BOOMERanG Launch (Dec. 28, 1998) EPS HEPP Prizes – Grenoble July 25, 2011 P. de Bernardis – Sapienza – Roma.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Observational constraints and cosmological parameters
Advertisements

Primordial perturbations and precision cosmology from the Cosmic Microwave Background Antony Lewis CITA, University of Toronto
Constraining Inflation Histories with the CMB & Large Scale Structure Dynamical & Resolution Trajectories for Inflation then & now Dick Bond.
QUIET Q/U Imaging ExperimenT Osamu Tajima (KEK) QUIET collaboration 1.
Eloisa Menegoni ICRA and INFN, University of Rome “La Sapienza” Cosmological constraints on variations of fundamental constants Miami2010, Fort Lauderdale,
Planck 2013 results, implications for cosmology
Dark Energy Observations of distant supernovae and fluctuations in the cosmic microwave background indicate that the expansion of the universe is accelerating.
Cosmology topics, collaborations BOOMERanG, Cosmic Microwave Background LARES (LAser RElativity Satellite), General Relativity and extensions, Lense-Thirring.
Observational Cosmology - a laboratory for fundamental physics MPI-K, Heidelberg Marek Kowalski.
Observational Cosmology - a unique laboratory for fundamental physics Marek Kowalski Physikalisches Institut Universität Bonn.
Contamination of the CMB Planck data by galactic polarized emissions L. Fauvet, J.F. Macίas-Pérez.
K.S. Dawson, W.L. Holzapfel, E.D. Reese University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, CA J.E. Carlstrom, S.J. LaRoque, D. Nagai University of Chicago,
CMB as a physics laboratory
A Primer on SZ Surveys Gil Holder Institute for Advanced Study.
Gary Hinshaw NASA/GSFC From Quantum to Cosmos, Airlie Center VA, July year Results from WMAP with a Glimpse Ahead.
Constraining Galactic Halos with the SZ-effect
What is the Dark Matter? What about “ordinary” non-luminous matter (basically, made from proton, neutrons and electrons)? “Dead stars” (White Dwarfs,
Signe Riemer-Sørensen, University of Queensland In collaboration with C. Blake (Swinburne), D. Parkinson (UQ), T. Davis (UQ) and the WiggleZ collaboration.
NEUTRINO MASS FROM LARGE SCALE STRUCTURE STEEN HANNESTAD CERN, 8 December 2008 e    
The CMB and Neutrinos. We can all measure the CMB T CMB = \ K CMB approx 1% of TV noise! 400 photons/cc at 0.28 eV/cc.
P olarized R adiation I maging and S pectroscopy M ission Probing cosmic structures and radiation with the ultimate polarimetric spectro-imaging of the.
PHY306 1 Modern cosmology 4: The cosmic microwave background Expectations Experiments: from COBE to Planck  COBE  ground-based experiments  WMAP  Planck.
The Science Case for the Dark Energy Survey James Annis For the DES Collaboration.
Cosmological Tests using Redshift Space Clustering in BOSS DR11 (Y. -S. Song, C. G. Sabiu, T. Okumura, M. Oh, E. V. Linder) following Cosmological Constraints.
Polarization-assisted WMAP-NVSS Cross Correlation Collaborators: K-W Ng(IoP, AS) Ue-Li Pen (CITA) Guo Chin Liu (ASIAA)
Bill Reach 2009 May 14 Greater IPAC Technology Symposium.
Dark energy I : Observational constraints Shinji Tsujikawa (Tokyo University of Science)
Relic Neutrinos, thermal axions and cosmology in early 2014 Elena Giusarma arXiv: Based on work in collaboration with: E. Di Valentino, M. Lattanzi,
US Planck Data Analysis Review 1 Lloyd KnoxUS Planck Data Analysis Review 9–10 May 2006 The Science Potential of Planck Lloyd Knox (UC Davis)
The Cosmic Microwave Background Lecture 2 Elena Pierpaoli.
CMB observations and results Dmitry Pogosyan University of Alberta Lake Louise, February, 2003 Lecture 1: What can Cosmic Microwave Background tell us.
Constraints on the neutrino mass by future precise CMB polarization and 21cm line observations Yoshihiko Oyama The Graduate University for Advanced Studies.
Constraints on Dark Energy from CMB Eiichiro Komatsu University of Texas at Austin Dark Energy February 27, 2006.
How can CMB help constraining dark energy? Licia Verde ICREA & Institute of space Sciences (ICE CSIC-IEEC)
