Kilarc-Cow Creek Hydroelectric Project Decommissioning FERC Project No. 606 Technical Meeting May 16, 2007, 1-4 pm Red Lion Redding, CA.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Restore and Protect Red River Watershed Nez Perce Tribe Fisheries Watershed Program.
Advertisements

LOWER SALMON RIVER Tributary Protection and Enhancement.
Assessing effects of Columbia River Basin anadromous fish flow management on the aquatic ecology of the Henrys Fork watershed A Proposal By The Henrys.
Summary of Aquatic Programs Administered by the WV Division of Natural Resources Dan Cincotta WVDNR P. O. Box 67 Elkins, WV
Notebook Ref 3.5. Tier 3: No Degradation in ONRWs Applies only to waters classified as Outstanding National Resource Waters (ONRW) This classification.
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES FIRE DEPARTMENT FORESTRY DIVISION (323)
Capacity Building for RCDs The Santa Cruz Countywide Partners in Restoration (PIR) Permit Coordination Program Prepared for the California Association.
Chattahoochee River Restoration Aquatic Ecosystem Restoration City Mills Dam Eagle and Phenix Dam.
Ted Craddock, DWR 2014 NWHA Conference Oroville Facilities FERC Project No
General Information on Permitting Electric Transmission Projects at the California Public Utilities Commission June 2009 Presentation created by the Transmission.
FLOW 2008 Oct. 7-9, 2008 San Antonio, TX Housatonic River Case Study Robert Gates FirstLight Power Resources Services.
NWHA- Panel Discussion “Spawning Better Ideas for Fish Passage”
City of St Helena Upper York Creek Ecosystem Restoration Project April 28, 2015 St. Helena City Council Meeting.
Hydroelectric Relicensing in Vermont Brian Fitzgerald Vermont Agency of Natural Resources.
USDA Forest Service Agency Mission and Habitat Management
Cedar River Instream Flow Management Balancing Certainty and Flexibility.
Restoration of Chamberlain Creek Amy Clinefelter Riparian Wetland Research Program Restoration of Chamberlain Creek Amy Clinefelter Riparian Wetland Research.
Decommissioning and Site Restoration of Non-Federal Hydroelectric Projects John A. Schnagl Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (202)
Yellowstone River Compact Commission Technical Committee Discussions Sheridan County Courthouse Sheridan, WY April 24, 2007 Bighorn Reservoir operations.
Drought and the Central Valley Project August 2014.
Lassen Lodge Hydroelectric Project Public Scoping Meetings November 5, 2014 (Sacramento and Red Bluff) State Water Resources Control Board Division of.
State of Oregon New Hydroelectric Projects Mary Grainey October 2008 Oregon Water Resources Department.
Eagle Crest Energy Company February Page 2 New Hydro: Making it Happen Background on the Eagle Mountain Pumped Storage Project Need for Eagle.
Periodic Review of the 1995 Water Quality Control Plan for the San Francisco Bay/Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta Estuary Comments of The Bay Institute on.
Comments on Proposed Methods to Develop Flow Criteria for Priority Tributaries to the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta Prepared for SWRCB March 19, 2014 Valerie.
State Permitting Issues for Wind Developments Southeast and Mid-Atlantic Regional Wind Summit 19 September 2005 Jennifer A. DeCesaro Energy Policy Specialist.
Citizens Advisory Committee to the Chesapeake Executive Council November 29, 2012.
2010 Yakima Basin Science & Management Conference Yakima River Basin Study June 16, 2010 Joel Hubble, Technical Projects Biologist Columbia-Cascades Area.
FERC Relicensing of the Toledo Bend Project – Hydroelectric Power Generation Drought Hydroelectric vs. Water Supply Sabine River Authority Issues.
Chumstick Creek Salmon Habitat Conditions* Land development, road construction, and other human activities have affected channel migration and sediment.
Marin Coastal Permit Coordination Program. Why do we need a program? Called for in Watershed Plans: As many as 9 permits to consider for restoration.
Built New license studies & application Watershed analysis Settlement Agreement 2001 New License issued 2003 (Nov 13) New License.
Cooper Lake Hydroelectric Project and Transmission Line Relicensing Update May 7, 2003.
The Columbia River Basin Where we’ve been. Where we’re going. October 18, 2005.
