0105-5-10 Height Growth [m/3yr] An example: Stand biomass estimation by LiDAR.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Quantifying the Ecological Footprint Of Suburban/Exurban Land Use Change Richard G. Lathrop and John A. Bognar Grant F. Walton Center for Remote Sensing.
Advertisements

Predicting and mapping biomass using remote sensing and GIS techniques; a case of sugarcane in Mumias Kenya Odhiambo J.O, Wayumba G, Inima A, Omuto C.T,
Forest Monitoring of the Congo Basin using Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) James Wheeler PhD Student Supervisors: Dr. Kevin Tansey,
Carbon dynamics at the hillslope and catchment scale Greg Hancock 1, Jetse Kalma 1, Jeff McDonnell 2, Cristina Martinez 1, Barry Jacobs 1, Tony Wells 1.
Accuracy Assessment of Thematic Maps
A Framework for Integrating Remote Sensing, Soil Sampling, and Models for Monitoring Soil Carbon Sequestration J. W. Jones, S. Traore, J. Koo, M. Bostick,
Improved Estimates of Aboveground Biomass using MODIS and the Geoscience Laser Altimeter System Michael Lefsky Colorado State University Plinio CamargoUniversity.
ReCover for REDD and sustainable forest management EU ReCover project: Remote sensing services to support REDD and sustainable forest management in Fiji.
Remote Sensing vs. Individual-Based Ecology. Goals of the Talk (Paper) Order my thoughts. Order my thoughts. Assemble/summarize/link some relevant 1°
Multiple Criteria for Evaluating Land Cover Classification Algorithms Summary of a paper by R.S. DeFries and Jonathan Cheung-Wai Chan April, 2000 Remote.
Carbon Benefits Project: Measurement of Carbon in Woody Biomass Mike Smalligan, Research Forester Global Observatory for Ecosystem Services Department.
VALIDATION OF REMOTE SENSING CLASSIFICATIONS: a case of Balans classification Markus Törmä.
Active Microwave and LIDAR. Three models for remote sensing 1. Passive-Reflective: Sensors that rely on EM energy emitted by the sun to illuminate the.
AA_Vis_1. Using the software “MultiSpec,” students follow protocols to prepare a “clustered” image of their GLOBE Study Site.
Module 2.1 Monitoring activity data for forests using remote sensing REDD+ training materials by GOFC-GOLD, Wageningen University, World Bank FCPF 1 Module.
“Using of remote sensing and GIS for forest monitoring as contribution to sustainable forest management in Vietnam”. Prepared by Dr. Nguyen Phu.
Overview of Biomass Mapping The Woods Hole Research Center Alessandro Baccini, Wayne Walker and Ned Horning November 8 – 12, Samarinda, Indonesia.
Lecture 17 – Forest remote sensing  Reading assignment:  Ch 4.7, 8.23,  Kane et al., Interpretation and topographic correction of conifer forest.
Accuracy Assessment. 2 Because it is not practical to test every pixel in the classification image, a representative sample of reference points in the.
Mapping Forest Vegetation Structure in the National Capital Region using LiDAR Data and Analysis Geoff Sanders, Data Manager Mark Lehman, GIS Specialist.
An overview of Lidar remote sensing of forests C. Véga French Institute of Pondicherry.
Chapter 9 Accuracy assessment in remotely sensed categorical information 遥感类别信息精度评估 Jingxiong ZHANG 张景雄 Chapter 9 Accuracy assessment in remotely sensed.
Methods of Validating Maps of Deforestation and Selective Logging Carlos Souza Jr. Instituto do Homem e Meio Ambiente da Amazônia—Imazon.
An Object-oriented Classification Approach for Analyzing and Characterizing Urban Landscape at the Parcel Level Weiqi Zhou, Austin Troy& Morgan Grove University.
Degradation Accounting Methods Katie Goslee Program Officer, Ecosystem Services Unit Winrock International Measuring.
Examination of Tropical Forest Canopy Profiles Using Field Data and Remotely Sensed Imagery Michael Palace 1, Michael Keller 1,2, Bobby Braswell 1, Stephen.
By Phoebe Oduor.  Countries are required to report on their GHG emissions to UNFCCC every four years (mandatory) and every two years (intermediary) 
Mapping Forest Canopy Height with MISR We previously demonstrated a capability to obtain physically meaningful canopy structural parameters using data.
Hiroshi Sasakawa Ph. D. Japan Forest Technology Association Remote sensing expert JICA Project in Gabon International Symposium on Land Cover Mapping for.
Jessica Schaefer. Introduction - Historically, ecological research was conducted in pristine wilderness areas - It is estimated that between 1/3 and ½.