Cosmology : Cosmic Microwave Background & Large scale structure & Large scale structure Cosmology : Cosmic Microwave Background & Large scale structure.
Clustering in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey Bob Nichol (ICG, Portsmouth) Many SDSS Colleagues.
Lecture 5: Matter Dominated Universe: CMB Anisotropies and Large Scale Structure Today, matter is assembled into structures: filaments, clusters, galaxies,
MAPping the Universe ►Introduction: the birth of a new cosmology ►The cosmic microwave background ►Measuring the CMB ►Results from WMAP ►The future of.
Cosmic Microwave Background Carlo Baccigalupi, SISSA CMB lectures at TRR33, see the complete program at darkuniverse.uni-hd.de/view/Main/WinterSchoolLecture5.
LHC conference - Isfahan
Joint analysis of Archeops and WMAP observations of the CMB G. Patanchon (University of British Columbia) for the Archeops collaboration.
PHY306 1 Modern cosmology 4: The cosmic microwave background Expectations Experiments: from COBE to Planck  COBE  ground-based experiments  WMAP  Planck.
SUNYAEV-ZELDOVICH EFFECT. OUTLINE  What is SZE  What Can we learn from SZE  SZE Cluster Surveys  Experimental Issues  SZ Surveys are coming: What.
(some) Future CMB Constraints on fundamental physics Alessandro Melchiorri Universita’ di Roma, “La Sapienza” MIAMI2010, Fort Lauderdale December 15th.
Weighing neutrinos with Cosmology Fogli, Lisi, Marrone, Melchiorri, Palazzo, Serra, Silk hep-ph , PRD 71, , (2005) Paolo Serra Physics Department.
Observational constraints and cosmological parameters Antony Lewis Institute of Astronomy, Cambridge
Michael Doran Institute for Theoretical Physics Universität Heidelberg Time Evolution of Dark Energy (if any …)
the National Radio Astronomy Observatory – Socorro, NM
Cosmic Microwave Background Carlo Baccigalupi, SISSA CMB lectures at TRR33, see the complete program at darkuniverse.uni-hd.de/view/Main/WinterSchoolLecture5.
Using Baryon Acoustic Oscillations to test Dark Energy Will Percival The University of Portsmouth (including work as part of 2dFGRS and SDSS collaborations)
The Planck Satellite Hannu Kurki-Suonio University of Helsinki Finnish-Japanese Workshop on Particle Cosmology, Helsinki
THE CONNECTION OF NEUTRINO PHYSICS WITH COSMOLOGY AND ASTROPHYSICS STEEN HANNESTAD CERN, 1 OCTOBER 2009 e    
Observation and Data Analysis Activityin SPOrt and BaR-SPOrt Exp.s Ettore Carretti Bologna 7-9 January 2004.
OLIMPO An arcmin-resolution survey of the sky at mm and sub-mm wavelengths ( Silvia Masi Dipartimento di Fisica La Sapienza,
The Cosmic Microwave Background
Quantum Noises and the Large Scale Structure Wo-Lung Lee Physics Department, National Taiwan Normal University Physics Department, National Taiwan Normal.
The Planck Satellite Matthew Trimble 10/1/12. Useful Physics Observing at a redshift = looking at light from a very distant object that was emitted a.
Carlos Hernández-Monteagudo CE F CA 1 CENTRO DE ESTUDIOS DE FÍSICA DEL COSMOS DE ARAGÓN (CE F CA) J-PAS 10th Collaboration Meeting March 11th 2015 Cosmology.
The Planck Mission: Looking into the Past to Learn about Our Future Courtney Nickle, Stephanie Clark and Taylor Phillips Astronomy, Spring 2011 Abstract.
WG1 NuFact04, Osaka, July Neutrino mass and Cosmology: current bounds and future sensitivities Sergio Pastor (IFIC) ν.
Cheng Zhao Supervisor: Charling Tao
Jochen Weller Decrypting the Universe Edinburgh, October, 2007 未来 の 暗 黒 エネルギー 実 験 の 相補性.
Precision cosmology, status and perspectives Alessandro Melchiorri Universita’ di Roma, “La Sapienza” INFN, Roma-1 FA-51 Meeting Frascati, June 22nd 2010.
Smoke This! The CMB, the Big Bang, Inflation, and WMAP's latest results Spergel et al, 2006, Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) Three Year results:
CMB physics Zong-Kuan Guo 《现代宇宙学》
Cosmic Microwave Background Polarization
Jan Hamann Rencontres de Moriond (Cosmology) 21st March 2016
Precision cosmology, status and perspectives
(some) Future CMB Constraints on fundamental physics
6-band Survey: ugrizy 320–1050 nm
Presentation transcript:

BOOMERanG Launch (Dec. 28, 1998) EPS HEPP Prizes – Grenoble July 25, 2011 P. de Bernardis – Sapienza – Roma

DASI/CBI MAXIMA WMAP ARCHEOPS QMAP/TOCO

BOOMERanG-98 & MAXIMA : The first views of causal horizons at recombination 3 peaks first peak

Evidence from these experiments : “Acoustic”, adiabatic oscillations in the primeval photons-baryons plasma Geometry of the universe and its mass-energy density its composition in terms of baryons, dark matter and dark energy An early inflation process is needed All these have a huge impact on our understanding of fundamental physics.

peaks (!) There is, however, much more. A lot is still to be gained from precision measurements of the CMB.

Planck carries a complex CMB experiment all the way to L2 improving the sensitivity wrt WMAP by at least a factor 10, the angular resolution by a factor 2-3 and extending the frequency coverage towards high frequencies by a factor about 10

HFI LFI PPPPPPP These characteristics boost the reliability of the cosmological fluctuations detected.

Thermal performance : Planck collaboration: astro-ph/1101:2023

Mission : Planck collaboration: astro-ph/1101:2022

ESA-SCI(2005)1

EE TE

ERCSC : Planck collaboration: astro-ph/1101:2041 # sources Faintest source vs. frequency band

ERCSC (>15000) All sky Early Sunyaev-Zeldovich cluster sample (189) Early Cold Cores Sample (915) Galaxies ……

Thanks to its all-sky coverage, Planck has a unique capability to detect the rarest and most massive clusters in the exponential tail of the mass function. As a matter of fact, two of the newly- discovered clusters in the ESZ and confirmed by XMM- Newton have estimated total masses larger than M sol. All-sky Sunyaev-Zeldovich clusters

Forthcoming : (with Planck and after Planck)

B-modes & non-gaussianity  High precision polarization measurements might detect the rotational component of the polarization pattern of the CMB, which is related to the tensor fluctuations generated during the inflation process.  This is a generic prediction of all inflation scenarios.  At the moment the upper limit on the ratio of tensor to scalar fluctuations is of the order of r = 0.3.  Planck can well reach r = 0.01, but future, optimized measurements can reach r =  If these measurements will be successful we will be able to constrain the energy scale of the inflation process down to 6.5x10 15 GeV, probing physics at energies so high that are not testable in current and future accelerators.  Similar constraints are expected from detections of non-gaussianity of the CMB. astro-ph /

Neutrino masses  Massive neutrinos (a fraction of eV) are relativistic during the early matter domination era, and not relativistic today.  They escape from overdensities and suppress structure growth. Also, the lensing from modified matter fluctuations is modified.  For both reasons, the anisotropy and polarization power spectra of the CMB are sensitive to neutrino mass.  Planck: detection if > 0.2 eV  Future optimized instruments: 50 meV, sufficient to distinguish normal and inverted mass hierarchies.  CMB measurements probe an early linear pase, and complement very well optical measurements in the non-linear phase (BAO & lensing) Blue: no mass N =3,  m =0.65 eV Red: N =3,  m =0.65 eV

With Planck : < 0.2 eV From Fogli et al. 2008, Astro-ph/

Constraints on Neutrino Masses from CMB + Priors Red: 1000 riv+ Prior 1% H 0 + Priori 2%  m Blue: 5000 riv+ Prior 1% H 0 + Priori 2%  m Red Dashed: 1000 riv+ Prior 0.5% H 0 + Priori 1%  m Blue Dashed: 5000 riv+ Prior 0.5% H 0 + Priori 1%  m Limits at 95% c.l.: With external priors on the Hubble parameter And the matter density also the Normal Hierarchy can be probed: safe detection of a neutrino mass. constraints on neutrino masses (from Pagano & Melchiorri) constraints on neutrino masses (from Pagano & Melchiorri)

7.5 ’ 1ES

OLIMPO balloon payload (Masi et al. 2008), with solar panels, ground shield and sun shield removed. Note the tiltable 2.6m primary mirror and the lightweigth secondary. Pointing is obtained rotating the payload around an azimuth pivot and changing the elevation of the inner frame, including the telescope, the FTS and the detector’s cryostat The total mass of the payload is 1.5 tons.

The Payload Elevation motor Azimuth pivot Cryostat with cold optics and detector arrays Readout electronics window LHe 60 L LN 60L Reimaging optics dichroics arrays FTS

Simulated OLIMPO measurement of a cluster l.o.s. with  th =0.005, T e =10 keV,  nonth =0.0001, v pec =500 km/s, I dust The data with the error bars are simulated observations from a single pixel of the OLIMPO-FTS, for an integration time of 3 hours. The two lines through the data points represent the input theory (thin) and the best fit for the plotted data realization (thick). The other thin lines represent thermal plus non-thermal SZE, and dust emission. this shift is due to the peculiar velocity of the cluster The high-frequency excess is due to a modest amount of dust dust thermal + non-thermal SZ

Kinetic Inductance Detectors (KIDs) arrays Caltech, Grenoble, SRON, Cardiff … and also made in Italy, FBK + Sapienza + Perugia, M. Calvo et al. Experimental Astronomy (2010) 28: 185–194

Applications of mm-wave imagers and polarimeters Vision through fog Vision through fog Non-invasive mm-wave scanners Non-invasive mm-wave scanners In-vivo detection of breast / skin cancer In-vivo detection of breast / skin cancer Quality control – internal structure of wood, plastics etc. Quality control – internal structure of wood, plastics etc. …

CMB research is not over…. Stay tuned !