Marin Coastal Watersheds Permit Coordination Program Marin Resource Conservation District U.S.D.A. Natural Resources Conservation Service Sustainable Conservation.
Dominguez-Escalante National Conservation Area Dominguez Canyon Wilderness Resource Management Plan Scoping Meetings August 30 and 31, 2010.
Fish and Wildlife : Regulatory Framework and Challenges Cherise M. Oram STOEL RIVES LLP Hydrovision 2008 Ocean/Tidal/Stream Power Track 7D “Environmental.
Laguna Creek Watershed Council Development of the Laguna Creek Watershed Management Action Plan & It’s Relevance to the Elk Grove Drainage Master Planning.
Solano Habitat Conservation Plan 580,000 Acres 36 Covered Species; 4 Natural Communities 17,500 acres of Urban Development; 1,280 acres of other New Facilities.
Regulatory Permits for Farm Bill Projects Jackie Charbonneau, Ecologist Natural Resources Conservation Service September 20, 2012.
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Inter-Agency Coordination BLM PILOT VERNAL & GLENWOOD SPRINGS U.S. Army Corps of Engineers & U.S. Bureau of Land.
Channel Rehabilitation Projects TAMWG - June ‘04 Trinity River at Hocker Flat 1/16/2003.
Overview of Alabama Power’s Tallapoosa River Operations Martin Dam Relicensing Informational Meeting April 1, 2008 Andy Sheppard, P.E. Project Mgr. - Hydro.
Salton Sea Species Conservation Habitat Scoping Meetings July 7 and 8, 2010.
HYDROELECTRIC POWER AND FERC. HYDRO 101A ”Water Runs Down Hill”
Kilarc-Cow Creek Hydroelectric Project Decommissioning FERC Project No. 606 Shasta County Board of Supervisors March 4, 2008.
NOAA RESTORATION CENTER The NOAA RC seeks to make the process of regulatory review and permitting of environmentally beneficial habitat restoration projects.
Estimated Cost for Appendix K Compliance Biological Surveys Marie Campbell President, Sapphos Environmental, Inc. December 15, 2011.
Kilarc-Cow Creek Hydroelectric Project Decommissioning FERC Project No. 606 Public Meeting May 15, 2007, 6-9 pm Millville Grange Palo Cedro, CA.
Placer County Water Agency Middle Fork American River Project Plenary Meeting January 4, 2010 Handout #3.
Watershed Stewardship Program Status of Marin County Public Works Watershed Program 11/7/08 11/7/08.
Overview of Proposed Alaska National Wildlife Refuges Regulatory Changes U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
CVPIA §3406(b)(2) Water Operations on the Sacramento River Sacramento River Conservation Area Forum Technical Advisory Committee February 7, 2012.
Central Valley Flood Protection Board Meeting – Agenda Item No. 7D Methylmercury Open Water Workplan.
Fish and Game Commission Meeting February 5, 2014 Fisheries Branch Stafford Lehr Request for Emergency Regulatory Action.
The Fish and Game Commission has designated the states portion of the South Bay Salt Ponds an Ecological Reserve. Planning for the management of Ecological.
Alameda Creek Watershed San Francisco Public Utilities Commission October 27, 2009.
Senate Resources Committee & House Energy Committee Prepared by Alaska Energy Authority 1 /25/2011.
1 How the Water Board Protects California’s Water Quality Kate Hart, Board Member Chair Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board.
Sustainable Vineyard Practices Replanting Strategies & Economics December 13, 2012 Conditional Waiver of Waste Discharge Requirements Vineyards in Napa.
Russian River Estuary Management.
Placer County Water Agency Middle Fork American River Project Plenary Meeting February 2, 2009 Handout #5.
Legislative History. First enacted in 1934  Enacted due to concerns over the loss of commercial and sport fisheries from water resource developments.
Source: Stream Corridor Restoration Manual WATERSHED MANAGEMENT.
GOOSE CREEK WATERSHED LEVEL I STUDY SCOPING MEETING
Watershed Restoration on the Lolo NF Benefits for the Clark Fork Watershed Taylor Greenup, Hydrologist, Lolo National Forest Jennifer Mickelson,
SEQRA as a Tool to Review Energy Projects
Yakima River Basin Integrated Water Resource Management Plan 2011 Yakima Basin Science & Management Conference Central Washington University Ellensburg,
Pacific Northwest Fish Screening and Passage Workshop 2013
Vineyards and Water Quality
Presentation transcript:

Kilarc-Cow Creek Hydroelectric Project Decommissioning FERC Project No. 606 Technical Meeting May 16, 2007, 1-4 pm Red Lion Redding, CA

2 Agenda Introductions/Review Agenda Overview of Project and Decommissioning Agreement Relicensing Studies BREAK Regulatory Permits Next Steps

3 Meeting Process

4 PG&E is Committed to Decommissioning the Project Including: –Complying with the Project Agreement on Decommissioning –Returning diverted flow to the streams and transferring PG&E water rights to a resource agency or other entity to protect, preserve and/or enhance aquatic resources –Timely preparation of a Decommissioning Plan and Surrender Application –Timely implementation of the Decommissioning Plan following FERC approval of the Surrender Application

5 Overview of Project and Decommissioning Agreement Overview of Project Project Agreement Proposed Schedule for Decommissioning Process Surrender Application Content and Process

6 Overview of Project Primary Project Features Cow Creek Development 1.8 MW –Located on South Cow Creek –Several Small Diversions –2 Miles of Canal, Forebay, and Powerhouse Kilarc Development 3.2 MW –Located on Old Cow Creek –Several Small Diversions –3.5 Miles of Canal, Forebay, and Powerhouse

7 Overview of Project Kilarc-Cow Creek Hydroelectric Project Began Operating in 1904 and 1907 Operated by PG&E Licensed by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) Current FERC License Issued Feb. 1, 1980 License Expired March 27, 2007 (operating on an annual license) Project Relicensing Started 2001

8 Overview of Project Project Relicensing Began in 2001 –An Application for New License was required to be filed by March 27, 2005 Economic Issues –Small 5 MW Project in two developments, old facilities with high maintenance for power generated –Anticipated significant increase in instream flow requirements and construction of fish passage facilities –Decommissioning within the “Project Agreement” framework was more economic than continuing to operate the project –Less costly replacement power available Environmental Laws and Compliance Issues –Threatened Species (Steelhead) –Species of Concern (Fall- and Late Fall-Run Chinook Salmon, Yellow legged frogs)

9 Overview of Project In Early 2004 PG&E Decided To: –Interrupt relicensing the Project –Develop a Project Agreement to implement decommissioning, if no other entity relicensed the Project Decision Based On: –Project economics –Anticipated new license conditions –Environmental benefits of decommissioning

10 Project Agreement Signed March 2005 Agreement with State and Federal resource agencies and other stakeholders –U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service –California Department of Fish and Game –National Park Service –California State Water Resources Control Board –NOAA Fisheries –Friends of the River –Trout Unlimited –PG&E

11 Project Agreement PG&E agreed not to seek a new license Identified “Subjects and Desired Conditions” that would be addressed if the Project was decommissioned Upon decommissioning, transfer of PG&E water rights to other entity or agency to protect, preserve, and/or enhance aquatic resources FERC has final approval authority over decommissioning

12 Project Agreement What Happened After the Agreement Was Signed PG&E filed Agreement and informed FERC of the decision not to relicense the Project (3/30/05) FERC “Public Notice” that the license was available (4/7/05) Several entities evaluated acquiring the license and Project, but ultimately did not file license application PG&E filed the required Surrender Schedule with FERC on 3/23/07 Next, FERC is expected to order PG&E to develop a decommissioning plan and file a Surrender Application within 2 years

13 Proposed Schedule for Decommissioning Process Filed Surrender Schedule with FERC– March 23, 2007 Hold stakeholder meetings to identify issues and develop decommissioning plan– April 2007 through Oct 2007 Conduct resource analysis in 2007 and 2008 PG&E prepares Surrender Application- Jan 2008 – March 2009 Surrender Application including Decommissioning Plan proposed to be filed with FERC by March 2009 Upon approval of Decommissioning Plan by FERC, PG&E to implement plan

14 Surrender Application Content and Process FERC Regulatory Requirements –FERC Regulations Addressing Decommissioning 18 CFR part 6, and 18 CFR s –Surrender application Must be filed in the same form and manner as the application for license Must provide for disposition of any Project facility Must comply with approved schedule Must comply with the requirements of consultation

15 Resource Study Areas Hydrology –Developed and verified estimated hydrology –Estimate average monthly flow at each diversion Water Quality and Water Temperature –All water samples were within Basin Plan objectives except 4 coliform samples (2 background) –Old Cow Creek Water Temperature below 20°C –Water entering Project on South Cow routinely above 20°C during summer/fall

16 Resource Study Areas (cont.) Sediment and Channel Stability –Channel banks stable –Sediment moves through system –Spawning gravel not reduced below diversions Aquatic Habitat –Passage Barriers 14 barriers on Old Cow Creek 9 barriers on South Cow Creek

17 Resource Study Areas (cont.) Fish Population –Old Cow - Rainbow Trout, Sculpin, Brown Trout, Sacramento Pikeminnow –South Cow- Steelhead, Chinook salmon (Wagoner Canyon) –Resident fish in canals and both forebays Wildlife Resources –No CRLF or VELB –FYLF (South Cow) –Northwestern Pond Turtle (Hooten Gulch) –Osprey, Golden Eagle (Kilarc Forebay)

18 Resource Study Areas (cont.) Historic, Archaeological, Cultural, Recreational, Land Management & Aesthetics –Kilarc and Cow Powerhouse eligible –No cultural properties identified Recreation –Limited opportunities –Kilarc Forebay - picnicing and fishing –84% from Shasta County

19 BREAK

20 Regulatory Permits Anticipated Permits FERC Surrender Application Army Corps of Engineer 404 CDFG 1603 (Stream Bed Alteration) Stormwater runoff permit (depending on size of deconstruction area) County grading permits (depending on construction of temporary roads)

21 Next Steps

22 Project Area

23 Project Schematic