Guidance on Measurement Elaboration and Examples.
Biomass Mapping The set of field biomass training data and the MODIS observations were used to develop a regression tree model (Random Forest). Biomass.
Generic Approaches to Model Validation Presented at Growth Model User’s Group August 10, 2005 David K. Walters.
Translation to the New TCO Panel Beverly Law Prof. Global Change Forest Science Science Chair, AmeriFlux Network Oregon State University.
Remote Sensing for agricultural statistics Main uses and cost-effectiveness in developing countries Insert own member logo here Pietro Gennari, Food and.
Final Meeting Development of Harmonised Indicators and Estimation Procedures for Forests with Protective Functions against Natural Hazards in the Alpine.
Accuracy Assessment Having produced a map with classification is only 50% of the work, we need to quantify how good the map is. This step is called the.
1 UNFCCC Workshop on Reducing Emissions from Deforestation in Developing Countries 30/08-01/9/2006, Rome, Italy Overview of scientific, socio- economic,
Citation: Moskal, L. M. and J. Kirsch, Calibrating Estimates of Above- and Below- Ground Forests Biomass Using Remotely Sensed Metrics. Factsheet.
Chuvieco and Huete (2009): Fundamentals of Satellite Remote Sensing, Taylor and Francis Emilio Chuvieco and Alfredo Huete Fundamentals of Satellite Remote.
Remote Sensing Classification Accuracy
The application of Remote Sensing and GIS for forest cover monitoring. 学 生:阿 玛 娜 导 师: 刘耀林 教授 学 号: 学 号: 专 业:地图学与地理信息系统单 位:资源与环境科学学院.
BOT / GEOG / GEOL 4111 / Field data collection Visiting and characterizing representative sites Used for classification (training data), information.
Remote Sensing of Forest Structure Van R. Kane College of Forest Resources.
October 02, st IHOP_2002 Water Vapor Intercomparison Workshop Status of intercomparisons and the next steps  Characterize moisture measuring techniques.
2011 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium (IGARSS) Aihua Li Yanchen Bo
H51A-01 Evaluation of Global and National LAI Estimates over Canada METHODOLOGY LAI INTERCOMPARISONS LEAF AREA INDEX JUNE 1997 LEAF AREA INDEX 1993 Baseline.
APPLIED REMOTE SENSING TECHNOLOGY TO ANALYZE THE LAND COVER/LAND USE CHANGE AT TISZA LAKE By Yudhi Gunawan * and Tamás János ** * Department of Land Use.
FOR 274: From Photos to Lidar Introduction to LiDAR What is it? How does it work? LiDAR Jargon and Terms Natural Resource Applications Data Acquisition.
Citation: Moskal, L. M., D. M. Styers, J. Richardson and M. Halabisky, Seattle Hyperspatial Land use/land cover (LULC) from LiDAR and Near Infrared.
Housekeeping –5 sets of aerial photo stereo pairs on reserve at SLC under FOR 420/520 –June 1993 photography.
ReCover for REDD and sustainable forest management 1 An overview of the ReCover project, focusing on the Democratic Republic of Congo 04 October 2012,
Puulajeittainen estimointi ja ei-parametriset menetelmät Multi-scale Geospatial Analysis of Forest Ecosystems Tahko Petteri Packalén Faculty.
Accuracy Assessment of Thematic Maps THEMATIC ACCURACY.
Airborne LiDAR requires purchase, but offers a number of advantages; Airborne LiDAR requires purchase, but offers a number of advantages; Spatial resolution.
Module 2.8 Overview and status of evolving technologies REDD+ training materials by GOFC-GOLD, Wageningen University, World Bank FCPF 1 Module 2.8 Overview.
Forest Monitoring Service MESA IGAD Thema Expérience Siro Abdallah GIS / RS Analyst RCMRD, ICPAC AFRIGEOSS 28th April, Zimbabwe.
Factsheet # 26 Understanding multiscale dynamics of landscape change through the application of remote sensing & GIS CREATING LIDAR-DRIVEN MODELS TO IMPROVE.
26. Classification Accuracy Assessment
LADA WORKSHOP 16 – 18 September 2008
PADMA ALEKHYA V V L, SURAJ REDDY R, RAJASHEKAR G & JHA C S
Accuracy Assessment of Thematic Maps
A Comparative Analysis of Urban Tree Canopy Assessment Methods in Minnesota Remote Sensing of Natural Resources and Environment | FR 5262 | University.
DIABOLO has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No Project duration:
USGS contribution to assessing mangrove conditions using a multidisciplinary approach Elitsa Peneva-Reed 24 October, 2017.
By Yudhi Gunawan * and Tamás János **
The GISCO task force “Remote Sensing for Statistics”
Supervised Classification
National Forest Inventory for Great Britain
(Presented at SCGIS Conference, Monterey, US, 2016)
Presentation transcript:

Height Growth [m/3yr] An example: Stand biomass estimation by LiDAR

Stand biomass by LiDAR & Stand Density Chart RMSE = 53.0 m 3 /ha Bias = m 3 /ha Ratio of contribution = 0.94 Stand Height Stand Density Biomass

LiDAR Large footprint Harding, D.J., Lefsky, M.A., Parker, G.G., Blair, J.B., Laser altimeter canopy height profiles: methods and validation for closed-canopy, broadleaf forests. Remote Sensing of Environment 76,

Lefsky, M.A et al Remote Sensing of Environment 70,

Do we actually tell you the truth by RS? Need the accuracy control How can we disseminate the developed techniques to the real forest management?

Real world vs. satellite view Real land cover Satellite map vs.

Real world vs. satellite view Error Matrix (real) Real land coverSatellite mapvs. K statistics Overall Accuracy Error Matrix

Real world vs. satellite view Error Matrix (random sample) Real land coverSatellite mapvs. Error Matrix / Multinominal Sampling K statistics Overall Accuracy

Real world vs. satellite view Error Matrix (random sample) Real land coverSatellite mapvs. Error Matrix / Multinominal Sampling Area Estimation

Real world vs. satellite view Error Matrix (stratified sample) Real land coverSatellite mapvs. Error Matrix / Stratified Sampling (Sat map) Overall Accuracy

Real world vs. satellite view Error Matrix (stratified sample) Real land coverSatellite mapvs. Error Matrix / Stratified Sampling (Sat map) Area Estimation K statistics

Accuracy evaluation is really awful So many samples to make the result statistically relevant On the field, we can never be ‘random’ Many researches using RS skipped/ignored/pretended this process Sometimes they induced problematic aftermath How can we make them meaningful?

Activities in Forested Landscapes How can we disseminate RS to the real forest management? FM/LM SFM/SLM Research MeasurementC&I RS

But… Remote sensing has not yet succeeded in the practical world – the world of application. Franklin (2001) “Remote “Remote Sensing for Sustainable Forest Management” Why? How can we overcome?

Why RS is successful in researches, but not in real SFM? No universal answers Result here cannot be applied to there What are the universal tendency of forested landscapes? Ground truths expensive Pitfall of ‘Professional’ monitoring How to re-use the existing knowledge? Credibility/accuracy Khat syndrome, but actually makes sense? Minimum guideline for assessable result User’s capacity Colorful Landsat image cannot intuitively be understood High resolution image interpretation – intuitive & interesting

For real use of RS, simple methods have been longed for Less skill/equipment demanding More intuitive analyses Simpler procedures More talks between the users and the RS specialists

Conclusion RS has been expected to contribute to the forest measurement and monitoring Many methods have been developed There are new sophisticated sensors and analysis techniques Appropriate use will contribute to solve the mysteries in forests To make RS work in the real world, we should also consider the impact of RS on the users/decision makers

Thank you for your attention For more discussion, contact

Chambers, J.Q et al., Regional ecosystem structure and function: ecological insights from remote sensing of tropical forests. TRENDS in Ecology and Evolution 22,