% contour interval 20-km 21-24h period 10% contour interval

Probabilities for Different Time Periods Comparison of probabilities for 12-h vs 3-h time periods both on the 40-km grid As the resolution increases in time and space, the magnitude of the probabilities will decrease as the likelihood of an event at an exact time and point in space approaches zero

MOS Thunderstorm Probability Guidance Given that: The area covered by the forecast should be at least as large as the event Thunderstorm forecast probabilities traditionally represent an area within 25 miles of a point, and We don’t want the probabilities to become so small they lose information and credibility… The gridded MOS thunderstorm probability is defined as the probability of one or more cloud-to-ground lightning strikes in a 40-km square grid box during a given time period. So: The guidance is interpolated to the 5-km NDFD grid using bilinear interpolation It represents the likelihood of a cloud-to-ground lightning strike 40-km around each 5-km grid box, and Stations have the value of the 40-km grid box they are sitting in, using nearest neighbor assignments, to fill in the text messages Bilinear interpolation interpolates in both the x- and y-direction

Thunderstorm Equation Development Equations developed from 5 years of GFS model output All 40-km “stations” were combined into one region increased sample size and eliminated boundaries Separate equations were developed for 3 seasons Spring: March 16 – June 30 Summer: July 1 – October 15 Cool: October 16 – March 15 3-h time periods through day 3; 6- and 12-h time periods through day 7. Important Predictors Stability Indices Convective precipitation amount Product of vertical velocity * relative humidity K-index * thunderstorm relative frequency Thunderstorm relative frequencies approximately 6,800 stations on the 40-km grid, interpolated to 380,000 stations on the 5-km grid Stability indices like CAPE, K-index, best lifted index K-index * rf is an interactive predictor. RFs alone more important at later projections

Gridded MOS Thunderstorm Products NDGD web-based graphics Distributed in GRIB2 format 3-,6-, 12-h forecast periods Available in AWIPS with OB7.1 release, as part of the gridded MOS system

“Enhanced-Resolution” MOS “True” gridded MOS Uses remotely-sensed data, i.e. the probability of a thunderstorm “MOS at any point” Emphasis on high-density surface networks; Co-Op, buoy, mesonet, etc Uses high-resolution geophysical data Analyze forecasts on high-resolution grid Traditional MOS downscales the model output to specific sites Examples of weather elements temperature dew point temperature max/min temperature wind speed and direction relative humidity probability of precipitation (6- and 12-h periods)

Gridded MOS Objective Generate guidance sufficient for forecast initialization at WFOs Generate guidance with an accuracy comparable to that of the station-oriented guidance – do no harm. Support NDFD, useful as a first guess, may give the forecasters the same starting point, helpful to eliminate WFO boundary problems Generate guidance sufficient for forecast initialization at the WFOs, currently on a 5-km grid, headed towards 2.5-km

Forecaster Feedback is Invaluable Gridded MOS wind speed problem Strange dots Bad “if test” in a wind post-processing subroutine created calm winds, when the direction was near 0. Too many calm mountain winds A control file setting caused excessive calm winds over the mountains 20060921 1200 UTC 21 hour forecast

Forecaster Feedback is Invaluable Thank you The subroutine and control files have been fixed and implemented 20060921 1200 UTC 21 hour forecast 20060921 1200 UTC 21 hour forecast

Summary Gridded MOS thunderstorm probabilities are valid over a 40-km area, for each 5-km NDFD grid box Gridded MOS is a work in progress more elements are coming improvements to current algorithms and equations expected increased resolution from 5-km to 2.5-km User feedback is critical to define requirements and improve the products Alaska and other OCONUS areas are in the early stages of development Link to documentation and products http://www.weather.gov/mdl/synop/gmos.html